Ligelizumab improves sleep interference and disease burden in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria

Background

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) negatively impacts patients' sleep, thereby reducing health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). Half of patients with inadequately controlled CSU report sleep interference often or every night, which can lead to depression, anxiety, social, and work‐related problems.

Methods

This randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled Phase 2b core study (NCT02477332) included adult patients ≥18 years with moderate to severe CSU inadequately controlled with H₁‐antihistamines. The current analysis includes patients randomized to receive ligelizumab 72 or 240 mg, omalizumab 300 mg or placebo every 4 weeks (q4w) for five injections over 20 weeks with treatment‐free follow‐up for 24 weeks. Patients could enter the open‐label extension study (NCT02649218) from Week 32 onwards if their weekly urticaria activity score was ≥12, which included an open‐label treatment (52 weeks of ligelizumab 240 mg q4w) and a 48‐week post‐treatment follow‐up. Weekly Sleep Interference Scores (SIS7, range 0 [no interference]–21 [substantial interference]), Weekly Activity Interference Score (AIS7), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores, and Overall Work Impairment were assessed.

Results

Mean baseline SIS7 scores were balanced between the treatment arms for ligelizumab 72 mg (n = 84) and 240 mg (n = 85), omalizumab 300 mg (n = 85), and placebo (n = 43). By Week 12, patients experienced large improvements in sleep interference, with least square mean (standard error) changes from baseline (CFB) in SIS7 of −7.84 (0.58), −7.55 (0.61), −6.98 (0.60), and −5.85 (0.81), respectively. By Week 12, CFB in AIS7 were −8.25 (0.57), −8.25 (0.59), −7.30 (0.60), and −5.62 (0.79), DLQI scores were −9.79 (0.77), −9.93 (0.81), −8.35 (0.79), and −6.99 (1.11), and Overall Work Impairment scores were −28.96 (3.73), −30.76 (3.71), −25.74 (3.91), and −20.13 (5.10) for ligelizumab 72 and 240 mg, omalizumab 300 mg and placebo, respectively. Improvements in each patient‐reported outcome were sustained with ligelizumab 240 mg treatment during the extension study.

Conclusions

Ligelizumab showed effective and sustained responses in managing sleep interference in patients with CSU, and numerically higher responses than with omalizumab and placebo. Treating the symptoms of CSU with ligelizumab improved disease burden, HRQoL, and markedly improved sleep quality.

Sustained safety and efficacy of ligelizumab in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: A one-year extension study

BACKGROUND

Ligelizumab, a next-generation, humanized anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) monoclonal antibody is in development as a treatment for patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria, whose symptoms are inadequately controlled with standard-of-care therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term safety and re-treatment efficacy of ligelizumab 240 mg in patients who completed the core study and extension study.

METHODS

This open-label, single-arm, long-term Phase 2b extension study was designed to assess patients who were previously administered various doses of ligelizumab, omalizumab or placebo in the Phase 2b, dose-finding core study and who presented with active disease after Week 32. In the extension study, patients received ligelizumab 240 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks, for 52 weeks and were monitored post-treatment for 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Overall, ligelizumab was well-tolerated with no newly identified safety signals. A total of 95.4% (226/237) screened patients received ligelizumab 240 mg in the extension study; 84.1% (190/226) of patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. Most reported events were mild (41.6%) or moderate (35.8%) and mostly unrelated to the study treatment. At Week 12, 46.5% of patients had a complete response increasing to 53.1% after 52 weeks. Following 52 weeks of extension study treatment, 75.8% (95% confidence interval, 69.9, 81.3) of patients had cumulative complete responses. The median time to relapse in complete responders was 38 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The long-term safety profile of ligelizumab 240 mg in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria was consistent with the core study and re-treatment efficacy was shown.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02477332 and NCT02649218.

Ligelizumab treatment for severe asthma: learnings from the clinical development programme

Objective

Ligelizumab is a humanised IgG1 anti-IgE antibody that binds IgE with higher affinity than omalizumab. Ligelizumab had greater efficacy than omalizumab on inhaled and skin allergen provocation responses in mild allergic asthma. This multi-centre, randomised, double-blind study was designed to test ligelizumab in severe asthma patients not adequately controlled with high-dose inhaled corticoids plus long-acting β2-agonist.

Methods

Patients received 16 weeks ligelizumab (240 mg q2w), omalizumab or placebo subcutaneously, and ACQ-7 was measured as primary outcome at Week 16. In addition, the study generated dose-ranging data of ligelizumab and safety data.

Results

A total of 471 patients, age 47.4 ± 13.36 years, were included in the study. Treatment with ligelizumab did not significantly improve asthma control (ACQ-7) and exacerbation rates compared to omalizumab and placebo. Therefore, primary and secondary objectives of the study were not met. The compound was well tolerated, and the safety profile showed no new safety findings. Pharmacokinetic data demonstrated faster clearance and lower serum concentrations of ligelizumab than historical omalizumab data, and exploratory in vitro data showed differential IgE blocking properties relative to FcεRI and FcεRII/CD23 between the two compounds.

Conclusion

Ligelizumab failed to demonstrate superiority over placebo or omalizumab. Although ligelizumab is more potent than omalizumab at inhibiting IgE binding to the high-affinity FcεRI, there is differential IgE blocking properties relative to FcεRI and FcεRII/CD23 between the two compounds. Therefore, the data suggest that different anti-IgE antibodies might be selectively efficacious for different IgE-mediated diseases.

