Cost-effectiveness analysis of tele-retinopathy of prematurity screening in Iran

AIM

To conduct a cost-utility analysis of the tele-retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening program against no screening.

METHODS

A decision tree model was developed to identify and treat the infants with threshold ROP through the tele-screening system compared with no screening program from the societal perspective. We used the quality adjusted life years (QALY) index to measure the scenarios' effectiveness, which was discounted for the future years by 0.058. One hundred twenty-six randomly selected newborns with ROP required treatment were investigated to extract the treatment information. We considered the direct medical and non-medical costs in cost calculations analysed by the bottom-up approach. The figures of the model's inputs were calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation that generated 1000 random iteration of the data, and a one-way sensitivity analysis was performed on the model to cope with the potential uncertainties.

RESULTS

The total and per capita needed the budget to establish a tele-ROP screening system were estimated at over 1.5 million and 35.13 USD, respectively. The total cost of identifying and treating an ROP case in tele-screening and no screening strategies were obtained as 108.72 and 63.52 USD, respectively, and their lifetime discounted QALY gained were calculated as 15.39 and 15.11, respectively. Therefore, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of tele-screening strategy against the competitive strategy was achieved as 161.43 USD.

CONCLUSION

Tele-ROP screening program is one of the most cost-effective interventions in the Iranian health system and has a high priority to receive a budget for implementation.

Fuchs' Uveitis in Iranian Patients: A Review of 89 Eyes

Purpose: To describe clinical and imaging features of Fuchs' Uveitis (FU) and investigate the rate of misdiagnosis in Iranian patients. Methods: Records of 82 FU patients (89 eyes) were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Remarkable findings included iris heterochromia in 14 (17.1%) patients and Fuchs' keratic precipitates in 97.8%, vitritis in 89.7% and cataract in 69.7% eyes. FU discovered as an incidental finding in 7 patients (10.0%). Imaging revealed disc hyperfluorescence, mild vascular leakage and epiretinal membrane in 72.7%, 32.5% and 19.4% of eyes, respectively. The rate of misdiagnosis was 19.5% (16 patients) with intermediate uveitis being as the most common erroneous diagnosis (10 patients). Patients with the wrong diagnosis were significantly younger (p = 0.045) and more likely to have bilateral involvement (p = 0.004) or no anterior chamber cells (p = 0.039). Conclusions: Heterochromia is an infrequent clinical feature in Iranian FU patients, however, vitreous involvement is common. Intermediate uveitis is a usual misdiagnosis.