Patients' perspectives and safety of COVID-19 vaccination among cancer patients: A prospective single-center study

e24043

Background: Concerns about safety and treatment interference are known barriers to COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients. Data on safety and tolerability in this population remain scarce. One of the objectives of this study is to describe COVID-19 vaccination safety in cancer patients. Methods: Patients diagnosed with a malignancy requiring systemic treatment in the last 12 months and undergoing COVID-19 vaccination were prospectively enrolled in this single-center study. Validated questionnaires to assess vaccine-related adverse events (VRAEs) were collected; chart review identified baseline characteristics and treatments received. Descriptive statistics and logistic regressions were performed. Results: 253 questionnaires were collected from 171 patients, enrolled between May and September 2021. 130 patients were survey-eligible after the 1st dose (D1) and 185 after 2nd dose (D2). 91 questionnaires were collected after D1 (Questionnaire 1: Q1) and 162 after D2 (Questionnaire 2: Q2). Surveys couldn’t be collected due to interval > 1 month between D1 / enrollment, patients’ unavailability, withdrawal of study or death. Median age was 55 (24-87) and 62.8% were female. 58.5% had solid tumors, treated with chemotherapy (49%) or checkpoint inhibitors only (9.5%); 19.4% malignancies were treated with targeted therapies and 22.1% had hematological malignancies. Most frequent solid tumors were breast (31.3%), lung (15.9%) and gastro-intestinal (GI) (14.3%). Patients received 45.6% Pfizer/BioNTech, 52.8% Moderna and 1.6% Oxford/AstraZeneca. A combination of 2 different vaccines was administered to 11.9%. Interval between D1 and D2 was ≤30 days in 53.1%, 31-90 days in 42.6%, and 91-180 days in 4.3%. Among all patients, 84.1% developed VRAEs after a median of 2 days post-vaccine for a median of 4 days. 74.5% had local symptoms (Sx) (pain, sensitivity and/or redness at injection site and/or arm) and 65.8% had systemic Sx. Most frequent systemic Sx were fatigue, chills or myalgia (39.4%), GI (6.3%) and fever (2.9%). Most patients (90.7%) described their Sx as having no / minimal impact (Gr 1), 7.8% reported seeking medical consultation (Gr 2), and 1.5% lead to hospitalization (Gr 3) (1 cardiovascular event, 1 infection; causality with concurrent systemic treatment not excluded and 1 due to malignancy). Gr 2, but not Gr 3, VRAEs were more common after D2 (11.4% vs 2.5%, p = 0.03). 41.7% considered their Sx as a new health problem. On multivariate analysis, younger age and female sex were significantly associated with the development of any Sx (OR 1.08, p = 0.01; OR 2.92, p = 0.02, respectively) and local Sx (OR 1.04, p = 0.04; OR 2.19, p = 0.04), but not systemic Sx or new health problem. Conclusions: Patients experienced mostly minor and transient symptoms post-vaccination; few perceived these as a new health problem. COVID-19 vaccination is overall safe and well-tolerated among cancer patients.

Association of Obesity with Breast Cancer Outcome in Relation to Cancer Subtypes: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Obesity at breast cancer (BC) diagnosis has been associated with poor outcome, although the magnitude of effect in different BC subtypes is uncertain. We report on the association of obesity or overweight at diagnosis of nonmetastatic BC with disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the following defined subtypes: hormone receptor positive/HER2 negative (HR+HER2−), HER2 positive (HER2+), and triple negative (TNBC).

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases up to January 1, 2019. Study eligibility was performed independently by 2 authors. Studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) of OS and/or DFS for obesity or overweight in BC subtypes were included. The pooled hazard ratio was computed and weighted using generic inverse variance and random effects models.

Results

Twenty-seven studies were included. Obese compared with nonobese women had worse DFS in all subtypes: the hazard ratios were 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13 to 1.41, P < .001) for HR+HER2− BC, 1.16 (95% CI = 1.06 to 1.26, P < .001) for HER2+ BC, and 1.17 (95% CI = 1.06 to 1.29, P = .001) for TNBC. OS was also worse in obese vs nonobese women (HR+HER2− BC HR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.62, P < .001; HER2+ BC HR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.33, P = .006; and TNBC HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.53, P < .001). As opposed to obesity, overweight was not associated with either DFS or OS in HER2+ BC (HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.81 to 1.28, P = .85; and HR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.21, P = .99, respectively) or TNBC (HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.18, P = .49; and HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.81 to 1.44, P = .17), respectively. In HR+HER2− BC, being overweight was associated with worse OS (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.22, P < .001).

