Correction: Telehealth Education in Allied Health Care and Nursing: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey of Students' Perceived Knowledge, Skills, Attitudes, and Experience

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/51112.].

Telehealth Education in Allied Health Care and Nursing: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey of Students' Perceived Knowledge, Skills, Attitudes, and Experience

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the growing relevance of telehealth in health care. Assessing health care and nursing students' telehealth competencies is crucial for its successful integration into education and practice.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess students' perceived telehealth knowledge, skills, attitudes, and experiences. In addition, we aimed to examine students' preferences for telehealth content and teaching methods within their curricula.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional web-based study in May 2022. A project-specific questionnaire, developed and refined through iterative feedback and face-validity testing, addressed topics such as demographics, personal perceptions, and professional experience with telehealth and solicited input on potential telehealth course content. Statistical analyses were conducted on surveys with at least a 50% completion rate, including descriptive statistics of categorical variables, graphical representation of results, and Kruskal Wallis tests for central tendencies in subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 261 students from 7 bachelor's and 4 master's health care and nursing programs participated in the study. Most students expressed interest in telehealth (180/261, 69% very or rather interested) and recognized its importance in their education (215/261, 82.4% very or rather important). However, most participants reported limited knowledge of telehealth applications concerning their profession (only 7/261, 2.7% stated profound knowledge) and limited active telehealth experience with various telehealth applications (between 18/261, 6.9% and 63/261, 24.1%). Statistically significant differences were found between study programs regarding telehealth interest (P=.005), knowledge (P<.001), perceived importance in education (P<.001), and perceived relevance after the pandemic (P=.004). Practical training with devices, software, and apps and telehealth case examples with various patient groups were perceived as most important for integration in future curricula. Most students preferred both interdisciplinary and program-specific courses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes the need to integrate telehealth into health care education curricula, as students state positive telehealth attitudes but seem to be not adequately prepared for its implementation. To optimally prepare future health professionals for the increasing role of telehealth in practice, the results of this study can be considered when designing telehealth curricula.

Best Practice Guide for Reducing Barriers to Video Call-Based Telehealth: Modified Delphi Study Among Health Care Professionals

BACKGROUND

Telehealth has grown, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, improving access for those in remote or underserved areas. However, its implementation faces technological, practical, and interpersonal barriers.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify and consolidate best practices for telehealth delivery, specifically for video call sessions, by synthesizing the insights of health care professionals across various disciplines.

METHODS

We first identified 15 common telehealth barriers from a preceding scoping review. Subsequently, a modified Delphi method was used, involving 9 health care professionals (physiotherapists, speech and language therapists, dietitians, and midwife) with telehealth experience in qualitative interviews and 2 iterative rounds of web-based surveys to form consensus.

RESULTS

This study addressed 15 telehealth barriers and identified 105 best practices. Among these, 20 are technology-related and 85 concern health care practices. Emphasis was placed on setting up telehealth environments, ensuring safety, building relationships and trust, using nonmanual methods, and enhancing observation and assessment skills. Best practice recommendations for dealing with patients or caregiver skepticism or lack of telehealth-specific knowledge were developed. Further, approaches for unstable networks and privacy and IT security issues were identified. Areas with fewer best practices were the lack of technology skills or technology access, unreliability of hardware and software, increased workload, and a lack of caregiver support.

CONCLUSIONS

This guide of best practices serves as an actionable resource for health care providers to navigate the complexities of telehealth. Despite a small participant sample and the potential for profession-specific biases, the findings provide a foundation for improving telehealth services and inform future research for its application and education.