Mannitol facilitates neurotrophic factor up-regulation and behavioural recovery in neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic rats with human umbilical cord blood grafts

We recently demonstrated that blood–brain barrier permeabilization using mannitol enhances the therapeutic efficacy of systemically administered human umbilical cord blood (HUCB) by facilitating the entry of neurotrophic factors from the periphery into the adult stroke brain. Here, we examined whether the same blood–brain barrier manipulation approach increases the therapeutic effects of intravenously delivered HUCB in a neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic (HI) injury model. Seven-day-old Sprague–Dawley rats were subjected to unilateral HI injury and then at day 7 after the insult, animals intravenously received vehicle alone, mannitol alone, HUCB cells (15k mononuclear fraction) alone or a combination of mannitol and HUCB cells. Behavioural tests at post-transplantation days 7 and 14 showed that HI animals that received HUCB cells alone or when combined with mannitol were significantly less impaired in motor asymmetry and motor coordination compared with those that received vehicle alone or mannitol alone. Brain tissues from a separate animal cohort from the four treatment conditions were processed for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at day 3 post-transplantation, and revealed elevated levels of GDNF, NGF and BDNF in those that received HUCB cells alone or when combined with mannitol compared with those that received vehicle or mannitol alone, with the combined HUCB cells and mannitol exhibiting the most robust neurotropic factor up-regulation. Histological assays revealed only sporadic detection of HUCB cells, suggesting that the trophic factor–mediated mechanism, rather than cell replacement per se, principally contributed to the behavioural improvement. These findings extend the utility of blood–brain barrier permeabilization in facilitating cell therapy for treating neonatal HI injury.

Preeclampsia: immunologic alteration of Nitabuch's membrane? Clinical sequelae

OBJECTIVE

To determine if preeclampsia is an immunologic disease process consistent with a host-vs.-graft reaction by examining differences in immunoglobulin deposition at the maternal fetal interface (Nitabuch's layer) in preeclamptic patients.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study of patients at Lehigh Valley Hospital was conducted between July 1993 and April 1994. Group 1 (study) consisted of 11 primigravid women meeting the criteria for the diagnosis of preeclampsia. Group 2 (control) consisted of 11 primigravid women who had an uncomplicated pregnancy. At delivery, basal plate placental specimens were obtained, fixed, and processed for study by a blinded observer utilizing IgG, IgA, IgM, IgE immunofluorescence techniques. The placenta was then sent to a gynecologic pathologist for blinded evaluation and measurement of Nitabuch's membrane by light microscopy.

RESULTS

Taking the average width of 3 measurements of Nitabuch's membrane by light microscopy revealed no significant difference (group 1, .1839 mm vs. group 2, .1555 mm). Immunofluorescence techniques revealed that the thickness of immunofluorescence of Nitabuch's membrane was significantly greater in the study group vs. the control group (157.48 pixels vs. 63.80 pixels, P = .006, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of the maternal-fetal interface reveals the deposition of increased immunoglobulins, the physiology of which may be similar to nephropathies as seen in systemic disease processes. The deposition of immunoglobulins may be associated with a common antigen which may point to an immunologic etiology for preeclampsia in some women.

Does centralized monitoring affect perinatal outcome?

A retrospective study was performed comparing centralized monitoring to noncentralized monitoring in regard to perinatal outcome. The study was conducted at Lehigh Valley Hospital (Allentown, PA) between August 1994 and February 1995. All deliveries during a 28-week-period were studied retrospectively. The study was designed such that for 14 weeks all patients were centrally monitored (Group A). During the following 14 weeks, no patients were centrally monitored (Group B). Patients not requiring monitoring, such as elective cesarean sections, were excluded from the study. The variables that were studied were the 5-minute Apgar, cord blood pH, perinatal mortality, admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), spontaneous vaginal deliveries, cesarean sections, and operative vaginal deliveries. A total of 1,622 deliveries occurred during the 28 weeks of antenatal care. Group A consisted of 805 centralized monitored patients and Group B had 817 noncentralized monitored patients. There was no statistical difference in the 5-minute Apgar, umbilical artery pH, perinatal mortality, or the NICU admissions between the two groups. However, there was a significant statistical difference in the percent of cesarean sections performed for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracings (Group A, 17.89% vs. Group B, 12.16%; P = 0.02). The overall cesarean section rate was increased in the centrally monitored group (Group A, 23.6% vs. Group B, 18.1%; P = 0.01). There were also statistically significant differences in operative vaginal deliveries (forceps and vacuum) for fetal heart rate abnormalities between Group A, 0.52% vs. Group B, .39% (P = 0.05). Centralized monitoring may be associated with an increase in the overall cesarean section rate. In addition, the rate of operative vaginal and abdominal deliveries appears to be increased for the indication of nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracings with the use of centralized monitoring.

