Low serum chloride level gives renin-angiotensin system inhibitor a prognostic impact in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction

Background

Hypochloremia is associated with a poor prognosis of heart failure (HF) patients. This phenomenon is sustained even in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Serum chloride level is known to be affected by serum renin secretion; however, this relationship is one of the least investigated field in HF patients. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor is recommended as a first-line medication for HF patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, but no prior studies of RAS inhibitors have achieved to improve the prognosis of HFpEF patients.

Purpose

We investigated the relationship between baseline serum chloride level and the prognostic impact of RAS inhibitor in HFpEF patients.

Methods

This is an observational study including 1,913 consecutive patients who admitted to hospital due to worsening of HF and discharged alive in a single university hospital. After excluding patients who received regular hemodialysis and whose left ventricular ejection fraction were under 50%, 506 HFpEF patients were ultimately analyzed. They were categorized into tertiles by serum chloride levels at discharge (T1: −100 mEq/L, T2: 101–104 mEq/L, T3: 105- mEq/L), and patients in each category were further divided into subgroups depending on the prescription of RAS inhibitor at discharge (RAS inhibitor group and Non-RAS inhibitor group). The primary endpoint of this study was death from any cause.

Results

During the observation period with 479 days of median follow-up, 77 (15.2%) died. Patients in the RAS inhibitor group had significantly better prognosis than those in the Non-RAS inhibitor group in T1 category (Log-rank: p=0.003, Figure). In contrast, there was no statistical difference in the mortality between the RAS inhibitor group and Non-RAS inhibitor group in T2 and T3 categories (Log-rank: p=0.15, p=0.81, respectively, Figure). Multivariate Cox regression analysis in T1 category revealed that taking RAS inhibitor at discharge was independently associated with a lower mortality rate, even after the adjustment of diverse covariates (hazard ratio: 0.40, 95% confidence interval: 0.20–0.80).

Conclusion

In this observational study, the administration of RAS inhibitor was associated with an improved prognosis of HFpEF patients only in low serum chloride level at discharge. Therapeutic strategy focusing on the chloride level may be one of the promising options to find the light on a unintervenable prognosis of HFpEF.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Prognostic advantage of optimal medical therapy is not cancelled in hospitalized heart failure patients receiving regular hemodialysis

Background

As the first-line medications, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) and β-blocker provide prognostic benefits in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, the negative inotropic effect of these drugs may destabilize the hemodynamics during hemodialysis (HD) and become prognostically controversial in patients receiving regular HD. Indeed, prior studies have reported the cancellation of the favorable prognostic effects of RAASi and β-blocker in patients with HD. However, it is totally unknown whether the guideline-directed medical therapy affects the prognosis in HF patients receiving regular HD.

Purpose

We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of RAASi and β-blocker on the cardiovascular (CV) events in HF patients on regular HD.

Methods

This observational study initially included 1,930 consecutive patients who were hospitalized due to HF and discharged alive. Of these, 151 patients who received regular HD were ultimately analyzed. They were classified into 3 groups depending on the prescribing medications at discharge; patients who received none of RAASi or β-blocker (None group: N=19), either RAASi or β-blocker (Either group: N=56), and both RAASi and β-blocker (Both group: N=76). The primary endpoint was a composite of CV death and readmission due to HF.

Results

During the observation period of median 501 (interquartile range: 197–954) days, the primary endpoint occurred in 61 patients (40%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the highest rate of composite endpoint in the None group (log-rank for trend: p<0.001, Figure). After adjusting for covariates of age, sex, LVEF, and systolic blood pressure and heart rate at discharge, the hazard ratio (HR) for a composite endpoint was significantly lower in the Either group or Both group than that in the None group [HR: 0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.08–0.45; HR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.06–0.42, respectively].

