Arterial occlusive events during chemotherapy for germ cell cancer

During four courses of chemotherapy for a disseminated testicular seminoma a 30-year-old man developed three arterial occlusive events and one silent myocardial infarction. The events occurred approximately 10 days after the start of each chemotherapy course. During chemotherapy suggested pathogenetic factors were monitored without observing any significant abnormality. After completion of chemotherapy the patient remained in a complete remission and free of new thromboembolic events. A review of possible pathogenetic factors is given.

Phase II study of the combination cisplatin, etoposide, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

The objective of this study was to determine the toxicity and the efficacy of the combination of cisplatin, etoposide, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid in the treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Patients received cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1, etoposide 125 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1 and etoposide 200 mg/m(2) p.o. on days 3 and 5, 5-FU 375 mg/m(2)/day continuously i.v. combined with folinic acid 30 mg p.o. 6 times per day on days 1--4. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks until progression or up to a maximum of 6 courses. Patients were evaluated for response after every two courses. Sixty-nine patients received a total of 291 courses (median 4, range 1--6). The hematological toxicity consisted of leukocytopenia grade 3 or 4 in 17 and 16% of patients, respectively. Leukocytopenic fever was seen in 19% of patients. Thrombocytopenia grade 3 or 4 was seen in 13 and 7% of patients, respectively. Non-hematological toxicity consisted of nausea/vomiting grade 3 in 32%, diarrhea grade 3 in 6% and mucositis grade 3 or 4 in 23% of patients. The overall response rate was 34% (complete response 4%, partial response 30%) and the median time to progression was 7 months in 13 patients who received no additional treatment. The median survival for all patients was 9.5 months with a 1-year survival rate of 36%. Ten patients with initially locally unresectable disease (N=2) or celiac or supraclavicular lymph node metastases (N=8) who received additional treatment (esophageal resection in seven patients and radiotherapy in three patients) after they had responded to chemotherapy had a 3-year survival of 50%. We conclude that the combination cisplatin and etoposide combined with 5-FU and folinic acid is a safe and active regimen for patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Mucositis is the most prevalent toxicity.

Is there a common etiology for the rising incidence of and decreasing survival with adenocarcinoma of the lung?

We studied possible explanations for the deteriorating survival for adenocarcinoma of the lung between 1975 and 1994 in relation with trends in incidence. The proportion of adenocarcinoma among men has been increasing since 1975 and for those born after 1920, while survival has decreased since 1975 and for those born since 1930. Among women, both the proportion of adenocarcinoma and survival have remained more or less constant. The rising incidence and the decreasing survival may both be related to changes in tobacco use, the increased use of low-tar filter cigarettes since the 1960s being the most likely candidate.

D-TRP-6-LHRH (Triptorelin) is not effective in ovarian carcinoma: an EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Co-operative Group Study

Between March and September 1988, 74 patients with progressive ovarian cancer after prior platinum-based therapy were treated with the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist Triptorelin (Decapeptyl degrees). Treatment consisted of i.m. injection of 3.75 mg of microencapsulated Triptorelin on days 1, 8 and 28 followed by 4-weekly injections until tumor progression. No objective responses were observed. Eleven out of 68 evaluable patients (16%) had stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 5 months in patients with disease stabilization and 2 months for all evaluable patients. The median survival for patients with disease stabilization was 17 months, whereas for all patients it was 4 months. The treatment was well tolerated; the only reported adverse events were incidental hot flushes. This study showed that the LHRH agonist Triptorelin has only modest efficacy in patients pretreated with platinum-containing chemotherapy.

Randomized Trial of Surgery Versus Radiotherapy in Patients with Stage IIIA (N2) Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer After a Response to Induction Chemotherapy: EORTC 08941

Combined modality treatment of patients with stage III non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has recently become widely accepted. Standard combinations are neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy or concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The effect of combined modality treatment on survival is dependent on both the efficacy of chemotherapy to eradicate micrometastases and optimal local control. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Lung Cancer Cooperative Group has chosen to investigate in a comparative way the side effects and the effect on survival of radiotherapy versus surgery in stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC.

Evaluation of diffusing capacity in patients with a restrictive lung disease

BACKGROUND

In healthy volunteers, the single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) decreases and DLCO normalized per liter alveolar volume (VA; DLCO/VA) increases if VA is decreased. We hypothesized that comparison of DLCO/VA with its predicted value at predicted total lung capacity (TLC) will result in an underestimation of the diffusion disorder in patients with a restrictive lung disease, if a similar relationship exists between DLCO/VA and lung volume as found in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE

To test this hypothesis, we studied total gas transfer DLCO and DLCO/VA as functions of VA in patients who developed a restrictive lung disease and a diffusion disorder in a short period of time.

DESIGN

An observational survey.

SETTING

Pulmonary function department.

PATIENTS

Thirteen patients without any initial pulmonary pathology who developed the mentioned pulmonary pathology due to bleomycin treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Bleomycin treatment.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

We performed the single-breath test at various VA levels before, during, and after bleomycin treatment. In the majority of the patients, the DLCO vs VA relationship remained parabolic, but shifted downwards during therapy. Therefore, the linear DLCO/VA vs VA relationship shifted downwards, while the negative slope was not changed, indicating the development of a decreased gas transfer. Six patients also developed a volume restriction.

