Barriers and facilitators to measuring patient reported outcomes in an academic breast cancer clinic: An application of the RE-AIM framework

BACKGROUND

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important for patient-centered, value-based care; however, implementation into surgical practice remains limited. We aimed to demonstrate feasibility of measuring PROMs in an academic breast cancer clinic.

METHODS

We conducted a pilot study implementing the patient-reported outcome measure BREAST-Q among patients with Stage 0-III breast cancer at a single institution from 06/2019-03/2023 using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Barriers and facilitators were characterized. Survey completion was assessed pre-operatively and up to 12 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

Barriers included limited time and lack of incorporation into the electronic medical record. Facilitators included utilizing trained team members and an automated workflow. Among eligible patients, 74% completed BREAST-Q at 2-weeks post-operatively and 55% at 12 months post-operatively.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe the implementation of a PROM using the RE-AIM framework, highlighting facilitators and barriers that may assist others in collecting patient-reported outcome data.

Characterizing informational needs and information seeking behavior of patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Appropriate information may facilitate adjustment to cancer diagnoses. Our study aims to characterize informational satisfaction in breast cancer patients and assess resources used by patients to gain information.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed Stage 0-III breast cancer patients seen at an academic medical center between May and September 2020 received questionnaires assessing information satisfaction. Patients indicated resources used to obtain information along with satisfaction with information received in various topics. A subset of questionnaire respondents completed semi-structured interviews.

RESULTS

Fifty-two (35 ​%) patients completed the questionnaire. Patients received information from physicians (96 ​%), the internet (81 ​%), nurses (79 ​%), and fellow breast cancer patients (54 ​%). Interview participants preferred receiving information from providers when making medical decisions but found patient forums and social media to be important adjuncts for receiving information.

CONCLUSION

Patients are satisfied with information received about diagnosis and treatment, but finances, sexual health, and fertility are less frequently discussed.

Information transparency with immediate release: Oncology clinician and patient perceptions

INTRODUCTION

As part of the 21st Century Cures Act (April 2021), electronic health information (EHI) must be immediately released to patients. In this study, we sought to evaluate clinician and patient perceptions regarding this immediate release.

METHODS

After surveying 33 clinicians and 30 patients, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a subset of the initial sample, comprising 8 clinicians and 12 patients. Open-ended questions explored clinicians' and patients' perceptions of immediate release of EHI and how they adjusted to this change.

RESULTS

Ten themes were identified: Interpreting Results, Strategies for Patient Interaction, Patient Experiences, Communication Strategies, Provider Limitations, Provider Experiences, Health Information Interfaces, Barriers to Patient Understanding, Types of Results, and Changes due to Immediate Release. Interviews demonstrated differences in perceived patient distress and comprehension, emphasizing the impersonal nature of electronic release and necessity for therapeutic clinician-patient communication.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians and patients have unique insights on the role of immediate release. Understanding these perspectives will help improve communication and develop patient-centered tools (glossaries, summary pages, additional resources) to aid patient understanding of complex medical information.

Clinical implications of receptor conversions in breast cancer patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to determine the incidence of receptor conversions after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer and assess the rate at which receptor conversion leads to changes in adjuvant therapy regimens.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of female breast cancer patients treated with NAC at an academic breast center between January 2017 and October 2021. Patients with residual disease on surgical pathology and complete receptor status information for both pre-NAC and post-NAC specimens were included. Incidence of receptor conversions, defined as a change in at least one hormone receptor (HR) or HER2 status compared to preoperative specimens, was tabulated, and adjuvant therapy modalities were reviewed. Factors associated with receptor conversion were analyzed using chi-square tests and a binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 240 patients with residual disease after NAC, 126 (52.5%) had receptor testing repeated. After NAC, 37 specimens (29%) had a receptor conversion. Receptor conversion resulted in the addition or removal of an adjuvant therapy in 8 patients (6%), indicating a number needed to screen of 16. Prior history of cancer, receipt of initial biopsy at an outside site, HR-positive tumors, and a pathologic stage of II or lower were factors associated with receptor conversions.

CONCLUSION

HR and HER2 expression profiles frequently change after NAC and drive adjustments in adjuvant therapy regimens. Repeat testing of HR and HER2 expression should be considered in patients who receive NAC, especially in patients with early stage, HR-positive tumors whose initial biopsies were performed externally.

Improved Survival After Adjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Pathologic Complete Response

BACKGROUND

The benefit of adjuvant therapy is unclear in patients with rectal cancer achieving a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival among rectal cancer patients with a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

National Cancer Database (2004-2017).

PATIENTS

Patients with clinical stage 2 or 3 rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation (50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions) followed by total mesorectal excision with a pathologic complete response were included.

