Oncological and functional outcomes in T3 and T4 laryngeal cancer patients: choice for larynx preservation or total laryngectomy based on expected laryngeal function

OBJECTIVE

To determine oncological and functional outcomes in patients with T3 and T4 laryngeal carcinoma, in which choice of treatment was based on expected laryngeal function and not T classification.

METHODS

Oncological outcomes (disease-specific survival and overall survival) as well as functional outcomes (larynx preservation and functional larynx preservation) were analysed.

RESULTS

In 130 T3 and 59 T4 patients, there was no difference in disease-specific survival or overall survival rates after radiotherapy (RT) (107 patients), chemoradiotherapy (36 patients) and total laryngectomy (46 patients). The five-year disease-specific survival rates were 83 per cent after RT, 78 per cent after chemoradiotherapy and 69 per cent after total laryngectomy, whereas overall survival rates were 62, 54 and 60 per cent, respectively. Five-year larynx preservation and functional larynx preservation rates were comparable for RT (79 and 66 per cent, respectively) and chemoradiotherapy (86 and 62 per cent, respectively).

CONCLUSION

There is no difference in oncological outcome after (chemo)radiotherapy or total laryngectomy in T3 and T4 laryngeal carcinoma patients whose choice of treatment was based on expected laryngeal function.

Potential imaging targets in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and lymph node metastases

PURPOSE

To investigate glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein B (GPNMB) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as potential fluorescent imaging markers by comparing their protein expression to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight paired samples of untreated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) primary tumours (PT) and corresponding synchronous lymph node metastases (LNM) were selected. After immunohistochemical staining, expression was assessed and compared by the percentage of positive tumour cells. Data were analysed using the Mann-Whitney test, effect sizes (ESr) and Spearman's correlation coefficient (r).

RESULTS

GPNMB expression was observed in 100 % of PT, and median 80 % (range 5-100 %) of tumour cells, VEGF in 92 % and 60 % (0-100 %), EGFR in 87 % and 60 % (0-100 %) respectively. In corresponding LNM, GPNMB expression was observed in 100 % of LNM and median 90 % (20-100 %) of tumour cells, VEGF in 87 % and 65 % (0-100 %), and EGFR in 84 % and 35 % (0-100 %). A positive correlation was found between expression in PT and LNM for GPNMB (r = 0.548) and EGFR (r = 0.618) (p < 0.001), but not for VEGF (r = -0.020; p = 0.905). GPNMB expression was present in a higher percentage of tumour cells compared to EGFR in PT (p = 0.015, ESr = -0.320) and in LNM (p < 0.001, ESr = -0.478), while VEGF was not (p = 1.00, ESr = -0.109 and - 0.152, respectively).

CONCLUSION

GPNMB expression is higher than EGFR in untreated HNSCC PT and corresponding LNM, while VEGF expression is comparable to EGFR. GPNMB is a promising target for fluorescent imaging in HNSCC.

Considerable interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the Netherlands- A nationwide evaluation study

AIMS

Patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are eligible for first-line immune checkpoint inhibition if their tumour is positive for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) determined by the combined positive score (CPS). This nationwide study, using real-world data, investigated the developing PD-L1 testing landscape in the first 3 years after introduction of the test in HNSCC and examined interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity rates.

METHODS

Pathology reports of HNSCC patients mentioning PD-L1 were extracted from the Dutch Pathology Registry (Palga). Tumour and PD-L1 testing characteristics were analysed per year and interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity rates was assessed using funnel plots with 95% confidence limits around the overall mean.

RESULTS

A total of 817 PD-L1 tests were reported in 702 patients among 19 laboratories; 85.2% of the tests on histological material were stated to be positive. The national PD-L1 positivity rate differed significantly per year during the study period (79.7-89.9%). The use of the recommended 22C3 antibody increased from 59.9 to 74.3%. A total of 673 PD-L1 tests on histological material from 12 laboratories were analysed to investigate interlaboratory variation. Four (33%) deviated significantly from the national mean of PD-L1-positive cases using CPS ≥ 1 cut-off, while two (17%) deviated significantly for CPS ≥ 20 cut-off.

CONCLUSION

In the first 3 years of PD-L1 assessment in HNSCC, the testing landscape became more uniform. However, interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity rates between Dutch laboratories was substantial. This implies that there is a need for further test standardisation to reduce this variation.

Identification of new head and neck squamous cell carcinoma molecular imaging targets

OBJECTIVES

Intraoperative fluorescence imaging (FI) of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is performed to identify tumour-positive surgical margins, currently using epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as imaging target. EGFR, not exclusively present in HNSCC, may result in non-specific tracer accumulation in normal tissues. We aimed to identify new potential HNSCC FI targets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Publicly available transcriptomic data were collected, and a biostatistical method (Transcriptional Adaptation to Copy Number Alterations (TACNA)-profiling) was applied. TACNA-profiling captures downstream effects of CNAs on mRNA levels, which may translate to protein-level overexpression. Overexpressed genes were identified by comparing HNSCC versus healthy oral mucosa. Potential targets, selected based on overexpression and plasma membrane expression, were immunohistochemically stained. Expression was compared to EGFR on paired biopsies of HNSCC, adjacent macroscopically suspicious mucosa, and healthy mucosa.

RESULTS

TACNA-profiling was applied on 111 healthy oral mucosa and 410 HNSCC samples, comparing expression levels of 19,635 genes. The newly identified targets were glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1), placental cadherin (P-cadherin), monocarboxylate transporter-1 (MCT-1), and neural/glial antigen-2 (NG2), and were evaluated by IHC on samples of 31 patients. GLUT-1 was expressed in 100 % (median; range: 60-100 %) of tumour cells, P-cadherin in 100 % (50-100 %), EGFR in 70 % (0-100 %), MCT-1 in 30 % (0-100 %), and NG2 in 10 % (0-70 %). GLUT-1 and P-cadherin showed higher expression than EGFR (p < 0.001 and p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

The immunohistochemical confirmation of TACNA-profiling results showed significantly higher GLUT-1 and P-cadherin expression than EGFR, warranting further investigation as HNSCC FI targets.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated polymyalgia rheumatica versus primary polymyalgia rheumatica: comparison of disease characteristics and treatment requirement

OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical characteristics, imaging findings and treatment requirements of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated polymyalgia rheumatica (ICI-PMR) and primary PMR.

METHODS

This single centre, retrospective cohort study compared ICI-PMR in patients with cancer (n = 15) to patients with primary PMR (n = 37). A comparison was made between clinical symptoms, laboratory markers, ultrasonography,18F-FDG-PET/CT findings and treatment requirements related to PMR.

RESULTS

Patients with ICI-PMR less frequently fulfilled the EULAR/ACR classification criteria for PMR (66.7%) than patients with primary PMR (97.3%). Morning stiffness, weight loss and elevation of the ESR were less frequently seen in patients with ICI-PMR. No differences were observed regarding the presence of inflammatory lesions on ultrasound of the shoulders and hips between the two groups. The Leuven and the Leuven/Groningen 18F-FDG-PET/CT scores were significantly lower in the ICI-PMR group. Finally, the ICI-PMR group could be managed with less glucocorticoids than the primary PMR group.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that ICI-PMR may have a milder course with less inflammation than primary PMR on 18F-FDG-PET/CT. ICI-mediated PMR patients can be managed with a relatively low glucocorticoid dose. Our study underscores that ICI-PMR should be regarded as PMR-like syndrome.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: nationwide trends in subtype-specific incidence and survival over 3 decades in a non-endemic area

PURPOSE

To identify trends in incidence and survival of NPC, subdivided by EBV status and histopathological subtype, over a 30-year period in the Netherlands.

METHODS

Anonymized data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank (PALGA) for the period 1989-2018 were linked to identify and classify NPC cases.

RESULTS

Incidence of NPC remained stable, with an annual percentage change (APC) of - 0.2. (95% CI - 0.9; 0.5). EBV testing became routine only in the last decade, the incidence of EBV-positive tumors remained stable over this period (APC 1.2, 95% CI - 1.3; 3.8). An increase in EBV-negative tumors (APC: 7.1, 95% CI 2.5; 11.9) and a decrease in untested tumors were found (APC: - 10.7, 95% CI - 15.7; - 5.7). The incidence of non-keratinizing, differentiated tumors increased (APC: 3.8, (95% CI 2.2; 5.5) while the incidence of other histological subtypes remained stable. Overall survival was better in patients diagnosed after 1998 (hazard ratio 0.8, 95% CI 0.6; 0.9). EBV status, histology, stage, and age were independently associated with relative excess risk of dying, but period of diagnosis was not.

CONCLUSION

Testing for EBV increased over time, and a stable incidence of EBV-positive NPC over the last 10 years. The rising incidence of non-keratinizing, differentiated NPC mirrors data from the US and suggests a shift in non-endemic regions.

ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale for haematological malignancies (ESMO-MCBS:H) version 1.0

BACKGROUND

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS) has been accepted as a robust tool to evaluate the magnitude of clinical benefit reported in trials for oncological therapies. However, the ESMO-MCBS hitherto has only been validated for solid tumours. With the rapid development of novel therapies for haematological malignancies, we aimed to develop an ESMO-MCBS version that is specifically designed and validated for haematological malignancies.

METHODS

ESMO and the European Hematology Association (EHA) initiated a collaboration to develop a version for haematological malignancies (ESMO-MCBS:H). The process incorporated five landmarks: field testing of the ESMO-MCBS version 1.1 (v1.1) to identify shortcomings specific to haematological diseases, drafting of the ESMO-MCBS:H forms, peer review and revision of the draft based on re-scoring (resulting in a second draft), assessment of reasonableness of the scores generated, final review and approval by ESMO and EHA including executive boards.

RESULTS

Based on the field testing results of 80 haematological trials and extensive review for feasibility and reasonableness, five amendments to ESMO-MCBS were incorporated in the ESMO-MCBS:H addressing the identified shortcomings. These concerned mainly clinical trial endpoints that differ in haematology versus solid oncology and the very indolent nature of nevertheless incurable diseases such as follicular lymphoma, which hampers presentation of mature data. In addition, general changes incorporated in the draft version of the ESMO-MCBS v2 were included, and specific forms for haematological malignancies generated. Here we present the final approved forms of the ESMO-MCBS:H, including instructions.

CONCLUSION

The haematology-specific version ESMO-MCBS:H allows now full applicability of the scale for evaluating the magnitude of clinical benefit derived from clinical studies in haematological malignancies.

The PRO-RCC study: a long-term PROspective Renal Cell Carcinoma cohort in the Netherlands, providing an infrastructure for 'Trial within Cohorts' study designs

BACKGROUND

Ongoing research in the field of both localized, locally advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma has resulted in the availability of multiple treatment options. Hence, many questions are still unanswered and await further research. A nationwide collaborative registry allows to collect corresponding data. For this purpose, the Dutch PROspective Renal Cell Carcinoma cohort (PRO-RCC) has been founded, for the prospective collection of long-term clinical data, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient reported experience measures (PREMs).

METHODS

PRO-RCC is designed as a multicenter cohort for all Dutch patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Recruitment will start in the Netherlands in 2023. Importantly, participants may also consent to participation in a 'Trial within cohorts' studies (TwiCs). The TwiCs design provides a method to perform (randomized) interventional studies within the registry. The clinical data collection is embedded in the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Next to the standardly available data on RCC, additional clinical data will be collected. PROMS entail Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), symptom monitoring with optional ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of pain and fatigue, and optional return to work- and/or nutrition questionnaires. PREMS entail satisfaction with care. Both PROMS and PREMS are collected through the PROFILES registry and are accessible for the patient and the treating physician.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Ethical board approval has been obtained (2021_218) and the study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05326620).

DISCUSSION

PRO-RCC is a nationwide long-term cohort for the collection of real-world clinical data, PROMS and PREMS. By facilitating an infrastructure for the collection of prospective data on RCC, PRO-RCC will contribute to observational research in a real-world study population and prove effectiveness in daily clinical practice. The infrastructure of this cohort also enables that interventional studies can be conducted with the TwiCs design, without the disadvantages of classic RCTs such as slow patient accrual and risk of dropping out after randomization.

The genomic and transcriptomic landscape of advanced renal cell cancer for individualized treatment strategies

Differences in the clinical course and treatment responses in individual patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can largely be explained by the different genomics of this disease. To improve the personalized treatment strategy and survival outcomes for patients with advanced RCC, the genomic make-up in patients with advanced RCC was investigated to identify putative actionable variants and signatures. In this prospective multicenter study (NCT01855477), whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data of locally advanced and metastatic tissue biopsies and matched whole-blood samples were collected from 91 patients with histopathologically confirmed RCC. WGS data were analyzed for small somatic variants, copy-number alterations and structural variants. For a subgroup of patients, RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data could be analyzed. RNA-Seq data were clustered on immunogenic and angiogenic gene expression patterns according to a previously developed angio-immunogenic gene signature. In all patients with papillary and clear cell RCC, putative actionable drug targets were detected by WGS, of which 94% were on-label available. RNA-Seq data of clear cell and papillary RCC were clustered using a previously developed angio-immunogenic gene signature. Analyses of driver mutations and RNA-Seq data revealed clear differences among different RCC subtypes, showing the added value of WGS and RNA-Seq over clinicopathological data. By improving both histological subtyping and the selection of treatment according to actionable targets and immune signatures, WGS and RNA-Seq may improve therapeutic decision making for most patients with advanced RCC, including patients with non-clear cell RCC for whom no standard treatment is available to data. Prospective clinical trials are needed to evaluate the impact of genomic and transcriptomic diagnostics on survival outcome for advanced RCC patients.

Methodological and reporting standards for quality-of-life data eligible for European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) credit

BACKGROUND

The European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) has been developed to grade clinical benefit of cancer therapies. Improvement in quality of life (QoL) is considered relevant, especially in the non-curative setting. This is reflected by an upgrade of the preliminary ESMO-MCBS score if QoL is improved compared to the control arm or a downgrade if an improvement in progression-free survival is not paralleled by an improvement in QoL or overall survival. Given the importance of QoL for the final score, a need to ensure the robustness of QoL data was recognised.

DESIGN

A checklist was created based on existing guidelines for QoL research. Field testing was carried out using clinical trials that either received an adjustment of the preliminary ESMO-MCBS score based on QoL or had QoL as the primary endpoint. Several rounds of revision and re-testing of the checklist were undertaken until a final consensus was reached.

RESULTS

The final checklist consists of four items and can be applied if three prerequisites are met: (i) QoL is at least a secondary endpoint, (ii) evidence of reliability and validity of the instrument is provided, and (iii) a statistically and clinically significant improvement in QoL is observed. The four items on the checklist pertain to the (i) hypothesis, (ii) compliance and missing data, (iii) presentation of the results, and (iv) statistical and clinical relevance. Field testing revealed that a clear QoL hypothesis and correction for multiple testing were mostly lacking, while the main statistical method was always described.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the ESMO-MCBS QoL checklist will facilitate objective and transparent decision making on QoL data within the ESMO-MCBS scoring process. Trials published until 1 January 2025 will have to meet the prerequisites and at least two items for crediting QoL benefit in the final ESMO-MCBS score. Trials published thereafter will have to meet all four items.

Methylated Cell-Free DNA Sequencing (MeD-seq) of LpnPI Digested Fragments to Identify Early Progression in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients on Watchful Waiting

According to the current guidelines, watchful waiting (WW) is a feasible option for patients with good or intermediate prognosis renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). However, some patients rapidly progress during WW, requiring the initiation of treatment. Here, we explore whether we can identify those patients using circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation. We first defined a panel of RCC-specific circulating methylation markers by intersecting differentially methylated regions from a publicly available dataset with known RCC methylation markers from the literature. The resulting RCC-specific methylation marker panel of 22 markers was subsequently evaluated for an association with rapid progression by methylated DNA sequencing (MeD-seq) in serum from 10 HBDs and 34 RCC patients with a good or intermediate prognosis starting WW in the IMPACT-RCC study. Patients with an elevated RCC-specific methylation score compared to HBDs had a shorter progression-free survival (PFS, p = 0.018), but not a shorter WW-time (p = 0.15). Cox proportional hazards regression showed that only the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria were significantly associated with WW time (HR 2.01, p = 0.01), whereas only our RCC-specific methylation score (HR 4.45, p = 0.02) was significantly associated with PFS. The results of this study suggest that cfDNA methylation is predictive of PFS but not WW.

[89Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab and [18F]FDG PET/CT to Predict Watchful Waiting Duration in Patients with Metastatic Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Watchful waiting (WW) can be considered for patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) with good or intermediate prognosis, especially those with <2 International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium criteria and ≤2 metastatic sites [referred to as watch and wait ("W&W") criteria]. The IMaging PAtients for Cancer drug SelecTion-Renal Cell Carcinoma study objective was to assess the predictive value of [18F]FDG PET/CT and [89Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab PET/CT for WW duration in patients with mccRCC.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Between February 2015 and March 2018, 48 patients were enrolled, including 40 evaluable patients with good (n = 14) and intermediate (n = 26) prognosis. Baseline contrast-enhanced CT, [18F]FDG and [89Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab PET/CT were performed. Primary endpoint was the time to disease progression warranting systemic treatment. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were measured using lesions on CT images coregistered to PET/CT. High and low uptake groups were defined on the basis of median geometric mean SUVmax of RECIST-measurable lesions across patients.