Conclusions

The prescription of RAASi or β-blocker at discharge was associated with lower adverse CV event rates in patients on regular HD who were hospitalized for HF. In order to improve long-term prognosis of HF patients on HD, we should consider the prescription of RAASi or β-blocker for them if hemodynamics during HD is affordable.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1

Heart failure re-hospitalization differently affects the following mortality in patients with reduced, mid-range and preserved LVEF

Introduction

The recent advances in the treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have been remarkable, while no therapy has convincingly improved the prognosis in HF patients with preserved (HFpEF) and mid-range (HFmrEF) ejection fraction. Frequent decompensations of HF lead to progressive deterioration of cardiac and renal function, and quality of life. Hence, prior studies have reported that the mortality of HFrEF patients increases as hospitalization for HF repeats. However, it is still unclear whether this trend applies for HFpEF and HFmrEF patients.

Purpose

We aimed to compare the prognostic impact of re-hospitalization due to HF on cardiovascular death (CVD) among HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF patients.

Methods

This observational study included 1,930 consecutive patients who were hospitalized for worsening of HF and discharged alive. Of them, patients who have never or have not been hospitalized for HF at least last 2 years, were finally analyzed. Patients were consisted of the population with HFrEF (EF<40%, n=421), HFmrEF (EF 40–49%, n=202) and HFpEF (EF>50%, n=291). Patients in each EF-classified population were divide into 2 subgroups based on whether patients were re-hospitalized for HF during the observational period, respectively. The primary endpoint of this study was CVD.

Results

During the observation period, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients who were re-hospitalized for HF had higher event rate of CVD in HFrEF group (Log-rank p=0.008, Figure). Even after adjusting with multivariate covariates including age, sex, EF, brain natriuretic peptide and estimated glomerular filtration rate, re-hospitalization for HF was an independent predictor for CVD in HFrEF group (HR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.11–2.86, p=0.029). However, in HFmrEF group and HFpEF group, there was no significant difference in the rates of CVD between 2 subgroups divided whether patients were re-hospitalized for HF or not (p=0.91, p=0.34, respectively).

Conclusion

Re-hospitalization for HF affected the CVD rate in HFrEF group, but not in HFmrEF and HFpEF groups. The prevention of re-hospitalization for HF is important particularly in HFrEF patients in order to improve cardiovascular mortality.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

P1958Baseline glycated hemoglobin level was differently associated with long-term prognosis in peripheral artery disease patients with and without hemodialysis

Introduction

Diabetes (DM) is the leading cause of induction of hemodialysis (HD), and both are major prognostic factors in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, the prognostic importance of baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in PAD patients with and without HD is yet to be elucidated.

Purpose

We hypothesized that baseline HbA1c levels had different prognostic impacts after endovascular therapy (EVT) in between PAD patients with and those without regular HD.

Methods

This observational study included 643 consecutive patients who received EVT between 2013 and 2017. Each of 313 HD patients and 330 Non-HD patients was respectively divided into 2 groups by the comorbidity of diabetes, and DM patients were further divided into 3 subgroups depending on HbA1c level at the time of EVT; DM-Low (HbA1c: <6.0%), DM-Mid (6.1–7.0%), and DM-High (>7.1%) groups. The primary endpoint of this study was major amputation-free survival (AFS).

Results

HD group included significantly more patients presenting critical limb ischemia than Non-HD group (46.6% vs. 30.0%, p<0.001). During the observation period after EVT, there were 81 events (25.9%), including 55 death and 26 major amputations in HD group, and 45 events (13.6%), including 30 death and 15 major amputations in Non-HD group. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that DM patients had a significantly higher AFS rate in HD group (Log-rank: p=0.003, Figure A). In contrast, in Non-HD group, there was no statistical difference in AFS between DM and Non-DM patients (p=0.36). In Cox regression analysis in HD group, the higher HbA1c-DM group showed the higher hazard ratio (HR) for AFS (p=0.039, Figure B), and DM patients with HbA1c >6.0% had significantly higher HR than Non-DM patients. Whereas, in Non-HD group, HbA1c-DM class adversely associated with HR for AFS (p=0.003), even any classes did not reach statistical differences from Non-DM patients.

Figure 1

Conclusions

Comorbidity of diabetes at the time of EVT worsened long-term prognosis in PAD patients receiving regular HD, but not in those without HD. Additionally, baseline HbA1c levels oppositely affected prognosis in PAD patients with and without HD.