Conclusions

Obesity was associated with modestly worse DFS and OS in all BC subtypes.

Association of obesity with breast cancer outcome in relation to cancer subtypes

11557

Background: Obesity at breast cancer (BC) diagnosis is associated with poor outcome, although the magnitude of effect in different BC subtypes is uncertain. Here we report on the association of obesity at BC diagnosis with disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the following subtypes: (i) hormone receptor (ER/PgR) +ve, HER2-ve, (ii) HER2+ve, any ER/PgR and (iii) triple negative (TN). Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE databases to December 31, 2018 and meeting presentations (past 5 years) using predefined search terms. Study eligibility, data abstraction were performed independently by two authors; those reporting hazard ratios (HR) for obesity and DFS/OS in BC subtypes were included. Using Review Manager pooled HRs were computed and weighted using generic inverse variance in fixed and random effects models (results were similar, random effects are presented). Results: Of 10,702 titles, 26 studies (108,793 patients) were included. Pooled HR for DFS for obese vs non-obese were (i) ER/PgR+ve HER2-ve 1.21 (95% Confidence interval, CI; 1.12-1.31, p < 0.00001), (ii) HER2+ve, any ER/PgR 1.16 (95%CI, 1.06-1.26; p = 0.0006) and (iii) TN, 1.13 (95%CI; 1.05-1.22 p = 0.002). Pooled HRs for OS were (i) ER/PgR+ve, HER2-ve 1.45 (95%CI; 1.30-1.62 p < 0.00001), (ii) HER2+ve any ER/PgR 1.21 (95%CI; 1.10-1.34 p = 0.0001) and (iii) TN 1.13 (95%CI, 1.04-1.23, p = 0.003).PooledHR for OS (but not DFS) were somewhat higher in observational vs interventional studies in (i) ER/PgR+ve, HER2-ve 1.57 vs 1.36, HER2+ve any ER/PgR (ii) 1.37 vs 1.09 but not (iii) TN 1.12 vs 1.22 (p = 0.21, 0.03 and 0.48, respectively). Conclusions: Obesity was associated with a worse outcome in all BC subtypes. Higher HR for OS in observational studies in (i) ER/PgR+ve, HER2- and (ii) HER2+ve any ER/PgR BC may reflect selection of healthier patients for intervention trials.

Systemic Therapy Use and Outcomes After Relapse from Preoperative Radiation and Extrapleural Pneumonectomy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Multimodality therapy with preoperative radiation (RT) followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EP) for patients with operable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has demonstrated encouraging results. At relapse, there are few data on the tolerance and efficacy of systemic therapies after prior multimodality therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with relapsed MPM after RT and EPP ± adjuvant chemotherapy to determine overall survival (OS; date of relapse to death) and the proportion of patients that received systemic therapy and associated response rate (RR). OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and potential prognostic variables were examined.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were included (2008-2016). Median OS was 4.8 months (median follow-up 4.4 months, range 0.03-34.8). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≥2, disease-free interval (DFI) <1 year, and hemoglobin ≤110 g/L at recurrence were associated with worse prognosis. Thirty-six percent of patients received any systemic therapy, whereas it was omitted in 62% because of poor PS. RR was 15% (0 complete responses, 15% partial responses) in 13 individuals with response-evaluable disease. Therapy was discontinued because of toxicity (6/15) or disease progression (5/15), and median number of cycles was four.

CONCLUSION

Patients with relapsed MPM following RT and EPP, especially those with ECOG PS ≥2, DFI <1 year, and hemoglobin ≤110 g/L at recurrence, have poor prognosis and low RR to first-line systemic therapy. Earlier detection and novel diagnostic markers of relapse as well as potential neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic therapy should be investigated in future studies.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The results of this study have reinforced the importance of careful selection of appropriate candidates for this combined-modality approach and favor prompt detection of recurrence with early and regular postoperative imaging and biopsy of suspected relapsed disease along with rapid initiation of systemic therapy even in patients with very low burden of disease. Furthermore, with the emergence of new systemic agents targeting different histological subtypes of malignant pleural mesothelioma, histological sampling of recurrence could inform therapeutic decisions in the future.

