Surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common infections associated with health care, but its importance as a global health priority is not fully understood. We quantified the burden of SSI after gastrointestinal surgery in countries in all parts of the world.

METHODS

This international, prospective, multicentre cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing elective or emergency gastrointestinal resection within 2-week time periods at any health-care facility in any country. Countries with participating centres were stratified into high-income, middle-income, and low-income groups according to the UN's Human Development Index (HDI). Data variables from the GlobalSurg 1 study and other studies that have been found to affect the likelihood of SSI were entered into risk adjustment models. The primary outcome measure was the 30-day SSI incidence (defined by US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for superficial and deep incisional SSI). Relationships with explanatory variables were examined using Bayesian multilevel logistic regression models. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02662231.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 4, 2016, and July 31, 2016, 13 265 records were submitted for analysis. 12 539 patients from 343 hospitals in 66 countries were included. 7339 (58·5%) patient were from high-HDI countries (193 hospitals in 30 countries), 3918 (31·2%) patients were from middle-HDI countries (82 hospitals in 18 countries), and 1282 (10·2%) patients were from low-HDI countries (68 hospitals in 18 countries). In total, 1538 (12·3%) patients had SSI within 30 days of surgery. The incidence of SSI varied between countries with high (691 [9·4%] of 7339 patients), middle (549 [14·0%] of 3918 patients), and low (298 [23·2%] of 1282) HDI (p<0·001). The highest SSI incidence in each HDI group was after dirty surgery (102 [17·8%] of 574 patients in high-HDI countries; 74 [31·4%] of 236 patients in middle-HDI countries; 72 [39·8%] of 181 patients in low-HDI countries). Following risk factor adjustment, patients in low-HDI countries were at greatest risk of SSI (adjusted odds ratio 1·60, 95% credible interval 1·05-2·37; p=0·030). 132 (21·6%) of 610 patients with an SSI and a microbiology culture result had an infection that was resistant to the prophylactic antibiotic used. Resistant infections were detected in 49 (16·6%) of 295 patients in high-HDI countries, in 37 (19·8%) of 187 patients in middle-HDI countries, and in 46 (35·9%) of 128 patients in low-HDI countries (p<0·001).

INTERPRETATION

Countries with a low HDI carry a disproportionately greater burden of SSI than countries with a middle or high HDI and might have higher rates of antibiotic resistance. In view of WHO recommendations on SSI prevention that highlight the absence of high-quality interventional research, urgent, pragmatic, randomised trials based in LMICs are needed to assess measures aiming to reduce this preventable complication.

FUNDING

DFID-MRC-Wellcome Trust Joint Global Health Trial Development Grant, National Institute of Health Research Global Health Research Unit Grant.

Outcomes of resection and non-resection strategies in management of patients with advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with surgically incurable bowel cancer at presentation is controversial. The aims of treatment are to optimise quality of life and prolong survival. It has been believed that the most effective palliation is achieved by resection of the primary cancer in order to pre-empt future complications. This study reviews and compares the outcomes of patients with incurable bowel cancer managed by resection and non-resection strategies over a 7-year period in a single District General Hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients with surgically incurable bowel cancer at presentation were identified from the prospectively collected local ACPGBI database. Survival, using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, was compared between patients managed by resection of the primary, non-resectional intervention (surgery, stent & oncological treatments) and those managed with supportive care only. The primary endpoint of the study was survival on an intention to treat basis, compared using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Of 646 consecutive newly diagnosed bowel cancer patients over a 7 year period 154 cases (24%) were deemed surgically incurable at presentation. Of these surgical resection was carried out in 45 patients (29%), non-resectional intervention was followed in 52 patients (34%) and supportive treatment alone in 57 patients (37%). Median survival of each group was as follows: resected patients 11 months (I.Q range 3-18 months), non-resectional intervention 7 months (I.Q range 2-15 months) and supportive care alone 2 months (I.Q range 1-8 months). Only one patient (2%) managed by non-resectional intervention required later surgery to treat primary tumour related complications. Survival was not significantly different between resection and non-resection treatments. The overall operative mortality for the resection group was 16% (7/45 cases), with an elective mortality of 14% (4/28 cases) and emergency mortality 18% (3/17 cases).

