P–041 Reproductive concerns and sexual health in men with newly diagnosed testicular cancer prior to orchiectomy: preliminary results from an on-going study

Study question

What is the prevalence of reproductive concerns among patients with newly diagnosed testicular cancer (TC), and how do they rate their sexual health (SH).

Summary answer

Of 20 patients, 75% (n = 15) were moderate to highly concerned about decreased reproductive functioning. Twenty-four percent exhibited overall low SH.

What is known already

Currently, only little is known about reproductive concerns among TC patients. Furthermore, these concerns have not been investigated in a TC population prior to orchiectomy. One study among post-surgery TC patients two years after diagnosis, reported that 28% had high degree of reproductive concern. The literature indicates that TC patients’ sexual health is negatively affected due to altered body image and sexual dysfunction. However, studies regarding sexual health have primarily been performed on long term survivors of TC. Thus, little is known about SH in this population prior to treatment.

Study design, size, duration

The present cross-sectional study included patients from the fertility clinic in Horsens, Denmark. Patients were approached at their pre-scheduled appointment for cryopreservation of semen prior to orchiectomy. Enrolment started March, 2019 and is still on-going. Preliminary data is included from 21 enrolled patients.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

Patients newly diagnosed with TC, who were referred to the fertility clinic for semen cryopreservation prior to orchiectomy and other treatment modalities were invited. The patients responded to a questionnaire package of which reproductive concerns were assessed with seven questions with Likert scale response options ranging from 0 (not concerned) to 5 (highly concerned). SH was assessed with the validated 22-item questionnaire European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Sexual health questionnaire (EORTC-SHQ).

Main results and the role of chance

A total of 37 patients met the inclusion criteria and of these 21 were enrolled in the study. Due to technical issues, only 20 out of 21 patients completed the full questionnaire package. Patients were asked about concerns regarding the ability to father children. Nine patients (45%) were moderately concerned, and six patients (30%) were highly concerned. When asked about their concerns of not being able to father children without fertility treatment, the answers were mostly unaffected with eight patients (40%) being moderately concerned, and seven patients (35%) highly concerned.

Four patients (20%) were highly concerned that decreased semen quality would affect future or present relationships. Patients were also asked if they felt sufficiently informed regarding the chance of fathering children without help from a fertility clinic following cancer treatment. Three patients (15%) reported that they were insufficiently informed, while four patients (20%) responded only to a little extend. Five patients (23,8%) scored ≤ 50 on the EORTC SHQ indicating that they had low SH. Eleven patients (52,3%) felt less masculine due to their disease. Furthermore, one patient (4,8%) scored ≤ 50 on the symptomatic scale, indicating that he had symptomatic sexual problems as fatigue and sexual pain.

Limitations, reasons for caution

The relatively low participant number is a limitation, making the results less generalizable. Furthermore, there is a risk of selection bias due to the moderate inclusion rate. Also, the questionnaire examining fertility related concerns were non validated, and focused mainly on the fertility-related aspects of reproductive concerns.

Wider implications of the findings: A considerable number of patients with newly diagnosed TC show substantial reproductive concerns as well as lowered sexual health. These worries could possibly be alleviated by more sufficient information from the health professionals already in the beginning of the treatment phase, reducing further emotional distress during the remaining treatment period.

Trial registration number

ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT03880994

Evaluation of the effect of nurse education on patient-reported foot checks and foot care behaviour of people with diabetes receiving haemodialysis

AIMS

To assess whether a programme of nurse education increased the frequency with which nurses conducted foot checks on people with diabetes undergoing haemodialysis and to evaluate whether this influenced self-reported foot care behaviour.

METHODS

A non-randomized stepped-wedge design was used to evaluate a nurse education programme implemented in four UK National Health Service dialysis units. People with diabetes undergoing haemodialysis were invited to complete a questionnaire on the frequency of foot examination by health professionals, on the presence of foot problems and on their own foot care behaviour, using the Nottingham Assessment of Functional Foot-care (NAFF). An education session for nurses, including procedures for foot examination, was conducted sequentially in each of four haemodialysis units. The questionnaire was repeated at 2-monthly intervals.

RESULTS

The education session resulted in a significant increase in the reported number of foot examinations by nurses (P = 0.007). There was also a significant improvement in reported foot care behaviour (P < 0.001), but this occurred between the first and second 2-monthly assessments and was unrelated to the timing of the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

A single education session can improve the routine checking of the feet of people with diabetes undergoing haemodialysis. The administration of the Nottingham Assessment of Functional Foot-care questionnaire was associated with improved self-reported foot care behaviour, reflecting greater awareness of risk in this population.

Using realist review to inform intervention development: methodological illustration and conceptual platform for collaborative care in offender mental health

BACKGROUND

This paper reports how we used a realist review, as part of a wider project to improve collaborative mental health care for prisoners with common mental health problems, to develop a conceptual platform. The importance of offenders gaining support for their mental health, and the need for practitioners across the health service, the criminal justice system, and the third sector to work together to achieve this is recognised internationally. However, the literature does not provide coherent analyses of how these ambitions can be achieved. This paper demonstrates how a realist review can be applied to inform complex intervention development that spans different locations, organisations, professions, and care sectors.

METHODS

We applied and developed a realist review for the purposes of intervention development, using a three-stage process. (1) An iterative database search strategy (extending beyond criminal justice and offender health) and groups of academics, practitioners, and people with lived experience were used to identify explanatory accounts (n = 347). (2) From these accounts, we developed consolidated explanatory accounts (n = 75). (3) The identified interactions between practitioners and offenders (within their organisational, social, and cultural contexts) were specified in a conceptual platform. We also specify, step by step, how these explanatory accounts were documented, consolidated, and built into a conceptual platform. This addresses an important methodological gap for social scientists and intervention developers about how to develop and articulate programme and implementation theory underpinning complex interventions.

RESULTS

An integrated person-centred system is proposed to improve collaborative mental health care for offenders with common mental health problems (near to and after release) by achieving consistency between the goals of different sectors and practitioners, enabling practitioners to apply scientific and experiential knowledge in working judiciously and reflectively, and building systems and aligning resources that are centred on offenders' health and social care needs.

CONCLUSIONS

As part of a broader programme of work, a realist review can make an important contribution to the specification of theoretically informed interventions that have the potential to improve health outcomes. Our conceptual platform has potential application in related systems of health and social care where integrated, and person-centred care is a goal.