INTERVENTION

Adjuvant chemotherapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall survival.

RESULTS

There were 20,518 patients and 2221 (11%) had a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Of 2221 patients, 1441 (65%) did not receive adjuvant therapy and 780 (35%) did. Patients who received adjuvant therapy were more likely to be younger (median 58 vs 62 y), have private insurance (61% vs 49%), and have node-positive disease (57% vs 48%) (all p < 0.05). There were no differences in sex, race, Charlson-Deyo score, clinical T-stage, tumor size and differentiation, adequate lymphadenectomy (12 or more), or sphincter preservation between groups (all p > 0.05). Overall survival at 5, 10, and 14 years was significantly longer in the adjuvant group (93%, 85%, 83%, respectively) compared to patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy (87%, 67%, 51%, respectively) ( p < 0.001). In a subgroup analysis, adjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival in patients with clinical stage 2 and 3 rectal cancer ( p < 0.001). After adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics, omission of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with significantly worse survival (HR 1.53, 95% 1.08-2.16).

LIMITATIONS

Selection bias, unknown perioperative morbidity, chemotherapy regimen, recurrence status, and other unidentified factors limiting survival analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with clinical stage 2 or 3 rectal cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival in patients achieving a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C139 .

SOBREVIDA MEJORADA DESPUS DE LA TERAPIA ADYUVANTE EN PACIENTES CON CNCER DE RECTO LOCALMENTE AVANZADO CON RESPUESTA PATOLGICA COMPLETA

ANTECEDENTES:En los pacientes con cáncer de recto que logran una respuesta patológica completa después de la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante y la escisión total del mesorrecto, el beneficio de la terapia adyuvante no está claro.OBJETIVO:Evaluar el beneficio de la quimioterapia adyuvante en la sobrevida de los pacientes con cáncer de recto con una respuesta patológica completa después de la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ESCENARIO:Base de Datos Nacional de Cáncer (2004-2017).PACIENTES:Pacientes con adenocarcinoma rectal en estadio clínico 2 ó 3 que se sometieron a quimiorradiación neoadyuvante (50-50,4 Gy en 25-28 fracciones) seguida de escisión mesorrectal total con una respuesta patológica completa.INTERVENCIÓN:Quimioterapia adyuvante.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Sobrevida global.RESULTADOS:Hubo 20.518 pacientes y 2.221 (11%) tuvieron una respuesta patológica completa después de la quimiorradiación neoadyuvante. Entre estos 2221 pacientes, 1441 (65%) no recibieron terapia adyuvante y 780 (35%) sí. Los pacientes que recibieron terapia adyuvante tenían más probabilidades de ser más jóvenes (mediana de 58 frente a 62 años), tener un seguro privado (61% frente a 49%) y tener enfermedad con linfonodos positivos (57% frente a 48 %) (todos p < 0,05). No hubo diferencias en género, raza, puntuación de Charlson-Deyo, estadio T clínico, tamaño y diferenciación del tumor, linfadenectomía adecuada (≥12) o preservación del esfínter entre los grupos (todos p > 0,05). La sobrevida general a los 5, 10 y 14 años fue significativamente mayor en el grupo adyuvante (93%, 85%, 83%, respectivamente) en comparación con los pacientes que no recibieron terapia adyuvante (87%, 67%, 51% respectivamente) ( p < 0,001). En un análisis de subgrupos, la terapia adyuvante se asoció con una mejor sobrevida general en pacientes con cáncer de recto en estadio clínico 2 y 3 ( p < 0,001). Después de ajustar por las características del paciente y del tumor, la omisión de la quimioterapia adyuvante se asoció con una sobrevida global significativamente peor (HR 1,53, IC del 95%, 1,08-2,16).LIMITACIONES:Sesgo de selección; morbilidad perioperatoria desconocida, régimen de quimioterapia, estado de recurrencia y otros factores no identificados que limitan el análisis de sobrevida.CONCLUSIONES:En pacientes con cáncer de recto en estadio clínico 2 ó 3, la quimioterapia adyuvante se asoció con una mejor sobrevida general en pacientes que lograron una respuesta patológica completa después de la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C139 . (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

Abstract P6-05-58: Comparing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Same-day Discharge and Inpatient Admission After Mastectomy