RESULTS

The median WW time was 16.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.0-31.7]. The median WW period was shorter in patients with high [18F]FDG tumor uptake than those with low uptake (9.0 vs. 36.2 months; HR, 5.6; 95% CI: 2.4-14.7; P < 0.001). Patients with high [89Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab tumor uptake had a median WW period of 9.3 versus 21.3 months with low uptake (HR, 1.7; 95% CI: 0.9-3.3; P = 0.13). Patients with "W&W criteria" had a longer median WW period of 21.3 compared with patients without: 9.3 months (HR, 1.9; 95% CI: 0.9-3.9; Pone-sided = 0.034). Adding [18F]FDG uptake to the "W&W criteria" improved the prediction of WW duration (P < 0.001); whereas [89Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab did not (P = 0.53).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with good- or intermediate-risk mccRCC, low [18F]FDG uptake is associated with prolonged WW. This study shows the predictive value of the "W&W criteria" for WW duration and shows the potential of [18F]FDG-PET/CT to further improve this.

Molecular imaging to support cancer immunotherapy

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has reinvigorated the field of immuno-oncology. These monoclonal antibody-based therapies allow the immune system to recognize and eliminate malignant cells. This has resulted in improved survival of patients across several tumor types. However, not all patients respond to immunotherapy therefore predictive biomarkers are important. There are only a few Food and Drug Administration-approved biomarkers to select patients for immunotherapy. These biomarkers do not consider the heterogeneity of tumor characteristics across lesions within a patient. New molecular imaging tracers allow for whole-body visualization with positron emission tomography (PET) of tumor and immune cell characteristics, and drug distribution, which might guide treatment decision making. Here, we summarize recent developments in molecular imaging of immune checkpoint molecules, such as PD-L1, PD-1, CTLA-4, and LAG-3. We discuss several molecular imaging approaches of immune cell subsets and briefly summarize the role of FDG-PET for evaluating cancer immunotherapy. The main focus is on developments in clinical molecular imaging studies, next to preclinical studies of interest given their potential translation to the clinic.

A Randomized Phase II Study of MEDI0680 in Combination with Durvalumab versus Nivolumab Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

MEDI0680 is a humanized anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody, and durvalumab is an anti-PD-L1 antibody. Combining treatment using these antibodies may improve efficacy versus blockade of PD-1 alone. This phase II study evaluated antitumor activity and safety of MEDI0680 plus durvalumab versus nivolumab monotherapy in immunotherapy-naïve patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma who received at least one prior line of antiangiogenic therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received either MEDI0680 (20 mg/kg) with durvalumab (750 mg) or nivolumab (240 mg), all intravenous, every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included best overall response, progression-free survival (PFS), safety, overall survival (OS), and immunogenicity. Exploratory endpoints included changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), baseline tumor mutational burden, and tumor-infiltrated immune cell profiles.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were randomized (combination, n = 42; nivolumab, n = 21). ORR was 16.7% [7/42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.0-31.4] with combination treatment and 23.8% (5/21; 95% CI, 8.2-47.2) with nivolumab. Median PFS was 3.6 months in both arms; median OS was not reached in either arm. Because of adverse events, 23.8% of patients discontinued MEDI0680 and durvalumab and 14.3% of patients discontinued nivolumab. In the combination arm, reduction in ctDNA fraction was associated with longer PFS. ctDNA mutational analysis did not demonstrate an association with response in either arm. Tumor-infiltrated immune profiles showed an association between immune cell activation and response in the combination arm.

CONCLUSIONS

MEDI0680 combined with durvalumab was safe and tolerable; however, it did not improve efficacy versus nivolumab monotherapy.

Abstract 6260: Identification of molecular imaging targets specific for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by transcriptional adaptation to copy number alterations profiling: Digital data translated to protein expression

Objective: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) can intraoperatively be visualized by fluorescence molecular imaging (FMI) using fluorophores conjugated to HNSCC specific antibodies. Currently, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is used as a target. Targets more specific for HNSCC would reduce background signal, resulting in a higher tumor to background ratio. We aimed to identify new potential targets for FMI in HNSCC.

Methods: Publicly available transcriptomic data were collected. A biostatistical method known as Transcriptional Adaptation to Copy Number Alterations (TACNA) profiling was applied, which captures the downstream effects of copy number alterations (CNAs) on mRNA levels, which we used to predict the overexpression on the protein level. By comparing gene expression profiles of HNSCC and normal oral mucosa, genes overexpressed explicitly in HNSCC were identified. Potential targets were selected based on the degree of overexpression, plasma membrane expression, and cross expression in other tissues in the head and neck region. Next, the expression of potential targets of TACNA results on mRNA level were validated on the protein level and compared to EGFR expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Subsequently, paired biopsies of HNSCC, adjacent suspicious mucosa, and healthy mucosa of the same patients were stained. Receptor expression was evaluated using H-scores (i.e., percentage of positive cells combined with staining intensity).

Results: TACNA profiling was applied on 111 samples of healthy oral mucosa and 410 HNSCC comparing expression levels of 19,635 genes. The newly identified membrane-bound targets were glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1), placental cadherin (P-cadherin), and monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT-1). The three targets were evaluated by IHC in a total of 31 patients, of which 8 had oropharyngeal, 7 hypopharyngeal, and 16 laryngeal carcinomas. GLUT-1 had a median H-score of 175, P-cadherin 140, and MCT-1 40. GLUT-1 and P-cadherin were significantly higher compared to EGFR, with a median H-score of 90 (p &lt; .001). GLUT-1 receptor expression was also seen on erythrocytes, while P-cadherin expression was seen in the basal layer of normal epithelium. This can complicate its use in FMI.

Conclusion: TACNA profiling results were successfully validated in immunohistochemistry as a first step in the search for new specific FMI targets in HNSCC. GLUT-1 and P-cadherin show promising results with significantly higher receptor expression than EGFR.

Citation Format: Jeroen E. van Schaik, Bert van der Vegt, Bernard F.A.M. van der Laan, Max J.H. Witjes, Sjoukje F. Oosting, Rudolf S. Fehrmann, Boudewijn E. Plaat. Identification of molecular imaging targets specific for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by transcriptional adaptation to copy number alterations profiling: Digital data translated to protein expression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 6260.

Abstract 6261: Comparison of glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein b, epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and untreated and residual lymph node metastases

Objective: To evaluate expression of the potential molecular imaging targets glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein B (GPNMB) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in comparison to classical epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in previously untreated head and neck cancer primary tumors and corresponding lymph node metastases, and in lymph node metastases after initial (chemo)radiotherapy. Methods: Primary tumors and lymph node metastases of 38 patients who underwent primary resection of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) were selected. In addition, lymph node metastases from salvage surgery after (chemo)radiotherapy from 22 patients with HNSCC were selected. Immunohistochemical staining for EGFR, VEGF and GPNMB was performed, after which protein expression was scored using H-scores (percentage of positive tumor cells multiplied by staining intensity ranging from 0 to 2). Primary tumors and lymph node metastases with an H-score ≥5 were considered positive, after which sensitivity rates were calculated. Groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric data with post-hoc Bonferroni corrections. Results: In untreated primary HNSCC the sensitivity was 86.8% for EGFR (median H-score 60), 92.1% for VEGF (median 60), and 100% for GPNMB (median 100). In previously untreated lymph node metastases the sensitivity was 81.6% for EGFR (median 30), 86.8% for VEGF (median 65), and 100% for GPNMB (median 118). In lymph node metastases after initial (chemo)radiotherapy, sensitivity was 86.4% for EGFR (median 95) and 100% for GPMB (median 100). VEGF sensitivity could not reliably be evaluated in these lymph nodes due to nonspecific staining in all tissue slides. GPNMB expression was significantly higher compared to EGFR in untreated primary HNSCC (p = .009 and p &lt; .001, respectively) and lymph node metastases (p &lt; .001 for both). Conclusion: GPNMB shows better tumor-specific receptor expression in both sensitivity and H-scores compared to EGFR and VEGF in immunohistochemistry. VEGF performed comparable to EGFR in untreated HNSCC and lymph node metastases. GPNMB could therefore be a new potential imaging target based on these immunohistochemical results.

Citation Format: Jeroen E. van Schaik, Bert van der Vegt, Saskia H. Hanemaaijer, Gyorgy B. Halmos, Max J. Witjes, Bernard F.A.M. van der Laan, Rudolf S. Fehrmann, Sjoukje F. Oosting, Boudewijn E. Plaat. Comparison of glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein b, epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and untreated and residual lymph node metastases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 6261.

