First-line therapy with palbociclib in patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer: The real-life study PALBOSPAIN

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line therapy with palbociclib in a Spanish cohort treated after palbociclib approval.

METHODS

PALBOSPAIN is an observational, retrospective, multicenter study evaluating real-world patterns and outcomes with 1 L palbociclib in men and women (any menopausal status) with advanced HR+/HER2- BC diagnosed between November 2017 and November 2019. The primary endpoint was real-world progression-free survival (rw-PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), the real-world response rate (rw-RR), the clinical benefit rate, palbociclib dose reduction, and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 762 patients were included. The median rw-PFS and OS were 24 months (95% CI 21-27) and 42 months (40-not estimable [NE]) in the whole population, respectively. By cohort, the median rw-PFS and OS were as follows: 28 (95% CI 23-39) and 44 (95% CI 38-NE) months in patients with de novo metastatic disease, 13 (95% CI 11-17) and 36 months (95% CI 31-41) in patients who experienced relapse < 12 months after the end of ET, and 31 months (95% CI 26-37) and not reached (NR) in patients who experienced relapse > 12 months after the end of ET. rw-PFS and OS were longer in patients with oligometastasis and only one metastatic site and those with non-visceral disease. The most frequent hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (72%; grade ≥ 3: 52.5%), and the most common non-hematologic adverse event was asthenia (38%).

CONCLUSION

These findings, consistent with those from clinical trials, support use of palbociclib plus ET as 1 L for advanced BC in the real-world setting, including pre-menopausal women and men.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04874025 (PALBOSPAIN). Date of registration: 04/30/2021 retrospectively registered.

Abstract PD1-02: Withdrawn

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.

Citation Format: Cortes J, Martin M, Pernas S, Gomez Pardo P, Lopez-Tarruella S, Gil-Martin M, Manso L, Ciruelos E, Perez-Fidalgo JA, Hernando C, Ademuyiwa FO, Weilbaecher K, Mayer I, Pluard TJ, Martinez Garcia M, Vahdat L, Wach A, Barker D, Romagnoli B, Kaufman PA. Withdrawn [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-02.

Abstract P4-20-01: Implications of financial modeling in breast cancer clinical research from 1990 to 2010

SUMMARY: Over the past two decades significant progress has been made in breast cancer treatment resulting in a substantial improvement in patients' outcome. But we have to think about who promotes all this research and the consequences of the type of fundingThis project aims to evaluate the implication of finance in clinical research and the variance according to the type of funding.

OBJETIVES: To evaluate the financial evolvement of breast cancer clinical trials in the past two decades, regarding the phase of development design of the studies, the collaboration between Academy (Acad) and Industry (Ind), the sample size, the study results and the statistical analyses conducted.

METHODS: A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE to identify breast cancer randomized clinical trials published between January1990 and December2010. Studies that involved chemotherapy, endocrine and/or targeted therapies, wherethe primary endpoint was considered adequate to support a drug approval in oncology according to the FDA and EMA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency, respectively), were included.

RESULTS:Data were evaluated 2,211 and 472 met selection criteria comprised in the methodology During the first decade the Acad was the main breast cancer research promoter being replaced by the Inv. throughout the second decade (p &lt;0.0001). Thirty nine percent of the studies evaluated were phase III (39% Acad, 61% Ind), 15% were phase II (30% Acad, 70% Ind) and the remaining 47% were not classified by authors (65% Acad 35% Ind). As for the primary endpoint, 25% of the phase III trials evaluated progression free survival, 15% overall response rate, 1% time to progression and only 5% examined overall survival. Sixty five percent of the trials were national (60% Acad 40% Ind) and 35% international (25% Acad 75% Ind). Single-center studies accounted for 11% of the trial (65% Acad 35% Ind). Most of the national trials were developed by the US. Fifty four percent of the studies were conducted by research groups (67% supported by Ind. and 33% Acad.). The Ind sponsored 26% of the studies in the first decade and 50% during the second. The median number of patients enrolled by research groups was 892 in contrast with 409 included by other organizations. The primary endpoint was achieved in 19% of the Acad trials and 21% of the Ind trials. Only 53% of the studies declared intention to treat based analysis in their statistical workout.

RESULTS  ACADEMY(%)INDUSTRY (%)PPROMOTION OF THE STUDY1990-2000121(26)68(14)0,0001 2001-2010105(22)178(38)0,0001STUDY DESIGNUNICENTRIC TRIALS34(7)18(4)0,007 MULTICENTRIC TRIALS191(40)228(48)  NATIONAL TRIALS183(39)122(26)0,0001 INTERNATIONAL TRIALS42(9)124(26)  COOPERATIVE GROUP95(20)160(34)  NOT COOPERATIVE GROUP130(28)86(18) STATISTICAL ANALYSISINTENT OF TREAT86(18)163(35)  NOT DECLARATED140(30)83(18) 

CONCLUSIONS:There is a significant tendency towards the promotion of research by the pharmaceutical industries during the last two decades, leading a change in the clinical trials design and the endpoints.

Citation Format: Jerez Y, Lopez-Tarruella S, Marquez-Rodas I, Perez S, Ocaña A, Echavarria I, Lobo M, Gallego I, Torres G, Ortega L, Garcia G, Palomero I, Gonzalez Del Val R, Massarrah T, Esteban M, Del Monte-Millan M, Martin M. Implications of financial modeling in breast cancer clinical research from 1990 to 2010 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-20-01.

SEOM clinical guidelines in metastatic breast cancer 2015

Metastatic breast cancer is essentially an incurable disease. However, recent advances have resulted in a significant improvement of overall survival. The SEOM guidelines are intended to make evidence-based recommendations on how to manage patients with metastatic breast cancer to achieve the best patient outcomes based on a rational use of the currently available therapies. To assign a level of certainty and a grade of recommendation the United States Preventive Services Task Force guidelines methodology was selected as reference.

Trastuzumab associated with successive cytotoxic therapies beyond disease progression in metastatic breast cancer

10617

Background: Whether trastuzumab should be continued after tumor progression remains unknown.We describe the activity of successive trastuzumab-containing regimens in patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer, as well as the response rate, time to progression and predictive factors for response. Methods: Descriptive retrospective study of trastuzumab activity in patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer treated at our hospital from 10/1999 to 07/2005. Results: 93 consecutive patients were evaluated obtaining an objective response rate (OR) for first-time administration of trastuzumab of 46.2%; stable disease (SD) 24.7%; clinical benefit (CB) 71%. Median time-to-progression (TTP) was 5 months (range: 1–39+). A total of 47 pts (50.5%) received a second trastuzumab-containing regimen with an OR of 29.8%; SD 21.3%; CB 51.1%; TTP 4 months (range: 1–31). A total of 21 pts (22.6%) received a third trastuzumab-containing regimen; OR 38.1%; SD 23.8%; CB 61.9%; TTP 4 months (range: 1–30+). A total of 10 pts (10.8%) received a fourth trastuzumab-containing regimen; OR 20%; SD 20%; CB 40%; TTP 4 months (range: 1–37). 5 pts (5.4%) received a fifth trastuzumab-containing regimen; OR 0%; SD 60%. Age < 45 years is a significant prognostic factor (p: 0.005, 95% CI, OR 5.6 (1.5–20.6)). A better response rate in the successive trastuzumab-containing regimens was observed, when there was a response in the first regimen: p = 0.04; 95% CI; OR 3.84 (1.07–14.65). With a follow-up of 16,5 months 45 pts (48,4%) are alive. Conclusions: Trastuzumab-containing therapies beyond disease progression in metastatic breast cancer show activity. There were more responses in younger pts. Those pts who had a previous response to trastuzumab therapy were more likely to respond to successive trastuzumab-containing regimens. Additional controlled studies are needed to test this approach.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.