Background: Same-day discharge after mastectomy has been demonstrated to be safe in appropriately selected candidates. However, the association between same-day discharge after mastectomy and quality of life (QOL) is unclear. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures represent important indicators of QOL among patients undergoing treatment for breast cancer. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of same-day discharge after mastectomy on PROs.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected, longitudinal PRO registry of female breast cancer patients treated at an academic breast center between June 2019 and June 2022. Patients were invited to complete the BREAST-Q module, a validated PRO questionnaire measuring QOL domains such as psychosocial wellbeing, physical wellbeing, satisfaction with their surgeon, and satisfaction with their medical team. Preoperative and 2-week postoperative questionnaire responses were analyzed in this study. Patients who had a mastectomy with or without reconstruction were included in this analysis. Those who underwent immediate reconstruction with autologous tissue were excluded as these operations are not conducive to same-day discharge. Patients were divided into two groups: the first was discharged on the date of surgery while the second was admitted to the hospital for a minimum of one night. Clinical and demographic factors were collected from a review of the electronic medical record. The primary endpoints were mean satisfaction scores as well as differences between postoperative and preoperative scores for the psychosocial and physical wellbeing domains. T-tests were used to evaluate differences between groups. A multiple regression model was fit to adjust for the effects of relevant clinical and demographic factors.

Results: A total of 104 patients within the registry underwent mastectomy during the study period and were offered questionnaires. Of these, 58 completed both the preoperative and 2-week postoperative questionnaire (56% response rate); 20 (34%) in the same-day discharge group and 38 (66%) in the inpatient admission group. The groups were similar in age, stage, American Society of Anesthesiologists’ classification group, body mass index, frequency of unplanned readmission or reoperation, and receipt of bilateral mastectomy, axillary lymph node dissection, post-mastectomy reconstruction, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Mean patient satisfaction scores and mean changes in psychosocial and physical wellbeing scores were similar between the groups 2 weeks after surgery (Table 1). After controlling for age, type of reconstructive operation, receipt of unplanned reoperation, and preoperative score, same-day discharge did not have a significant effect on satisfaction with the surgeon (Beta=-4.3, p=0.37), satisfaction with the medical team (Beta=0.2, p=0.97), physical wellbeing score (Beta=-0.1, p=0.99), or psychosocial wellbeing score (Beta=8.0, p=0.15).

Conclusions: Patients who are discharged from the hospital on the same day of a mastectomy display similar levels of satisfaction with their care team and similar short-term trends in physical and psychosocial wellbeing compared to those who are admitted to the hospital. While further data are being accrued, these early results suggest patients tolerate same-day discharge after mastectomy well.

Table 1 Patient-reported outcomes at 2 weeks after mastectomy for patients discharged on the date of surgery compared to those admitted inpatient

Citation Format: Sudheer Vemuru, Kathryn Colborn, Laura Leonard, Victoria Huynh, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis, Justin Cohen, David Mathes, Nicole Christian, Gretchen M. Ahrendt, Christine M. Fisher, Simon Kim, Sarah Tevis. Comparing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Same-day Discharge and Inpatient Admission After Mastectomy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-05-58.

Access to Results of Patient Reported Outcome Surveys Does Not Improve Survey Response Rates

INTRODUCTION

In this embedded substudy of a longitudinal, randomized controlled trial, we sought to evaluate the effects of patient engagement and results feedback on longitudinal patient-reported outcome (PRO) survey completion rates.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed stage 0-III breast cancer patients seen at an academic breast center between June 2019 and December 2021 were invited to participate in a longitudinal PRO study. Participants were emailed the BREAST-Q survey, a validated PRO scale, preoperatively and at regular intervals during their postoperative course. Patients were randomized into the intervention group, who received survey results upon completion, or the control group, who received no feedback. The primary endpoint was postoperative survey completion rate. An intention to treat analysis was performed and a quasi-Poisson regression was used to compare rates of longitudinal survey completion between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of the 253 patients offered the preoperative survey, 115 were in the intervention group and 138 were in the control group. Postoperative survey completion rate was 54% for the intervention group and 47% for the control group. There was no significant difference in longitudinal postoperative survey completion rate between the two groups (rate ratio 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.31).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective randomized controlled study, patients did not complete surveys at a higher rate when their survey results were shared with them, suggesting that viewing these results without appropriate clinical context does not generate significant enhancement in patient engagement. Effective interventions to improve survey response rate must be identified to better evaluate PROs.

No One-Size-Fits-All: Sexual Health Education Preferences in Patients with Breast Cancer

Background

Using explanatory mixed methods, we characterize the education that patients with breast cancer received about potential sexual health effects of treatment and explore preferences in format, content, and timing of education.

Patients and Methods

Adult patients with stage 0–IV breast cancer seen at an academic breast center during December 2020 were emailed questionnaires assessing sexual health symptoms experienced during treatment. Patients interested in further study involvement were invited to participate in semistructured interviews. These interviews explored sexual health education provided by the oncology team and patient preferences in content, format, and timing of education delivery.