89Zr-DFO-durvalumab PET/CT prior to durvalumab treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer

Background: In the PINCH study we performed ⁸⁹Zr-DFO-durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) PET/CT in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) prior to monotherapy durvalumab treatment. The primary aims were to assess safety and feasibility of ⁸⁹Zr-DFO-durvalumab PET-imaging and predict disease control rate during durvalumab treatment. Secondary aims were to correlate ⁸⁹Zr-DFO-durvalumab uptake to tumor PD-L1 expression, ¹⁸F-FDG uptake, and treatment response of individual lesions. Methods: In this prospective multicenter phase I-II study (NCT03829007), patients with incurable R/M SCCHN underwent baseline [¹⁸F]FDG PET and CT or MRI imaging. Subsequently, PD-L1 PET-imaging was performed 5 days after 37MBq [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-durvalumab administration. To optimize imaging conditions, dose-finding was performed in the first 14 patients. For all patients, durvalumab treatment (1500mg/4 weeks, IV) was started <1 week after PD-L1 PET imaging and continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (maximum 24 months). CT evaluation was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 every 8 weeks. PD-L1-expression was determined by combined positive score (CPS) on (archival) tumor-tissue. [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-durvalumab uptake was measured in [¹⁸F]FDG-positive lesions, primary and secondary lymphoid organs, and bloodpool. Results: In total, 33 patients with locoregional recurrent (n = 12) or metastatic SCCHN (n = 21) were enrolled. [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-durvalumab injection was safe. A dose of 10mg durvalumab resulted in highest tumor-to-blood-ratios. After a median follow-up of 12.6 months, overall response rate was 26%. The disease control rate at 16 weeks was 48% with a mean duration of 7.8 months (range 1.7-21.1). On a patient level, [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-durvalumab-SUVpeak or tumor-to-blood ratio could not predict treatment response (HR 1.4 (95%CI 0.5-3.9, P = 0.54) and (HR 1.3 (95%CI 0.5-3.6, P = 0.61) respectively). Also, on a lesion level, [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-durvalumab-SUVpeak showed no substantial correlation to treatment response (Spearman ρ= 0.45, P = 0.051). Lesional [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-durvalumab-uptake did not correlate to PD-L1 CPS score, but did correlate to [¹⁸F]FDG SUV peak (Spearman ρ= 0.391, P = 0.005). Conclusion: PINCH is the first PD-L1 PET/CT study in patients with R/M SCCHN and has shown the feasibility and safety of [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-durvalumab PET/CT in a multi-center trial. [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-durvalumab-uptake did not correlate to durvalumab treatment response.

Disadvantaged Subgroups Within the Global Head and Neck Cancer Population: How Can We Optimize Care?

Within the global head and neck cancer population, there are subgroups of patients with poorer cancer outcomes independent from tumor characteristics. In this article, we review three such groups. The first group comprises patients with nasopharyngeal cancer in low- and middle-income countries where access to high-volume, well-resourced radiotherapy centers is limited. We discuss a recent study that is aiming to improve outcomes through the instigation of a comprehensive radiotherapy quality assurance program. The second group comprises patients with low socioeconomic status in a high-income country who experience substantial financial toxicity, defined as financial hardship for patients due to health care costs. We review causes and consequences of financial toxicity and discuss how it can be mitigated. The third group comprises older patients who may poorly tolerate and not benefit from intensive standard-of-care treatment. We discuss the role of geriatric assessment, particularly in relation to the use of chemotherapy. Through better recognition and understanding of disadvantaged groups within the global head and neck cancer population, we will be better placed to instigate the necessary changes to improve outcomes and quality of life for patients with head and neck cancer.

Impact of sarcopenia on acute radiation-induced toxicity in head and neck cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Sarcopenia is related to late radiation-induced toxicities and worse survival in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. This study tested the hypothesis that sarcopenia improves the performance of current normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models of radiation-induced acute toxicity in HNC patients.

MATERIAL/METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis in a prospective cohort of HNC patients treated from January 2007 to December 2018 with (chemo)radiotherapy. Planning CT-scans were used for evaluating skeletal muscle mass. Characteristics of sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients were compared. The impact of sarcopenia was analysed by adding sarcopenia to the linear predictors of current NTCP models predicting physician- and patient-rated acute toxicities.

RESULTS

The cut-off values of sarcopenia in the study population (n=977) were established at skeletal muscle index <42.0 cm2/m2 (men) and <31.2 cm2/m2 (women), corresponding to the lowest sex-specific quartile. Compared to non-sarcopenic patients, sarcopenic patients were more frequently smokers (61% vs. 48%, p<0.001), had more often advanced stage of disease (stage III-IV, p=0.004), higher age (67 vs. 63 years, p<0.001) and experienced more pretreatment complaints, such as dysphagia (grade ≥2, p<0.001). Sarcopenia remained statistically significant, next to the linear predictor, only for physician-rated grade ≥3 dysphagia (week 3-6 during RT, p<0.01). However, sarcopenia did not improve the performance of these NTCP models (p>0.99).

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia in HNC patients was an independent prognostic factor for radiation-induced physician-rated acute grade ≥3 dysphagia, which might be explained by its impact on swallowing muscles. However, addition of sarcopenia did not improve the NTCP model performance.

Comprehensive Molecular Characterization Reveals Genomic and Transcriptomic Subtypes of Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Recent molecular characterization of primary urothelial carcinoma (UC) may guide future clinical decision-making. For metastatic UC (mUC), a comprehensive molecular characterization is still lacking. We analyzed whole-genome DNA and RNA sequencing data for fresh-frozen metastatic tumor biopsies from 116 mUC patients who were scheduled for palliative systemic treatment within the context of a clinical trial (NCT01855477 and NCT02925234). Hierarchical clustering for mutational signatures revealed two major genomic subtypes: GenS1 (67%), which was APOBEC-driven; and GenS2 (24%), which had a high fraction of de novo mutational signatures related to reactive oxygen species and is putatively clock-like. Significantly mutated genes (SMGs) did not differ between the genomic subtypes. Transcriptomic analysis revealed five mUC subtypes: luminal-a and luminal-b (40%), stroma-rich (24%), basal/squamous (23%), and a nonspecified subtype (12%). These subtypes differed regarding expression of key genes, SMGs, oncogenic pathway activity, and immune cell infiltration. We integrated the genomic and transcriptomic data to propose potential therapeutic options by transcriptomic subtype and for individual patients. This in-depth analysis of a large cohort of patients with mUC may serve as a reference for subtype-oriented and patient-specific research on the etiology of mUC and for novel drug development. PATIENT SUMMARY: We carried out an in-depth analysis of the molecular and genetic features of metastatic cancer involving the cells that line the urinary tract. We showed that this is a heterogeneous disease with different molecular subtypes and we identified possible targets for therapy for each subtype.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis : Case reports and a review of the literature

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly recognised to effectuate long-lasting therapeutic responses in solid tumours. However, ICI therapy can also result in various immune-related adverse events, such as ICI-associated myocarditis, a rare but serious complication. The clinical spectrum is wide and includes asymptomatic patients and patients with fulminant heart failure, making it challenging to diagnose this condition. Furthermore, the optimal diagnostic algorithm and treatment of ICI-associated myocarditis is unknown. In this review, we describe two cases on both ends of the spectrum and discuss the challenges in recognising, diagnosing and treating ICI-associated myocarditis.

mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccination in patients receiving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or chemoimmunotherapy for solid tumours: a prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer have an increased risk of complications from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccination to prevent COVID-19 is recommended, but data on the immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines for patients with solid tumours receiving systemic cancer treatment are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to assess the impact of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and chemoimmunotherapy on the immunogenicity and safety of the mRNA-1273 (Moderna Biotech, Madrid, Spain) COVID-19 vaccine as part of the Vaccination Against COVID in Cancer (VOICE) trial.

METHODS

This prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority trial was done across three centres in the Netherlands. Individuals aged 18 years or older with a life expectancy of more than 12 months were enrolled into four cohorts: individuals without cancer (cohort A [control cohort]), and patients with solid tumours, regardless of stage and histology, treated with immunotherapy (cohort B), chemotherapy (cohort C), or chemoimmunotherapy (cohort D). Participants received two mRNA-1273 vaccinations of 100 μg in 0·5 mL intramuscularly, 28 days apart. The primary endpoint, analysed per protocol (excluding patients with a positive baseline sample [>10 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL], indicating previous SARS-CoV-2 infection), was defined as the SARS-CoV-2 spike S1-specific IgG serum antibody response (ie, SARS-CoV-2-binding antibody concentration of >10 BAU/mL) 28 days after the second vaccination. For the primary endpoint analysis, a non-inferiority design with a margin of 10% was used. We also assessed adverse events in all patients who received at least one vaccination, and recorded solicited adverse events in participants who received at least one vaccination but excluding those who already had seroconversion (>10 BAU/mL) at baseline. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04715438.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 17 and March 12, 2021, 791 participants were enrolled and followed up for a median of 122 days (IQR 118 to 128). A SARS-CoV-2-binding antibody response was found in 240 (100%; 95% CI 98 to 100) of 240 evaluable participants in cohort A, 130 (99%; 96 to >99) of 131 evaluable patients in cohort B, 223 (97%; 94 to 99) of 229 evaluable patients in cohort C, and 143 (100%; 97 to 100) of 143 evaluable patients in cohort D. The SARS-CoV-2-binding antibody response in each patient cohort was non-inferior compared with cohort A. No new safety signals were observed. Grade 3 or worse serious adverse events occurred in no participants in cohort A, three (2%) of 137 patients in cohort B, six (2%) of 244 patients in cohort C, and one (1%) of 163 patients in cohort D, with four events (two of fever, and one each of diarrhoea and febrile neutropenia) potentially related to the vaccination. There were no vaccine-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Most patients with cancer develop, while receiving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or both for a solid tumour, an adequate antibody response to vaccination with the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine is also safe in these patients. The minority of patients with an inadequate response after two vaccinations might benefit from a third vaccination.

