1
|
Bajsova S, Klat J, Reimer P. Intrathecal morphine in oncogynecologic surgery. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.06.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
2
|
Bajsova S, Klat J, Bajerova M. Visceral manipulation in postoperative ileus treatment. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.06.099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
3
|
Zapardiel I, Kocian R, Köhler C, Klat J, Germanova A, Jacob A, Bajsova S, Böhmer G, Lay L, Gil-Ibañez B, Havelka P, Kipp B, Szewczyk G, Toth R, Staringer JC, De Santiago J, Coronado PJ, Poka R, Laky R, Luyckx M, Fastrez M, Dusek L, Hernandez A, Cibula D. Voiding recovery after radical parametrectomy in cervical cancer patients: An international prospective multicentre trial - SENTIX. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 160:729-734. [PMID: 33419610 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Voiding dysfunctions represent a leading morbidity after radical hysterectomy performed in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to perform ad hoc analysis of factors influencing voiding recovery in SENTIX (SENTinel lymph node biopsy in cervIX cancer) trial. METHODS The SENTIX trial (47 sites, 18 countries) is a prospective study on sentinel lymph node biopsy without pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Overall, the data of 300 patients were analysed. Voiding recovery was defined as the number of days from surgery to bladder catheter/epicystostomy removal or to post-voiding urine residuum ≤50 mL. RESULTS The median voiding recovery time was three days (5th-95th percentile: 0-21): 235 (78.3%) patients recovered in <7 days and 293 (97.7%) in <30 days. Only seven (2.3%) patients recovered after >30 days. In the multivariate analysis, only previous pregnancy (p = 0.033) and type of parametrectomy (p < 0.001) significantly influenced voiding recovery >7 days post-surgery. Type-B parametrectomy was associated with a higher risk of delayed voiding recovery than type-C1 (OR = 4.69; p = 0.023 vs. OR = 3.62; p = 0.052, respectively), followed by type-C2 (OR = 5.84; p = 0.011). Both previous pregnancy and type C2 parametrectomy independently prolonged time to voiding recovery by two days. CONCLUSIONS Time to voiding recovery is significantly related to previous pregnancy and type of parametrectomy but it is not influenced by surgical approach (open vs minimally invasive), age, or BMI. Type B parametrectomy, without direct visualisation of nerves, was associated with longer recovery than nerve-sparing type C1. Importantly, voiding dysfunctions after radical surgery are temporary, and the majority of the patients recover in less than 30 days, including patients after C2 parametrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Roman Kocian
- Gynaecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, CEEGOG, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Cristhardt Köhler
- Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jaroslav Klat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Poruba, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Germanova
- Gynaecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, CEEGOG, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Jacob
- Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sylva Bajsova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Poruba, Czech Republic
| | - Gerd Böhmer
- Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Laura Lay
- Department of Gynaecology, Institute of Oncology Angel H Roffo University of Bueno s Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Blanca Gil-Ibañez
- Unit of Gynaecological Oncology, Institute Clinic of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology (ICGON), Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pavel Havelka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bata Hospital Zlin, Czech Republic, CEEGOG, Zlin, Czech Republic
| | - Barbara Kipp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Grzegorz Szewczyk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Robert Toth
- Oncology Institute of East Slovakia, Košice, Slovakia
| | - Juan Carlos Staringer
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Español de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Pluvio J Coronado
- Departamento de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Robert Poka
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Rene Laky
- Gynaecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Mathieu Luyckx
- Department of Gynaecology, Universite catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Maxime Fastrez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Pierre University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ladislav Dusek
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Alicia Hernandez
- Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Cibula
- Gynaecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, CEEGOG, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cibula D, Kocian R, Plaikner A, Jarkovsky J, Klat J, Zapardiel I, Pilka R, Torne A, Sehnal B, Ostojich M, Petiz A, Sanchez OA, Presl J, Buda A, Raspagliesi F, Kascak P, van Lonkhuijzen L, Barahona M, Minar L, Blecharz P, Pakiz M, Wydra D, Snyman LC, Zalewski K, Zorrero C, Havelka P, Redecha M, Vinnytska A, Vergote I, Tingulstad S, Michal M, Kipp B, Slama J, Marnitz S, Bajsova S, Hernandez A, Fischerova D, Nemejcova K, Kohler C. Sentinel lymph node mapping and intraoperative assessment in a prospective, international, multicentre, observational trial of patients with cervical cancer: The SENTIX trial. Eur J Cancer 2020; 137:69-80. [PMID: 32750501 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND SENTIX (ENGOT-CX2/CEEGOG-CX1) is an international, multicentre, prospective observational trial evaluating sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy without pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. We report the final preplanned analysis of the secondary end-points: SLN mapping and outcomes of intraoperative SLN pathology. METHODS Forty-seven sites (18 countries) with experience of SLN biopsy participated in SENTIX. We preregistered patients with stage IA1/lymphovascular space invasion-positive to IB2 (4 cm or smaller or 2 cm or smaller for fertility-sparing treatment) cervical cancer without suspicious lymph nodes on imaging before surgery. SLN frozen section assessment and pathological ultrastaging were mandatory. Patients were registered postoperatively if SLN were bilaterally detected in the pelvis, and frozen sections were negative. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02494063). RESULTS We analysed data for 395 preregistered patients. Bilateral detection was achieved in 91% (355/395), and it was unaffected by tumour size, tumour stage or body mass index, but it was lower in older patients, in patients who underwent open surgery, and in sites with fewer cases. No SLN were found outside the seven anatomical pelvic regions. Most SLN and positive SLN were localised below the common iliac artery bifurcation. Single positive SLN above the iliac bifurcation were found in 2% of cases. Frozen sections failed to detect 54% of positive lymph nodes (pN1), including 28% of cases with macrometastases and 90% with micrometastases. INTERPRETATION SLN biopsy can achieve high bilateral SLN detection in patients with tumours of 4 cm or smaller. At experienced centres, all SLN were found in the pelvis, and most were located below the iliac vessel bifurcation. SLN frozen section assessment is an unreliable tool for intraoperative triage because it only detects about half of N1 cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Roman Kocian