CONCLUSIONS

The agreement of the data with the hypothesis increased its probability. Consequently, to evaluate a diffusion disorder, DLCO/VA at a lower actual TLC of patients with a lung restriction should be compared to a reference DLCO/VA at a lung volume equal to the actual TLC.

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator system in resected non-small-cell lung cancer. Rotterdam Oncology Thoracic Study Group

BACKGROUND

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), its receptor (uPAR) and plasminogen activator inhibitors (PAI-1 and PAI-2), all play important roles in tumour invasion and metastasis. The tumour levels of the components of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator system (uPA-system) may help to identify individuals with a poor prognosis in postoperative non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The levels of uPA, uPAR PAI-1 and PAI-2 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in triton-extracts, prepared from 88 NSCLC tissues (stage I-IIIa) and 74 normal lung tissues from the same patients.

RESULTS

The expression levels of uPA, uPAR, PAI-1 and PAI-2 were significantly higher in tumour tissues as compared to their normal equivalents (all, P < 0.0001). Significant relations were found between gender and uPA (P = 0.04) or uPAR (P < 0.001), and between PAI-2 and pathological stage (P = 0.03). For none of the studied factors of the uPA-system a significant relation with survival was found, neither in all patients, nor in the subgroups of patients with squamous-cell lung carcinoma or adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The expression levels of the components of the uPA-system were higher in NSCLC tissue as compared to normal lung tissue, but there were no significant relationships between their levels and survival.

Phase I study of a biweekly schedule of a fixed dose of cisplatin with increasing doses of paclitaxel in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer

We performed this dose-finding study with a fixed dose of cisplatin and increasing doses of paclitaxel given every 2 weeks to determine the maximum tolerable dose of this schedule. Sixty-four patients with advanced oesophageal cancer were treated with a cisplatin dose of 60 mg m(-2) and increasing doses of paclitaxel from 100 mg m(-2) up to 200 mg m(-2) both administered over 3 h for a maximum of six cycles in patients with stable disease or eight cycles in responding patients. Patients were retreated when the granulocytes were > 0.75 x 10(9) l(-1) and the platelets > 75 x 10(9) l(-1). The dose of paclitaxel could be increased to 200 mg m(-2) without encountering dose limiting haematological toxicity. At the dose levels 190 mg m(-2) and 200 mg m(-2) of paclitaxel cumulative sensory neurotoxicity became the dose-limiting toxicity. The dose intensity of paclitaxel calculated over six cycles rose from 50 mg m(-2) per week to 85 mg m(-2) per week. Only three episodes of granulocytopenic fever were encountered out of a total of 362 cycles of treatment. Of the 59 patients evaluable for response, 31 (52%) had a partial or complete response. In a biweekly schedule with a fixed dose of 60 mg m(-2) cisplatin it is possible to increase the dose of paclitaxel to 180 mg m(-2). At higher dose levels, neurotoxicity becomes the dose-limiting toxicity. The observed response rate warrants further investigation of this schedule.

Enhanced myelotoxicity due to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration until 48 hours before the next chemotherapy course in patients with small-cell lung carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) priming on peripheral-blood cell counts during standard-dose chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve patients with relapsed small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) were treated with two chemotherapy courses. Six patients received G-CSF priming only before the first course (group A) and the other six patients only before the second course (group B). Each patient served as his own control. Patients were treated with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and etoposide (CEE), or with vincristine, ifosfamide, mesna, and carboplatin (VIMP) every 4 weeks. G-CSF was administered subcutaneously 5 microg/kg/d for 6 days until 48 hours before the first or second chemotherapy course.

RESULTS

Priming caused a lowering of the WBC nadir, with a median value of 0.95 x 10(9)/L (P = .004), and of absolute neutrophil nadir, with a median value of 0.48 x 10(9)/L (P = .03). There was a trend for a lower platelet (PLT) nadir after G-CSF priming (P = .09). G-CSF priming resulted in a prolonged duration of WBC count less than 3.0 x 10(9)/L of +4.25 days (P = .04), and of WBC count less than 1.0 x 10(9)/L of +0.50 days (P = .03). The duration of neutropenia less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L seemed longer in primed courses (+3.75 days, P = .18). The duration of PLT counts less than 100 x 10(9)/L was prolonged by 1.5 days (P = .04). Hemoglobin (Hgb) levels were not influenced by G-CSF priming.

CONCLUSION

G-CSF administration until 48 hours before the next chemotherapy course increases chemotherapy-associated leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia. This may be of special concern when G-CSF is administered during dose-densified chemotherapy.