FUNDING

ZonMw, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.

Abstract 2190: Integrative genomic and transcriptomic characterization of metastatic urothelial carcinoma

Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is a lethal cancer with limited therapeutic options available. To identify novel targets for therapy, large-scale sequencing efforts are needed. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) initiative substantially improved our knowledge on the genomic and transcriptomic characteristics of primary UC (Robertson et al. Cell 2017), however, the molecular landscape of mUC still remains largely unexplored.

We performed whole genome sequencing (WGS) on 116 biopsies of UC metastases and matched mRNA sequencing (RNAseq) for 90 samples. We applied genomic alteration analysis on the WGS data and consensus clustering on the RNAseq data.

We compared the molecular alterations of mUC with the data of the TCGA cohort and found that most affected driver genes were similar between primary UC and mUC. However, we identified CNTNAP5, RARG and MGP as exclusively mutated driver genes in the metastatic setting, and TP53 alterations were more prevalent in mUC than in primary UC. APOBEC induced mutation signatures in coding and non-coding regions were identified in 91% of the mUC samples and correlated with ploidy, mutational burden and copy number alterations. Based on the etiology of observed mutational signatures, five genomic subtypes were identified in mUC and validated in the TCGA cohort. APOBEC mutagenesis was the main mutational process in genomic subtype 1, which was the most common subtype (67%, N = 78). Moreover, APOBEC deamination mutations were found to be increased over time in paired biopsies from eight patients, indicating that APOBEC enzyme activity is ongoing in the metastatic setting. Unsupervised clustering and comparing phenotypic markers between the groups revealed five clinically-relevant transcriptomic subtypes: luminal-a (20%), luminal-b (20%), stroma-rich (24%), basal/squamous (23%) and a non-specified phenotype (12%). The basal/squamous and stroma-rich subtypes showed highly similar molecular characteristics as the TCGA subtypes, but with enrichment of the stroma-rich and reduction of the basal/squamous subtype. Based on genomic alterations, potential therapeutic targets were identified in 111/116 mUC patients, of which FGFR3 alterations (18%) and fusions (6%), and CDKN2A (44%), ERBB2 (20%), and TSC1 (14%) alterations were most common. By integrating the genomic and transcriptomic data, we propose potential novel therapeutic options per transcriptomic subtype, like addition of a TGF-β inhibitor to immune checkpoint inhibition for the stroma-rich and basal/squamous subtypes that showed the highest TGF-β pathway activity.

Using WGS and RNAseq analyses, we provide a comprehensive overview of the molecular landscape of mUC that may serve as a reference for more subgroup-oriented and patient-specific research on the etiology of mUC and future drug development.

Citation Format: Maud Rijnders, J Alberto Nakauma-González, Job van Riet, Michiel S. van der Heijden, Jens Voortman, Edwin P. J. G Cuppen, Niven Mehra, Sandra van Wilpe, Sjoukje F. Oosting, L Lucia Rijstenberg, Ellen C. Zwarthoff, Ronald de Wit, Astrid A. van der Veldt, Harmen J. van de Werken, Martijn P. Lolkema, Joost L. Boormans. Integrative genomic and transcriptomic characterization of metastatic urothelial carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2190.

Abstract LB037: 89ZED88082A PET imaging to visualize CD8+ T cells in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor

T cell enhancing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are effective across several tumor types in a subset of patients. Insights into systemic localization of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells might support early treatment decisions. To address this, we performed a PET imaging study with a zirconium-89 (89Zr) labeled one-armed CD8-specific antibody 89ZED88082A to assess tracer performance, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) before and during treatment. Here we report preliminary data on uptake in tumor lesions before ICI. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors that may benefit from ICI are eligible. In part A (imaging before treatment) and part B (imaging before and during treatment), 37 MBq (1 mCi) 89ZED88082A is administered with unlabeled one-armed antibody CED88004S to vary total protein dose. PET images are acquired at up to 4 time points: 1 h, and days (d) 2, 4, 7 post-injection followed by a tumor biopsy for CD8 immunohistochemistry and autoradiography (NCT04029181). Subsequently, patients receive atezolizumab (NCT02478099) or standard of care nivolumab ± ipilimumab. Tumor and lymph node 89ZED88082A uptake are assessed as (geometric mean) maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), in other organs as SUVmean. Serum 89ZED88082A/CED88004S levels are measured for PK. Tumor response is according to (i)RECIST1.1. Results: For pretreatment imaging results, 32 patients (9 part A, 23 part B) were evaluable; 3 received 4 mg total tracer protein dose, 29 received 10 mg. No tracer infusion-related reactions occurred. Here we show results on d2 PET imaging with 10 mg protein dose, which was considered optimal based on superior 89Zr blood pool activity, clinical feasibility and serum antibody PK with a half-life of 28.6 h. 89ZED88082A uptake was observed within 1 h in spleen, and strong d2 imaging signal was seen across lymphoid organs including spleen (\bar{x}$ SUVmean 47.2), lymph nodes (SUVmax 4.2), bone marrow (\bar{x}$ SUVmean 5.0), small bowel and Waldeyer's ring. 89ZED88082A tumor uptake was seen at all main metastatic organ sites (overall lesion SUVmax 5.5, range 0.6-30.9) and varied across patients (\bar{x}$ per patient SUVmax 5.4, IQR 3.8-7.4). Higher tumor uptake showed a trend with better response (p=0.059) and longer PFS (p=0.033). Tumor uptake was higher in patients with mismatch-repair deficient (dMMR) than MMR proficient tumors (SUVmax 9.3 vs 4.9, p&lt;0.001). Tumors with immune desert vs CD8+ cell stromal/inflamed profile had a \bar{x}$ SUVmax of 4.7 vs 8.3 (p=0.042). In tumor biopsies, autoradiography signal and CD8 staining were linearly associated (p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: 89ZED88082A PET imaging is safe and shows high uptake in normal lymphoid organs. Uptake in tumor lesions is heterogeneous within and between patients. Tumor uptake is higher pretreatment in dMMR tumors and correlated with patient outcome. 89ZED88082A uptake on PET and by autoradiography reflects CD8 expression in tumor biopsies.

Citation Format: Laura Kist de Ruijter, Pim P. van de Donk, Jahlisa S. Hooiveld-Noeken, Danique Giesen, Alexander Ungewickell, Bernard M. Fine, Simon P. Williams, Sandra M. Sanabria Bohorquez, Mahesh Yadav, Hartmut Koeppen, Jing Jing, Sebastian Guelman, Mark T. Lin, Michael J. Mamounas, Jeffrey Eastham, Patrick K. Kimes, Andor W. Glaudemans, Adrienne H. Brouwers, Marjolijn N. Lub-de Hooge, Jourik A. Gietema, Carolina P. Schröder, Wim Timens, Mathilde Jalving, Sjoerd Elias, Sjoukje F. Oosting, Derk J. de Groot, Elisabeth G. de Vries. 89ZED88082A PET imaging to visualize CD8+ T cells in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB037.

Patient-Reported Toxicity and Quality-of-Life Profiles in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Definitive Radiation Therapy or Chemoradiation

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy is an effective but burdensome treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC). We aimed to characterize the severity and time pattern of patient-reported symptoms and quality of life in a large cohort of patients with HNC treated with definitive radiation therapy, with or without systemic treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 859 patients with HNC treated between 2007 and 2017 prospectively completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Cancer module (QLQ-HN35) and Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) at regular intervals during and after treatment for up to 5 years. Patients were classified into 3 subgroups: early larynx cancer, infrahyoideal cancer, and suprahyoideal cancer. Outcome scales of both questionnaires were quantified per subgroup and time point by means of average scores and the frequency distribution of categorized severity (none, mild, moderate, and severe). Time patterns and symptom severity were characterized. Toxicity profiles were compared using linear mixed model analysis. Additional toxicity profiles based on age, human papillomavirus status, treatment modality, smoking status, tumor site, and treatment period were characterized as well.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 157 patients with early larynx cancer, 304 with infrahyoideal cancer, and 398 with suprahyoideal cancer. The overall questionnaire response rate was 83%. Generally, the EORTC QLQ-HN35 symptoms reported showed a clear time pattern, with increasing scores during treatment followed by a gradual recovery in the first 2 years. Distinct toxicity profiles were seen across subgroups (P < .001), with generally less severe symptom scores in the early larynx subgroup. The EORTC QLQ-C30 functioning, quality-of-life, and general symptoms reported showed a less evident time pattern and less pronounced differences in mean scores between subgroups, although differences were still significant (P < .001). Differences in mean scores were most pronounced for role functioning, appetite loss, fatigue, and pain.

