A 5-Year Open-Label Follow-up of a Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy for Birch and Grass Allergy Reveals Long-term Beneficial Effects

BACKGROUND

Intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) is a novel, faster alternative to conventional allergen immunotherapy (AIT). Few previous studies have evaluated its long-term effects. The objective of the present study was to complete a 5-year follow-up of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of ILIT for a combination of birch and grass allergens.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients with allergic rhinitis were treated with either placebo or a combination of ALK Alutard Birch and Grass 1000 SQ-U administered in 3 intralymphatic injections at 1-month intervals. A year after the vaccination, the symptoms induced by nasal provocation were significantly reduced. After 5-6 years, 20 out of 26 actively treated patients were followed up with a nasal provocation test (NPT) and seasonal registration of the combined symptom and medications score (CSMS), IgE and IgG4 levels in blood, and immunological markers in blood and lymph nodes and compared with 13 unvaccinated controls.

RESULTS

The reduction in the NPT response with ILIT at year 1 could not be convincingly reproduced at year 5. The new CSMS scores were markedly lower among the previously treated patients than among the control group. Furthermore, grass-specific IgG4 was increased, grass-specific IgE decreased, FcεR1 on basophils was reduced, and the fraction of memory T-cells in lymph nodes increased.

CONCLUSION

The combination of seasonal clinical data and immunological parameters supports the notion of a long-lasting effect of ILIT. These data support the concept of ILIT as a good alternative to traditional AIT in pollen-induced allergic rhinitis.

Timing-dependent effects of restraint stress on eosinophilic airway inflammation in mice

BACKGROUND

Chronic stress has been proposed to aggravate allergic inflammation, whereas acute stress may have functional beneficial effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of timing of single short restraint stress (RST) in a model of eosinophilic airway inflammation.

METHODS

The airways of ovalbumin (OVA)-sensitized mice were exposed to an intranasal OVA challenge. RST was applied in two different ways; either 2 h before (pre-stress) or after (post-stress) the OVA challenge, respectively, or as a combination of stress before and after (double-stress) the OVA challenge. One group of mice was also treated with metyrapone (ME) prior to a pre-stress challenge. The inflammatory cell response was evaluated in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), lung and nasal tissue, as well as bone marrow.

RESULT

RST applied prior to the OVA challenge (pre-stress) inhibited OVA-induced airway inflammation in BALF and lung tissue, and reduced nasal histopathology compared to unstressed mice. Given as post-stress or double-stress, RST did not affect the inflammation in BALF, lungs or nasal tissue. Pre-treatment with ME prevented the pre-challenge stress evoked decrease in inflammation in BALF and lungs.

CONCLUSION

Effects of RST on eosinophilic airway inflammation appear to be strongly dependent on timing and, as could be judged from the ME inhibition pattern, also corticosterone dependent. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation probably influences eosinophilic inflammation through specific sequences of compartmental activation and thereby timing effects are evident on cellular recruitment pattern during the allergic reaction.