CONCLUSION

In an unselected bowel cancer population surgical resection of the primary tumour in patients presenting with incurable disease does not improve survival and is associated with a high risk of post-operative mortality.

The impact of surgeon and pathologist on lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer and its impact on survival for patients with Dukes' stage B disease

OBJECTIVE

An adequate lymph node harvest is necessary for accurate Dukes' stage discrimination in colorectal cancer. The aim of this study is to identify the effect of variables, including the individual surgeon and pathologist, on lymph node harvest in a single institution.

METHOD

Three hundred and eighty one consecutive patients had resection for colorectal cancer, in a single unit. Factors influencing lymph node retrieval, including individual surgeon and reporting pathologist, were subjected to uni- and multivariate analysis. Actuarial survival of all patients with Dukes' stage B and C disease was then calculated and survival compared between Dukes' stage B and C at differing levels of lymph node harvest.

RESULTS

The unit median lymph node harvest was 13 nodes/patient (95% CI 13.1-14.5). There was no difference in lymph node harvest between specialist colorectal surgeons and the pooled results of four nonspecialist consultant surgeons. However, there was a significant difference between reporting pathologists (P < 0.001). On univariate analysis, operation type, operative urgency, Dukes' stage, T-stage, reporting pathologist and use of neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer, were found to significantly affect lymph node retrieval. On multivariate analysis, operation type, T-stage, reporting pathologist and neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer remained significant variables. Patients with one or more lymph node metastasis had greater nodal harvests than those without (median 15 vs 12 P = 0.02). Survival of patients with Dukes' stage B disease was found to improve as lymph node harvest increased.

CONCLUSION

Overall lymph node harvest, in this unit, varied according to the reporting pathologist but not operating surgeon. As lymph node harvest increased to 15 per patient, the probability of identifying a metastatic node increased.

Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Closure of an abdominal stoma, a common elective operation, is associated with frequent complications; one of the commonest and impactful is incisional hernia formation. We aimed to investigate whether biological mesh (collagen tissue matrix) can safely reduce the incidence of incisional hernias at the stoma closure site.

METHODS

In this randomised controlled trial (ROCSS) done in 37 hospitals across three European countries (35 UK, one Denmark, one Netherlands), patients aged 18 years or older undergoing elective ileostomy or colostomy closure were randomly assigned using a computer-based algorithm in a 1:1 ratio to either biological mesh reinforcement or closure with sutures alone (control). Training in the novel technique was standardised across hospitals. Patients and outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was occurrence of clinically detectable hernia 2 years after randomisation (intention to treat). A sample size of 790 patients was required to identify a 40% reduction (25% to 15%), with 90% power (15% drop-out rate). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02238964.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 28, 2012, and Nov 11, 2015, of 1286 screened patients, 790 were randomly assigned. 394 (50%) patients were randomly assigned to mesh closure and 396 (50%) to standard closure. In the mesh group, 373 (95%) of 394 patients successfully received mesh and in the control group, three patients received mesh. The clinically detectable hernia rate, the primary outcome, at 2 years was 12% (39 of 323) in the mesh group and 20% (64 of 327) in the control group (adjusted relative risk [RR] 0·62, 95% CI 0·43-0·90; p=0·012). In 455 patients for whom 1 year postoperative CT scans were available, there was a lower radiologically defined hernia rate in mesh versus control groups (20 [9%] of 229 vs 47 [21%] of 226, adjusted RR 0·42, 95% CI 0·26-0·69; p<0·001). There was also a reduction in symptomatic hernia (16%, 52 of 329 vs 19%, 64 of 331; adjusted relative risk 0·83, 0·60-1·16; p=0·29) and surgical reintervention (12%, 42 of 344 vs 16%, 54 of 346: adjusted relative risk 0·78, 0·54-1·13; p=0·19) at 2 years, but this result did not reach statistical significance. No significant differences were seen in wound infection rate, seroma rate, quality of life, pain scores, or serious adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with a biological mesh at the time of stoma closure reduced clinically detectable incisional hernia within 24 months of surgery and with an acceptable safety profile. The results of this study support the use of biological mesh in stoma closure site reinforcement to reduce the early formation of incisional hernias.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research Research for Patient Benefit and Allergan.

