Advances in management of primary myelofibrosis and polycythaemia vera: Implications in clinical practice

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and polycythaemia vera (PV) are rare BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, associated with an increased risk of thrombosis, haemorrhagic complications and progression to fibrosis or leukaemia or fibrosis for PV. Both diseases are characterised by biological and clinical heterogeneity, leading to great variability in their management in routine clinical practice. In this review, we present an updated overview of the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of PMF and PV, and we discuss how our multidisciplinary expert group based across France translates this evidence-based knowledge into routine clinical practice.

First-line second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with newly diagnosed accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia

Accelerated phase (AP) CML at onset and have poorer prognosis than CP-CML. We hypothesize that off-license use of second generation TKI (TKI2) as front-line therapy might counterbalance this poor prognosis, with limited toxicity. In "real-life" conditions, newly diagnosed patients meeting the ELN cytological criteria for AP-CML or harboring ACA and treated with first-line TKI2 were included in this retrospective multicenter observational study. We enrolled 69 patients [69.5 % male, median age 49.5 years, median follow-up 43.5 months], segregated into hematologic AP [HEM-AP (n = 32)] and cytogenetically defined AP [ACA-AP (n = 37)]. Hematologic parameters were worse in HEM-AP [spleen size (p = 0.014), PB basophils (p < .001), PB blasts (p < .001), PB blasts+promyelocytes (p < .001), low hemoglobin levels (p < .001)]. Dasatinib was initiated in 56 % patients in HEM-AP and in 27 % in ACA-AP, nilotinib in 44 % and 73 % respectively. Response and survival do not differ, regardless of the TKI2: 81 % vs 84.3 % patients achieved CHR, 88 % vs 84 % CCyR, 73 % vs 75 % MMR respectively. The estimated 5-year PFS 91.5 % (95%CI: 84.51-99.06 %) and 5-year OS 96.84 % (95%CI: 92.61-100 %). Only BM blasts (p < 0.001) and BM blasts+promyelocytes (p < 0.001) at diagnosis negatively influenced OS. TKI2 as front-line therapy in newly diagnosed AP-CML induce excellent responses and survival, and counterbalance the negative impact of advanced disease phase.

A randomised phase II study of azacitidine (AZA) alone or with Lenalidomide (LEN), Valproic acid (VPA) or Idarubicin (IDA) in higher-Risk MDS or low blast AML: GFM's "pick a winner" trial, with the impact of somatic mutations

In order to improve the outcome observed with azacitidine (AZA) in higher-risk Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), its combination with other drugs in MDS must be evaluated. So far, no combination has not been shown to be more effective than AZA alone. AZA-PLUS was a phase II trial that, in a "pick a winner" approach, randomly assigned patients with higher-risk MDS, CMML and low blast count AML to: AZA; AZA plus lenalidomide; AZA plus Valproic Acid or AZA plus Idarubicin. 322 patients were included. After six cycles, 69 (21.4%) CR + PR were observed with no benefit from any combination. Median EFS and OS were 17.2 and 19.7 months in the whole cohort, respectively, with no difference across randomised arms. Infection and rates of hospitalisation during the first six cycles were higher in the AZA-LEN And AZA-IDA arm, related to increased myelosuppression. Factors associated with better response were IPSS, favourable or intermediate karyotype, haemoglobin, lower circulating blast count, fibrinogen level and lower LDH, while poorer survival was seen in therapy-related MDS and, in the case of TP53, PTPN11 or CSF3R mutation. The combinations used did not improve the outcome obtained with AZA alone. However, our "pick a winner" randomised strategy may remain useful with potentially more active drugs to be tested in combination with AZA.

New Data on the Epidemiology of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to illustrate the epidemiological situation of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) by focusing on the changes published after 2019 and particularly the new approaches of cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Article search was performed from January 2019 to date using the PubMed database. Fourteen articles were included in the qualitative evaluation of international data. Moreover, the latest reports regarding the total number of BIA-ALCL cases and number of deaths were identified.

RESULTS

Estimates of the risk and incidence have increased significantly recently, affecting 1 in every 2,969 women with breast implants and 1 in 355 patients with textured implants after breast reconstruction. The average exposure time to diagnosis was 8 (range: 0-34) years. Approximately 80% of BIA-ALCL cases were diagnosed at IA-IIA stages, for which the treatment was breast implant removal, full capsulectomy, and excision of all suspected lymph nodes. Globally, at least 949 cases were reported to date.

