Treatment of thoracolumbar fractures: comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous versus open surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION

Spinal fractures are common trauma that can be treated by a range of techniques, from functional to surgical. Spine surgery has been around for many years. The first procedures were done open but have been plagued by numerous complications-sometimes severe-and substantial intraoperative blood loss. Percutaneous surgery was developed to help reduce the complications while providing similar clinical and radiological outcomes to open surgery. We conducted a study to compare open and percutaneous surgery and to evaluate other complications as well as short- and medium-term clinical and radiological results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective, single-center study comparing two cohorts of patients suffering from an isolated vertebral fracture who were operated using either an open or percutaneous technique. Included were patients who had an isolated vertebral fracture between T10 and L3 and were operated between 01/01/2016 and 31/12/2018 at the Reims university hospital. These patients were reviewed in person after a minimum of 18 months postoperative for clinical and radiological assessments. The Mercuriali and Brecher formula was used to calculate intraoperative blood loss based on pre- and postoperative hematocrit; the total blood volume was determined with the Nadler formula.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 79 patients operated by percutaneous surgery and 55 patients operated by open surgery. The blood loss in the percutaneous surgery group was 176 mL versus 220 mL in the open surgery group (p = 0.02). The length of hospital stay was shorter after percutaneous surgery (mean of 3.6 days) than after open surgery (mean of 5.5 days) (p < 0.001). Also, the pedicle screw placement was optimal in 88% of percutaneous procedures versus 67% of open procedures (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous surgery for thoracolumbar fractures causes less blood loss than conventional open surgery. The clinical and radiological results are on par with conventional open surgery. The mean length of hospital stay is shorter and the accuracy of pedicular screw placement is higher with percutaneous surgery. Thus, we can conclude that percutaneous surgery is the preferred treatment for thoracolumbar fractures when no neurological deficit is present.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Posterolateral fusion versus Dynesys dynamic stabilization: Retrospective study at a minimum 5.5years' follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Lumbar fusion is one of the most widespread techniques to treat degenerative lumbar pathology. To prevent complications such as non-union or adjacent segment degeneration, dynamic stabilization techniques were developed, but with controversial results. The aim of the present study was to compare long-term radiologic and clinical results between fusion and dynamic stabilization.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective study included patients with recurrent lumbar discal hernia or lumbar canal stenosis managed by posterolateral fusion or by dynamic stabilization associated to neurologic release. Patients were seen in follow-up for radiological and clinical assessment: visual analog pain scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-12 (SF-12), adjacent segment disease (ASD), and intervertebral range of motion (ROM).

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were included: 25 in the fusion group (FG), and 33 in the Dynesys^® group (DG). VAS scores were significantly lower in DG than FG. ODI was 14.6±2.8 in DG, versus 19.4±3.3 in FG (P=0.0001). SF-12 physical subscore was significantly higher in DG. ROM was 4.1±2° in DG, vs. 0.7±0.5° in FG (P=0.001). Radiologic ASD was significantly greater in FG than DG (36% vs. 12.1%; P=0.012), without difference in clinical expression (DG, 1 case; FG, 2 cases).

CONCLUSION

Dynamic stabilization provided clinical and radiological results comparable to those of posterolateral fusion in these indications (although level L5-S1 was not studied).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Percutaneous surgery for thoraco-lumbar fractures in ankylosing spondylitis: Study of 31 patients

BACKGROUND

The risk of vertebral fracture is increased 4-fold in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Diagnostic challenges and the vulnerability associated with AS combine to generate high morbidity and mortality rates. The objective of this study was to assess the outcome of percutaneous thoraco-lumbar fracture surgery in patients with AS, in terms of quality of life, fracture healing, and complications.

HYPOTHESIS

Percutaneous surgery used to treat thoraco-lumbar fractures in patients with AS reliably provides fracture healing, preserves self-sufficiency, and minimises post-operative complications.

METHODS

Two centres included 31 patients with AS who were managed by percutaneous surgery for thoraco-lumbar fractures in 2013-2015. The data were reviewed retrospectively, although admission data were collected prospectively. Clinical outcomes were assessed by comparing the values at baseline and last follow-up of three variables: the Parker score, the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, and the EuroQol five dimensions (EQ-5D) quality-of-life score. Computed tomography was performed 1 year after surgery to evaluate bone healing, screw position, and implant loosening. Intra- and post-operative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The 31 patients had a mean age at surgery of 75.1 years, a mean follow-up of 35.6 months, and a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Three patients died during follow-up. Mean hospital stay duration was 6 days. Cemented screw fixation was used in 18 patients. At last follow-up, all patients had recovered their self-sufficiency; the mean Parker score was 7.14, compared to 6.73 at baseline, the mean VAS pain score was 1.8, and the mean EQ-5D score decrease versus baseline was 0.07 (P=0.02). Bone healing was consistently achieved. Loosening of an uncemented pedicle screw was noted in 1 patient. Of the 228 screws implanted, 6 (2.6%) were improperly positioned, including 1 within the spinal canal in a patient free of neurological manifestations. Asymptomatic cement leakage was noted in 2 patients.

DISCUSSION

Percutaneous fixation of thoraco-lumbar fractures in patients with AS is a reliable method that produces a high healing rate and allows prompt patient mobilisation with preservation of self-sufficiency. The post-operative complication rate is low.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective observational study.