New Noncoding Base Pair Mutation at the Identical Locus as the Original NCMD/MCDR1 in a Mexican Family, Suggesting a Mutational Hotspot

Purpose

To clinically and molecularly study a newly found family with North Carolina macular dystrophy (NCMD/MCDR1) from Mexico.

Methods

This retrospective study comprised 6 members of a 3-generation Mexican family with NCMD. Clinical ophthalmic examinations, including fundus imaging, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, electroretinography, and electrooculography, were performed. Genotyping with polymorphic markers in the MCDR1 region was performed to determine haplotypes. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed followed by variant filtering and copy number variant analysis.

Results

Four subjects from 3 generations were found to have macular abnormalities. The proband presented with lifelong bilateral vision impairment with bilaterally symmetric vitelliform Best disease-like appearing macular lesions. Her 2 children had bilateral large macular coloboma-like malformations, consistent with autosomal dominant NCMD. The 80-year-old mother of the proband had drusen-like lesions consistent with grade 1 NCMD. WGS and subsequent Sanger sequencing found a point mutation at chr6:99593030G>C (hg38) in the noncoding region of the DNase I site thought to be a regulatory element of the retinal transcription factor gene PRDM13. This mutation is the identical site/nucleotide as in the original NCMD family (#765) but is a guanine to cytosine change rather than a guanine to thymine mutation, as found in the original NCMD family.

Conclusions

We report a new noncoding mutation at the same locus (chr6:99593030G>C) involving the same DNase I site regulating the retinal transcription factor gene PRDM13. This suggests that this site, chr6:99593030, is a mutational hotspot.

Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy (BVMD) is a phenocopy of North Carolina Macular Dystrophy (NCMD/MCDR1)

PURPOSE

North Carolina Macular Dystrophy (NCMD) and Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy (BVMD) are rare autosomal dominant macular dystrophies. Both BVMD and NCMD have markedly variable expressivity. In some individuals, it can be difficult to differentiate between the two disease entities.

METHODS

Clinical findings including fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were evaluated in 5 individuals with NCMD and 3 with BMD. Electrooculography (EOG) was performed in 2 NCMD subjects. Molecular diagnosis was performed using Sanger DNA sequencing. IRB approval was obtained.

RESULTS

Five NCMD subjects had clinical findings indistinguishable from three of our BVMD subjects. Molecular diagnosis was confirmed in all but one BVMD subject who had an abnormal EOG prior to discovery of the BEST1 gene. Two NCMD subjects had an abnormal EOG with a normal ERG, which has been considered a unique feature of BVMD. SD-OCT in one BVMD subject demonstrated a small lucency/excavation into the choroid similar to that in grade 3 lesions of NCMD. Two NCMD subjects had elevated sub-macular lesions giving a pseudo-vitelliform appearance on OCT similar to BVMD.

CONCLUSION

Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy can be a phenocopy of NCMD. There is considerable clinical overlap between NCMD and BVMD, which can cause diagnostic inaccuracies. Our new findings demonstrate that like BVMD, NCMD can also have an abnormal EOG with a normal ERG. The overlapping phenotypes of BVMD with NCMD may provide insights into the mechanisms of the macular changes.