Negotiating. Biases physicians bring to the table

What are some of the obstacles that physicians face as they seek to become more effective at the bargaining table? The author's thesis, based on experience in both the classroom and the front lines of medical practice, is that physicians face a set of systematic "biases" derived from physician training and professional culture that make negotiation especially difficult for them. They outline the biases they have observed, explore some possible explanations, and suggest solutions for physicians who wish to negotiate more effectively.

Resident data collection: do the numbers add up?

OBJECTIVES

Our purpose was to investigate methods for standardization of data collection across residency training programs in obstetrics and gynecology.

STUDY DESIGN

A survey was developed and sent to all accredited residency programs in the United States and Canada. It assessed each program's current data collection method and whether the system could track discrepancies, account for completeness of data, or collect primary care data. The second part of the survey was designed to assess program director consistency in assignment of resident responsibility.

RESULTS

In 78.5% of programs residents used a paper-based system. Only 27.1% and 31.3% of the residency programs, respectively, had systems for resolving resident responsibility conflicts or determining accuracy percentages. Few (8.3%) program directors were able to collect primary care data. There were wide variations among program directors in assignment of resident responsibility in the simulated cases, indicating different interpretations of Residency Review Committee reporting criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Most resident data systems in use do not promote or require standardization of data collection; therefore comparisons between programs would be difficult. The ideal system would be flexible, require standardization of data collection, enable direct transfer to Residency Review Committee forms, be translatable to any residency program, and allow meaningful intraprogram and interprogram comparisons.

The impact of mandated in-hospital coverage on primary cesarean delivery rates in a large nonuniversity teaching hospital

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine whether attending physician call status affected the primary cesarean delivery rates of the resident or private services after institution of in-hospital coverage.

STUDY DESIGN

Data for the study year, during which in-hospital attending coverage was in place, were compared with those of the previous year, during which in-hospital attending coverage of residents was not in place. Birth records were analyzed retrospectively for physician and patient factors.

RESULTS

For the year before in-hospital coverage the institutional total cesarean rate was 24.9%, with a primary cesarean section rate of 17.6%. In the first year of coverage the total cesarean delivery was 21.7%, with a decrease in the primary rate to 15.3%. The resident service primary cesarean delivery rate was 10.6% during the study year, which was unchanged from 10.9% the prior year and did not contribute to the overall decrease. Conversely, the private service primary cesarean rate decreased from 18.0% in the prestudy year to 13.4% when the attending physician was on call in the hospital but remained higher at 17.5% when the attending physician was on call not in the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital attending physician coverage lowered individual attending physicians' private service primary cesarean rates. Resident service primary cesarean rates were lower than private service and were unaffected by the initiation of in-hospital coverage.

A study on intrauterine fetal resuscitation with terbutaline

A randomized study on the effect of terbutaline on fetal distress was carried out in 20 patients who showed evidence of ominous fetal heart rate patterns and fetal scalp blood pH values of less than 7.25. Of those, 11 received terbutaline (study group) and nine did not (control group). There was a significant improvement in the acid-base status of the fetus in the study group compared with those in the control group (p less than 0.01). No significant maternal or fetal morbidity occurred in the study group. Apgar scores at 1 minute were 7 or greater in 10 of the 11 study subjects whereas only four of the nine control subjects had a score of 7 or greater. These results suggest that terbutaline may become a useful agent in the treatment of intrauterine fetal distress.