CONCLUSIONS

We established patient-reported toxicity and quality-of-life profiles that showed different patterns for 3 subgroups of patients with HNC. These profiles provide detailed information on the severity and persistence of various symptoms as experienced by patients during and after definitive radiation therapy. These profiles can be used to inform treatment of future patients and may serve as a benchmark for future studies.

Vascular aging in long-term survivors of testicular cancer more than 20 years after treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Late effects of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in testicular cancer survivors (TCS) include cardiovascular morbidity, but little data is available beyond 20 years. The objective was to assess vascular damage in very long-term TCS.

METHODS

TCS (treated with chemotherapy or orchiectomy only) and age-matched healthy controls were invited. Study assessment included vascular stiffness with ultrasound measurement of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV).

RESULTS

We included 127 TCS consisting of a chemotherapy group (70 patients) and an orchiectomy group (57 patients) along with 70 controls. Median follow-up was 28 years (range: 20-42). The cf-PWV (m/s) was higher in TCS than in controls (geometrical mean 8.05 (SD 1.23) vs. 7.60 (SD 1.21), p = 0.04). The cf-PWV was higher in the chemotherapy group than in the orchiectomy group (geometrical mean 8.39 (SD 1.22) vs. 7.61 (SD 1.21), p < 0.01). In the chemotherapy group cf-PWV increased more rapidly as a function of age compared to controls (regression coefficient b 7.59 × 10^-3 vs. 4.04 × 10^-3; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Very long-term TCS treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy show increased vascular damage compatible with "accelerated vascular aging" and continue to be at risk for cardiovascular morbidity, thus supporting the need for intensive cardiovascular risk management.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The clinical trial registration number is NCT02572934.

Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab in patients with autoimmune disease: Subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma

AIM

Patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease (AID) are typically excluded from clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and there are limited data on outcomes in this population. The single-arm international SAUL study of atezolizumab enrolled a broader 'real-world' patient population. We present outcomes in patients with a history of AID.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma received atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks until loss of clinical benefit or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end-point was safety. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary end-point. Subgroup analyses of AID patients were prespecified.

RESULTS

Thirty-five of 997 treated patients had AID at baseline, most commonly psoriasis (n = 15). Compared with non-AID patients, AID patients experienced numerically more adverse events (AEs) of special interest (46% versus 30%; grade ≥3 14% versus 6%) and treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs (26% versus 12%), but without relevant increases in treatment-related deaths (0% versus 1%) or AEs necessitating treatment discontinuation (9% versus 6%). Pre-existing AID worsened in four patients (11%; two flares in two patients); three of the six flares resolved, one was resolving, and two were unresolved. Efficacy was similar in AID and non-AID patients (median OS, 8.2 versus 8.8 months, respectively; median progression-free survival, 4.4 versus 2.2 months; disease control rate, 51% versus 39%).

CONCLUSIONS

In 35 atezolizumab-treated patients with pre-existing AID, incidences of special- interest and treatment-related AEs appeared acceptable. AEs were manageable, rarely requiring atezolizumab discontinuation. Treating these patients requires caution, but pre-existing AID does not preclude atezolizumab therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02928406.

Assessment of Bone Lesions with 18F-FDG PET Compared with 99mTc Bone Scintigraphy Leads to Clinically Relevant Differences in Metastatic Breast Cancer Management

It is unknown whether assessment of potential bone lesions in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) by ¹⁸F-FDG PET instead of ^99mTc bone scintigraphy (BS) supports clinically relevant changes in MBC management. Therefore, we retrospectively compared management recommendations based on bone lesion assessment by ¹⁸F-FDG PET plus contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) or BS plus ceCT, for patients with newly diagnosed MBC. Methods: Baseline ceCT, BS, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET for all patients included in the IMPACT-MBC study (NCT01957332) at the University Medical Center Groningen were reviewed for bone lesions. If bone lesions were found by any imaging modality, virtual MBC management recommendations were made by a multidisciplinary expert panel, based on either ¹⁸F-FDG PET plus ceCT or BS plus ceCT. The panel had access to standard clinicopathologic information and baseline imaging findings outside the skeleton. Clinically relevant management differences between the 2 recommendations were defined either as different treatment intent (curative, noncurative, or unable to determine) or as different systemic or local treatment. If no bone lesions were found by any imaging modality, the patients were included in the analyses without expert review. Results: In total, 3,473 unequivocal bone lesions were identified in 102 evaluated patients (39% by ceCT, 26% by BS, and 87% by ¹⁸F-FDG PET). Additional bone lesions on ¹⁸F-FDG PET plus ceCT compared with BS plus ceCT led to change in MBC management recommendations in 16% of patients (95% CI, 10%-24%). BS also changed management compared with ¹⁸F-FDG PET in 1 patient (1%; 95% CI, 0%-5%). In 26% (95% CI, 19%-36%) of patients, an additional ¹⁸F-FDG PET exam was requested, because BS provided insufficient information. Conclusion: In this exploratory analysis of newly diagnosed MBC patients, ¹⁸F-FDG PET versus BS to assess bone lesions resulted in clinically relevant management differences in 16% of patients. BS delivered insufficient information in over one fourth of patients, resulting in an additional request for ¹⁸F-FDG PET. On the basis of these data, ¹⁸F-FDG PET should be considered a primary imaging modality for assessment of bone lesions in newly diagnosed MBC.

Minimally important differences for interpreting European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 scores in patients with head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

We aimed to estimate minimally important difference (MID) for interpreting group-level change over time for European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) scores in head and neck cancer.

METHODS

Data were derived retrospectively from two published EORTC trials. Clinical anchors were selected using correlation strength and clinical plausibility of the given anchor/QLQ-C30 scale pair. MIDs for within-group and between-group change were estimated via the mean change method and linear regression, respectively. Distribution-based MIDs were also examined. MIDs for two of the scales, dyspnea and nausea/vomiting, are more uncertain considering their low correlations with the anchors.

RESULTS

Anchor-based MIDs could be determined for deterioration in 7 of the 14 QLQ-C30 scales assessed, and in 3 scales for improvement. MIDs varied by scale, direction of change, and anchor. Absolute MID values ranged from 5 to 15 points for within-group change and 4 to 12 for between-group change. Most MIDs were within 4 to 10 points.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings, if confirmed, will aid interpreting changes in selected QLQ-C30 scale scores over time and inform sample size calculations in future clinical trials in head and neck cancer.

Comparison of Carboplatin With 5-Fluorouracil vs. Cisplatin as Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) including three cycles of cisplatin is considered the standard of care for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). However, around one-third of the patients cannot complete cisplatin because of toxicity. Carboplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (carbo-5FU) is another accepted treatment option with a different toxicity profile. We compared tolerability and efficacy of concomitant carbo-5FU and cisplatin. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of LA-HNSCC patients treated with CRT in two Dutch cancer centers between 2007 and 2016. All patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy. One center routinely administered carboplatin 300-350 mg/m² at day 1, 22, and 43 followed by 5FU 600 mg/m²/day for 96 h. The other center used cisplatin 100 mg/m² at day 1, 22, and 43. The primary endpoint of this study was chemotherapy completion rate. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional control (LRC) and distant metastasis-free interval (DMFS), toxicity, and unplanned admissions. Results: In the carbo-5FU cohort (n = 211), 60.2% of the patients completed chemotherapy vs. 76.7% (p < 0.001) of the patients in the cisplatin cohort (n = 223). Univariate analysis showed a higher risk of death in the carbo-5FU cohort [hazard ratio (HR) 1.53, 95% CI, 1.09-2.14, p = 0.01] with a 3-year OS of 65.4 vs. 76.5% for cisplatin. OS was independently associated with T and N stage and p16 status, but not with chemotherapy regimen (HR 1.08, 95% CI, 0.76-1.55, p = 0.65). Three-year DFS was 70.0% for carbo-5FU vs. 78.6% for cisplatin (HR 1.37, 95% CI, 0.93-2.01, p = 0.05). A similar outcome was observed for both LRC (HR 1.27, 95% CI, 0.74-2.09, p = 0.4) and DMFS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.62-1.90, p = 0.77). The risk of discontinuation for chemotherapy-associated toxicity was higher in the carbo-5FU cohort than in the cisplatin cohort (relative risk = 1.69). Conclusion: LA-HNSCC patients treated with concomitant carbo-5FU completed chemotherapy less frequently than patients treated with cisplatin. Treatment regimen was not an independent prognostic factor for OS.