Randomized study of paclitaxel-cisplatin versus cisplatin-teniposide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group

PURPOSE

To compare two cisplatin based chemotherapy schedules in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 332 patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 either in combination with teniposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 (arm A) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 by 3-hour infusion on day 1 (arm B); cycles were repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were ineligible; patient characteristics were well balanced between the two arms: 71% were male, 71% had less than 5% weight loss, 89% had a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status of 0 to 1, 51% had adenocarcinoma, and 61% had stage IV disease. Hematologic toxicity was significantly more severe in arm A (leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia grade 3 or 4: 66% v 19%, 83% v 55%, 36% v 2% in arms A and B, respectively), which resulted in more febrile neutropenia (27% v 3% in arms A and B, respectively), dose reductions, and treatment delays. There were a total of nine toxic deaths, six due to neutropenic sepsis: five in arm A and one in arm B. In contrast, arthralgia/myalgia (grade 2 or 3, 4% v 17%), peripheral neurotoxicity (grade 2 or 3, 6% v 29%), and hypersensitivity reactions (1% v 7%, all grades) were significantly more frequent in arm B. The frequency and severity of other toxicities were comparable between the two arms. Responses were one complete and 44 partial on arm A (28%) and two complete and 61 partial (41%) on arm B (P = .018). There was no significant difference in survival, with median and 1-year survivals 9.9 versus 9.7 months and 41% versus 43%, respectively in arm A and B. Progression-free survival was 4.9 and 5.4 months in arm A and B, respectively. Selected centers participated in a quality-of-life (QoL) assessment, which was performed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and LC-13 administered at baseline and every 6 weeks thereafter. Arm B achieved a better score at week 6 for emotional, cognitive and social functioning, global health status, fatigue, and appetite loss, which was lost at 12 weeks. In conclusion, arm B appears superior to arm A with regard to response rate, side effects, and QoL.

CONCLUSION

Although survival was not improved, arm B offers a better palliation for advanced NSCLC patients than arm A.

A phase I dose finding study of a biweekly schedule of a fixed dose of cisplatin with increasing doses of paclitaxel in patients with advanced esophageal cancer

We performed a phase I study of a fixed dose of cisplatin combined with increasing doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) given in a biweekly schedule to determine the maximum tolerated dose in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. The starting dose was cisplatin 60 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 100 mg/m2, given by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks. Patients were re-treated when the granulocyte counts were greater than 0.75 x 10(9)L and the platelet counts were greater than 75 x 10(9)/L. The paclitaxel dose has been escalated to 160 mg/m2 and the maximum tolerated dose has not yet been reached. At the higher dose levels, more grade 3 and 4 granulocytopenia was observed, but no patient had to be hospitalized because of febrile neutropenia. Nonhematologic toxicity was mild at all dose levels. Increasing the dose of paclitaxel from 100 mg/m2 to 160 mg/m2 leads to an approximately 50% increase in the dose intensity, as calculated in milligrams per square meter per week (mg/m2/wk) over six cycles. Of the 31 patients evaluable for response, 17 (55%) achieved either a partial or a complete response. In conclusion, biweekly administration of cisplatin and paclitaxel, with re-treatment at a granulocyte level greater than 0.75 x 10(9)/L, is feasible and well tolerated, and has a promising response rate in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Further accrual is ongoing to determine the maximum tolerated dose of this schedule.

Etoposide in malignant pleural mesothelioma: two phase II trials of the EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative Group

Intravenous and oral etoposide (VP 16-213) were tested in two sequential phase II trials in chemotherapy-naive patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. In the first trial, etoposide was given intravenously (i.v.) at a dose of 150 mg/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 every 3 weeks. The second trial investigated a daily oral dose of 100 mg for 21 days followed by a 2-week treatment-free period, and then recycling. In both trials, the treatment was given until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or patient refusal. In the i.v. trial, 49 patients were included, 2 patients were ineligible. The oral trial recruited 45 patients, 4 patients were not eligible. In both trials, the main side-effects were moderate leucopenia, alopecia, nausea and vomiting. Two partial responses (4%) and three partial responses (7%) were reported in the i.v. and oral trials, respectively. The median survival was 29 weeks and 38 weeks in the i.v. and oral trials, respectively. In conclusion, further investigation of etoposide in malignant mesothelioma is not recommended.

Introduction to the treatment of lung cancer

Lung cancer represents the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Its incidence has declined in men but is increasing in women, assuring that this largely preventable disease will continue to affect millions. In small cell lung cancer, the advent of chemotherapy in the 1970s and continued refinements in the 1980s yielded improved median survivals in patients with both limited disease and extensive disease and improved long-term survival in limited-disease patients. Reinduction chemotherapy was shown in the 1980s to improve survival in patients who had achieved a complete remission to initial chemotherapy, and a consensus subsequently developed regarding standard induction chemotherapy for patients with small cell lung cancer. The prognosis for patients with small cell lung cancer depends largely on delivering the optimal combination chemotherapy to achieve early, maximal cell kill with manageable toxicity. Future challenges include comparing newer combinations and novel schedules of administration with "standard" chemotherapy, optimizing the use of complementary treatment modalities, and refining prognostic factors to better define treatment and improve outcome. In patients with non-small cell lung cancer, single-modality treatment has been compared with combined-modality therapy in numerous randomized trials, with consistent survival benefits accrued by patients in combined-modality treatment arms. The recent availability of novel cytotoxic and cytostatic agents has prompted additional comparisons of new combination-chemotherapy regimens, with or without other treatment modalities, in patients with lung cancer. Questions for the future include defining the most effective chemotherapy to eradicate distant metastases and understanding which modalities offer superior local control.