Volume and accreditation, but not specialty, affect quality standards in colonoscopy

BACKGROUND

The Global Rating Scale, defined by the Joint Advisory Group for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, requires monitoring of endoscopic performance indicators. There are known variations in colonoscopic performance, and investigation of factors causing this is needed. This study aimed to analyse the impact of endoscopist specialty and procedural volume on the quality of colonoscopy.

METHODS

Data collected prospectively from a UK hospital endoscopy service between June 2007 and January 2010 were analysed. The main endpoint was the adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary endpoints were polyp detection rate (PDR), reported caecal intubation rate (CIR) and reported complications. Multivariable binary regression models were built to adjust for confounding patient-level and endoscopist-level variation.

RESULTS

A total of 10,026 colonoscopies were included, with an overall ADR of 19.2 per cent, a CIR of 90.2 per cent and a perforation rate of 0.06 per cent. In univariable analyses, surgeons had a higher ADR and higher PDR, but lower CIR, compared with physicians. Surgeons had a significantly different case mix in terms of age, sex and indication for colonoscopy. After adjusting for this case mix in multivariable analysis, specialty was no longer a significant predictor of ADR; however, surgeons retained their higher PDR and physicians their higher CIR. Endoscopists accredited for screening and those performing more than 100 colonoscopies per year had a higher ADR.

CONCLUSION

Adjusting for case mix, physicians and surgeons performed equally well in terms of ADR. Accreditation and a higher annual number of colonoscopies were more important factors in achieving quality standards.

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

BACKGROUND

Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres.

METHODS

This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low-middle-income countries.

RESULTS

In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of 'single-use' consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low-middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia.

CONCLUSION

This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high- and low-middle-income countries.

Accuracy of multidetector CT in detecting anastomotic leaks following stapled left-sided colonic anastomosis

AIMS

To assess accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and individual radiological signs in the diagnosis of anastomotic leaks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing anterior resection with a stapled anastomosis over a 2 year period were identified. Electronic and clinical records of these patients were reviewed. Unenhanced and/or enhanced MDCT was performed with intravenous and/or per-rectal contrast medium and read by a radiologist blinded to the patients' clinical details to determine the sensitivity and specificity of specific findings at MDCT for identifying leaks.

RESULTS

Seventeen percent (30/170) of the anterior resections were suspected to have an anastomotic leak. Ninety-three percent (28/30) of patients underwent MDCT. Seven point six percent (11+2/170) had a confirmed leak. Two patients underwent surgery without MDCT. A leak was confirmed by MDCT in 91% (10/11) of patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MDCT in diagnosing a leak was 0.91, 1, 1, and 0.95, respectively. The sensitivity of peri-anastomotic air, peri-anastomotic collection, extravasation of rectal contrast medium, and staple line integrity was 0.81, 0.63, 0.54, and 0.72, respectively. Use of rectal contrast medium (8/11 cases) increased the subjective ease of diagnosis and was the only sign in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Presence of peri-anastomotic air is a reliable marker of anastomotic leaks at MDCT. Leakage of rectal contrast medium is highly accurate and increases confidence of diagnosis. The appearance of the staple line itself is not accurate in assessing anastomotic integrity.

Socioeconomic deprivation adversely affects survival of patients with rectal cancer

Background

The aim was to examine the influence of socioeconomic deprivation on stage at presentation, perioperative mortality, permanent stoma rates and overall survival in patients with rectal cancer.

Methods

Data on patient demographics, mode and stage of presentation, and short- and longer-term outcomes were extracted from a database of patients with rectal cancer. Comparisons were made after stratification into quintiles of socioeconomic deprivation.

Results

In total 486 patients were identified. Fewer patients from the most deprived group than from the least deprived group underwent resectional surgery (79·2 versus 93 per cent; P = 0·005). Permanent stoma rates among patients who had surgery were 40·8 and 30 per cent respectively (P = 0·110). The overall 5-year survival rate was 32·8 per cent for the most deprived compared with 64·0 per cent for the least deprived patients (P &lt; 0·001). Respective rates for those who underwent resectional surgery were 49·9 and 72 per cent (P = 0·030).