Pre-treatment radiomic features predict individual lymph node failure for head and neck cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To develop and validate a pre-treatment radiomics-based prediction model to identify pathological lymph nodes (pLNs) at risk of failures after definitive radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Training and validation cohorts consisted of 165 patients with 558 pLNs and 112 patients with 467 pLNs, respectively. All patients were primarily treated with definitive radiotherapy, with or without systemic treatment. The endpoint was the cumulative incidence of nodal failure. For each pLN, 82 pre-treatment CT radiomic features and 7 clinical features were included in the Cox proportional-hazard analysis.

RESULTS

There were 68 and 23 nodal failures in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed three clinical features (T-stage, gender and WHO Performance-status) and two radiomic features (Least-axis-length representing nodal size and gray level co-occurrence matrix based - Correlation representing nodal heterogeneity) as independent prognostic factors. The model showed good discrimination with a c-index of 0.80 (0.69-0.91) in the validation cohort, significantly better than models based on clinical features (p < 0.001) or radiomics (p = 0.003) alone. High- and low-risk groups were defined by using thresholds of estimated nodal failure risks at 2-year of 60% and 10%, resulting in positive and negative predictive values of 94.4% and 98.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A pre-treatment prediction model was developed and validated, integrating the quantitative radiomic features of individual lymph nodes with generally used clinical features. Using this prediction model, lymph nodes with a high failure risk can be identified prior to treatment, which might be used to select patients for intensified treatment strategies targeted on individual lymph nodes.

Molecular imaging biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have substantially changed the field of oncology over the past few years. ICIs offer an alternative treatment strategy by exploiting the patients' immune system, resulting in a T cell mediated anti-tumor response. These therapies are effective in multiple different tumor types. Unfortunately, a substantial group of patients do not respond to ICIs. Molecular imaging, using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET), can provide non-invasive whole-body visualization of tumor and immune cell characteristics and might support patient selection or response evaluations for ICI therapies. In this review, recent studies with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET imaging, imaging of immune checkpoints and imaging of immune cells will be discussed. These studies are until now mainly exploratory, but the first results suggest that molecular imaging biomarkers could have a role in the evaluation of ICI therapy.

From presentation to paper: Gender disparities in oncological research

Gender disparities in scientific publications have been identified in oncological research. Oral research presentations at major conferences enhance visibility of presenters. The share of women presenting at such podia is unknown. We aim to identify gender-based differences in contributions to presentations at two major oncological conferences. Abstracts presented at plenary sessions of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meetings and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congresses were collected. Trend analyses were used to analyze female contribution over time. The association between presenter's sex, study outcome (positive/negative) and journals' impact factors (IFs) of subsequently published papers was assessed using Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. Of 166 consecutive abstracts presented at ASCO in 2011-2018 (n = 34) and ESMO in 2008-2018 (n = 132), 21% had female presenters, all originating from Northern America (n = 17) or Europe (n = 18). The distribution of presenter's sex was similar over time (p = 0.70). Of 2,425 contributing authors to these presented abstracts, 28% were women. The proportion of female abstract authors increased over time (p < 0.05) and was higher in abstracts with female (34%) compared to male presenters (26%; p < 0.01). Presenter's sex was not associated with study outcome (p = 0.82). Median journals' IFs were lower in papers with a female first author (p < 0.05). In conclusion, there is a clear gender disparity in research presentations at two major oncological conferences, with 28% of authors and 21% of presenters of these studies being female. Lack of visibility of female presenters could impair acknowledgement for their research, opportunities in their academic career and even hamper heterogeneity in research.

Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors is associated with very low plasma-free serotonin concentrations in humans

Background

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) block the serotonin transporter on neurons, but also on platelets, thus decreasing platelet serotonin concentrations in users of SSRIs. Data on plasma-free serotonin concentrations in SSRI users are lacking, while plasma-free serotonin is available for receptor binding and plays a role in several pathophysiological processes. We therefore measured the plasma-free and platelet serotonin concentrations in users of SSRIs and age-matched healthy controls, and we analysed plasma concentrations of the serotonin precursor tryptophan and serotonin metabolite 5-hydroxyindoleamineacetic acid (5-HIAA).

Methods

For this cross-sectional single-centre case control study, participants were recruited at the departments of Psychiatry and General Medicine. High-performance liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to measure plasma-free and platelet serotonin, plasma tryptophan and 5-HIAA concentrations. Preanalytical conditions were optimized by careful blood collection, rapid sample handling, high-speed centrifugation, drug and diet restrictions and age-matched controls.

Results

In 64 SSRI users, median concentrations of plasma-free and platelet serotonin were 10-fold and 14-fold lower, respectively, than in 64 matched controls. Patients using higher dose SSRIs or those with higher affinity for the serotonin transporter had lower plasma-free and platelet serotonin concentrations. Compared with controls, SSRI users had similar median plasma tryptophan concentrations but slightly higher plasma 5-HIAA concentrations.

Conclusion

SSRI users have low platelet serotonin and low plasma-free serotonin. This could not be explained by lower concentrations of its precursor tryptophan, and only partially by increased breakdown to 5-HIAA.

Best Practice in Systemic Therapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Treating head and neck cancer patients with systemic therapy is challenging because of tumor related, patient related and treatment related factors. In this review, we aim to summarize the current standard of care in the curative and palliative setting, and to describe best practice with regard to structural requirements, procedures, and monitoring outcome. Treatment advice for individual head and neck cancer patients is best discussed within a multidisciplinary team. Cisplatin is the drug of choice for concomitant chemoradiotherapy in the primary and postoperative setting, and also a main component of induction chemotherapy. However, acute and late toxicity is often significant. Checkpoint inhibitors have recently been proven to be active in the metastatic setting which has resulted in a shift of paradigm. Detailed knowledge, institution of preventive measures, early recognition, and prompt treatment of adverse events during systemic therapy is of paramount importance. Documentation of patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, treatment details, and clinical and patient reported outcome is essential for monitoring the quality of care. Participation in initiatives for accreditation and registries for benchmarking institutional results are powerful incentives for implementation of best practice procedures.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended follow-up of efficacy and safety results from a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

In the ongoing phase 3 CheckMate 214 trial, nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed superior efficacy over sunitinib in patients with previously untreated intermediate-risk or poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma, with a manageable safety profile. In this study, we aimed to assess efficacy and safety after extended follow-up to inform the long-term clinical benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in this setting.

METHODS

In the phase 3, randomised, controlled CheckMate 214 trial, patients aged 18 years and older with previously untreated, advanced, or metastatic histologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma with a clear-cell component were recruited from 175 hospitals and cancer centres in 28 countries. Patients were categorised by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk status into favourable-risk, intermediate-risk, and poor-risk subgroups and randomly assigned (1:1) to open-label nivolumab (3 mg/kg intravenously) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously) every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab (3 mg/kg intravenously) every 2 weeks; or sunitinib (50 mg orally) once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle). Randomisation was done through an interactive voice response system, with a block size of four and stratified by risk status and geographical region. The co-primary endpoints for the trial were overall survival, progression-free survival per independent radiology review committee (IRRC), and objective responses per IRRC in intermediate-risk or poor-risk patients. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival per IRRC, and objective responses per IRRC in the intention-to-treat population, and adverse events in all treated patients. In this Article, we report overall survival, investigator-assessed progression-free survival, investigator-assessed objective response, characterisation of response, and safety after extended follow-up. Efficacy outcomes were assessed in all randomly assigned patients; safety was assessed in all treated patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02231749, and is ongoing but now closed to recruitment.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 16, 2014, and Feb 23, 2016, of 1390 patients screened, 1096 (79%) eligible patients were randomly assigned to nivolumab plus ipilimumab or sunitinib (550 vs 546 in the intention-to-treat population; 425 vs 422 intermediate-risk or poor-risk patients, and 125 vs 124 favourable-risk patients). With extended follow-up (median follow-up 32·4 months [IQR 13·4-36·3]), in intermediate-risk or poor-risk patients, results for the three co-primary efficacy endpoints showed that nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to be superior to sunitinib in terms of overall survival (median not reached [95% CI 35·6-not estimable] vs 26·6 months [22·1-33·4]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·66 [95% CI 0·54-0·80], p<0·0001), progression-free survival (median 8·2 months [95% CI 6·9-10·0] vs 8·3 months [7·0-8·8]; HR 0·77 [95% CI 0·65-0·90], p=0·0014), and the proportion of patients achieving an objective response (178 [42%] of 425 vs 124 [29%] of 422; p=0·0001). Similarly, in intention-to-treat patients, nivolumab and ipilimumab showed improved efficacy compared with sunitinib in terms of overall survival (median not reached [95% CI not estimable] vs 37·9 months [32·2-not estimable]; HR 0·71 [95% CI 0·59-0·86], p=0·0003), progression-free survival (median 9·7 months [95% CI 8·1-11·1] vs 9·7 months [8·3-11·1]; HR 0·85 [95% CI 0·73-0·98], p=0·027), and the proportion of patients achieving an objective response (227 [41%] of 550 vs 186 [34%] of 546 p=0·015). In all treated patients, the most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events in the nivolumab and ipilimumab group were increased lipase (57 [10%] of 547), increased amylase (31 [6%]), and increased alanine aminotransferase (28 [5%]), whereas in the sunitinib group they were hypertension (90 [17%] of 535), fatigue (51 [10%]), and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (49 [9%]). Eight deaths in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and four deaths in the sunitinib group were reported as treatment-related.