[The changing role of chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma stage III]

Non-small cell pulmonary carcinoma stage III occurs in the Netherlands in a heterogeneous group of over 2500 patients annually. The standard treatment is radiotherapy. In view of the fact that 70-80% of the patients in the long run develop metastases, the question was studied if combination therapy (especially with chemotherapy) gives longer survival. Chemotherapy may be administered as systemic treatment preceding radiotherapy, or to enhance the effect of radiotherapy. The results of 11 of the 18 studies of combination treatment compared with monotherapy published since 1990 show a statistically significantly slightly longer survival after combination therapy (two other studies involved too few patients to demonstrate statistically significant differences). The difference was maximal after approximately 3 years.

Cisplatin/paclitaxel vs cisplatin/teniposide for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative Group. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer

A total of 332 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group (EORTC) to receive one of two cisplatin (Platinol)-based chemotherapy regimens: Paclitaxel (Taxol) 175 mg/m2 given by 3-hour infusion followed by cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1; Or cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1, followed by teniposide (Vumon) 100 mg/m2 given on days 1, 3, and 5. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Preliminary analysis of the results of this phase III trial shows that hematologic toxicity was decidedly more severe in the group treated with cisplatin/teniposide than in those given paclitaxel/cisplatin. Of 264 patients evaluable so far, responses have been observed in 47% of those given paclitaxel and in 29% of those treated with teniposide. However, extramural radiologic response evaluation is still under way, so these figures are expected to change somewhat. It appears clear that the paclitaxel-based therapy affords a benefit in terms of response and toxicity, but survival results are premature and any definite conclusions await final analysis.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable (stage I and II) and locally advanced (stage IIIA-N2) non-small cell lung cancer

In 1995, a randomized intergroup study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by either surgery or radiotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer was started under the auspices of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC 08941). The objective of this study is to investigate whether surgery or radiotherapy represents superior locoregional treatment, in terms of survival and quality of life, for patients with stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer who have achieved a response after three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A phase II side study will investigate the clinical and pathologic response rate (if applicable), as well as acute and late side effects during or after consecutive surgery and/or radiotherapy of combination paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) and carboplatin. It is planned that paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 will be given as a 3-hour infusion, followed by a 30-minute infusion of carboplatin at a dose based on a target area under the concentration-time curve of 6 mg x min/mL. This phase II study was started in October 1996. Depending on the response rate and early and late side effects observed in this well-defined, prognostically favorable group of patients, it will be decided whether and how to use the same combination chemotherapy in an ongoing randomized trial currently being conducted by the Dutch Lung Cancer Study Group (DLCSG 94-2). In the latter trial, patients with stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer are randomized to immediate surgery or two courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Responding patients will receive another two courses of chemotherapy before surgery; nonresponders will go directly to surgery.

Results of the phase II EORTC study comparing paclitaxel/cisplatin with teniposide/cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative Group

Toxicity and response rates are evaluated in a randomized phase II study comparing paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ)/cisplatin with teniposide/cisplatin in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer to decide whether this study should continue as a phase III trial. A response was seen in 26% (10 of 38) of the patients receiving teniposide/cisplatin and in 40% (14 of 35) of those receiving paclitaxel/cisplatin. Overall, evidence of toxicity was more severe in the cisplatin/teniposide group, especially with regard to myelotoxicity. Grade 4 neutropenia was seen in 66% of patients receiving teniposide compared with 29% of those treated with paclitaxel/cisplatin. The study is to continue as a phase III trial, with 150 patients expected to participate in each treatment group.

Cisplatin and etoposide in oesophageal cancer: a phase II study. Rotterdam Oesophageal Tumour Study Group

In the search for effective chemotherapy regimens which can be used in multimodality treatment programmes for patients with cancer of the oesophagus, we conducted a phase II trial to determine the activity and toxicity of the combination of cisplatin and etoposide in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. Seventy-three consecutive patients with unresectable or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic oesophagus were treated with cisplatin 80 mg m-2 by 4 h infusion on day 1, etoposide 100 mg (fixed dose) by 2 h infusion on day 1 and 2, and etoposide 200 mg m-2 orally on day 3 and 5. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks, for a maximum of six courses. The oral dosages of etoposide were modified individually until a significant degree of myelosuppression was reached. Of 65 evaluable patients, five complete responses (CRs) and 26 partial responses (PRs) were seen, for an overall response rate of 48% (95% confidence interval 35-60%). Median time to progression was 7 months (range 3-72 + months). There were two toxic deaths (neutropenic sepsis). The response rate equals that of other cisplatin-based regimens. Its toxicity profile allows addition of a third active drug such as 5-fluorouracil.

