Bevacizumab, Irinotecan, or Topotecan Added to Temozolomide for Children With Relapsed and Refractory Neuroblastoma: Results of the ITCC-SIOPEN BEACON-Neuroblastoma Trial

PURPOSE

Outcomes for children with relapsed and refractory high-risk neuroblastoma (RR-HRNB) remain dismal. The BEACON Neuroblastoma trial (EudraCT 2012-000072-42) evaluated three backbone chemotherapy regimens and the addition of the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab (B).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients age 1-21 years with RR-HRNB with adequate organ function and performance status were randomly assigned in a 3 × 2 factorial design to temozolomide (T), irinotecan-temozolomide (IT), or topotecan-temozolomide (TTo) with or without B. The primary end point was best overall response (complete or partial) rate (ORR) during the first six courses, by RECIST or International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria for patients with measurable or evaluable disease, respectively. Safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) time were secondary end points.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty patients with RR-HRNB were included. For B random assignment (n = 160), the ORR was 26% (95% CI, 17 to 37) with B and 18% (95% CI, 10 to 28) without B (risk ratio [RR], 1.52 [95% CI, 0.83 to 2.77]; P = .17). Adjusted hazard ratio for PFS and OS were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.27) and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.70 to 1.45), respectively. For irinotecan ([I]; n = 121) and topotecan (n = 60) random assignments, RRs for ORR were 0.94 and 1.22, respectively. A potential interaction between I and B was identified. For patients in the bevacizumab-irinotecan-temozolomide (BIT) arm, the ORR was 23% (95% CI, 10 to 42), and the 1-year PFS estimate was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80).

CONCLUSION

The addition of B met protocol-defined success criteria for ORR and appeared to improve PFS. Within this phase II trial, BIT showed signals of antitumor activity with acceptable tolerability. Future trials will confirm these results in the chemoimmunotherapy era.

Epstein-Barr virus-associated risk factors for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in pediatric liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) are the most common de novo malignancies after liver transplantation (LT) in children. The aim of our study was to assess the role of pre-LT EBV status and post-LT EBV viral load as risk factors for developing PTLD in a cohort of pediatric LT recipients.

METHODS

Data of all children who underwent LT between January 2002 and December 2019 were collected. Two cohorts were built EBV pre-LT primary infected cohort and EBV post-LT primary infected cohort. Moreover, using the maximal EBV viral load, a ROC curve was constructed to find a cutoff point for the diagnosis of PTLD.

RESULTS

Among the 251 patients included in the study, fifteen PTLD episodes in 14 LT recipients were detected (2 plasmacytic hyperplasia, 10 polymorphic PTLD, 2 monomorphic PTLD, and 1 Classical-Hodgkin's lymphoma). Patients of the EBV post-LT primary infected cohort were 17.1 times more likely to develop a PTLD than patients of the EBV pre-LT primary infected cohort (2.2-133.5). The EBV viral load value to predict PTLD was set at 211 000 UI/mL (93.3% sensitivity and 77.1% specificity; AUC 93.8%; IC 0.89-0.98). In EBV post-LT primary infected cohort, patients with a viral load above 211 000 were 30 times more likely to develop PTLD than patients with a viral load below this value (OR 29.8; 3.7-241.1; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of pretransplant EBV serological status with EBV post-transplant viral load could be a powerful tool to stratify the risk of PTLD in pediatric LT patients.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Vincristine-Irinotecan With or Without Temozolomide, in Children and Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Rhabdomyosarcoma: A European Paediatric Soft tissue Sarcoma Study Group and Innovative Therapies for Children With Cancer Trial

PURPOSE

The VIT-0910 trial was conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety of the vincristine-irinotecan combination with and without temozolomide (VIT and VI, respectively) in relapsed or refractory rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS).

METHODS

In this randomized European phase II trial, patients age 0.5-50 years received 21-day cycles combining vincristine (1.5 mg/m² once a day on day 1 and day 8) and irinotecan (50 mg/m² once a day from day 1 to day 5) with and without temozolomide (125 mg/m² once a day from day 1 to day 5 and 150 mg/m² once a day from cycle 2), until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate after two cycles. Secondary end points included best response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. A Simon 2-stage design was initially planned to separately analyze 40 patients/arm. After amendment, the trial sample size was increased to 120 and a comparison between arms, adjusted for confounding factors, was added to the statistical plan (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01355445).

RESULTS

Overall, 120 patients (60 per arm) were recruited in 37 European centers. The median age was 11 years (range, 0.75-45); 89% of patients had a relapsed RMS. The objective response rate was 44% (24 of 55 evaluable patients) for VIT versus 31% (18 of 58) for VI (adjusted odds ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.22 to 1.12; P = .09). The VIT arm achieved significantly better overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.84; P = .006) compared with VI, with consistent progression-free survival results (adj-hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.01; P = .059). Overall, patients experienced adverse events ≥ grade 3 more frequently with VIT than VI (98% v 78%, respectively; P = .009), including a significant excess of hematologic toxicity (81% v 61%; P = .025).

CONCLUSION

The addition of temozolomide to VI improved chemotherapy efficacy for patients with relapsed RMS, with manageable increase in toxicity. VIT is considered the new standard treatment in these patients in the European paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Group and will be the control arm in the next randomized trial.

