1285 IMPLEMENTATION OF A MEDICINE MANAGEMENT PLAN TO REDUCE MEDICATION-RELATED HARM IN OLDER PEOPLE POST-HOSPITAL DISCHARGE - AN RCT

Introduction

Medication-related harm (MRH) events are increasing among older adults especially in the 8-weeks after hospital discharge. The Discharge Medical Service (DMS), a UK initiative, aims to reduce post-discharge MRH. In this study, we will compare the clinical, economic, and service outcomes of the DMS.

Method

Using a randomised control trial design, 682 older adults ≥ 65years due for hospital-discharge will be recruited. Participants will be randomized to either intervention arm (medicine management plan (MMP) and DMS), or control arm (DMS only) using a 1:1 stratification. The MMP includes patient and carer education about MRH, copy of discharge medications, and MRH risk score calculated using a validated prediction tool (1). Data collection includes patient clinical and social demographics, and admission and discharge medications. At 8-weeks post discharge, study pharmacist will verify MRH through patient telephone interview, and review of patients’ GP records.

Data Analysis

Univariate analysis will be done for baseline variables comparing the intervention and control arms. Variables known to be associated with MRH will be described by the randomisation groups. Further multivariate logistic regression will be done incorporating these variables. Economic evaluation will compare the cost-of-service use among the two arms and modelled to provide national estimates. Qualitative data from focus group interviews at participating hospital sites will explore practitioners’ understanding and acceptance of the DMS and MMP.

Conclusion

This study will inform the use of a validated MRH risk prediction tool, and provide a clinical, and economic evaluation of the DMS and MMP in the NHS. The study has ethics approval and is adopted in the national ageing research portfolio. We are seeking additional sites.

Reference

1. Parekh N, Ali K, Davies JG et al. Medication-related harm in older adults following hospital discharge: development and validation of a prediction tool. BMJ Quality and Safety 2020; 29: 142–53.

The role of Allied Health Professions and Nursing Research Internships in developing a research culture: a mixed-methods exploration of stakeholder perspectives

BACKGROUND

Developing research capability and capacity within the healthcare professions is a challenge throughout diverse international settings. Within England, the National Institute for Health Research aimed to address these challenges through the Integrated Clinical Academic (ICA) research careers escalator for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals. Poor academic progression has been identified in the advanced stages of the pathway, though progression from the earlier entry point (Internship) has not previously been investigated. A national evaluation of four completed Internship cohorts was undertaken to explore stakeholder perspectives and progression beyond the Internship programme.

METHODS

A mixed methods project used sequential qualitative and quantitative data collection phases commencing with two stakeholder focus groups (n = 10); the findings informed the development of an online survey distributed to previous cohorts of interns (n = 104), their managers (n = 12) and academic mentors (n = 36). Eight semi-structured interviews subsequently explored the challenges and opportunities afforded by the internships. Thematic analysis was used to review qualitative data from focus groups and interviews, with survey data analysed and displayed using descriptive statistics. Synthesis of data from each phase is displayed within the four level evaluation framework outlined within the New World Kirkpatrick® Training Evaluation Model.

RESULTS

Important regional differences exist yet the internships are highly valued by all stakeholders. Representation varied between different professions, with nursing and some service-based professions poorly represented. All interns successfully completed the programme (n = 104), with evidence of positive impacts on interns, colleagues and patient care. Balancing research commitments with clinical activity was challenging; middle managers were seen as gatekeepers to programme success. Progression to the next stage of the ICA pathway is highly competitive and was achieved by only a quarter of interns; access to mentors outside of the funded programme is vital for a successful transition.

CONCLUSIONS

The Internship programme succeeds in providing a range of important early experiences in research, though progression beyond the programme is challenging due, in part, to a widening gap between Internship and the next level of the ICA framework. Vital mentorship support to bridge this gap is threatened by a lack of time and funding; therefore, the pursuit of a clinical-academic career will continue to be elusive for many nurses and allied health professionals. A partnership approach to clinical academic support at institutional level is needed with several international models offering alternative strategies for consideration.