Standard versus alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy in extensive small cell lung cancer: an EORTC Phase III trial

Alternating chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer has been tested in several studies. Some have shown positive results that have not been confirmed in other studies. In all of the studies, however, the degree of non-cross-resistance in the regimens was questionable. The EORTC Lung Cancer Study Group developed two equipotent regimens: (i) standard (CDE)-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide; (ii) (VIMP)-vincristine, carboplatin, ifosfamide, mesna, both non-cross-resistance. These two combinations were alternated and compared with the standard chemotherapy regimen in a group of 143 patients with extensive small cell lung cancer. Median survival was 7.6 months in the standard arm and 8.7 in the alternating arm (P = 0.243). Median time to progression was 5.8 and 6.4 months, respectively (P = 0.166). Median response duration was 7.0 and 6.8 months (P = 0.221). The use of two alternating regimens with a proven degree of non-cross-resistance did not result in any improvement in survival in patients with extensive small cell lung cancer.

Serum neuron-specific enolase (S-NSE) and the prognosis in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC): a combined multivariable analysis on data from nine centres

The influence of pretreatment serum neuron-specific enolase (S-NSE) in addition to more conventional prognostic factors on survival duration in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) was investigated in 770 patients from nine centres in six countries. The other variables included stage of disease, performance status (PS), age, sex, serum lactate dehydrogenase (S-LDH), serum alkaline phosphatase (S-AP), and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (S-CEA). Increased values of S-NSE (> 12.5 micrograms-1 l) were observed in 81% of the patients, whereas S-LDH, S-AP and S-CEA were elevated in only half of the patients or less. Multivariable analysis by Cox's proportional hazard model disclosed S-NSE as the most powerful prognostic factor followed by poor PS and extensive stage disease. If PS was ignored, S-LDH came up as a significant prognostic factor. S-AP, S-CEA, age and sex had no significant influence on the prognosis. The three prognostic factors, S-NSE, PS and stage of disease, enabled establishment of a prognostic index (PI) based on a simple algorithm PI = zNSE + z(stage) + 2zPS. This segregated the patients into four groups with clearly different prognosis. The median survival and 95% confidence intervals of the four groups were: 468 days (540-408), 362 days (405-328), 256 days (270-241) and 125 days (179-58). Based on the present results we recommend S-NSE and PS, in addition to stage, for prognostic stratification in treatment trials on SCLC.

5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or esophago-gastric junction area. Rotterdam Esophageal Tumor Study Group

BACKGROUND

The results of chemotherapy against gastric cancer or esophageal squamous cell carcinomas cannot be generalized to adenocarcinomas of the esophagus. Therefore the combination of 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid was studied in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After a loading dose of 4 x 90 mg folinic acid orally, a continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/sqm/day for 5 days with concommitant folinic acid 6 x 60 mg/day orally, was administered to 29 consecutive patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction area.

RESULTS

This schedule was tolerated well with mild mucositis and diarrhea. In one patient reversible cardiotoxicity was seen. Five patients obtained a partial remission (19%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 6%-38%), and 8 patients stable disease. One early death.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination has modest activity against adenocarcinoma of the esophagus; its toxicity profile permits incorporation in combination protocols.

Genitourinary group phase II study of chemotherapy in stage T3-4 N0-X M0 transitional cell cancer of the bladder: prognostic factor analysis

The aim of this study was to examine prognostic factors for survival of patients with invasive bladder cancer who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by further treatment. From 1986 to 1990, 149 eligible patients with T3-4 N0-X M0 bladder cancer were entered into a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of cisplatin and methotrexate. Patients received two or four courses of chemotherapy, depending on the absence or presence, respectively, of a major clinical response after two courses. 136 patients were evaluable for clinical response after two courses of chemotherapy, and 75 patients were evaluable for pathological response after two or four courses. A multivariate analysis, based on pretreatment variables and the post-treatment variables, clinical response and pathological response, showed that performance status, tumour size and clinical response after two courses of chemotherapy were the only independent prognostic factors for all eligible patients. A second multivariate analysis in the selected subgroup of patients, who underwent a cystectomy, showed that the G-cagetory and pathological response were the only independent prognostic factors. In conclusion, in this group of patients, the response to chemotherapy was a strong and independent prognostic factor in addition to other independent variables. However, it was not accurate or strong enough to allow an impact on the choice of locoregional therapy.

Two schedules of teniposide with or without cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group

PURPOSE

We conducted a randomized trial to investigate the value of the addition of cisplatin to teniposide (VM26) and to investigate the schedule dependence of the topoisomerase II inhibitor VM26, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred twenty-five NSCLC patients were randomized to receive VM26 120 mg/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 or 360 mg/m2 on day 1 only, either as a single drug or in combination with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Response rates, side effects, and survival were compared according to the 2 x 2 factorial design of this study.

RESULTS

The response rate of the two cisplatin-containing arms was superior to that of the two arms that contained VM26 only (22% v 6%, P < .001); progression-free survival and survival times were also longer in the cisplatin-containing arms (median, 4.3 v 2.2 months, P = .003; median 7.2 v 5.9 months, P = .008, respectively). Toxicity was significantly higher in the cisplatin-containing arms; the most frequent side effects were leukopenia, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia. The schedule of VM26 did not significantly influence the response rate, progression-free survival interval, or survival duration. However, the response rate of the 1-day administration was significantly lower than that of the 3-day administration when given as single drugs.

CONCLUSION

The addition of cisplatin to VM26 improves the response rate, progression-free survival interval, and survival duration over VM26 alone, although at the cost of a significant increase in toxicity. Cisplatin should be considered as the basis for combination chemotherapies in advanced NSCLC.

