Assessing Suffering in Experimental Pain Models

Abstract. Although suffering is a central issue in pain, there is only little research on this topic. The aim of this study was to assess suffering in an experimental context using various stimulation methods and durations, and to examine which psychological or psychophysiological measures covary with pain-related suffering. Twenty-one healthy volunteers participated in two experiments in which we used tonic thermal and phasic electric stimuli with short and long stimulus durations. The participants rated pain intensity, unpleasantness, and pain-related suffering on separate visual analog scales (VAS) and completed the Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM), originally developed to assess suffering in chronic illness. We measured heart rate, skin conductance responses (SCRs), and the electromyogram (EMG) of the musculus corrugator supercilii. For both heat and electric pain, we obtained high ratings on the suffering scale confirming that suffering can be evoked in experimental pain conditions. Whereas pain intensity and unpleasantness were highly correlated, both scales were less highly related to suffering, indicating that suffering is distinct from pain intensity and unpleasantness. Higher suffering ratings were associated with more pronounced fear of pain and increased private self-consciousness. Pain-related suffering was also related to high resting heart rate, increased SCR, and decreased EMG during painful stimulation. These results offer an approach to the assessment of suffering in an experimental setting using thermal and electric pain stimulation and shed light on its psychological and psychophysiological correlates.

Treatment history and placebo responses to experimental and clinical pain in chronic pain patients

BACKGROUND

Placebo analgesia refers to the reduction in pain due to the administration of an inert treatment. It is induced by expectations of pain relief which are enhanced by learning mechanisms. In healthy humans, prior positive experiences enhance the placebo response. However, the effects of patients' prior experiences with treatment on placebo responses have not yet been examined. This study investigated how verbal information, learning and treatment history influence the magnitude of placebo analgesia in chronic pain.

METHODS

We administered a pharmacological placebo intervention in a sample of chronic pain patients (n = 49) who were seeking treatment in an outpatient pain clinic. Analyses were based on placebo responders.

RESULTS

We found that verbal information about a potent pain-relieving effect of the intervention induced a large placebo analgesic response to both acute experimental (F(1,44) = 43.35, p < 0.001) and chronic pain (F(1,44) = 37.72, p < 0.001). However, the placebo responses to experimental and chronic pain were not significantly related (r = 0.012, p = 0.95). An additional conditioning procedure did not significantly enhance placebo analgesia. Treatment history modulated the magnitude of the placebo response: patients with a more negative pain-related treatment history reported significantly larger placebo responses to their own chronic pain (τ = 0.271, p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

We could show that placebo responses to both acute and chronic pain are high in pain treatment settings and that treatment history modulates this effect. Different mechanisms might underlie placebo responses to acute and chronic pain. Our findings highlight the necessity of considering placebo responses and treatment history in the treatment of chronic pain. WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD?: Placebo analgesia following verbal information of potent pain relief is high in chronic pain patients in a clinical setting. It is modulated by treatment history. Different mechanisms might underlie placebo analgesia to acute and chronic pain.

D-amphetamine does not improve outcome of somatosensory training

BACKGROUND

D-amphetamine has been shown to affect early stages of stroke recovery, and may have a beneficial effect on functions when administered later after stroke.

OBJECTIVE

To test D-amphetamine effects on skill acquisition after the acute or subacute stages of stroke, when lesion-related structural changes have consolidated.

METHODS

Sixteen healthy subjects were treated with D-amphetamine during a 4-week training of tactile frequency discrimination in a placebo-controlled, double-blind design.

RESULTS

All subjects improved significantly in tactile temporal acuity. However, improvement did not differ in subjects treated with or without D-amphetamine.

CONCLUSION

No beneficial effect of D-amphetamine on somatosensory training improvements was found in healthy subjects.