Development of a core descriptor set for Crohn's anal fistula

AIM

Crohn's anal fistula (CAF) is a complex condition, with no agreement on which patient characteristics should be routinely reported in studies. The aim of this study was to develop a core descriptor set of key patient characteristics for reporting in all CAF research.

METHOD

Candidate descriptors were generated from published literature and stakeholder suggestions. Colorectal surgeons, gastroenterologists and specialist nurses in inflammatory bowel disease took part in three rounds of an international modified Delphi process using nine-point Likert scales to rank the importance of descriptors. Feedback was provided between rounds to allow refinement of the next ratings. Patterns in descriptor voting were assessed using principal component analysis (PCA). Resulting PCA groups were used to organize items in rounds two and three. Consensus descriptors were submitted to a patient panel for feedback. Items meeting predetermined thresholds were included in the final set and ratified at the consensus meeting.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty three respondents from 22 countries completed round one, of whom 67.0% completed round three. Ninety seven descriptors were rated across three rounds in 11 PCA-based groups. Forty descriptors were shortlisted. The consensus meeting ratified a core descriptor set of 37 descriptors within six domains: fistula anatomy, current disease activity and phenotype, risk factors, medical interventions for CAF, surgical interventions for CAF, and patient symptoms and impact on quality of life.

CONCLUSION

The core descriptor set proposed for all future CAF research reflects characteristics important to gastroenterologists and surgeons. This might aid transparent reporting in future studies.

Defining core patient descriptors for perforated peptic ulcer research: international Delphi

BACKGROUND

Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) remains a common condition globally with significant morbidity and mortality. Previous work has demonstrated variation in reporting of patient characteristics in PPU studies, making comparison of studies and outcomes difficult. The aim of this study was to standardize the reporting of patient characteristics, by creating a core descriptor set (CDS) of important descriptors that should be consistently reported in PPU research.

METHODS

Candidate descriptors were identified through systematic review and stakeholder proposals. An international Delphi exercise involving three survey rounds was undertaken to obtain consensus on key patient characteristics for future research. Participants rated items on a scale of 1-9 with respect to their importance. Items meeting a predetermined threshold (rated 7-9 by over 70 per cent of stakeholders) were included in the final set and ratified at a consensus meeting. Feedback was provided between rounds to allow refinement of ratings.

RESULTS

Some 116 clinicians were recruited from 29 countries. A total of 63 descriptors were longlisted from the literature, and 27 were proposed by stakeholders. After three survey rounds and a consensus meeting, 27 descriptors were included in the CDS. These covered demographic variables and co-morbidities, risk factors for PPU, presentation and pathway factors, need for organ support, biochemical parameters, prognostic tools, perforation details, and surgical history.

CONCLUSION

This study defines the core descriptive items for PPU research, which will allow more robust synthesis of studies.

P-OGC14 Global Level of Harm Upper Gastrointestinal (GLEOHUG) – a multinational gastric cancer cross- sectional appraisal

Background

Gastric cancer (GC) is the 5^th most common malignancy and remains one of the major causes of worldwide cancer-related deaths. COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the provision of cancer care. This study aims to overview the global standpoint of gastric cancer patients (GCP) during the first year of the pandemic.

Methods

The Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons (TUGS), within its Global Level of Harm Project, designed an online cross-sectional survey to assess how gastric cancer patient’s management changed during the first year of the pandemic. The questionnaire included 33 questions about expertise, kind of health system, hospital organization and screening policies, personal protective equipment (PPE), change in patient’s characteristics, preoperative, operative and postoperative management of GCP.

Results

There were 209 participants from 178 centres & 50 countries). Results showed: most hospitals (88,18%) had restricted areas for COVID-19 patients; 53.58% of surgeons were redeployed; most frequent COVID-19 screening method was PCR (78,82%) & chest CT-scan (25,62%), and 55.98% lack full PPE. Preoperative management: 43.16% noted reduction in multidisciplinary teams (MDT) meetings; 28,42% increase in cT2 or higher GCP; 34,74% increase in metastatic (M1) GCP; 26,84% increase in patients receiving definitive palliative treatment; 23,68% note increase in frail patients; 50% increase in waiting list time; and 41,58% faced problems in the provision of oncological treatment. Operative management: 54,50% decrease in elective gastrectomies; 29,10% increase in urgent/semi-urgent gastrectomies; 37,04% decrease in the number of minimally-invasive gastrectomies (MIG); & 18,52% increase in the number of palliative surgeries. Postoperative management: 16,48% increase in the overall complication rate (OCR); 12,64% increase in the number of Clavien-Dindo 3 or higher complications; 8,13% increase in the leak rate; increase in pulmonary infections (26,79%) and bowel obstruction (2,39%); 44,51% note postoperative COVID-19; 15,38% increase in 30-days mortality; 23,08% mortality due to COVID-19 infection; 17,58% increase in the need for adjuvant treatment. Most patients were postoperatively assessed either through a face-to-face consultation or a hybrid approach.

Conclusions

COVID-19 pandemic has affected gastric cancer management by decreased frequency of MDT’s, higher clinical-stage migration and fuelled frailty. The pandemic increased waiting list time, the number of urgent and palliative surgeries, OCR, Clavie-Dindo 3 or higher complications, leak rate, and pulmonary infections. There was a noticeable high rate of postoperative COVID-19 infection and associated mortality. Further multicentric studies are warranted to affirm these findings.