A Canadian national expert consensus on neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: linking practice to evidence and beyond

BACKGROUND

Use of the neoadjuvant approach to treat breast cancer patients has increased since the early 2000s, but the overall pathway of care for such patients can be highly variable. The aim of our project was to establish a multidisciplinary consensus among clinicians with expertise in neoadjuvant therapy (nat) for breast cancer and to determine if that consensus reflects published methods used in randomized controlled trials (rcts) in this area.

METHODS

A modified Delphi protocol, which used iterative surveys administered to 85 experts across Canada, was established to obtain expert consensus concerning all aspects of the care pathway for patients undergoing nat for breast cancer. All rcts published between January 1, 1967, and December 1, 2012, were systematically reviewed. Data extracted from the rcts were analyzed to determine if the methods used matched the expert consensus for specific areas of nat management. A scoring system determined the strength of the agreement between the literature and the expert consensus.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved for all areas of the pathway of care for patients undergoing nat for breast cancer, with the exception of the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the pre-treatment or preoperative setting. The levels of agreement between the consensus statements and the published rcts varied, primarily because specific aspects of the pathway of care were not well described in the reviewed literature.

CONCLUSIONS

A true consensus of expert opinion concerning the pathway of care appropriate for patients receiving nat for breast cancer has been achieved. A review of the literature illuminated gaps in the evidence about some elements of nat management. Where evidence is available, agreement with expert opinion is strong overall. Our study is unique in its approach to establishing consensus among medical experts in this field and has established a pathway of care that can be applied in practice for patients receiving nat.

P5-08-04: Mammographic Microcalcifications and Breast Cancer Tumorigenesis: A Radiologic-Pathologic Analysis

Background

Microcalcifications (MCs) are tiny deposits of calcium in breast soft tissue. They serve as key diagnostic radiological features for localization of malignancy. Approximately 30% of early invasive breast cancers have fine, granular MCs detectable on mammography; however, their role in breast cancer tumorigenesis is currently unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between mammographic MCs and breast cancer pathology.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for 882 women treated for breast cancer between 2000–2010 at St. Michael's Hospital. Demographic information (age and menopausal status), tumor pathology (size, histology, grade, nodal status and lymphovascular invasion), hormonal status (ER and PR), HER-2 overexpression and presence of MCs were collected for breast cancer patients. Chi-square tests were performed for categorical variables and t-tests were performed for continuous variables. All tests were two-sided and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: A total of 826 patient charts were included; 56 (6.4%) patients had metastatic carcinoma and were excluded from analysis. Only 37.0% (326/882) of the patients presented with mammographic MCs. Patients were more likely to have MCs if they were HER-2 positive (51%) as opposed to being HER-2 negative (33.4%) (p=0.001). There was a significant association between MCs and being perimenopausal with a mean age of 50 (65.2%) (p=0.012). Patients with invasive ductal carcinomas (39.7%) were more likely to present with MCs than were patients with other tumor histology (p=0.001). There was a positive correlation between MCs and tumor grade (p=0.051), with grade III tumors (41.85%) presenting with the most MCs, followed by grade II (37.95%) and grade I (29.8%). There was no significant association between mean age, mean tumor size, ER and PR status with the presence of MCs.

Conclusion: This is the largest study that suggests the appearance of MCs on mammograms is strongly associated with HER-2 overexpression, invasive ductal carcinoma and perimenopausal status. Since HER-2 is implicated in mediating aggressive tumor growth and metastasis, future studies should investigate the molecular pathways underlying HER-2 overexpression and MC development. This would help better understand the role of MCs in breast cancer tumorigenesis.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-08-04.

Physician experience and challenges obtaining unfunded oral chemotherapy across Canada

155

Background: Previous studies have shown hematologists and medical oncologists may not accept the financial limits set by governing agencies on access to oral chemotherapy for their patients. This requires increased time and effort on the clinician’s part to obtain funding. We captured physicians’ perceptions of barriers to obtaining unfunded chemotherapies and methods used to overcome these barriers.

Methods: A total of 640 medical oncologists and hematologists were surveyed using a web-based survey tool. A thirteen-item survey was designed to assess the practice type along with time spent and methods used on obtaining unfunded oral chemotherapy.