INTERPRETATION

The results suggest that the superior efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab over sunitinib was maintained in intermediate-risk or poor-risk and intention-to-treat patients with extended follow-up, and show the long-term benefits of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma across all risk categories.

FUNDING

Bristol-Myers Squibb and ONO Pharmaceutical.

The prognostic value of CT-based image-biomarkers for head and neck cancer patients treated with definitive (chemo-)radiation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate whether quantitative CT image-biomarkers (IBMs) can improve the prediction models with only classical prognostic factors for local-control (LC), regional-control (RC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cohort included 240 and 204 HNC patients in the training and validation analysis, respectively. Clinical variables were scored prospectively and IBMs of the primary tumor and lymph nodes were extracted from planning CT-images. Clinical, IBM and combined models were created from multivariable Cox proportional-hazard analyses based on clinical features, IBMs, and both for LC, RC, DMFS and DFS.

RESULTS

Clinical variables identified in the multivariable analysis included tumor-site, WHO performance-score, tumor-stage and age. Bounding-box-volume describing the tumor volume and irregular shape, IBM correlation representing radiological heterogeneity, and LN_major-axis-length showing the distance between lymph nodes were included in the IBM models. The performance of IBM LC, RC, DMFS and DFS models (c-index(validated):0.62, 0.80, 0.68 and 0.65) were comparable to that of the clinical models (0.62, 0.76, 0.70 and 0.66). The combined DFS model (0.70) including clinical features and IBMs performed significantly better than the clinical model. Patients stratified with the combined models revealed larger differences between risk groups in the validation cohort than with clinical models for LC, RC and DFS. For DMFS, the differences were similar to the clinical model.

CONCLUSION

For prediction of HNC treatment outcomes, image-biomarkers performed as good as or slightly better than clinical variables.

Lesion detection by [89Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab and [18F]FDG-PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Purpose

The main objective of this preliminary analysis of the IMaging PAtients for Cancer drug selecTion (IMPACT)-renal cell cancer (RCC) study is to evaluate the lesion detection of baseline contrast-enhanced CT, [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab-PET/CT and [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT in detecting ccRCC lesions in patients with a good or intermediate prognosis metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) according to the International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMDC) risk model.

Methods

Between February 2015 and March 2018, 42 newly diagnosed mccRCC patients with good or intermediate prognosis, eligible for watchful waiting, were included. Patients underwent CT, [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab-PET/CT and [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT at baseline. Scans were independently reviewed and lesions of ≥10 mm and lymph nodes of ≥15 mm at CT were analyzed. For lesions with [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab or [¹⁸F]FDG-uptake visually exceeding background uptake, maximum standardized uptake values (SUV_max) were measured.

Results

A total of 449 lesions were detected by ≥1 modality (median per patient: 7; ICR 4.25–12.75) of which 42% were in lung, 22% in lymph nodes and 10% in bone. Combined [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab-PET/CT and CT detected more lesions than CT alone: 91% (95%CI: 87–94) versus 56% (95%CI: 50–62, p = 0.001), respectively, and more than CT and [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT combined (84% (95%CI:79–88, p < 0.005). Both PET/CTs detected more bone and soft tissue lesions compared to CT alone.

Conclusions

The addition of [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab-PET/CT and [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT to CT increases lesion detection compared to CT alone in newly diagnosed good and intermediate prognosis mccRCC patients eligible for watchful waiting.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-019-04358-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

89Zr-atezolizumab imaging as a non-invasive approach to assess clinical response to PD-L1 blockade in cancer

Programmed cell death protein-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) blockade is effective in a subset of patients with several tumor types, but predicting patient benefit using approved diagnostics is inexact, as some patients with PD-L1-negative tumors also show clinical benefit^1,2. Moreover, all biopsy-based tests are subject to the errors and limitations of invasive tissue collection^3-11. Preclinical studies of positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging with antibodies to PD-L1 suggested that this imaging method might be an approach to selecting patients^12,13. Such a technique, however, requires substantial clinical development and validation. Here we present the initial results from a first-in-human study to assess the feasibility of imaging with zirconium-89-labeled atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1), including biodistribution, and secondly test its potential to predict response to PD-L1 blockade (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT02453984 and NCT02478099). We imaged 22 patients across three tumor types before the start of atezolizumab therapy. The PET signal, a function of tracer exposure and target expression, was high in lymphoid tissues and at sites of inflammation. In tumors, uptake was generally high but heterogeneous, varying within and among lesions, patients, and tumor types. Intriguingly, clinical responses in our patients were better correlated with pretreatment PET signal than with immunohistochemistry- or RNA-sequencing-based predictive biomarkers, encouraging further development of molecular PET imaging for assessment of PD-L1 status and clinical response prediction.

Comparative biodistribution analysis across four different 89Zr-monoclonal antibody tracers-The first step towards an imaging warehouse

Rationale: Knowledge on monoclonal antibody biodistribution in healthy tissues in humans can support clinical drug development. Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) can yield information in this setting. However, recent imaging studies have analyzed the behavior of single antibodies only, neglecting comparison across different antibodies. Methods: We compared the distribution of four ⁸⁹Zr-labeled antibodies in healthy tissue in a retrospective analysis based on the recently published harmonization protocol for ⁸⁹Zr-tracers and our delineation protocol. Results: The biodistribution patterns of ⁸⁹Zr-lumretuzumab, ⁸⁹Zr-MMOT0530A, ⁸⁹Zr-bevacizumab and ⁸⁹Zr-trastuzumab on day 4 after tracer injection were largely similar. The highest tracer concentration was seen in healthy liver, spleen, kidney and intestines. About one-third of the injected tracer dose was found in the circulation, up to 15% in the liver and only 4% in the spleen and kidney. Lower tracer concentration was seen in bone marrow, lung, compact bone, muscle, fat and the brain. Despite low tracer accumulation per gram of tissue, large-volume tissues, especially fat, can influence overall distribution: On average, 5-7% of the injected tracer dose accumulated in fat, with a peak of 19% in a patient with morbid obesity. Conclusion: The similar biodistribution of the four antibodies is probably based on their similar molecular structure, binding characteristics and similar metabolic pathways. These data provide a basis for a prospectively growing, online accessible warehouse of molecular imaging data, which enables researchers to increase and exchange knowledge on whole body drug distribution and potentially supports drug development decisions.

Data-Driven prioritisation of antibody-drug conjugate targets in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

For patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) palliative treatment options that improve overall survival are limited. The prognosis in this group remains poor and there is an unmet need for new therapeutic options. An emerging class of therapeutics, targeting tumor-specific antigens, are antibodies bound to a cytotoxic agent, known as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). The aim of this study was to prioritize ADC targets in HNSCC.

METHODS

With a systematic search, we identified 55 different ADC targets currently targeted by registered ADCs and ADCs under clinical evaluation. For these 55 ADC targets, protein overexpression was predicted in a dataset containing 344 HNSCC mRNA expression profiles by using a method called functional genomic mRNA profiling. The ADC target with the highest predicted overexpression was validated by performing immunohistochemistry (IHC) on an independent tissue microarray containing 414 HNSCC tumors.

RESULTS

The predicted top 5 overexpressed ADC targets in HNSCC were: glycoprotein nmb (GPNMB), SLIT and NTRK-like family member 6, epidermal growth factor receptor, CD74 and CD44. IHC validation showed combined cytoplasmic and membranous GPNMB protein expression in 92.0% of the cases. Strong expression was seen in 65.9% of the cases. In addition, 86.5% and 67.7% of cases showed ≥5% and >25% GPNMB positive tumor cells, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a data-driven prioritization of ADCs targets that will facilitate clinicians and drug developers in deciding which ADC should be taken for further clinical evaluation in HNSCC. This might help to improve disease outcome of HNSCC patients.