Validation of the predictive model for operative intervention after blunt abdominal trauma in children with equivocal computed tomography findings: a multi-institutional study

BACKGROUND

We recently developed a preliminary predictive model identifying clinical and radiologic factors associated with the need for surgery following blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) in children. Our aim in this study was to further validate the factors in this predictive model in a multi-institutional study.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of pediatric patients from five pediatric trauma centers who experienced BAT between 2011 and 2020 was performed. Patients under 18 years of age who had BAT and computed tomography (CT) abdomen imaging were included. Children with evidence of pneumoperitoneum, and hemodynamic instability were excluded. Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis of the association between the following risk factors and need for laparotomy: abdominal wall bruising (AWB), abdominal pain/tenderness (APT), thoracolumbar fracture (TLF), presence of free fluid (FF), presence of solid organ injury (SOI). A predictive logistic regression model was then estimated employing these factors.

FINDINGS

Seven hundred thirty-four patients were identified in this multi-institutional dataset with BAT and abdominal CT imaging, and 726 were included. Of those, 59 underwent surgical intervention (8.8%). Univariate analysis of association between the studied factors and need for surgical management showed that the presence of TLF (p < 0.01), APT (p < 0.01), FF (p < 0.01), and SOI (p < 0.01) were significantly associated. A predictive model was created using the 5 factors resulting in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80. For the motor vehicle collisions (MVC) group, only FF, SOI, and TLF are significantly associated with the need for surgical intervention. The AUC for the MVC group was 0.87.

CONCLUSIONS

A clinical and radiologic prediction rule was validated using a large multi-institutional dataset of pediatric BAT patients, demonstrating a high degree of accuracy in identifying children who underwent surgery. FF, SOI, and TLF are the most important factors associated with the need for surgical intervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Successful Adolescent Varicocelectomy Improves Total Motile Sperm Count

BACKGROUND

Management of the adolescent varicocele focuses on optimizing fertility potential, but to date there is limited data on the success of varicocelectomy on optimizing semen parameters for individual adolescent patients. We reviewed our database of over 1600 adolescent varicocele patients to find those with pre- and postoperative semen analyses to determine the impact of varicocele correction.

METHODS

15 Tanner stage V patients with unilateral clinically apparent left-sided with pre- and postoperative semen analyses were identified. Mixed models were used to compare semen parameters pre- and post-varicocelectomy in patients with successful management.

RESULTS

Complete elimination of the varicocele was achieved in 12/15 (80%) patients. Three patients had persistent varicocele (with down-grading in two) and declined further intervention. Median time between pre- and postoperative semen analyses was 24.2 months. For those with successful varicocele correction, total motile sperm count (TMSC) improved in all but one (Figure 1), with an average increase of 44.0 million (95% CI: 18.7-69.3) in post-varicocelectomy analyses compared to pre-varicocelectomy (p = 0.0016). Mean percent improvement was 649.2%. It went from abnormal to normal (≥20 million/cc) in 55.6% (5/9). For the three patients with persistent varicocele, one had improved TMSC from abnormal to normal range, one had worsening within normal range, and one had effectively no change.

CONCLUSION

Successful correction of adolescent varicocele may improve TMSC. In over half of our institution's cases, an abnormal value normalized. Surgical intervention may be considered for adolescent varicoceles associated with abnormal semen parameters.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study.

Glycerin Suppositories and Enemas in Premature Infants: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Premature infants are often given glycerin suppositories or enemas to facilitate meconium evacuation and the transition to enteral feeds. We reviewed the best-available evidence for the use of glycerin suppositories and enemas in premature infants.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of premature infants treated with glycerin suppositories or enemas through January 2022. Studies were screened and data extracted independently and in duplicate. We included RCTs of premature infants <32 weeks gestation and/or birth weight <1500 g who were treated with glycerin suppositories or enemas. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects and reported as relative risk or mean difference.

RESULTS

We identified 6 single-center, RCTs of 389 premature infants treated with glycerin suppositories (n = 207) or enemas (n = 182). Mortality rates ranged from 0% to 17%, and the meta-analysis revealed no differences between treatment groups (P = .86). Active treatment was associated with earlier meconium evacuation (mean, 1.5 days; 95% confidence interval, 3.0 to 0.01; P = .05) but not a faster time to enteral feeds (mean, 0.5 days; P = .48). We identified 1 ongoing trial with a target recruitment of 220 premature infants. The quality of evidence was very low to moderate because of inadequate statistical power and other methodologic issues.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of glycerin suppositories and enemas in premature infants is associated with earlier meconium evacuation, but the clinical significance of this finding is uncertain. Treatment has no definitive effects on mortality, necrotizing enterocolitis, or enteral feeds.