Granulomatous mastitis caused by Rickettsia species

Granulomatous mastitis is a rare inflammatory disease of varying etiology. Tuberculosis and cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis caused by Corynebacterium are the best-established infectious examples. Despite the increasing incidence of Rickettsia-related diseases worldwide, granulomatous inflammation of breast parenchyma caused by Rickettsia has not yet been reported. We present a unique case of bilateral granulomatous mastitis documented with mammography, magnetic resonance imaging and core-needle biopsy. The rickettsial etiology of the disease was proved with specific immunohistochemistry and confirmed with DNA extraction, PCR and serology. The lesions completely resolved after a full-course tetracycline treatment. This case report widens the knowledge about the possible clinical manifestations of Rickettsia infection and adds a new bacterium to the list of etiological factors causing granulomatous mastitis.

The clinical value of detecting microcalcifications on a mammogram

Many breast lesions are associated with microcalcifications that are detectable by mammography. In most cases, radiologists are able to distinguish calcifications usually associated with benign diseases from those associated with malignancy. In addition to their value in the early detection of breast carcinoma and accurate radiological diagnosis, the presence of microcalcifications often affects the extent of surgical intervention. Certain types of microcalcifications are associated with negative genetic and molecular characteristics of the tumor and unfavorable prognosis. Microcalcifications localized in the larger ducts (duct-centric, casting-type microcalcifications) represent an independent negative prognostic marker compared to lesions containing other types of microcalcifications and to non-calcified lesions. In this review, we summarize the theoretical and methodological background for understanding the clinical impact and discuss the diagnostic and prognostic value of microcalcifications detected in the breast by mammography.

The subgross morphology of breast carcinomas: a single-institution series of 2033 consecutive cases documented in large-format histology slides

A large-format histology technique represents the most convenient method for documenting and assessing the subgross morphological prognostic parameters of breast cancer (i.e., the distribution of the tumor's invasive and in situ components, disease extent, and tumor size), especially when used in conjunction with systematic radiological-pathological correlation. Here we report a consecutive series of 2033 breast carcinomas operated on in Dalarna, Sweden, with a particular focus on these subgross parameters. We separately analyzed the distributions of the in situ and invasive components of the tumors and then combined these into an aggregate pattern when both components were present. We found that 40% of breast carcinomas had a simple (unifocal) subgross morphology, while 60% had a complex morphology presenting with multifocal or diffuse components. Extensive tumors (occupying a total volume of breast tissue with the greatest dimension being ≥ 40 mm) were more common in complex cases, occurring in 66% of multifocal cases and 88% of diffuse cases, compared with only 5% of unifocal cases. Compared with luminal A-like tumors, HER2-expressing tumors exhibited a significantly larger extent. Triple-negative and basal-like carcinomas tended to have a larger tumor size (based on the largest dimension of the largest invasive focus). In this report, we discuss the prognostic impact of these parameters and the necessity of their correct assessment in the diagnostic routine.

Multifocal breast cancer documented in large-format histology sections: long-term follow-up results by molecular phenotypes

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of molecular phenotype in breast cancer is well established in the literature. Recent studies have demonstrated that subgross lesion distribution (unifocal, multifocal, and diffuse) and disease extent also carry prognostic significance in this disease. However, the correlation of molecular phenotypes with subgross parameters has not yet been investigated in detail.

METHODS

In total, 444 consecutive invasive breast cancers that were documented in large-format histology slides and worked up with detailed radiologic-pathologic correlation were sampled into tissue microarray blocks and stained immunohistochemically to delineate the molecular subtypes.

RESULTS

Diffuse or multifocal distribution of the invasive component of breast carcinomas in this series was associated with a 4.14-fold respectively 2.75-fold risk of cancer-related death compared with unifocal tumors irrespective of molecular phenotype. Patients who had human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive cancers; estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, and HER2-negative (triple-negative) cancers; or basal-like cancers had a 2.18-fold, 2.33-fold, and 4.07-fold risk of dying of disease, respectively, compared with patients who had luminal A carcinomas. Unifocal luminal A, HER2-positive, and basal-like cancers were associated with significantly better long-term survival outcomes than their multifocal or diffuse counterparts; luminal B and triple-negative tumors also had the same tendency. In multivariate analysis, patient age, tumor size category, lymph node status, lesion distribution, and molecular phenotypes remained significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Multifocality and diffuse distribution of the invasive component were associated with significantly poorer survival in women with breast carcinomas compared with unifocal disease in patients with luminal A, HER2 type, and basal-like cancers. Molecular classification of breast cancer is a powerful tool but gains in power when combined with conventional and subgross morphologic parameters.

Molecular phenotypes of unifocal, multifocal, and diffuse invasive breast carcinomas

We analyzed the subgross distribution of the invasive component in 875 consecutive cases of breast carcinomas using large-format histology sections and compared the immunophenotype (estrogen and progesterone receptor expression, HER2 overexpression and expression of basal-like markers, CK5/6, CK14, and epidermal growth factor receptor) in unifocal, multifocal, and diffuse tumors. Histology grade and lymph node status were also analyzed. Unifocal invasive carcinomas comprised 58.6% (513/875), multifocal invasive carcinomas 36.5% (319/875), and diffuse invasive carcinomas 4.9% (43/875) of the cases. The proportion of lymph node-positive cases was significantly higher in multifocal and diffuse carcinomas compared to unifocal cancers, but no other statistically significant differences could be verified between these tumor categories. Histological multifocality and diffuse distribution of the invasive tumor component seem to be negative morphologic prognostic parameters in breast carcinomas, independent of the molecular phenotype.