1
|
Clinical relevance of impaired physiological assessment after percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.2014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Despite optimal angiographic result of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), residual disease at the site of the culprit lesion can lead to Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at follow-up [1]. Post-PCI physiological assessment can identify residual stenosis.
Purpose
The aim of this meta-analysis is to investigate data of studies with minimum follow-up of 6 months examining post-PCI physiological assessment in relation with long-term outcomes.
Methods
Studies were included in the meta-analysis after performing systematic search of the literature on 10th of January 2022. The primary endpoint was the incidence of MACE, Vessel-Orientated Cardiac Events (VOCE) or Target Vessel Failure (TVF). Secondary endpoints included the incidence of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR).
Results
Low post-PCI FFR, reported in seven studies [2–8], including 4017 patients, was associated with an increased rate of the primary endpoint (HR 2.06; 95%-CI 1.37–3.08). One study reported about impaired post-PCI (instantaneous wave-free ratio) iFR in relation with MACE, showing a significant association (HR 3.38; 95%-CI 0.99–11.6) [9]. Low post-PCI QFR, reported in three studies [10–12], including 1181 patients, was associated with increased rate of VOCE (HR 3.02; 95%-CI 2.13–4.30). Combining data of all modalities, impaired physiological assessment showed an increased rate of the primary endpoint (HR 2.32; 95%-CI 1.71–3.16) and secondary endpoints including death (HR 1.35; 95%-CI 1.01–1.82), MI (HR 2.50; 95%-CI 1.36–4.58) and TVR (HR 2.88; 95%-CI 1.91–4.35).
Conclusions
Impaired post-PCI physiological assessment is associated with an increase in adverse cardiac events and individual endpoints including death, MI and TVR. Prospective studies are awaited whether physiology-based optimization of PCI results in better clinical outcome.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None.
Collapse
|
2
|
Absolute flow and resistance have a lower variability in repeated testing as compared to CFR and IMR: an EDIT-CMD substudy. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.1209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Invasive coronary function testing (CFT), including both acetylcholine (ACH) spasm provocation testing and assessment of coronary flow and resistance, is recommended to assess coronary vasomotor dysfunction (CVDys) in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA).
Objectives
To determine repeat testing reliability of invasive measurements of CVDys.
Methods
In the EDIT-CMD trial, 73 patients underwent both baseline and follow-up CFT after six weeks. Repeat testing reliability for CVDys assessment, including coronary flow reserve (CFR), index of microvascular resistance (IMR), absolute flow (Q) and microvascular resistance (R) was assessed by 1.) comparing continuous values between baseline and follow-up measurement, including difference and correlation between the two measurements 2.) classification agreement (CCA) for the presence of CMD according to cut-offs, which was also assessed for ACH spasm provocation test and 3.) Bland-Altman plots. Fisher-Z scores were used to compare correlations.
Results
Mean CFR was 3.1±1.5 at baseline and 4.1±1.5 at follow-up (P=0.03), with no significant correlation (ρ=0.285, P=0.10). Mean IMR was 27±12 at baseline and 27±19 at follow-up (P=0.94), with a trend to a significant correlation (ρ=0.312, P=0.07). The CCA between the baseline and follow-up was 74% for CFR and 57% for IMR.
Mean Q was 183±72 at baseline and 192±78 at follow-up (P=0.49), with a significant correlation (ρ=0.579, P<0.001). Mean R was 527±233 at baseline and 506±228 at follow-up (P=0.67), with a significant correlation (ρ=0.51, p=0.03). The CCA between R at baseline and 6 weeks follow-up was 72% and for Q this was 82%.
The correlation coefficient (ρ) of Q was significantly better than the ρ of CFR (P=0.006). The ρ of R and IMR did not differ.
For the ACH spasm provocation test we found a CCA of 79% between both measurements.
Conclusion
This is the first study to assess re-test reliability of the invasive CFT. Measurements of Q and R show higher agreement and correlation than their surrogates CFR and IMR in assessing microvascular function. ACH provocation spasm test also demonstrated good re-test reliability.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Abbott
Collapse
|