Does resurfacing of asymptomatic full-thickness localized articular defects of the trochlea influence the outcome following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty of the medial compartment?: A retrospective cohort study with minimum seven-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral joint (PFJ) degeneration has been found not to affect outcome following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, PFJ disease occasionally presents as isolated trochlear cartilage lesions, with little available evidence regarding treatment options or necessity. We evaluated the effectiveness of concomitant trochlear resurfacing in patients undergoing medial UKA with asymptomatic trochlear lesions.

METHODS

We included 60 patients undergoing medial UKA with an associated full thickness lesion of the trochlea. A fixed bearing UKA implant (PKR™, Stryker, Warsaw, IND) was used in all cases. In 30 patients, trochlear lesions were resurfaced with a HemiCAP® PF Classic (HemiCAP® PFC) implant (Arthrosurface, Franklin, MA). Outcome measures included VAS-, KOOS-, WOMAC-, SF-36 scores and radiological assessment.

RESULTS

Average length of follow-up was 97.4 months (range: 88-106 months). Both groups showed significant improvement for all clinical scores post-operatively compared to pre-operatively (p < 0.001 for all). The UKA group showed a better VAS score at all follow-up moments (p < 0.01 for all), but no differences were found between both groups at all time points for other outcome measures. None of the HemiCAP® PFC implants needed to be revised within the timeframe of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective cohort study, we found a 100% survivorship of the HemiCAP® PFC implant at an average eight-year follow-up. However, no clinical benefits were found in performing trochlear resurfacing in conjunction with medial UKA for asymptomatic end-stage trochlear cartilage lesions. Therefore, these lesions can be safely ignored when performing a medial UKA.

Are Adult Ureteroscopes Safe in the Management of Urolithiasis in a Pediatric Population?

INTRODUCTION

Debate remains regarding the optimal caliber of ureteroscopes in the management of pediatric urolithiasis, ranging from pediatric scopes to standard scopes. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of stone management in a pediatric population using standard adult ureteroscopes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all ureteroscopic procedures in patients under the age of 16 years was carried out. Standard adult 7.5 French semi-rigid and 6 French flexible ureteroscopes were used.

RESULTS

During the study period, 8 patients underwent 21 ureteroscopic procedures. Two patients had rigid ureteroscopy, seven had flexible ureterorenoscopy and one had a subsequent open procedure. No patients required ureteric dilation. Double J ureteric stents were utilized in 7 patients. There were no complications. All patients required extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Stone clearance was achieved in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Our series demonstrates that, in skilled hands, adult ureteroscopes can be use safely for the treatment of urolithiasis in pediatric patients.