Abstract P6-12-22: Sexual health in long-term breast cancer survivors

Background Significant sexual dysfunction is reported in women with breast cancer (BC) in the years following diagnosis. It is unclear whether symptoms persist over time in BC survivors (BCS) as long-term data compared to healthy controls is lacking. We compared sexual functioning in long-term BCS to controls and explored the impact of adjuvant therapy on sexual health. Methods A cohort of women with localized BC recruited from 1989 to 1996 was prospectively followed as previously described. BCS without recurrence and controls without BC were contacted between 2005 and 2007 and answered self-reported quality of life questionnaires. Sexual health was measured with the Sexual Activity Questionnaire (SAQ). Vasomotor, gynecological and bladder symptoms were scored using the Menopausal Symptom Scale (scale ranges 0-4) based on the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial Symptom Checklist. Regression analysis was used to compare groups, with and without adjustment for age (quadratic) and menopausal status. P values &lt;0.05 were considered significant. Results 248 of 285 BCS and 159 of 167 controls completed the SAQ. The median time from diagnosis of BCS was 12.5 years. BCS were slightly older (61.9 vs 59.1 years, p=0.0004) and somewhat more likely to be post-menopausal (94.4 vs 85.5%, p=0.0025) than controls. Overall, fewer BCS were sexually active than controls (45.2 vs 59.7%, p=0.0041). This difference was no longer significant when adjusted for age and menopausal status (odds ratio 0.68, p=0.075). In those sexually active, no significant differences were noted on the SAQ Pleasure and Discomfort scales.Differences in adjuvant treatment were not significantly associated with being sexually active or the SAQ subscales. BCS scored higher (worse) on the gynecological and bladder symptom scale than controls (0.66 vs 0.43, p=0.0036, adjusted difference 0.24, p=0.0029; 0.60 vs 0.41, p=0.02, adjusted difference 0.18, p=0.029 respectively), but no difference was seen in vasomotor scores. Gynecological symptom scores were greatest in BCS who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion Despite more frequent long-term gynecological and bladder symptoms, sexual health is similar in BCS and controls. Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with persistent gynecological symptoms and interventions aimed at improving these could improve quality of life.

Citation Format: Soldera SV, Ennis M, Lohmann AE, Goodwin PJ. Sexual health in long-term breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-22.

Systemic therapy use and outcomes after relapse from accelerated hemithoracic radiation and surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM)

8559

Background: The prognosis of patients (pts) with MPM remains poor. Accelerated hemithoracic radiation followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy in ypN2 disease (SMART) provides encouraging results. The ability to administer systemic therapy (Tx) and response rate (RR) after recurrence remains unclear. We therefore examined subsequent lines of Tx and outcomes following relapse after SMART. Methods: A retrospective analysis of pts diagnosed with recurrent MPM following SMART was conducted at a single institution. OS was determined from date of relapse to death and was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Potential prognostic variables were tested utilizing the log-rank test. Results: Out of 86 pts undergoing SMART from 2008 to 2016, 53 (62%) developed recurrent disease of which 36% had pathological confirmation. Two cases with initial epithelial subtype on surgical specimen relapsed with different histology (sarcomatoid and small cell). In 48% of pts, relapse was unclear at first imaging (n = 42) and a median of 98 days (range 6-966) lapsed between first suspicion and final diagnosis. The median age at relapse was 66 years (range 45-79), 47% had a performance status (PS) ≥2 (n = 45) and 64% were of epithelial subtype. After a median follow up of 7.6 mo, the median OS was 5.2 mo. PS ≥2 was associated with worse OS (2.8 vs 10.7 mo, p < 0.001). Of 42 pts followed after relapse, 36% received any Tx (19% 1 line; 12% 2 lines; 5% ≥3 lines). Tx was omitted in 62% of pts due to poor PS (26/42). First line Tx consisted of platinum doublet in 93% of pts (n = 15). Of 13 pts with response evaluable disease, RR was 15% (0 CR, 15% PR). Of note, 0/13 pts had neoadjuvant Tx and 3/13 pts had adjuvant Tx (10, 13 and 38 mo lapsed between end of adjuvant Tx and start of Tx in the relapsed setting). 6/15 pts discontinued Tx due to toxicity, 5/15 due to progression and median number of cycles was 4. Conclusions: Pts with relapsed MPM following SMART have poor prognosis and low RR to first line Tx. Poor performance status at relapse is a poor prognostic factor. Earlier detection, novel diagnostic markers of relapse and consideration of maintenance strategies should be investigated in future studies.