Results

Eighty-seven (32%) patients completed the questionnaire. Most patients reported decreased sexual desire (69%), vaginal dryness (63%), and less energy for sexual activity (62%) during/after treatment. Sixteen patients participated in interviews. Few women reported receiving information about potential sexual effects of breast cancer treatment; patients who did reported a focus on menopausal symptoms or fertility rather than sexual function. Regarding preferences in format, patients were in favor of multiple options being offered rather than a one-size-fits-all approach, with particular emphasis on in-person options and support groups. Patients desired education early and often throughout breast cancer treatment, not only about sexual side effects but also on mitigation strategies, sexual function, dating and partner intimacy, and body image changes.

Conclusion

Few patients received information about the sexual health effects of breast cancer treatment, though many experienced symptoms. Potential adverse effects should be discussed early and addressed often throughout treatment, with attention to strategies to prevent and alleviate symptoms and improve overall sexual health.

Patient comprehension of breast pathology report terminology: The need for patient-centered resources

BACKGROUND

As health care continues to evolve toward information transparency, an increasing number of patients have access to their medical records, including result reports that were not originally designed to be patient-facing. Previous studies have demonstrated that patients have poor understanding of medical terminology. However, patient comprehension of terminology specific to breast pathology reports has not been well studied. We assessed patient understanding of common medical terms found in breast pathology reports.

METHODS

A survey was administered electronically to patients scheduled for a screening mammogram within a multisite health care system. Participants were asked to objectively define and interpret 8 medical terms common to breast biopsy pathology reports. Patient perception of the utility of various educational tools was also assessed. Demographic information including health literacy, education level, previous cancer diagnosis, and primary language was collected.

RESULTS

In total, 527 patients completed the survey. Terms including "malignant" and "benign" were the most correctly defined at 80% and 73%, respectively, whereas only 1% correctly defined "high grade." Factors including race/ethnicity and education level were correlated with more correct scores. Patients preferred educational tools that were specific to their diagnosis and available at the time they were reviewing their results.

CONCLUSION

Patient comprehension of common medical terminology is poor. Potential assumptions of understanding based on patient factors including education, past medical history, and occupation are misinformed. With the newly mandated immediate release of information to patients, there is a pressing need to develop and integrate educational tools to support patients through all aspects of their care.

A history of Clostridioides difficile infection portends infection recurrence and worse outcomes after stoma reversal

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile infection is reported to occur after 2.2% of colorectal operations and is associated with longer length of hospital stay, greater overall healthcare cost, and significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection is greatest after elective stoma reversal. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of prior Clostridioides difficile infection on patients undergoing stoma reversal. We hypothesized that patients with a history of Clostridioides difficile infection who underwent stoma reversal will be at an increased risk of postoperative Clostridioides difficile infection compared with patients without a history of Clostridioides difficile infection.

METHODS

This was an observational cohort study of patients undergoing elective stoma reversal surgery by colorectal surgeons at a single academic institution during a 10-year period. A prospectively maintained institutional database was queried to identify 454 patients who underwent stoma reversal surgery between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2017. The primary outcomes were Clostridioides difficile infection after stoma reversal and time to Clostridioides difficile infection after bowel refunctionalization. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, discharge destination, and 30-day readmission rate. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with Clostridioides difficile infection after stoma reversal.

RESULTS

A total of 445 patients were identified who underwent elective stoma reversal, 42 of whom had a history of Clostridioides difficile infection before the stoma reversal. There were no significant differences in patient age, number of days diverted, or use of perioperative antibiotics between patients with and without a history of Clostridioides difficile infection. The incidence of postreversal Clostridioides difficile infection was 23.4% in patients with a history of Clostridioides difficile infection compared with 9.6% in patients with no Clostridioides difficile infection history (P = .004); however, time to Clostridioides difficile infection after reversal did not differ. History of Clostridioides difficile infection was also associated with greater risk of postoperative complications (26.2% vs 9.4%, P < .01), increased length of stay (3 vs 5 days postoperatively, P < .01), increased likelihood of discharge to a skilled-care facility (11.9% vs 6.2%, P < .01), and readmission (13.7 vs 31.0%, P < .01) within 30 days. In a multivariable logistic regression model, history of Clostridioides difficile infection, increased length of hospital stay, and discharge to a skilled facility were associated with increased risk of Clostridioides difficile infection after reversal, while proton pump inhibitors use was associated with decreased risk of Clostridioides difficile infection.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a prior history of Clostridioides difficile infection who underwent stoma reversal exhibited higher rates of postoperative Clostridioides difficile infection and were at greater risk of postoperative complications, discharge to a skilled facility, and 30-day readmission. Furthermore, research into interventions aimed at improving outcomes in this unique, high-risk population is needed.