Recommendations and guidelines for the treatment of pneumonia in Taiwan

Pneumonia is a leading cause of death worldwide, ranking third both globally and in Taiwan. This guideline was prepared by the 2017 Guidelines Recommendations for Evidence-based Antimicrobial agents use in Taiwan (GREAT) working group, formed under the auspices of the Infectious Diseases Society of Taiwan (IDST). A consensus meeting was held jointly by the IDST, Taiwan Society of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (TSPCCM), the Medical Foundation in Memory of Dr. Deh-Lin Cheng, the Foundation of Professor Wei-Chuan Hsieh for Infectious Diseases Research and Education and CY Lee's Research Foundation for Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines. The final guideline was endorsed by the IDST and TSPCCM. The major differences between this guideline and the 2007 version include the following: the use of GRADE methodology for the evaluation of available evidence whenever applicable, the specific inclusion of healthcare-associated pneumonia as a category due to the unique medical system in Taiwan and inclusion of recommendations for treatment of pediatric pneumonia. This guideline includes the epidemiology and recommendations of antimicrobial treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia, healthcare-associated pneumonia in adults and pediatric pneumonia.

Prediction of imipenem-resistant microorganisms among the nosocomial critically ill patients with Gram-negative bacilli septicemia: a simple risk score

Objectives

The increasing number of reports on infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) has raised concerns, because they have complicated empiric or guided antibiotic therapy for critically ill patients. We aimed to develop a scoring system to predict nosocomial imipenem-resistant GNB (IR-GNB) septicemia among the critically ill patients.

Materials and methods

The study included critically ill adult patients with nosocomial GNB septicemia at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH) in 2013-2015, and the scoring system for predicting IR-GNB septicemia was developed, followed by prospective validation conducted among patients at Linkou CGMH and Kaohsiung CGMH between January and June, 2016.

Results

In the development of the scoring system, 748 patients were included. The independent factors associated with IR-GNB septicemia were prior exposure (days) to carbapenems (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] per 1-day increase, 1.1; 1-3 days: 2 points, 4-6 days: 5 points, 7-9 days: 8 points, and ≥10 days: 13 points), use of mechanical ventilation (aOR 3.7; 5 points), prior colonization with IR-GNB strains (aOR 3.5; 5 points) within 30 days before the onset of GNB septicemia, and comorbid condition with chronic kidney disease (aOR 2.1; 3 points). The internal validation showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of 0.75; and an external validation among 314 patients showed similarly good performance (ROC 0.77). Youden's index indicated the score of ≥6 as the best cutoff value with sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 79%.

Conclusion

This scoring system might help clinicians stratify the risk for developing IR-GNB septicemia among critically ill patients and combined antibiotics may be used until antimicrobial de-escalation/adjustment is clearly indicated by the subsequently identified GNB and its susceptibility profile.

Risk factors and outcomes for the acquisition of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacillus bacteremia: A retrospective propensity-matched case control study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

A substantial number of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR GNB) have been identified among the etiologic multidrug-resistant GNB in healthcare-associated infections. For achieving a better therapeutic outcome by minimizing inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment before blood culture and susceptibility testing results are available, it is very important to identify patients who are at risk for the development of CR GNB bacteremia.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of propensity-score matched (PSM) adult patients with CR GNB bacteremia (PSM-group 1 [n = 95]) and those with non-CR GNB bacteremia (PSM-group 2 [n = 190]).

RESULTS

PSM-group 1 was found to a significantly longer length of hospital stay (27 vs. 18 days; p < 0.001) after emerging GNB bacteremia and a higher 30-day all-cause mortality rate (27.4% vs. 5.8%; p < 0.001), when compared with PSM-2 group. Independent risk factors for the acquisition of CR GNB bacteremia were previous exposure to an antipseudomonal penicillin (odds ratio [OR] = 3.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30-9.90), an antipseudomonal cephalosporin (OR = 3.49; 95% CI = 1.09-11.24), and a carbapenem (OR = 3.60; 95% CI = 1.37-9.47), and longer length of hospital stay before the development of GNB bacteremia (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 1.01-1.05).

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for acquisition of CR GNB bacteremia identified in this study each may serve as a reminder alerting clinicians to hospitalized patients at risk for CR GNB bacteremia requiring appropriate antibiotic coverage, and in these circumstances, combined antibiotics may be used until antimicrobial de-escalation/adjustment is clearly indicated by the subsequently identified pathogenic GNB and its susceptibility profile.

Pancreatic enzymes in uremic patients with or without dialysis

One hundred thirty blood samples from 87 patients with renal failure, but without abdominal pain, were analyzed for blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, amylase, p-isoamylase, and lipase simultaneously. We found that 74, 78, and 80% of the patients had hyperamylasemia, hyperisoamylasemia, and hyperlipasemia. None had amylase higher than five times the upper limit. A few patients (2.3%) had lipase elevated to more than 10 times the upper limit. No significant change of pancreatic enzyme level was noted as a result of hemodialysis, but a significant amount of amylase was removed from the circulation in patients receiving intermittent peritoneal dialysis. Significantly lower pancreatic enzyme levels were observed in patients with less impairment of renal function. We conclude that elevation of pancreatic enzymes in uremic patients is more frequent and more extensive than most articles indicate, and that the extent of increase is related more to renal function than to the modalities of dialysis the patients received.