Conclusion

In rectal cancer, socioeconomic deprivation appears to be associated with poorer outcomes and survival. This has important implications for healthcare planning.

Unintended consequences of policy change to watchful waiting for asymptomatic inguinal hernias

INTRODUCTION

In 2009 the Department of Health instructed McKinsey & Company to provide advice on how commissioners might achieve world class National Health Service productivity. Asymptomatic inguinal hernia repair was identified as a potentially cosmetic procedure, with limited clinical benefit. The Birmingham and Solihull primary care trust cluster introduced a policy of watchful waiting for asymptomatic inguinal hernia, which was implemented across the health economy in December 2010. This retrospective cohort study aimed to examine the effect of a change in clinical commissioning policy concerning elective surgical repair of asymptomatic inguinal hernias.

METHODS

A total of 1,032 patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair in the 16 months after the policy change were compared with 978 patients in the 16 months before. The main outcome measure was relative proportion of emergency repair in groups before and after the policy change. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to adjust the main outcome for age, sex and hernia type.

RESULTS

The period after the policy change was associated with 59% higher odds of emergency repair (3.6% vs 5.5%, adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-2.47). In turn, emergency repair was associated with higher odds of adverse events (4.7% vs 18.5%, adjusted OR: 3.68, 95% CI: 2.04-6.63) and mortality (0.1% vs 5.4%, p<0.001, Fisher's exact test).

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of a watchful waiting policy for asymptomatic inguinal hernias was associated with a significant increase in need for emergency repair, which was in turn associated with an increased risk of adverse events. Current policies may be placing patients at risk.

Extracolonic findings (ECF) on CT colonography (CTC) in patients presenting with colorectal symptoms

BACKGROUND

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is now an established method for imaging the colon and rectum in the screening and symptomatic setting. Additional benefit of CTC is the ability to assess for extracolonic findings especially in patients presenting with colorectal symptoms.

PURPOSE

To determine prevalence of extracolonic findings (ECF) in symptomatic patients undergoing CTC and determine accuracy of CTC for exclusion of significant abdominal disease and extracolonic malignancy (ECM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 1359 unenhanced prone and postcontrast supine CTC studies were performed between March 2002 and December 2007. ECF were retrospectively classified according to C-RADS criteria into E1 to E4 findings. For ECM, a gold standard of clinical and/or radiological follow-up supplemented with data from the regional cancer registry with a median follow-up of 42 months was created. Sensitivity and negative predictive values for ECM was calculated.

RESULTS

Following exclusions, 1177 CTCs were analyzed. Of 1423 extracolonic findings reported, 328/1423 (23%) E3 and 100/1423 (7%) E4 (including six eventual FP studies) findings were identified. Thirty-two ECMs were confirmed following further investigations. Seven further small ECMs were detected during the entire follow-up, of which two were potentially visible in retrospect (false-negative studies). Additional tests were generated from 55/1177 (4.7%) studies. Sensitivity and negative predictive value for ECM was 94.1% (95% CI 78.9-98.9%) and 99.8% (95% CI 99.3-99.9%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

One in 37 patients were found to have an ECM. Two potentially detectable cancers were missed. Only a small proportion of patients underwent additional work-up.

Appendicitis as a manifestation of colon cancer: should we image the colon after appendicectomy in patients over the age of 40 years?

BACKGROUND

Appendicitis can be secondary to caecal pathology (polyp or cancer). Increasing age is a risk factor for malignancy coexisting with appendicitis. There is an increased coexistence of cancer post-appendicectomy in patients aged 50-54 years. This study investigates whether post-appendicectomy patients aged over 40 years should receive further colorectal imaging and follow-up.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected for 1633 patients aged 40 years and over who underwent appendicectomy in a 10-year period (1st January 2004-31st December 2014). Data were analysed for patients with histological confirmation of acute appendicitis. Incidental appendicular tumours were excluded.