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Andrea Plaikner
- Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jiri Jarkovsky
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jaroslav Klat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava Poruba, Czech Republic
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Radovan Pilka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Aureli Torne
- Unit of Gynecological Oncology, Institute Clinic of Gynaecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic-Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Borek Sehnal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bulovka Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marcela Ostojich
- Department of Gynecology, Institute of Oncology Angel H. Roffo, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires Autonomous City, Argentina
| | - Almerinda Petiz
- Department of Gynecology, Francisco Gentil Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
| | - Octavio A Sanchez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital of the Canary Islands, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Jiri Presl
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alessandro Buda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | | | - Peter Kascak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty Hospital Trencin, Trencin, Slovakia
| | - Luc van Lonkhuijzen
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc Barahona
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Biomedical Research Institute of Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lubos Minar
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Pawel Blecharz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre of Oncology, M. Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Cracow Department, Cracow, Poland
| | - Maja Pakiz
- University Clinic for Gynaecology and Perinatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Dariusz Wydra
- Department of Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Gynecologic Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Leon C Snyman
- Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Kamil Zalewski
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Holycross Cancer Center, Kielce, Poland
| | - Cristina Zorrero
- Gynecology Department, Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (IVO), Valencia, Spain
| | - Pavel Havelka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KNTB a.s Zlin, Czech Republic
| | - Mikulas Redecha
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | | | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Martin Michal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Ceske Budejovice, JSC, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
| | - Barbara Kipp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Jiri Slama
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife and Radiotherapy University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sylva Bajsova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava Poruba, Czech Republic
| | - Alicia Hernandez
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniela Fischerova
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Kristyna Nemejcova
- Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Christhardt Kohler
- Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nemejcova K, Kocian R, Kohler C, Jarkovsky J, Klat J, Berjon A, Pilka R, Sehnal B, Gil-Ibanez B, Lupo E, Petiz A, Arencibia Sanchez O, Kascak P, Martinelli F, Buda A, Presl J, Barahona M, van Lonkhuijzen L, Szatkowski W, Minar L, Pakiz M, Havelka P, Zorrero C, Misiek M, Snyman LC, Wydra D, Vergote I, Vinnytska A, Redecha M, Michal M, Tingulstad S, Kipp B, Szewczyk G, Toth R, de Santiago Garcia FJ, Coronado Martin PJ, Poka R, Tamussino K, Luyckx M, Fastrez M, Staringer JC, Germanova A, Plaikner A, Bajsova S, Dundr P, Mallmann-Gottschalk N, Cibula D. Central Pathology Review in SENTIX, A Prospective Observational International Study on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer (ENGOT-CX2). Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12051115. [PMID: 32365651 PMCID: PMC7281480 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The quality of pathological assessment is crucial for the safety of patients with cervical cancer if pelvic lymph node dissection is to be replaced by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. Central pathology review of SLN pathological ultrastaging was conducted in the prospective SENTIX/European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial (ENGOT)-CX2 study. All specimens from at least two patients per site were submitted for the central review. For cases with major or critical deviations, the sites were requested to submit all samples from all additional patients for second-round assessment. From the group of 300 patients, samples from 83 cases from 37 sites were reviewed in the first round. Minor, major, critical, and no deviations were identified in 28%, 19%, 14%, and 39% of cases, respectively. Samples from 26 patients were submitted for the second-round review, with only two major deviations found. In conclusion, a high rate of major or critical deviations was identified in the first round of the central pathology review (28% of samples). This reflects a substantial heterogeneity in current practice, despite trial protocol requirements. The importance of the central review conducted prospectively at the early phase of the trial is demonstrated by a substantial improvement of SLN ultrastaging quality in the second-round review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristyna Nemejcova
- Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.N.); (P.D.)