Randomized phase 2 trial of the combination of vincristine and irinotecan with or without temozolomide, in children and adults with refractory or relapsed rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS)

10000

Background: Vincristine with Irinotecan (VI) is effective in patients with relapsed RMS but outcomes remain poor. The addition of temozolomide to VI (VIT) is attractive owing to different resistance mechanisms and distinct toxicity profiles. Methods: The VIT-0910 trial, an EpSSG-ITCC randomized phase 2 trial, evaluated efficacy and safety of VI and VIT in patients (pts) aged 0.5-50 years with relapsed/refractory RMS. Pts received Vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 d1, d8, Irinotecan 50mg/m2 d1-d5 +/- Temozolomide 125 mg/m² d1-d5 (150 mg/m² from cycle 2 if no toxicity > grade 2); 21-day cycles were given until progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was centrally reviewed objective response rate (ORR) after 2 cycles (primary lesion, WHO response criteria: metastatic sites, RECIST 1.1 ). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (NCI-CTCAE v4). Initially a Simon 2-stage design was used to analyse separately 40 pts/arm. After amendment, the trial sample size was increased to 120, and a comparison between arms, adjusted for confounding factors, was added to the statistical plan. Results: 120 pts (60 VIT, 60 VI) were recruited in 37 European centers from 03/2012-04/2018. Median age was 11 years (0.75-46), 89% pts relapsed RMS. ORR was 24/55 (44%) for VIT vs 18/58 (31%) for VI; adjusted odds ratio =0.50, 95%CI, 0.22-1.12, p=0.09. The VIT arm achieved significantly better PFS (adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR)=0.65, 95%Cl, 0.43-0.97, p=0.036) and OS (HR=0.53, 95%CI, 0.33-0.83, p=0.005) compared to VI. PFS and OS results were similar when only relapsed patients were included. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 were more frequent in VIT compared to VI, but only hematological toxicity was significantly increased (81% for VIT, 59% for VI, odds ratio=1.36, 95%CI, 1.06-1.76, P=0.02). Conclusions: The addition of temozolomide to VI improves PFS and OS of pts with relapsed/refractory RMS. VIT is now standard treatment for relapsed RMS in Europe. Clinical trial information: NCT01355445.

Maintenance low-dose chemotherapy in patients with high-risk (HR) rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS): A report from the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG)

LBA2

Background: Most patients with localized RMS achieve complete remission during standard (std) treatment but approximately 20-30% of them relapse and chance of salvage is poor. We tested whether adding maintenance metronomic chemotherapy after std chemotherapy would improve survival for patients with non metastatic RMS defined as HR according to EpSSG stratification. Methods: Patients (pts) age >6 months <21 years, with N0 alveolar (A)RMS or incompletely resected (Group II or III) embryonal (E)RMS arising in an unfavorable primary site and/or N1 in complete remission after std treatment including 9 cycles of ifosfamide, vincristine and actinomycin D +/- doxorubicin, surgery and/or radiotherapy were eligible for randomization to stop treatment (Std-arm) or receive maintenance chemotherapy (M-arm) with 6 28-day cycles of iv vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on day 1,8,15 of each cycle and continuous daily oral cyclophosphamide 25 mg/m2 . The study was initially designed with 80% power (5% 2-sided alpha level) to detect an increase in 3 yr Event Free Survival (EFS) from 55% to 67%, a Hazard Ratio of 0.67, but was successively amended to allow a detection of a relative reduction in the relapse rate of 50% in the M-arm, with 80% power, testing at the 5% significance level (2-sided). Results: 670 pts were entered between 4/2006-12/2016, with 371 confirmed eligible and 186 assigned to the std-arm and 185 to M-arm. Clinical features were well balanced in the two arms and included ERMS 67%, ARMS 33%, age 10+ years 21%; IRS Group III 86%; N1 16%. Most common primary tumor sites were parameningeal (32%) and “other” sites (23%). With median follow up of 5 years in surviving pts, 3 yr EFS and overall survival (OS) in M-arm vs Std-arm were respectively: EFS 78.4% (95% IC -71.5-83.8) vs 72.3% (95% IC -65.0-78.3) (p 0.061) and OS 87.3% (95% IC 81.2-91.6) vs 77.4 (95% IC 70.1-83.1) (p = 0.011). Toxicity in the M-arm was manageable: grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia in 25% of pts, grade 4 neurotoxicity in 1.1%. Conclusions: The addition of maintenance after std treatment significantly improves OS in HR RMS patients and support its inclusion in future EpSSG trials. Clinical trial information: 2005-000217-35.

Oral manifestations of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Case study of a two-year-old boy

Langerhans cell histiocytosis is a rare pathology. It may be a single system disease at a single site or at multiple sites, or a multisystem disease; it may evolve from one of these forms into another. Oral manifestations may be the first signs of the disease. Little is known as yet about its etiology. We review the nosological entity and present the case of a two-year-old boy suffering from the multisystem form, paying particular attention to the oral manifestations. Physical examination on admittance revealed skin lesions in the scalp, armpits and groins, hepatosplenomegaly and bilateral otorrhea. The diagnosis was multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis, affecting the skin, bone, liver and CNS.