Results: Of the 640 invitees, 568 were delivered and 168 responded (response rate 30%). 91 respondents were medical oncologists, 44 were hematologists and 33 treated both solid and non-solid malignancies. 65% of physicians spent an average of 1-4 hours obtaining funding for oral drugs for patients per week. 62% indicated their institution has a drug access coordinator (DAC). Having a DAC did not impact the proportion of physicians spending >4 hrs/ week accessing oral drugs (38% vs 29%, p=NS). To overcome barriers to funding, physicians’ enrolled patients on clinical trials (91%), used compassionate access programs (96%) or special request forms to government (92%). Other methods included writing false claims on forms to fit funding criteria for a drug (36%) or use of leftover drug supplies (36%). The majority of physicians felt that their inability to obtain unfunded medications for their patients has negatively impacted patients’ clinical outcomes (56%) and psychosocial quality of life (74%). Of all respondents, only 28% of physicians contacted their governing body with concerns of funding for oral chemotherapy.

Conclusions: Practicing hematologists and medical oncologists in Canada use numerous methods to obtain unfunded oral chemotherapies, including lying on access forms. Overall, the majority of physicians spend 1-4 hours a week on obtaining funding; this did not differ for physicians with or without a DAC at their practice. Despite the challenges in accessing oral chemotherapies, most physicians have not contacted governing bodies for legislative change.

Improvement in the quality of care for patients with locally advanced breast cancer through implementation of an integrated electronic care pathway

207

Background: Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) refers to the most advanced stage of non-metastatic tumours with an incidence of approximately 10% in newly diagnosed breast cancers. Currently, for optimal care, patients with LABC require a multidisciplinary approach including coordinated planning with medical, surgical and radiation oncologists. We created an interactive electronic care pathway and self populating quality assurance database at St. Michael’s Hospital (SMH) to facilitate multidisciplinary teams to track LABC patient histories and patient treatments in order to coordinate therapy effectively and expedite care (LABC E-PATH).

Methods: This is an observational before-and-after cohort study of patients with LABC with a retrospective review pre-implementation and prospective collection of clinical data post-implementation. The completeness of workup and the timeliness of treatment pre- and post-implementation of the LABC E-PATH in May 2010 were assessed.

Results: With the implementation of the LABC E-PATH in May 2010 at SMH, the delay between the identification of the patient as LABC and their referral to a medical oncologist for treatment for their LABC decreased from a median of 9 days pre-implementation, (range 0-780 days) to 1 day post-implementation, (range 0-52 days). The time between referral to medical oncologist and the start of their chemotherapy treatment decreased from a median of 12 days to 9 days (pre-implementation: range = 4 to 494, post-implementation: range = 0 to 39). All pre-treatment staging was completed faster post-implementation of the LABC e-path than pre-implementation, expediting time to initiation of chemotherapy. The number of referrals for LABC to the SMH program increased from < 1 patient per month to 5 patients per month post-implementation.

Conclusions: The LABC E-PATH at SMH has achieved its goal of expediting care for this patient population. It has also ensured timely and appropriate resource allocation. This unique system may also be applied to other disease sites where coordination of a multi-disciplinary team is critical for appropriate patient management.

Abstract P5-15-05: Applicability of Breast Cancer Guidelines and Knowledge Translation in a Community Oncology Setting

Background: The quality of a guideline may impact adherence to that guideline. Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) produces guidelines to help manage all stages of disease. CCO's staging and follow-up guideline suggests patients (pts) with stage I breast cancer require no further staging investigations, bone scan for stage II disease, and for stage III disease in addition to bone scan, chest and abdominal imaging. The guideline on bisphosphonate (BP) use in metastatic breast cancer pts indicates that all pts with bone metastases should be offered a BP. We assessed the efficacy of knowledge translation of these guidelines at a community oncology centre by correlating rate of adherence with the quality of the guideline as scored using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument.

Methods: The quality of 2 breast cancer guidelines from CCO were assessed using the AGREE instrument. Two cohort studies of breast cancer pts seen were then conducted to evaluate the adherence to these guidelines. Specifically, staging investigations ordered on pts seen in our multidisciplinary clinic between January 2009 and April 2010 were recorded and correlated to pathological stage of disease. Our second cohort study reviewed breast cancer pts with bone metastases who died between 1999 and 2009, and initiation of a BP was recorded in order to determine adherence to the second guideline.

Results: Inadequate adherence was identified and correlated with low applicability scores for these two guidelines (58% and 33% respectively). Only 68 pts (61%) with bone metastases received BP for treatment between 1999 to 2009. 129 pts (56%) underwent unnecessary staging investigations.

Discussions: Non-chemotherapy breast cancer guidelines by CCO scored low in the field of applicability; this was confirmed by two retrospective cohort studies. Improvement in knowledge translation strategies are needed to improve adherence to practice guidelines set out by this national organization.