Disease monitoring by the tumour markers cyfra 21.1 and TPA in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

We evaluated the use of two tumour markers Cyfra 21.1 and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) for disease monitoring. Assessment of response to WHO criteria was compared to response assessment according to changes in the tumour marker levels. The criteria defined for marker response were a 65% decrease for a partial response and a 40% increase for progressive disease. When response evaluations with a positive lead time were included, 72% of 115 evaluations for Cyfra 21.1 and 59% of 107 evaluations for TPA yielded the same result. Most discordant evaluations were caused by those evaluations whereby the patient achieved a partial response according to the WHO criteria and had normalisation of the marker. Less cases with a positive lead time, more negative lead times, and more patients with progressive disease without an increase of the marker were seen with TPA compared to Cyfra 21.1. In conclusion, Cyfra 21.1 follows the changes in the tumour load better than TPA. Rising levels of both markers nearly always indicate disease progression, and such knowledge easily obtained may prevent the continuation of ineffective treatment.

Mitoxantrone in metastatic apudomas: a phase II study of the EORTC Gastro-Intestinal Cancer Cooperative Group

We performed a phase II study with mitoxantrone in patients with carcinoid tumours, islet cell tumours and medullary carcinomas of the thyroid. Thirty-five eligible patients received mitoxantrone 12 mg m-2 i.v. every 3 weeks. Among 18 previously untreated patients, three responded (17%, 95% CI = 4-41%); no responses were achieved in 17 previously treated patients. Of the 21 patients who had carcinoid tumours, 11 were previously untreated and two achieved a response (18%, 95% CI = 2-52%). Overall response rate was 9% (95% CI = 2-23%). At a median follow-up of 43 months, median overall survival was 16 months. The median survival of 21 patients with a normal alkaline phosphatase was 29 months and 9 months for 14 patients with elevated serum levels (P = 0.005). A similar observation was noticed for gamma-glutamyltransferase (P = 0.007). We concluded that mitoxantrone is not active in APUD tumours. Elevated alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyltransferase are associated with a poor prognosis.

Phase II study of carboplatin and etoposide as a first line regimen in patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The data available on the role of carboplatin and etoposide in breast cancer, especially in patients with no or minimal prior therapy are limited.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a phase II study with carboplatin and etoposide as first line treatment in 34 patients with metastatic breast cancer. The treatment regimens was carboplatin 300 mg/m2 day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 days 1, 3 and 5 every four weeks.

RESULTS

Of 33 evaluable patients, 2 achieved complete responses (6%) lasting 4 and 5 months, 7 patients (21%) achieved partial responses with a median duration of 6+ (range 5-8) months, 15 patients had stable disease, and 9 progressed during treatment. The major toxicity was myelosuppression WHO grades 3 or 4 leukocytopenia or thrombocytopenia were seen in 15 and 10 patients, respectively. One formally ineligible patient with an impaired renal function died 14 days after the start of treatment because of a septicaemia in the presence of a grade 4 leukocytopenia. Besides this patient no other patient presented with granulocytopenic fever.

CONCLUSION

In view of the observed response rate of 27% (95% confidence interval 11%-43%) we think that carboplatin and etoposide given in this dose and schedule has probably no clear advantage over the more commonly used regimens.

Acute myeloid leukaemia with +i(12p) shortly after treatment of mediastinal germ cell tumour

We report a patient who developed acute myeloid leukaemia (M2) shortly after successful treatment of a mediastinal germ cell tumour. The leukaemia was preceded by a documented myelodysplastic phase. Complex cytogenetic abnormalities were found in bone marrow and peripheral blood cells including +i(12p), typical of germ cell malignancy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed the presence of +i(12p) in myeloblasts, erythroblasts and neutrophils but not in lymphocytes. This case provides further evidence for a common clonal origin of haematological malignancies and mediastinal germ cell tumours.

The effects of an ACTH (4-9) analogue on development of cisplatin neuropathy in testicular cancer: a randomized trial

The efficacy of the ACTH (4-9) analogue Org 2766 in the prevention of subclinical cisplatin neuropathy was assessed in a double-blind placebo-controlled multi-centre study in patients with testicular cancer or adenocarcinoma of unknown primary. Forty-two patients received at least four cycles of cisplatin (100 mg/m2 per cycle), together with subcutaneous injections of Org 2766 (2 mg/day for 5 consecutive days) or placebo. Vibratory threshold was used as a measure of neuropathy. For each individual patient, the influence of cisplatin on vibratory perception was quantified by the slope of the regression line between the natural logarithm of the vibratory thresholds and the number of cycles. From the slopes, the proportional increase of vibratory threshold per cycle of cisplatin was calculated. On average, vibratory thresholds increased by 42% with each cycle of 100 mg/m2 of cisplatin in the placebo group, and by 19% during treatment with Org 2766. The influence of cisplatin on vibratory thresholds was highly significant in the placebo group (P < 0.0001), and of borderline significance in the group treated with Org 2766 (P = 0.06). The difference in slopes between the two groups was of borderline statistical significance (Wilcoxon's two-sample test: P = 0.06; analysis of variance: P = 0.04). These results show that Org 2766 cannot completely prevent cisplatin neuropathy in young men with testicular cancer, but nerve damage may be ameliorated by the use of this ACTH (4-9) analogue.

