Effects of folic acid supplementation on C-reactive protein: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Given the contradictory results of previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify and summarize the effects of folic acid supplementation on C-reactive protein (CRP).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a systematic search of all available RCTs conducted up to October 2018 in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane. RCTs that investigated the effect of folate on CRP were included in the present study. Data were combined with the use of generic inverse-variance random-effects models. Statistical heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using Cochran's Q-test. Ten RCTs (1179 subjects) were included in the present meta-analysis. Pooled analysis results showed that folate supplementation significantly lowered the serum CRP level (weighted mean difference (WMD): -0.685 mg/l, 95% CI: -1.053, -0.318, p < 0.001). However, heterogeneity was significant (I² = 96.7%, p = 0.000). Stratified analyses indicated that sex, intervention period, and type of study population were sources of heterogeneity. Following analysis, results revealed that the greatest impact was observed in women (WMD: -0.967 mg/l, 95% CI: -1.101, -0.833, p = 0.000), patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (WMD: -1.764 mg/l, 95% CI: -2.002, -1.526, p = 0.000), and intervention period less than 12 weeks (WMD: -0.742 mg/l, 95% CI: -0.834, -0.650, p = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggested that folic acid supplementation could significantly lower the serum CRP level. Folic acid leads to greater CRP lowering effect in women, patients with T2DM, and those with less than 12-week intervention.

Multicenter study of some liver and heart function tests in SARS-Cov-2 patients from three ethnic groups in Iran

The liver and cardiovascular system disorders are not common in COVID-19 patients, but the patients suffering from these complications are exposed to a higher rate of mortality and disease progression. Hepatic injuries can drive to increased levels of liver enzymes, including ALT, AST, and LDH. Abundant levels of AST, LDH, and CPK can be indicators of cardiac injuries. The current study comparise 366 individuals who are divided into COVID-19 patients and healthy individuals groups, in which we have examined hepatic and cardiac function parameters. Moreover, the clinical characteristics of the participants, ethnicities, and their difference with studied parameters were assessed. The results showed Fars individuals are more susceptible to the disease progression, including liver and heart damage. COVID-19 infection is associated with aging, which indicates that the mean age of the case group is ten years older than the control group (P < 0.001). The blood sugar in the case group (140.50) was higher than in the control group (131.66), although there was no difference between the infection and BS (P = 0.505). Similarly, the increased- mean of the ALT level in the case group (102.369) compared with the control group (68.324) resulted in no significant difference (P = 0.318). Other parameters, including CPK, LDH, and AST showed an increase in the control group values compared to the case group; however, the differences were not significant (P = 0.264, P = 0.795, P = 0.417). Considering the involvement of cardiac and hepatic organs by SARS-CoV-2, paying particular attention to the disorders of these organs through assessing the hepatic and cardiac function parameters can enhance the patient's recovery and survival. However, in this study, we not observed significant differences, except for the Fars people. There is need for further assessment of this issue.