| | - Roman Kocian
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic; (R.K.); (A.G.)
| | - Christhardt Kohler
- Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg, 22763 Hamburg, Germany; (C.K.); (A.P.)
| | - Jiri Jarkovsky
- Institute for Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic;
| | - Jaroslav Klat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava Poruba, Czech Republic; (J.K.); (S.B.)
| | - Alberto Berjon
- Department of Pathology, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
- Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, IdiPAZ, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Radovan Pilka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, University Hospital Olomouc, 77520 Olomouc, Czech Republic;
| | - Borek Sehnal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bulovka Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 18081 Prague, Czech Republic;
| | - Blanca Gil-Ibanez
- Unit of Gynecological Oncology, Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology (ICGON), Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Ezequiel Lupo
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Oncology Angel H. Roffo, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires Autonomous City 1214, Argentina;
| | - Almerinda Petiz
- Department of Gynecology, Francisco Gentil Portuguese Oncology Institute, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal;
| | - Octavio Arencibia Sanchez
- Departments of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital of the Canary Islands, 35016 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain;
| | - Peter Kascak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty Hospital Trencin, 91171 Trencin, Slovakia;
| | - Fabio Martinelli
- IRCCS Foundation National Cancer Institute in Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Buda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, 20900 Monza, Italy;
| | - Jiri Presl
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, 30460 Prague, Czech Republic;
| | - Marc Barahona
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Biomedical Research Institute of Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, 08907 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Luc van Lonkhuijzen
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, 1100DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Wiktor Szatkowski
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre of Oncology, M. Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Cracow Department, 31-115 Cracow, Poland;
| | - Lubos Minar
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic;
| | - Maja Pakiz
- University Clinic for Gynaecology and Perinatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia;
| | | | - Cristina Zorrero
- Gynecology Department, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), 46009 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Marcin Misiek
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Holycross Cancer Center, 25-734 Kielce, Poland;
| | - Leon Cornelius Snyman
- Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa;
| | - Dariusz Wydra
- Department of Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Gynecologic Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-402 Gdansk, Poland;
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
| | - Alla Vinnytska
- LISOD-Israeli Oncological Hospital, 08720 Plyuty, Ukraine;
| | - Mikulas Redecha
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Comenius University, 82101 Bratislava, Slovakia;
| | - Martin Michal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Ceske Budejovice, JSC, 37001 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic;
| | | | - Barbara Kipp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland;
| | - Grzegorz Szewczyk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Mother and Child, 01-211 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Robert Toth
- Oncology Institute of East Slovakia, 04191 Košice, Slovakia;
| | | | | | - Robert Poka
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary;
| | | | - Mathieu Luyckx
- Department of Gynecology, Universite catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Maxime Fastrez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Pierre University Hospital, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Juan Carlos Staringer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Español de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires 2975, Argentina;
| | - Anna Germanova
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic; (R.K.); (A.G.)
| | - Andrea Plaikner
- Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg, 22763 Hamburg, Germany; (C.K.); (A.P.)
| | - Sylva Bajsova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava Poruba, Czech Republic; (J.K.); (S.B.)
| | - Pavel Dundr
- Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.N.); (P.D.)
| | | | - David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic; (R.K.); (A.G.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +420-224967451
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bajsova S, Klat J, Kufa C, Reimer P. Efficacy of intrathecal morphine in radical oncogynaecologic surgery. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.03.130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|