RESULTS

One thousand fifty-five (64%) patients had histological confirmation of acute appendicitis (median age 52 years; range 40-96 years). Six hundred three patients (57%) were aged 40-54 years; 452 patients (43%) were aged 55 years or over. Twenty-six (2.5%) patients were investigated post-appendicectomy. Three (11.5%) had caecal pathology: 2 adenocarcinoma, 1 benign caecal polyp. Ten (2.2%) patients aged 55 years or over had caecal pathology. Seven (1.6%) were diagnosed with caecal cancer. No patients below age 54 years were diagnosed with caecal cancer. The incidence of caecal cancer in the study population was 0.66% (40-54.9 years 0%; 55 years and over 1.6%). Patients aged 55 years or over were more likely to develop caecal pathology than patients aged 40-54 years (p = 0.006). The odds ratio of developing caecal pathology was 6.8 times greater (95% CI 1.49-31.29) in people aged 55 years and over.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients aged 55 years or over who have undergone appendicectomy should be offered colonoscopy to exclude coexistent caecal pathology.

CT colonography for synchronous colorectal lesions in patients with colorectal cancer: initial experience

AIM

To assess accuracy of CT colonography (CTC) in identifying synchronous lesions in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

This study included 174 consecutive patients undergoing CTC as part of staging or primary investigation where a colorectal cancer was diagnosed between 2004 and 2007. Prone unenhanced and portal phase enhanced supine series with air or CO(2) distension were acquired using 4- or 16-slice CT (Toshiba) and read by 2D +/- 3D formats. Synchronous lesions were classified according to American College of Radiology's (ACR) polyp classification. Segmental gold standard was flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy within 1 year and/or histology of colonic resection supplemented by follow-up. Nine patients without gold standard were excluded. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated on a per polyp, per patient and per segment basis and discrepancies analysed.

RESULTS

Direct comparable data were available for 764/990 colonic segments from 165 patients. Of 41 (C2-C4) synchronous lesions on "gold standard", 33 were correctly identified on virtual colonoscopy (VC), overall per polyp sensitivity was 80.5%, with detection rates of 20/24 C3 (83.3%) and 3/3 C4 (100%) with per patient and per segment specificity of 95.4% and 99.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CTC is an accurate technique to assess for significant synchronous lesions in patients with colorectal cancer and is applicable for total pre-operative colonic visualisation.

Comparative study of magnetic resonance defaecography and evacuation proctography in the evaluation of obstructed defaecation

AIM

Obstructed defaecation syndrome is a common condition of multifactorial aetiology and requires specialized evaluation. Accurate and reproducible pelvic floor imaging is imperative for multidisciplinary decision-making. Evacuation proctography (EP) and magnetic resonance defaecography (MRD) are the main imaging modalities used to assess dynamic pelvic floor function. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the findings and acceptability of MRD and EP in the same cohort of patients.

METHOD

This was a prospective comparative study of MRD vs EP in 55 patients with obstructed defaecation syndrome in a single National Health Service Foundation Trust.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were recruited and underwent both EP and MRD. Detection rates for rectocoele were similar (82% vs 73%, P = 0.227), but EP revealed a significantly higher number of trapping rectocoeles compared to MRD (75% vs 31%, P < 0.001). EP detected more rectal intussusceptions than MRD (56% vs 35%, P = 0.023). MRD appeared to underestimate the size of the identified rectocoele, although it detected a significant number of anatomical abnormalities in the middle and anterior pelvic compartment not seen on EP (1.8% enterocoele, 9% peritoneocoele and 20% cystocoele). Patients achieved higher rates of expulsion of rectal contrast during EP compared to MRD, but this difference was not significant (76% vs 64% in MRD, P = 0.092). Of the two studies, patients preferred MRD.

CONCLUSIONS

MRD provides a global assessment of pelvic floor function and anatomical abnormality. MRD is better tolerated by patients but it is not as sensitive as EP in detecting trapping rectocoeles and intussusceptions.