Acute antiemetic efficacy and safety of dolasetron mesylate, a 5-HT3 antagonist, in cancer patients treated with cisplatin. European Dolasetron Study Group

Dolasetron mesylate (MDL 73,147EF), a new serotonin receptor (5-HT3) antagonist was administered to 164 cancer patients naive or non-naive to chemotherapy, in single, rising doses of 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 mg i.v. 15 minutes prior to an infusion of cisplatin. The severity of nausea and number of episodes of emesis were recorded during the 24-hour period following cisplatin administration. There were significant differences between the dose groups, sex, and naive and non-naive patients. There were also significant dolasetron dose-dependent differences for no emesis (p = .01), less than 3 emetic episodes (p = .01), time-to-onset of nausea (p = .04), and time-to-onset of emesis (p = .003). The severity of symptoms was greater for females, for patients with previous chemotherapy, and with shorter duration of cisplatin infusion. Adjustment for these variables and the study center reduced the associations between the dose of dolasetron mesylate and the outcome variables. The principal adverse events were headache (11%) and diarrhea (6%). Dolasetron mesylate was well tolerated; a single dose of 40 or 50 mg controlled acute nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy in the majority, in particular in chemotherapy-naive and male patients. In conclusion, 50 mg and a larger dose merit study in controlled trials with stratification for sex and previous chemotherapy.

Evaluation of a new tumour marker in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: Cyfra 21.1

The Cyfra 21.1 assay is a newly developed test which measures in serum a fragment of cytokeratin 19. We evaluated this marker in 212 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), predominantly stage 3a-b and 4, and compared it with three other markers: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC) and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA). Sensitivities for Cyfra 21.1, TPA, CEA and SCC (using cut-off levels corresponding to a 95% specificity for benign lung diseases) were 40%, 40%, 42% and 19% respectively. The sensitivity of CEA was significantly higher in patients with adenocarcinomas compared with the other three markers, while the sensitivity of Cyfra 21.1 and TPA was significantly higher in patients with squamous cell carcinomas. The value of Cyfra 21.1 for monitoring disease during chemotherapy could be evaluated in 23 patients with squamous cell carcinomas. When the cases of lead time were included a concordance between clinical evaluations according to WHO response criteria and evaluations according to changes in the marker levels of 74% was found. The criteria defined for marker response were a 65% decrease in the marker level for a partial response and a 40% increase for progressive disease. In particular, increasing levels of this marker indicated usually disease progression. In conclusion, Cyfra 21.1 is a useful serum marker for patients with NSCLC, especially for disease monitoring of patients with squamous cell carcinoma during and after chemotherapy.

Prognostic significance of tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of the tumour marker, tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS), in 203 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and related this to several other known prognostic factors. TPS was significantly correlated with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase and alkaline phosphatase, and the median level of TPS in patients with stage 4 disease was significantly higher as compared to stage 3A and 3B disease. In the univariate analysis, performance status, stage of disease, LDH, alkaline phosphatase, a histology of undifferentiated large cell carcinoma and TPS all had a statistically significant association with survival. Multivariate analysis showed that stage of disease, performance status, histology and TPS were the most important prognostic factors. TPS has prognostic significance for survival in patients with advanced NSCLC, independent from performance status and stage of disease.

Long term survival of small cell lung cancer patients after chemotherapy

Eighty-one patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with a survival of more than 2 years after start of chemotherapy were studied. Twenty-six of the 28 patients who died of relapsed SCLC had in fact relapsed before two years and of the 55 who had not then only two (4%) relapsed subsequently. It is stressed that with such observations treatment related factors should be taken in account. Second tumours were observed in ten patients, nine proven malignant. Of the eight patients with non-small cell lung cancer three had residual disease after initial chemotherapy. In our patient group after a 2 year disease-free interval the risk of developing non-small cell lung cancer seems higher than a subsequent relapse of SCLC.

Testing the possible non-cross resistance of two equipotent combination chemotherapy regimens against small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative Group

The Goldie-Coldman hypothesis of alternating non-cross resistant combination chemotherapy regimens for small-cell lung cancer has never been adequately evaluated. In previously reported studies non-cross resistance and/or equipotency of the combinations used had not been tested before the phase III study was started. We describe two combination chemotherapy regimens with comparable efficacy against small-cell lung cancer and present a phase II test of their possible non-cross resistance. Patients clinically resistant to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and etoposide (CDE), were treated with the second-line regimen consisting of vincristine, ifosfamide, mesna and carboplatin (VIMP) (n = 25). This resulted in 1 complete and 14 partial responses, response rate 60% [95% confidence interval (CI): 38.7-78.9%]. Patients clinically resistant to vincristine, carboplatin (n = 22) or ifosfamide, mesna, carboplatin (n = 21) were treated with CDE, resulting in 6 complete responses and 16 partial responses, response rate 51% (95% CI: 35.5-66.7%). The clinical value of such a degree of non-cross resistance has to be evaluated in a phase III study.

