Mitochondrial ribosomal genes as novel genetic markers for discrimination of closely related species in the Angiostrongylus cantonensis lineage

The Angiostrongylus cantonensis lineage (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea) consists of the closely related species A. cantonensis, Angiostrongylus malaysiensis, and Angiostrongylus mackerrasae. Various genetic markers have been used for species discrimination in molecular phylogenetic studies of this lineage. However, despite showing potential in other organisms, mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes have not been used for Angiostrongylus species discrimination. Therefore, this study assessed these genes' suitability for inter- and intraspecies discrimination in the A. cantonensis lineage. The ultimate aim was to provide a novel genetic marker to support existing phylogenies. Sixty adult Angiostrongylus spp. worms from four geographic locations in Thailand were identified morphologically before molecular identification with 12S and 16S rRNA genes. Neighbor-joining and maximum likelihood algorithms were used for phylogenetic analyzes, and sequence variation was calculated to determine whether the genes could be used to discriminate among species. Furthermore, sequence variation was compared among previously used genetic markers to evaluate the robustness of the 12S and 16S rRNA genes as markers. Using both markers, the A. cantonensis lineage formed a monophyletic clade with a clear separation between A. cantonensis, A. malaysiensis, and A. mackerrasae. From our representative A. cantonensis and A. malaysiensis specimens, the genetic distance between the two clades was 6.8% -7.9% and 7.9% -10.0% for 12S and 16S rRNA genes, respectively, which is sufficient interspecific genetic variation for species discrimination. Higher levels of genetic variation were observed for the 16S rRNA gene, with 12 haplotypes and an intraspecific variation ≤2.2%. Thus, as a genetic marker, the 16S rRNA gene is comparable to mitochondrial protein-coding genes, which are commonly used in intra-level Angiostrongylus spp. studies. In conclusion, mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA genes can discriminate among closely related species in the A. cantonensis lineage, and they represent novel genetic markers for supporting existing phylogenies and verifying the phylogenetic position of A. mackerrasae.

Hurdles in the evolutionary epidemiology of Angiostrongylus cantonensis: Pseudogenes, incongruence between taxonomy and DNA sequence variants, and cryptic lineages

Angiostrongylus cantonensis, the rat lungworm, is a zoonotic pathogen that is one of the leading causes of eosinophilic meningitis worldwide. This parasite is regarded as an emerging pathogen with a global range expansion out of southeastern Asia post-WWII. To date, molecular systematic/phylogeographic studies on A. cantonensis have mainly used two mitochondrial (mtDNA) markers, cytochrome c oxidase 1 (CO1) and cytochrome b (CYTB), where the focus has largely been descriptive in terms of reporting local patterns of haplotype variants. In order to look for more global evolutionary patterns, we herein provide a collective phylogenetic assessment using the six available whole mtDNA genome samples that have been tagged as A. cantonensis, A. malaysiensis, or A. mackerrasae along with all other GenBank CO1 and CYTB partial sequences that carry these species identifiers. The results reveal three important complications that researchers will need to be aware of, or will need to resolve, prior to conducting future molecular evolutionary studies on A. cantonensis. These three problems are (i) incongruence between taxonomic identifications and mtDNA variants (haplotypes or whole mtDNA genome samples), (ii) the presence of a CYTB mtDNA pseudogene, and (iii) the need to verify A. mackerrasae as a species along with other possible cryptic lineages, of which there is suggestive evidence (i.e., A. cantonensis could be a species complex). We provided a discussion of how these complications are hurdles to our understanding of the global epidemiology of angiostrongyliasis. We call for future studies to be more explicit in morphological traits used for identifications (e.g., provide measurements). Moreover, it will be necessary to repeat prior morphological and life-history studies while simultaneously using sequence data in order to assess possible associations between critical epidemiological data (e.g., biogeography, virulence/pathology, host species use) and specific lineages.