CONCLUSION

At present, BIA-ALCL is an emerging pathology of interest. Data collection initiated since 2016 through different case registration databases is essential to ensure surveillance and to continue to increase the number of studies on this recently discovered pathology.

Ponatinib evaluation and safety in real-life chronic myelogenous leukemia patients failing more than two tyrosine kinase inhibitors: the PEARL observational study

Ponatinib represents a remarkable progress in the treatment of heavily pretreated chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and de novo Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL patients despite significant toxicity in clinical trials. To date, "real-life" data remain few and the use of ponatinib in this setting and its consequences remain mostly unknown. We report, within a national observational study, the use of ponatinib in unselected CML patients who had previously failed ≥2 lines of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy (or one line if an Abelson (ABL)^T315I mutation was identified), in real-life conditions (2013-2014) in a compassionate program. Our analysis has been focused on 48 chronic phase CML patients recorded. With a median follow-up of 26.5 months since ponatinib initiation, the overall survival (OS) rates (80.5% at 3 years) and cumulative incidence of major molecular response (81.8% at 18 months) were similar to those of the phase II study, with no influence of BCR-ABL mutations nor the reason of ponatinib prescription. A specific subanalysis of the preexisting cardiovascular risk factors and events occurring on ponatinib is described. These events occurred after a median time on ponatinib of 5.8 months (excluding hypertension) and were observed in 29/48 patients (47%), even in those already on anti-aggregants/coagulants. The majority were not severe and resolved, but two cases were fatal. Other hematological or nonhematological nonvascular adverse events were similar to those previously described in trials. This observational study reports similar rates of survival, molecular responses, and a slight increase in the cardiovascular toxicity of ponatinib in real-life conditions, prompting improved control of cardiovascular risk factors and selection of patients.

Dyserythropoiesis evaluated by the RED score and hepcidin:ferritin ratio predicts response to erythropoietin in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are generally the first line of treatment of anemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. We prospectively investigated the predictive value of somatic mutations, and biomarkers of ineffective erythropoiesis including the flow cytometry RED score, serum growth-differentiation factor-15, and hepcidin levels. Inclusion criteria were no prior treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndrome according to the International Prognostic Scoring System, and a hemoglobin level <10 g/dL. Patients could be red blood cell transfusion-dependent or not and were given epoetin zeta 40 000 IU/week. Serum erythropoietin level, iron parameters, hepcidin, flow cytometry Ogata and RED scores, and growth-differentiation factor-15 levels were determined at baseline, and molecular analysis by next-generation sequencing was also conducted. Erythroid response (defined according to the International Working Group 2006 criteria) was assessed at week 12. Seventy patients, with a median age of 78 years, were included in the study. There were 22 patients with refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia, 19 with refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia, 14 with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts, four with refractory anemia with excess blasts-1, six with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, two with del5q-and three with unclassifiable myelodysplastic syndrome. According to the revised International Prognostic Scoring System, 13 had very low risk, 47 had low risk, nine intermediate risk and one had high-risk disease. Twenty patients were transfusion dependent. Forty-eight percent had an erythroid response and the median duration of the response was 26 months. At baseline, non-responders had significantly higher RED scores and lower hepcidin:ferritin ratios. In multivariate analysis, only a RED score >4 (P=0.05) and a hepcidin:ferritin ratio <9 (P=0.02) were statistically significantly associated with worse erythroid response. The median response duration was shorter in patients with growth-differentiation factor-15 >2000 pg/mL and a hepcidin:ferritin ratio <9 (P=0.0008 and P=0.01, respectively). In multivariate analysis, both variables were associated with shorter response duration. Erythroid response to epoetin zeta was similar to that obtained with other erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and was correlated with higher baseline hepcidin:ferritin ratio and lower RED score. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT 03598582.

Prospective evaluation of the effect of deferasirox on hematologic response in transfusion-dependent patients with low-risk MDS and iron overload

OBJECTIVES

To assess the reduction of transfusions rate in transfusion-dependent patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with iron overload treated with deferasirox.

METHODS

Prospective observational study. Primary endpoint was reduction in transfusion requirements (RTR) at 3 months, (assessed on 8-week period). Secondary endpoints were hematologic improvement according to International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria at 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were evaluable. After 3 months of chelation, no effect was seen on transfusion requirement (5.9 packed red blood cells (PRBC) vs 5.8 before chelation). According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the probability of RTR at 3, 6, and 12 months was assessed as 3.5%, 9.1%, and 18.7%, respectively. Median duration of RTR was 182 days. However, during the 12-month follow-up after deferasirox initiation, 17 patients (31.5%) achieved minor erythroid response [HI-E] according to IWG criteria, 10 of whom having achieved Hb improvement at month 12.

CONCLUSION

After 3 months of treatment, deferasirox had no impact on transfusion requirement in regularly transfused patients with low-risk MDS. However, deferasirox could induce 31% of erythroid response during the 12-month follow-up period thus suggesting that iron chelation therapy with deferasirox may induce an effect on hematopoiesis in a subset of patients with MDS and iron overload.

Nilotinib and peginterferon alfa-2a for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (NiloPeg): a multicentre, non-randomised, open-label phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Nilotinib is now recommended for patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase and leads to important rates of molecular response 4·5 log (MR(4·5)), allowing the prospect of therapy cessation. However, most patients do not reach this criterion and nilotinib is taken for lengthy periods, resulting in chronic or late-onset adverse events. Nilotinib combined with interferon might further increase rates of MR(4·5), avoid late side-effects, and allow therapy cessation. In a phase 2 trial we aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and deep molecular response of the combination of nilotinib (600 mg daily) and peginterferon alfa-2a in newly diagnosed patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML).

METHODS

In a non-randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial, we enrolled adult patients (age ≥18 years) without any organ failure who had BCR-ABL-positive, chronic-phase CML, at diagnosis. After a priming procedure with 90 μg per week of peginterferon alfa-2a alone for a month, we gave patients peginterferon alfa-2a 45 μg per week combined with nilotinib 600 mg daily until 24 months after interferon initiation. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of MR(4·5) at 12 months after initiation of peginterferon alfa-2a. Data were analysed by a modified intention-to-treat principle. This trial is registered at the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT), number 2010-019786-28.

FINDINGS

Between March 24, 2011, and Sept 27, 2011, we enrolled 42 patients. One patient withdrew consent before receiving any study treatment so was excluded from analysis; 41 patients received treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a and nilotinib. At 12 months, seven (17%) patients had achieved MR(4·5). Haematological and hepatic adverse events were frequent-with grade 3-4 neutropenias occurring in ten (24%) patients, grade 3-4 thrombocytopenias occurring in ten (24%) patients, grade 3-4 cholestatic events occurring in seven (17%) patients, and grade 3-4 elevations in aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase occurring in three (7% patients-particularly during the first 3 months. However, 30 (73%) patients remained on interferon therapy at 1 year. Three grade 3-4 cardiac events (7% of patients, all coronary stenoses) occurred at later timepoints.

INTERPRETATION

The combination of peginterferon alfa-2a resulted in good molecular responses in patients. Despite substantial toxic effects, most patients remained on the study drugs for more than a year. This combination should now be tested in a randomised controlled trial.

FUNDING

Novartis Pharma.

Adherence and patients' attitudes to oral anticancer drugs: a prospective series of 201 patients focusing on targeted therapies

OBJECTIVES

Patient adherence is a challenge in oncology and hematology practice. Hormone therapy data in breast cancer suggest insufficient adherence and poor persistence. Limited data are available for targeted therapies (TT) including tyrosine kinase and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors.

METHODS

We performed a prospective survey using a 15-item questionnaire in patients with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies receiving oral anticancer therapy. Treatment duration, setting (adjuvant vs. metastatic), cancer type, age, and comedication were recorded.

RESULTS

201 patients (median age 65.5 years) participated, 102 with TT and 99 with hormone therapy or chemotherapy (HC). The median time of drug intake was 11.0 months. Written information was more frequently given to TT patients (68.6 vs. 23.2%, p < 0.0001). TT and HC patients showed equal adherence to therapy (72.5 vs. 69.6%, p = n.s.) despite TT patients experiencing more side effects (p < 0.0001) and taking more concomitant oral medication (p = 0.0042). Forgotten doses were the leading cause of nonadherence in HC patients (83%, as compared to 54% in the TT group), whereas dose reduction by the patient was higher in the TT group (32 vs. 17%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite advances in providing information to patients leading to better adherence among TT patients, efforts towards better patient education are warranted including dedicated staff for monitoring outpatient anticancer oral therapy.