Ligelizumab for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

BACKGROUND

In the majority of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria, most currently available therapies do not result in complete symptom control. Ligelizumab is a next-generation high-affinity humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody. Data are limited regarding the dose-response relationship of ligelizumab and the efficacy and safety of ligelizumab as compared with omalizumab and placebo in patients who have moderate-to-severe chronic spontaneous urticaria that is inadequately controlled with H₁-antihistamines at approved or increased doses, alone or in combination with H₂-antihistamines or leukotriene-receptor antagonists.

METHODS

In a phase 2b dose-finding trial, we randomly assigned patients to receive ligelizumab at a dose of 24 mg, 72 mg, or 240 mg, omalizumab at a dose of 300 mg, or placebo, administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks for a period of 20 weeks, or a single 120-mg dose of ligelizumab. Disease symptoms of hives, itch, and angioedema were monitored by means of weekly activity scores. The main objective was to determine a dose-response relationship for the complete control of hives (indicated by a weekly hives-severity score of 0, on a scale from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater severity); the primary end point of this response was assessed at week 12. Complete symptom control was indicated by a weekly urticaria activity score of 0 (on a scale from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater severity). Safety was analyzed throughout the trial.

RESULTS

A total of 382 patients underwent randomization. At week 12, a total of 30%, 51%, and 42% of the patients treated with 24 mg, 72 mg, and 240 mg, respectively, of ligelizumab had complete control of hives, as compared with 26% of the patients in the omalizumab group and no patients in the placebo group. A dose-response relationship was established. At week 12, a total of 30%, 44%, and 40% of the patients treated with 24 mg, 72 mg, and 240 mg, respectively, of ligelizumab had complete control of symptoms, as compared with 26% of the patients in the omalizumab group and no patients in the placebo group. In this small and short trial, no safety concerns regarding ligelizumab or omalizumab emerged.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher percentage of patients had complete control of symptoms of chronic spontaneous urticaria with ligelizumab therapy of 72 mg or 240 mg than with omalizumab or placebo. (Funded by Novartis Pharma; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02477332.).

Binding of 9-cis-retinoic acid and all-trans-retinoic acid to retinoic acid receptors alpha, beta, and gamma. Retinoic acid receptor gamma binds all-trans-retinoic acid preferentially over 9-cis-retinoic acid

Both 9-cis-retinoic acid (RA) and all-trans-RA (t-RA) compete for [3H]9-cis-RA binding to RA receptors (RAR alpha, beta, and gamma) in nucleosol fractions from transiently transfected COS-1 cells with IC50 values of approximately 12 and 5 nM, respectively. Curiously, 9-cis-RA competes for [3H]t-RA binding to mouse RAR alpha, beta, and gamma with IC50 values of 31, 8, and 60 nM, respectively, while t-RA itself does not exhibit such differential competition (IC50 values for RARs, 5 nM). A similar pattern is observed with human retinoic acid receptors (RARs). Differential binding of 9-cis-RA to the RAR beta and gamma receptors is also found following in vitro transcription and translation of these receptors. Displacement assays demonstrate that t-RA exhibits similar off-rates for RAR alpha, beta, and gamma. However, 9-cis-RA is 6-fold more rapidly displaced from RAR gamma than from RAR beta. When RAR-transfected COS-1 cells are incubated with [3H]t-RA, [3H]-9-cis-RA or various mixtures of these two radioligands, high performance liquid chromatography analysis demonstrates that the ligands bound in nucleosol fractions from RAR beta-transfected cells reflect the isomer content of the media. However, in identical whole cell assays, nucleosol fractions from RAR gamma-transfected cells preferentially bind t-RA over 9-cis-RA, consistent with the in vitro data. These binding kinetics in vitro and in whole cells suggest that there could be differences in the interactions of the receptor subtypes with the endogenous retinoic acids under physiologic conditions.

Distinct binding determinants for 9-cis retinoic acid are located within AF-2 of retinoic acid receptor alpha

Retinoids exert their physiological action by interacting with two families of nuclear receptors, the retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and the retinoid X receptors (RXRs), which regulate gene expression by forming transcriptionally active heterodimeric RAR/RXR or homodimeric RXR/RXR complexes on DNA. Retinoid receptor activity resides in several regions, including the DNA and ligand binding domains, a dimerization interface, and both a ligand-independent (AF-1) and a ligand-dependent (AF-2) transactivation function. While 9-cis retinoic acid (RA) alone is the cognate ligand for the RXRs, both 9-cis RA and all-trans RA (t-RA) compete for binding with high affinity to the RARs. This latter observation suggested to us that the two isomers may interact with a common binding site. Here we report that RAR alpha has two distinct but overlapping binding sites for 9-cis RA and t-RA. Truncation of a human RAR alpha to 419 amino acids yields a receptor that binds both t-RA and 9-cis RA with high affinity, but truncation to amino acid 404 yields a mutant receptor that binds only t-RA with high affinity. Remarkably, this region also defines a C-terminal boundary for AF-2, as addition of amino acids 405 to 419 restores receptor-mediated gene activity to a truncated human RAR alpha lacking this region. It is interesting to speculate that binding of retinoid stereoisomers to unique sites within an RAR may function with AF-2 to cause differential activation of retinoid-responsive gene pathways.