The effect of coffee consumption on insulin sensitivity and other biological risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In observational studies, coffee consumption has been consistently associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Trials examining the effect of coffee consumption on glucose metabolism have been limited by the use of surrogate insulin sensitivity indices, small sample sizes, lack of blinding, and short follow-up duration.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to overcome limitations of previously conducted coffee trials in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of the effect of coffee consumption on insulin sensitivity.

METHODS

We conducted a 24-wk randomized placebo-controlled trial in 126 overweight, non-insulin sensitive (HOMA-IR ≥1.30), Chinese, Malay, and Asian-Indian males and females aged 35-69 y. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 4 cups of instant regular coffee (n = 62) or 4 cups of a coffee-like placebo beverage (n = 64) per day. The primary outcome was the amount of glucose metabolized per kilogram of body weight per minute (Mbw) assessed during steady-state conditions with a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. Secondary outcomes included other clamp-based insulin sensitivity measures, biological mediators of insulin sensitivity, and measures of fasting glucose metabolism.

RESULTS

Coffee consumption did not significantly change insulin sensitivity compared with placebo (percentage mean difference in Mbw = 4.0%; 95% CI: -8.3, 18.0%; P = 0.53). Furthermore, no significant differences in fasting plasma glucose (2.9%; 95% CI: -0.4, 6.3%; P = 0.09) or biological mediators of insulin resistance, such as plasma adiponectin (2.3%; 95% CI: -1.4, 6.2%; P = 0.22), were observed between coffee and placebo groups over 24 wk of intervention. Participants in the coffee arm experienced a loss of fat mass (FM) (-3.7%; 95% CI: -6.3, -1.1%; P = 0.006) and reduction in urinary creatinine concentrations (-21.2%; 95% CI: -31.4, -9.5%; P = 0.001) compared with participants in the placebo arm over 24 wk of intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Consuming 4 cups/d of caffeinated coffee for 24 wk had no significant effect on insulin sensitivity or biological mediators of insulin resistance but was associated with a modest loss of FM and reduction in urinary creatinine concentrations.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01738399. Registered on November 28, 2012. Trial sponsor: Nestlé Research, Lausanne, Switzerland. Trial site: National University of Singapore.

Protein Intake at Breakfast Promotes a Positive Whole-Body Protein Balance in a Dose-Response Manner in Healthy Children: A Randomized Trial

Background

Protein ingestion promotes whole-body net protein balance (NB) in children, which is a prerequisite for growth. Determining how much protein is required at breakfast to promote a positive NB, which may be negative after the traditional overnight fast in children, has yet to be determined.

Objective

We determined the impact of incremental doses of milk protein at breakfast as well as the impact of daily dietary protein distribution on NB in children.

Methods

A total of 28 children [14 boys, 14 girls; age range: 7-11 y; body mass index (mean ± SD, in kg/m2): 16.0 ± 1.9] completed 2 intervention trials. During the breakfast meal, participants consumed an isoenergetic beverage with different amounts of protein (0, 7, 14, or 21 g for Groups A-D, respectively) and [15N]-glycine to measure whole body protein metabolism. Whole-body nitrogen turnover, protein synthesis (PS), protein breakdown, and NB were measured over 9 and 24 h.

Results

Following an overnight fast, children were in negative NB (-64.5 mg · kg-1 · h-1). Protein ingestion at breakfast induced a stepwise increase in NB over 9 h [Groups A (6.2 mg · kg-1 · h-1) < B (27.9 mg · kg-1 · h-1) < C (46.9 mg · kg-1 · h-1) < D (66.0 mg · kg-1 · h-1)] with all conditions different from each other (all P < 0.01). PS was 42% greater in Group D than in Group A over 9 h (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Consuming ≥7 g of the total daily protein intake at breakfast attenuates the observed overnight protein losses in children during the subsequent 9 h following breakfast consumption. The dose-dependent increase in NB over a daytime fed period, inclusive of breakfast and lunch, highlights the importance of breakfast protein intake on acute anabolism in healthy active children. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02465151.