Effects of ethnicity and socioeconomic status on surgical outcomes from inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE

Evidence suggests that ethnicity and socioeconomic status of patients with chronic diseases influence their healthcare outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of these factors on the surgical outcome of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) over a 15-year period.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study investigated IBD patients operated on at an NHS Trust between 2000-2015, with follow-up data until 2020. Logistic regression models were used to determine the relationship between ethnic minority background and Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) on outcomes including requirement for intra-abdominal surgery, permanent stoma, re-do surgery and surgical complications, accounting for age, gender, smoking history and biologic treatment.

RESULTS

There were 1,620 patients (56.7% ulcerative colitis (UC) and 43.3% Crohn's disease (CD)). Median age was 32 years, and 49.6% were female. Patients with an ethnic minority background accounted for 20.6%. Within 5 years of first presentation, 369 patients required intra-abdominal surgery, 95 permanent stomas and 107 re-do surgery. For CD patients, younger age at diagnosis, female patients, those with an ethnic minority background, higher IMD quintile, smoking history and biologic treatment were more likely to have intra-abdominal surgery. Ethnic minority background and higher IMD score were further associated with surgical complications for CD but not UC patients.

CONCLUSION

Ethnic minority status and socioeconomic deprivation were associated with worse surgical outcomes within our cohort of IBD patients. These findings may stimulate discourse regarding the strategic planning of equitable healthcare services.

Differences in screening vs non-screening colonoscopy: scope for improvement?

AIM

Colonoscopy performed as part of the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) is of high standard as measured using global rating scale (GRS) criteria. Screening practitioners also provide a non-screening colonoscopy service. The current study compares colonoscopy quality indicators between screening and non-screening groups performed by a single practitioner using the GRS.

METHOD

Patient details were obtained for all consecutive colonoscopies between 2007 and 2014 performed by a single screening practitioner. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic patient records; BCSP Exeter database and non-screening colonoscopies were compared. Data included patient demographics (age, gender), sedation, and the GRS data including caecal intubation, adenoma and neoplasia detection rates.

RESULTS

In all, 1961 colonoscopy procedures (1067 screening and 894 non-screening) were identified; 57% were men. Mean (SD) age for all patients was 64 (± 10.4) years. Non-screening patients were younger [62 (± 14) vs 66 (± 4.8) years; P < 0.05] and were less likely to be men (51.5% vs 61.9%; P < 0.05) than their screening counterparts. Caecal intubation was more successful in screening patients [1027/1067 (96.3%)] than non-screening patients [805/894 (90%)]; P < 0.05. Adenoma detection rate was higher in the screening (46.8 ± 4.4) than non-screening (26.3 ± 11.8) group; P < 0.05. There were no differences in neoplasia detection. Polypectomy was more likely (55.5% vs 30.2%) and polyp retrieval more successful (97.5% vs 86.7%) in the screening group.

CONCLUSION

Screening and non-screening colonoscopy differ in the GRS domains of completion and pathology detection. These differences need to be acknowledged when comparing screeners and non-screeners using GRS within units.

Plasma magnesium should be monitored perioperatively in patients undergoing colorectal resection

OBJECTIVE

Hypomagnesemia has been shown to have several clinically important sequelae. The aims of this study were: to assess the impact of bowel preparation, with sodium picosulphate (Picolax), on plasma electrolytes, with particular regard to plasma magnesium, in patients undergoing bowel preparation for colonoscopy and colorectal resection and to evaluate the influence of perioperative magnesium levels on postoperative cardiac dysrhythmias.

METHOD

Sixty-one patients receiving sodium picosulphate (Picolax) bowel preparation were studied in two groups: Colonoscopy (31 patients) and Colorectal resection (30 patients). Plasma sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, urea, creatinine and blood haematocrit were measured in all patients prior to commencement of bowel preparation, at the time of colonoscopy or colorectal resection and 24 h postoperatively (surgery group only). Mean electrolyte and haematocrit levels were then compared. Postoperative cardiac dysrhythmias were recorded and analysed.

