Comparative Study Between Crushing Technique and Lateral Laminectomy of Middle Turbinate as Auxiliary Management in Patients Who Underwent Septoplasty with Concha Bullosa.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022;
74:1153-1156. [PMID:
36452635 PMCID:
PMC9702221 DOI:
10.1007/s12070-020-02222-z]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim is to compare two commonly performed surgical techniques, lateral resection and crushing for Concha Bullosa (CB) as auxiliary management in patients who underwent septoplasty. In Patients diagnosed with DNS and CB, using endoscopy and Computerized Tomography, NOSE score was calculated. All patients underwent septoplasty and depending upon the surgical method followed for CB, patients allotted in two groups. In group A, crushing of middle turbinate was performed using Blakesley forceps and in group B, lateral resection of CB was done. Postoperative NOSE scores were calculated at 6 months and outcomes were compared. Both the surgical methods were highly effective in the management of CB. All patients had significant improvement in the NOSE score when compared with the preoperative values. Two patients in group B developed synechia between the turbinate and lateral wall. However, the superiority of one method over the other could not be established statistically. CB is a common anomaly in anatomy of nose and paranasal sinus. It frequently coexists with DNS and may cause sinus problems if it is over-pneumatised. In such cases, surgical correction is warranted. Crushing of MT and lateral resection are two commonly performed methods, both are equally effective, but the crushing technique has an advantage of mucosal preservation and less postoperative complications.
Collapse