Early Benefits of a Starter Formula Enriched in Prebiotics and Probiotics on the Gut Microbiota of Healthy Infants Born to HIV+ Mothers: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial

The gut microbiota of infants is shaped by both the mode of delivery and the type of feeding. The gut of vaginally and cesarean-delivered infants is colonized at different rates and with different bacterial species, leading to differences in the gut microbial composition, which may persist up to 6 months. In a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial conducted in South Africa, we tested the effect of a formula supplemented with a prebiotic (a mixture of bovine milk-derived oligosaccharides [BMOS] generated from whey permeate and containing galactooligosaccharides and milk oligosaccharides such as 3′- and 6′-sialyllactose) and the probiotic Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (B. lactis) strain CNCM I-3446 on the bifidobacteria levels in the gut of infants born vaginally or via cesarean section in early life. Additionally, the safety of the new formulation was evaluated. A total of 430 healthy, full-term infants born to HIV-positive mothers who had elected to feed their child beginning from birth (≤3 days old) exclusively with formula were randomized into this multicenter trial of four parallel groups. A total of 421 infants who had any study formula intake were included in the full analysis set (FAS). The first two groups consisted of cesarean-delivered infants assigned to the Test formula (n = 92) (a starter infant formula [IF] containing BMOS at a total oligosaccharide concentration of 5.8 ± 1.0 g/100 g of powder formula [8 g/L in the reconstituted formula] + B. lactis [1 × 10⁷ colony-forming units {cfu}/g]) or a Control IF (n = 101); the second two groups consisted of vaginally delivered infants randomized to the same Test (n = 115) or Control (n = 113) formulas from the time of enrollment to 6 months. The primary efficacy outcome was fecal bifidobacteria count at 10 days, and the primary safety outcome was daily weight gain (g/d) between 10 days and 4 months. At 10 days, fecal bifidobacteria counts were significantly higher in the Test formula than in the Control formula group among infants with cesarean birth (median [range] log: 9.41 [6.30–10.94] cfu/g versus 6.30 [6.30–10.51] cfu/g; P = 0.002) but not among those with vaginal birth (median [range] log: 10.06 [5.93–10.77] cfu/g versus 9.85 [6.15–10.79] cfu/g; P = 0.126). The lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval of the difference in the mean daily weight gain between the Test and Control formula groups was more than –3 g/d in both the vaginally and cesarean-delivered infants, indicating that growth in the Test formula-fed infants was not inferior to that of Control formula-fed infants. At 10 days and 4 weeks, the fecal pH of infants fed the Test formula was significantly lower than in those fed the Control formula, irrespective of mode of delivery: for vaginal delivery: 4.93 versus 5.59; P < 0.001 (10 days) and 5.01 versus 5.71; P < 0.001 (4 weeks); for cesarean delivery: 5.14 versus 5.65, P = 0.009 (10 days) and 5.06 versus 5.75, P < 0.001 (4 weeks). At 3 months, this acidification effect only persisted among cesarean-born infants. IF supplemented with the prebiotic BMOS and probiotic B. lactis induced a strong bifidogenic effect in both delivering modes, but more explicitly correcting the low bifidobacteria level found in cesarean-born infants from birth. The supplemented IF lowered the fecal pH and improved the fecal microbiota in both normal and cesarean-delivered infants. The use of bifidobacteria as a probiotic even in infants who are immunologically at risk is safe and well tolerated.

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of the effect of coffee consumption on insulin sensitivity: Design and baseline characteristics of the Coffee for METabolic Health (COMETH) study

BACKGROUND

Coffee consumption has been consistently associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in cohort studies. In addition, coffee components increased insulin sensitivity in animal models. However, data from intervention studies on the effect of coffee consumption on glucose metabolism have been limited by small sample sizes, lack of blinding, short follow-up duration and the use of surrogate indices of insulin sensitivity. We designed the Coffee for Metabolic Health (COMETH) study to evaluate the effect of coffee consumption on insulin sensitivity.

METHODOLOGY

The COMETH study is a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled 24-week trial. Participants were overweight, male and female habitual coffee consumers who were of Chinese, Malay and Asian-Indian ethnicity. We excluded smokers, persons with diabetes, and persons with low insulin resistance (HOMA-IR < 1.30). Participants were randomly assigned to receive daily 4 cups of instant regular coffee or 4 cups of a coffee-like placebo beverage. The hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp was performed at baseline and at the end of 24 weeks to determine changes in the bodyweight standardized M-value. Secondary outcomes included changes in fasting glucose and insulin sensitivity mediators such as adiponectin, markers of inflammation, liver function, and oxidative stress.We enrolled 128 participants, 126 (57.1% males; aged 35-67 years) of whom completed baseline assessments.