RESULTS

No significant changes following bowel preparation were observed in plasma sodium, potassium, calcium or creatinine. Plasma urea fell following bowel preparation (colonoscopy P < 0.001, resection P = 0.004) and rose following resection (P = 0.002). Magnesium levels increased following bowel preparation in both groups (colonoscopy P < 0.001, resection P = 0.007) and fell following resection (P < 0.001). Thirty-four per cent (21/60 patients) were hypermagnesemic following bowel preparation and 20% (6/30 patients) became hypomagnesemic following surgery. Postoperative cardiac dysrhythmias were associated with lower magnesium levels at induction and postoperatively (P = 0.022 and P = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Bowel preparation with Picolax does not appear to cause significant electrolyte disturbance, except in elevating plasma magnesium. Postcolorectal resection plasma magnesium dropped significantly suggesting perioperative monitoring and replacement should be routine following colorectal surgery.

Role of CT colonography in symptomatic assessment, surveillance and screening

INTRODUCTION

When 'whole colonic imaging' is indicated, clinicians must decide between optical colonoscopy, barium enema and CT colonography (CTC). CTC is a relatively new technique which has become increasingly accessible in the UK over the past 5 years. As radiologists have gained experience and scanning parameters have standardised, there have been substantial improvements in both the accuracy and safety of CTC.

METHODS

We review evidence from observational studies and randomised trials, and draw on expert opinion, to provide a comprehensive discussion of the current role of CTC in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

The emergence of CTC could soon entirely obviate the need for barium enema. CTC now has a complementary role alongside colonoscopy in symptomatic patients and a possible future role in colorectal cancer screening in the UK.

Administration of hyoscine- n-butylbromide during colonoscopy: a survey of current UK practice

OBJECTIVE

Current British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines suggest that hyoscine-n-butylbromide (Buscopan) should be avoided during colonoscopy in patients with a history of angle-closure glaucoma. Angle-closure glaucoma, however, is not very common, is asymptomatic before onset and is treated definitively by a single laser treatment (if spotted early). Open-angle glaucoma is not affected by hyoscine. The aim of this study was to assess the use of hyoscine among colonoscopists, with particular reference to glaucoma.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Following BSG endoscopy subcommittee approval, a short questionnaire was electronically administered to members of the BSG and the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Hyoscine use among colonoscopists, and effect of glaucoma history upon prescribing practice.

RESULTS

188 colonoscopists responded to some or all of the questions. 123/183 (67.2%) of respondents claimed they were aware of the BSG guidelines. 160/187 (85.6%) sometimes or always use hyoscine, while 27/187 (14.4%) never do. 137/177 (77.4%) always enquire about glaucoma history prior to administration, although 147/176 (83.0%) make no differentiation between open-angle or angle-closure forms. 126/178 (70.8%) would (incorrectly) withhold hyoscine if the patient declares a history of any form of glaucoma. 140/179 (78.2%) do not substitute glucagon as an antispasmodic. 4/180 (2.2%) had encountered ophthalmic complications post-administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Current BSG guidelines pertaining to hyoscine use and glaucoma are inappropriate; the authors recommend revision. Patients undergoing colonoscopy who have received hyoscine should, instead, be advised to seek urgent medical advice if they develop ophthalmic symptoms.

Attitudes to the treatment of chronic anal fissure in ano after failed medical treatment

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of chronic fissure may be medical or surgical. Indications for assessment, which is the better treatment and under what circumstances, are vital for the appropriate management. The aim of the study was to assess the management of this condition by an expert group of surgeons.

METHODS

Consultant members of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (n=452) were approached and requested to answer a preset multiple-choice questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed to assess their management strategy and their approach to investigation and treatment under different clinical situations.

RESULTS

The overall response was 78% (n = 356). Medical treatment was the first line treatment in 95% of the responders. Lateral anal sphincterotomy without pre-operative endoanal ultrasound and/or anorectal physiology was performed by 57%. Anal dilatation was performed selectively by 36% but only 35% of these would perform a pre-operative endoanal ultrasound or anorectal physiology.

CONCLUSION

In the selected group of clinicians lateral anal sphincterotomy remains the procedure of choice in both sexes. Pre-operative assessment using endoanal ultrasound and anorectal physiology is used selectively especially in postpartum women. Anal dilatation remains a subjective procedure and though used selectively, is performed without pre-operative endoanal ultrasound and/or anorectal physiology in majority of cases.