1
|
Vidal J, Bellosillo B, Santos Vivas C, García-Alfonso P, Carrato A, Cano MT, García-Carbonero R, Élez E, Losa F, Massutí B, Valladares-Ayerbes M, Viéitez JM, Manzano JL, Azuara D, Gallego J, Pairet S, Capellá G, Salazar R, Tabernero J, Aranda E, Montagut C. Ultra-selection of metastatic colorectal cancer patients using next-generation sequencing to improve clinical efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:439-446. [PMID: 30689692 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extended RAS analysis is mandatory in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. The optimal threshold of RAS mutated subclones to identify patients most likely to benefit from antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy is controversial. Our aim was to assess the clinical impact of detecting mutations in RAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and EGFRS492R in basal tissue tumour samples by using a highly sensitive next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology in mCRC patients treated with chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. PATIENTS AND METHODS Five hundred and eighty-one tumour samples from untreated mCRC patients from 7 clinical studies were collected. Mutational analysis was carried out by standard-of-care (therascreen pyro) with a sensitivity detection of 5% mutant allele fraction (MAF), and compared with NGS technology using 454GS Junior platform (Roche Applied Science, Germany) with a sensitivity of 1%. Molecular results were correlated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS After quality assessment, 380 samples were evaluable for molecular analysis. Standard-of-care mutational analysis detected RAS, BRAFV600E or PIK3CA mutations in 56.05% of samples compared with 69.21% by NGS (P = 0.00018). NGS identified coexistence of multiple low-frequency mutant alleles in 96 of the 263 mutated cases (36.5%; range 2-7). Response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were increasingly improved in patients with RAS wild-type, RAS/BRAF wild-type or quadruple (KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA) wild-type tumours treated with anti-EGFR, assessed by standard-of-care. No additional benefit in RR, PFS or OS was observed by increasing the detection threshold to 1% by NGS. An inverse correlation between the MAF of the most prevalent mutation detected by NGS and anti-EGFR response was observed (P = 0.039). EGFRS492Rmutation was not detected in untreated samples. CONCLUSIONS No improvement in the selection of patients for anti-EGFR therapy was obtained by adjusting the mutation detection threshold in tissue samples from 5% to 1% MAF. Response to anti-EGFR was significantly better in patients with quadruple wild-type tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Vidal
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, CIBERONC Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona
| | - B Bellosillo
- Pathology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona
| | - C Santos Vivas
- Translational Research Laboratory, Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), ICO-Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL)-CIBERONC Instituto de Salud Carlos III, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona
| | | | - A Carrato
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, CIBERONC Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Alcala University, Madrid
| | - M T Cano
- Medical Oncology Department, IMIBIC, Reina Sofía Hospital, University of Cordoba, CIBERONC Instituto de Salud Carlos III
| | - R García-Carbonero
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre, (imas12), UCM, CNIO, CIBERONC Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid
| | - E Élez
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), CIBERONC Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona
| | - F Losa
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Sant Joan Despí - Moisés Broggi, Barcelona
| | - B Massutí
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario, Alicante
| | - M Valladares-Ayerbes
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña
| | - J M Viéitez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo
| | - J L Manzano
- Medical Oncology Department, ICO, Badalona, Barcelona
| | - D Azuara
- Translational Research Laboratory, Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), ICO-Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL)-CIBERONC Instituto de Salud Carlos III, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona
| | - J Gallego
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Alicante
| | - S Pairet
- Pathology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona
| | - G Capellá
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Translational Research Laboratory, ICO-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, University of Barcelona, CIBERONC Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Salazar
- Translational Research Laboratory, Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), ICO-Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL)-CIBERONC Instituto de Salud Carlos III, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona
| | - J Tabernero
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), CIBERONC Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona
| | - E Aranda
- Medical Oncology Department, IMIBIC, Reina Sofía Hospital, University of Cordoba, CIBERONC Instituto de Salud Carlos III
| | - C Montagut
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, CIBERONC Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Calvo P, Pairet S, Vila M, Losada J, Bowen J, Cirac R, Bulbena A, Holloway A, Fatjó J. Dog assisted therapy for teenagers with emotional and behavioural issues: A multicentre study. Eur Psychiatry 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionFurther research is still needed to demonstrate the benefits of animal-assisted therapy (AAT) for specific participant profiles, such as children with behavioural disorders.ObjectivesWe wanted to find out if AAT could be considered an efficient therapeutic strategy for the treatment of children with behavioural disorders.AimsWe wanted to study the effects of a preestablished AAT program on the behaviour of children with emotional and behavioural issues in 6 different reception centres for children under government guardianship.MethodsForty-five children (12 to 17 years old) with emotional and behavioural issues participated in a 14-session AAT program. Behavioural measures were those routinely scored as part of therapy; an observational report of 3 different problematic behaviours (such as impulsivity, lack of social skills or lack of personal recognition) was made twice a week for each child (with a score of frequency and intensity). A pre- and post-treatment “global behaviour score” was calculated for each child, as an average value of the 3 problematic behaviours measured during the month pre-treatment and the month post-treatment.ResultsThe 45 participants attended, on average, 72.8% of AAT sessions. Independent behaviour scores differed between the pre- and post-intervention evaluations (n = 135 behaviours) (Wilcoxon test; P < 0.0001). Based on the global behaviour score for each child (n = 45), significant change was found between pre- and post-intervention evaluations (Wilcoxon test; P = 0.0011).ConclusionsOur results suggest AAT could be a beneficial intervention for children with behavioural issues in terms of program adherence and behaviour improvement.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.
Collapse
|