DISCUSSION

If improvement in insulin sensitivity in the coffee group is significantly greater than that of the placebo group, this would support the hypothesis that coffee consumption reduced risk of type 2 diabetes through biological pathways involving insulin sensitivity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01738399. Registered on 28 November 2012. Trial Sponsor: Nestlé Research Center, Lausanne, Switzerland. Trial Site: National University of Singapore.

Protein choices targeting thermogenesis and metabolism

BACKGROUND

Dietary proteins stimulate thermogenesis and satiety more than does carbohydrate or fat; however, less is known about the differences between protein sources.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to determine the differential effects of 3 proteins on energy metabolism, satiety, and glucose control.

DESIGN

Energy metabolism, satiety, and glucose control were measured in 23 lean, healthy subjects on separate occasions, before and 5.5 h after consumption of 4 isocaloric test meals in a randomized, double-blind, crossover design. Three meals consisting of 50% protein (whey, casein, or soy), 40% carbohydrate, and 10% fat and a fourth meal consisting of 95.5% carbohydrate were compared with a glucose meal that provided the same glucose load as the protein meals.

RESULTS

The thermic effect was greater after the whey (14.4 ± 0.5%) than after the casein (12.0 ± 0.6%; P = 0.002) and soy (11.6 ± 0.5%; P = 0.0001) meals and was greater after the whey, casein, and soy meals than after the high-carbohydrate meal (6.6 ± 0.5%; P < 0.0001). Cumulative fat oxidation tended to be greater after the whey meal (16.2 ± 1.1 g) than after the soy meal (13.7 ± 1.0 g; P = 0.097) and was greater after the whey and soy meals than after the high-carbohydrate meal (10.9 ± 0.9 g; P < 0.05). The glycemic response to glucose was attenuated 32% by the proteins (P < 0.001) at the expense of a greater insulin response after whey than after glucose (154%; P = 0.02), casein (143%; P = 0.07), and soy (151%; P = 0.03). Subjective appetite sensations indicated that casein and soy were more satiating than whey (P < 0.01), but whey was more "liked" compared with casein and soy (P = 0.025 and P = 0.09, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that different protein sources could be used to modulate metabolism and subsequently energy balance.

Oral pimecrolimus in the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis: a double-blind, multicentre, randomized, dose-finding trial

BACKGROUND

There is a need for safe and effective alternative treatments for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

OBJECTIVES

Pimecrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor that is being investigated in oral form for the treatment of psoriasis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, dose-finding study was performed. Healthy adult outpatients with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis (n = 143) were randomized to receive oral placebo or pimecrolimus 10 mg, 20 mg or 30 mg twice daily (b.d.) for 12 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was used to assess clinical severity of psoriasis. Results were analysed at weeks 7 (primary endpoint) and 13. Safety was assessed by monitoring all adverse events, laboratory investigations (blood chemistry, urinalysis, haematology) and physical examinations.

RESULTS

The change from baseline in PASI at week 7 showed a dose-dependent effect. The differences between each of the two higher doses of pimecrolimus and placebo were statistically significant (P < 0.001; ANOVA). The mean percentage decreases from baseline in PASI in the placebo group and pimecrolimus 10 mg, 20 mg and 30 mg b.d. groups at week 7 were 3.1%, 22.2%, 51.3% and 54.0%, respectively. Most adverse events were of mild or moderate severity. The only adverse event to show a dose-response relationship was a transient feeling of warmth. No clinically relevant effects on laboratory parameters were observed, and no increase in skin infection with pimecrolimus was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral pimecrolimus produces a dose-dependent reduction in psoriasis severity, with doses of 20 mg and 30 mg b.d. being the most effective and well tolerated.

Efficacy and tolerability of three different doses of oral pimecrolimus in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Adult atopic dermatitis (AD) can seriously affect quality of life of patients and their families, and patients' disease is frequently not satisfactorily controlled with topical therapy. There is a need for alternatives to topical treatment in patients with moderate to severe AD.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of oral pimecrolimus, and to determine the response to three different doses in the treatment of AD.

METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-finding study, patients with moderate to severe AD were randomized to receive either placebo, or oral pimecrolimus 10, 20 or 30 mg twice daily. The study consisted of a pretreatment phase, a 12-week double-blind treatment phase, and a 12-week post-treatment phase.

RESULTS

In total, 103 patients were randomized. A clear, dose-dependent therapeutic effect of pimecrolimus treatment was observed, with a statistically significant onset of efficacy at week 2 and the greatest reduction from baseline of the Eczema Area and Severity Index of 66.6% at week 7 in the 30 mg twice daily dose group. Oral pimecrolimus was well tolerated and there were no signs of nephrotoxicity or the induction of hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate the clinically relevant efficacy and short-term safety of oral pimecrolimus in adults with moderate to severe AD. Longer-term studies in larger cohorts are now required.

Oral pimecrolimus in the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis: a double-blind, multicentre, randomized, dose-finding trial

BACKGROUND

There is a need for safe and effective alternative treatments for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

OBJECTIVES

Pimecrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor that is being investigated in oral form for the treatment of psoriasis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, dose-finding study was performed. Healthy adult outpatients with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis (n = 143) were randomized to receive oral placebo or pimecrolimus 10 mg, 20 mg or 30 mg twice daily (b.d.) for 12 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was used to assess clinical severity of psoriasis. Results were analysed at weeks 7 (primary endpoint) and 13. Safety was assessed by monitoring all adverse events, laboratory investigations (blood chemistry, urinalysis, haematology) and physical examinations.

RESULTS

The change from baseline in PASI at week 7 showed a dose-dependent effect. The differences between each of the two higher doses of pimecrolimus and placebo were statistically significant (P < 0.001; ANOVA). The mean percentage decreases from baseline in PASI in the placebo group and pimecrolimus 10 mg, 20 mg and 30 mg b.d. groups at week 7 were 3.1%, 22.2%, 51.3% and 54.0%, respectively. Most adverse events were of mild or moderate severity. The only adverse event to show a dose-response relationship was a transient feeling of warmth. No clinically relevant effects on laboratory parameters were observed, and no increase in skin infection with pimecrolimus was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral pimecrolimus produces a dose-dependent reduction in psoriasis severity, with doses of 20 mg and 30 mg b.d. being the most effective and well tolerated.

Comparative evaluation of the efficacy and safety of two doses of terbinafine (500 and 1000 mg day-1) in the treatment of cutaneous or lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis. Vergleichende Bewertung der Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit zweier Terbinafin-Dosierungen (500 und 1000 mg/Tag) in der Therapie der kutanen und lymphokutanen Sporotrichose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral terbinafine (500 and 1000 mg day(-1)) in the treatment of cutaneous or lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis. A culture for Sporothrix schenckii was required for inclusion into this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients received either 250 mg b.i.d. or 500 mg b.i.d. oral terbinafine for up to a maximum of 24 weeks and were assessed up to 24 weeks post-treatment. The main efficacy outcome measure was cure, defined as no lesion and absence of adenopathy at the end of follow-up. Adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, vital signs and ophthalmological examinations were also assessed. Sixty-three patients (14-85 years of age) were treated with 500 mg day(-1) (n = 28) or 1000 mg day(-1) terbinafine (n = 35). The majority of patients were cured after 12-24 weeks of treatment, and the response was dose-dependent throughout the study and at the end of follow-up. The cure rate was significantly higher in patients treated with 1000 mg day(-1) terbinafine compared with those treated with 500 mg day(-1) terbinafine (87% vs. 52%, respectively; P = 0.004). There were no cases of relapse after 24 weeks of follow-up in the 1000 mg day(-1) terbinafine group, compared with six relapses in the terbinafine 500 mg day(-1) group. Terbinafine was well tolerated and the frequency of drug-related AEs was slightly higher in the 1000 mg treatment group. Both doses of terbinafine were well-tolerated and effective for the treatment of sporotrichosis. The 1000 mg day(-1) terbinafine dose was more efficacious than 500 mg day(-1) in the treatment of cutaneous or lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis.