An Overview of Reviews to Inform Organization-Level Interventions to Address Burnout in Rheumatologists

OBJECTIVE

To identify organization-directed strategies that could be implemented to prevent burnout among rheumatologists.

METHODS

A search of English language articles published 2011 or later was conducted on Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, Medline, and PsycInfo on January 25, 2022. Included reviews had ≥ 1 primary studies with ≥ 10% of participants who were physicians, recorded burnout as an outcome, and described an organization-directed intervention to prevent burnout. Overlap of primary studies across reviews was assessed. The final review inclusion was determined by study quality, minimization of overlap, and maximization of intervention breadth. The A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool was used for quality assessment. Included studies and interventions were assessed by rheumatologists for their applicability to rheumatology.

RESULTS

A total of 17 reviews, including 15 systematic reviews, 1 realist review, and 1 umbrella review were included. AMSTAR 2 quality ratings classified 5 systematic reviews as low quality, 1 as moderate, and 9 as critically low. There was significant heterogeneity between and within reviews. Six conducted a metaanalysis and 11 provided a qualitative summary of findings. The following intervention types were identified as having possible applicability to rheumatology: physician workflow and organizational strategies; peer support and formal communication training; leadership support; and addressing stress, mental health, and mindfulness. Across interventions, mindfulness had the highest quality of evidence to support its effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Although the quality of evidence for interventions to prevent burnout in physicians is low, promising strategies such as mindfulness have been identified.

Exploring structural barriers to diabetes self-management in Alberta First Nations communities

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes is highly prevalent in Canadian First Nations (FN) communities. FN individuals with diabetes are less likely to receive guideline recommended care and access specialist care. They are also less likely to be able to engage in optimal self-management behaviours. While the systemic and racial contributors to this problem have been well described, individuals' experiences with structural barriers to care and self-management remain under-characterized.

METHODS

We utilized qualitative methods to gain insight into the structural barriers to self-management experienced by FN individuals with diabetes. We conducted a qualitative descriptive analysis of a subcohort of patients with diabetes from FN communities (n = 5) from a larger qualitative study. Using detailed semi-structured telephone interviews, we inquired about participants' diabetes and barriers to diabetes self-management. Inductive thematic analysis was performed in duplicate using NVivo 10.

RESULTS

The structural barriers faced by this population were substantial yet distinct from those described by non-FN individuals with diabetes. For example, medication costs, which are usually cited as a barrier to care, are covered for FN persons with status. The barriers to diabetes self-management that were commonly experienced in this cohort included transportation-related difficulties, financial barriers to uninsured health services, and lack of accessible diabetes education and resultant knowledge gaps.

CONCLUSIONS

FN Albertans with diabetes face a myriad of barriers to self-management, which are distinct from the Non-FN population. In addition to the barriers introduced by colonialism and historical injustices, finances, geographic isolation, and lack of diabetes education each impede optimal management of diabetes. Programs targeted at addressing FN-specific barriers may improve aspects of diabetes self-management in this population.