Co-created Mobile Apps for Palliative Care Using Community-Partnered Participatory Research: Development and Usability Study

Background

Open design formats for mobile apps help clinicians and stakeholders bring their needs to direct, co-creative solutions. Palliative care for patients with advanced cancers requires intensive monitoring and support and remains an area in high need for innovation.

Objective

This study aims to use community-partnered participatory research to co-design and pretest a mobile app that focuses on palliative care priorities of clinicians and patients with advanced cancer.

Methods

In-person and teleconference workshops were held with patient and family stakeholders, researchers, and clinicians in palliative care and oncology. Question prompts, written feedback, semistructured interviews, and facilitated group discussions identified the core palliative care needs. Using Chorus, a no-code app-building platform, a mobile app was co-designed with the stakeholders. A pretest with 11 patients was conducted, with semistructured interviews of clinician and patient users for feedback.

Results

Key themes identified from the focus groups included needs for patient advocacy and encouragement, access to vetted information, patient-clinician communication support, and symptom management. The initial prototype, My Wellness App, contained a weekly wellness journal to track patient-reported symptoms, goals, and medication use; information on self-management of symptoms; community resources; and patient and caregiver testimonial videos. Initial pretesting identified value in app-based communication for clinicians, patients, and caregivers, with suggestions for improving user interface, feedback and presentation of symptom reports, and gamification and staff coordinators to support patient app engagement.

Conclusions

The development of a mobile app using community-partnered participatory research is a low-technology and feasible intervention for palliative care. Iterative redesign and user interface expertise may improve implementation.

Use of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale in patients with advanced cancer referred to an embedded palliative care clinician

96

Background: Physical and emotional symptoms are highly prevalent in patients with advanced cancers and contribute to overall distress level and decreased self-reported quality of life. Oncology organizations and accrediting bodies now routinely recommend universal distress screening among patients with advanced cancers. Palliative and supportive care clinicians play an important role in implementing symptom and distress screening in cancer centers. Methods: As part of an embedded palliative care nurse practitioner (PC-NP) intervention within a large ambulatory oncology clinic, patients with advanced breast, GU, GI and lung cancer were screened for physical and emotional symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and treated appropriately including referral to psychology-based supportive care clinic for moderate to severe anxiety and depression or clinician-identified need. We used pre-test post-test methods to see if symptoms improved after enrollment in an embedded palliative oncology program. Results: Sixty-eight patients were screened at initial visit and 41 had follow-up screening during the first 13 months of the program with a part-time PC-NP. Only the 41 patients who had both an initial and a follow-up visit were included in the analysis. Patients were assessed using the ESAS at initial visit and at a follow-up visit an average of 5.9 weeks later (RANGE 1.0-30.6), and significant reductions were found in self-reported pain (4.0 v. 3.0), shortness of breath (3.0 v. 2.1), lack of appetite (2.8 v. 2.1), and overall well-being (4.7 v 3.8) (p < 0.05). Emotional symptoms (anxiety and depression) also decreased but were not statistically significant. Aggregate scores (emotional symptoms plus physical symptoms plus well-being) demonstrated a 6 point reduction in severity (26.2 baseline to 20.3 at follow-up, p = 0.17). Conclusions: These findings are suggestive of improvement in cancer-related symptoms and distress after enrollment in an embedded palliative oncology program. More rigorous study designs are needed to better understand the impact of the intervention on symptom management.

Evaluation of the efficiency of an embedded palliative nurse practitioner in an oncology clinic

146

Background: We embedded a palliative nurse practitioner in 2 oncologists’ clinics in March 2014 using a reproducible training program. After one year, patients with advanced cancer receiving care in the embedded model clinics, compared to other oncologists’ clinics, were more likely to have advance care planning performed and to die receiving hospice. In order to expand the intervention to other oncologists, we evaluated the efficiency in our model of care delivery. Methods: We reviewed overall caseload and a subset of patient encounters in depth to understand how much of the NP's practice could be conducted by other staff to inform alternate clinical models of palliative care delivery in an oncology clinic. Overall time spent and time spent per task (Symptom Assessment Basic (SAB), Symptom Assessment Medical (SAM), Symptom Assessment Psychosocial (SAP), Communication Basic (CB), Communication Complex (CC)) was recorded for 16 patient encounters. We also completed 3 days of time motion study in which a trained observer tracked the NP's daily activities from minute to minute. Results: After part-time clinical participation over the first year of the program, the NP had seen 68 initial consults and 141 follow-up consults, which were potentially billable. She also had 120 encounters where she met a patient with an oncologist and 158 email or phone encounters that were not billable. Mean duration of a visit was 56 minutes (range 40-70 minutes) and about half of this time was spent on symptom assessment and communication topics requiring an MD or NP (SAM and CC), whereas half of the time was spent on topics that potentially could be covered by an RN (SAB or CB) or an MSW (SAB, SAP, CB). Time motion study revealed that a significant amount of time was spent with email correspondence and talking with other providers for care coordination. Conclusions: Palliative care is time consuming and much of the work is not reimbursed by a traditional fee for service model. Approximately half of the time spent by the NP in our embedded program potentially could have been completed by an RN or other interdisciplinary staff with training in palliative care under supervision of a physician. We plan to add an RN case management component to our model of care delivery.

Recognizing hospital-acquired disability among older adults

Approximately one third of hospitalized older adults develop a new disability by discharge, which places them at risk for readmission, institutionalization, and death. Various risk factors, both modifiable and nonmodifiable, coalesce in the acute care setting. As frontline health care providers, nurses are crucial to the process of altering modifiable risk factors by assessing patients’ risk for functional decline during hospitalization using a standardized instrument and treating risk with evidence-based interventions. Barriers to meeting this goal must be overcome, such as a lack of evidence to recommend use of one functional assessment tool over another, as well as the paucity of evidence-based interventions. Other obstacles such as the tacit acceptance of functional decline by health care providers and a lack of resources for mobilizing older adults contribute to the ongoing problem. Nurses are encouraged to develop new innovations to prevent the widespread and frequently untreated problem of hospital-acquired disability.

Mentoring new social work faculty:a gerontological perspective

The John A. Hartford Foundation, in collaboration with the Gerontological Society of America, has developed new models to create geriatric faculty capacity within social work. The Faculty Scholars Program is building faculty leadership in academic geriatric social work through a strategic approach that includes long-distance national and institution- based mentoring. While mentoring models have proven to be effective means of career development, this is relatively new in academic social work and little is known about the impact of long-distance mentoring in association with sponsorship from a mentor at the scholar's home institution. This paper describes the mentoring model and its conceptual underpinnings. Evaluation data from an ongoing evaluation is presented in discussion of the strengths and limitations of the mentoring model.