Correlation between changes in the tumour markers CA-M26 and CA-M29 and standard response evaluation in patients with metastatic breast cancer

In this study we correlated response evaluated by standard WHO criteria to strict defined criteria of tumour marker response in 63 patients with metastatic breast cancer. Pretreatment sensitivity at first evaluation was 71% and 85% for CA-M26 and CA-M29, respectively. Of the 156 evaluations for CA-M26 and 178 for CA-M29 in 26 and 30 patients with evaluable lesions 72% and 67% were concordant with the results of the clinical evaluations. When the discordant evaluations due to lead time were included the concordances were 87% for CA-M26 and 83% for CA-M29. Of the 70 evaluations for CA-M26 and 92 for CA-M29 in 19 and 24 patients with non-evaluable lesions 59% and 72% were concordant with the results of the clinical evaluations. Most importantly, progressive disease according to the changes in the marker level nearly always predicted disease progression. Such knowledge obtained in a simple way may prevent continuation of ineffective treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

What is the optimal dose and duration of treatment with etoposide? I. Maximum tolerated duration of daily treatment with 50, 75, and 100 mg of oral etoposide

Because etoposide is a cell-cycle phase-specific drug, its degree of cytotoxicity likely relies on duration of cell exposure to a specific concentration. We investigated the maximum tolerated duration of oral etoposide treatment at doses of 100, 75, and 50 mg/d in previously treated patients with biopsy-proven, advanced cancer. "Maximum tolerated" was defined as tumor progression or hematologic toxicity (World Health Organization [WHO] grade > or = 2). The maximum tolerated duration in 19 patients given 100 mg/d was > or = 21 days, since this was the predetermined cutoff point; 3 patients discontinued etoposide because of early tumor progression, and 6 others had developed leukopenia or thrombocytopenia (WHO grade > 2) by day 21. The maximum tolerated duration in 13 patients given 75 mg/d was a median of 11 weeks (range, 2 to 19); 6 patients developed tumor progression and 6 others leukopenia (WHO grade > or = 2) requiring discontinuation of treatment. Ten patients given 50 mg/d tolerated therapy for a median of 13 weeks (range, 3 to 26 weeks); treatment was halted in seven patients because of tumor progression, two because of leukopenia (WHO grade > or = 2), and one because of stomatitis. The data from this study and others suggest that above a certain minimal plasma level, etoposide induces concentration-dependent cumulative toxicity. What remains to be determined is the minimal plasma level per tumor type. It will also be interesting to see whether myelopoiesis, thrombocytopoiesis, and erythropoiesis have differential sensitivity to etoposide, since thrombocytopenia did not occur using daily etoposide doses of 50 and 75 mg, whereas at the same doses 10 of 23 patients required erythrocyte transfusion.

A European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer--Genitourinary Group phase 2 study of chemotherapy in stage T3-4N0-XM0 transitional cell cancer of the bladder: evaluation of clinical response

From 1986 to 1990 the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer--Genitourinary Group conducted a phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage T3-4N0-XM0 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. The objectives were to evaluate the clinical response in relation to the pathological response, and to measure the side effects of chemotherapy. Of 171 patients entered 136 were fully evaluable: 18% had clinical complete remissions, 36% had clinical partial remissions, 39% had no clinical remissions and 10% had unknown response. A selected subgroup of 76 patients underwent cystectomy after 2 or 4 courses of chemotherapy: 2 were not evaluable for pathological response because of preoperative radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 16 had a pathological complete remission, 7 had a pathological partial remission and 51 had no pathological remission. Comparison of the clinical response or T category only after 2 courses of chemotherapy with the pathological response after 2 or 4 courses of chemotherapy showed that in a number of patients the disease status could be downstaged to pathological complete or partial remission by additional courses of chemotherapy. If the discrepancies between clinical and pathological responses, or between T and P categories, induced by further downstaging after additional chemotherapy were left out, it was shown that clinical complete and partial remissions were a heterogeneous group but nonresponders could be delineated with a 100% accuracy by clinical response evaluation and transurethral resection biopsy only. Furthermore it seems important to establish the number of chemotherapy courses to induce a maximal response of the primary tumor.

What is the optimal dose and duration of treatment with etoposide? II. Comparative pharmacokinetic study of three schedules: 1 x 100 mg, 2 x 50 mg, and 4 x 25 mg of oral etoposide daily for 21 days

The large interpatient and intrapatient pharmacokinetic variability of oral etoposide is well known. We investigated whether dose fractionation would result in less variability. Fifteen patients (five in each etoposide schedule) were given either 100 mg once daily, 50 mg twice daily, or 25 mg four times daily for 21 days. On days 1, 8, and 15 blood samples were collected during 24 hours to measure plasma etoposide levels. Hematologic toxicity was determined by weekly leukocyte and platelet counts and expressed as the relative decrease in these parameters. Once-daily administration of etoposide 100 mg correlated with a significantly higher peak concentration than was observed with the other two schedules. The mean area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) and mean time with a plasma etoposide concentration above 1 microgram/mL were similar with the three schedules. Peak plasma concentrations, AUCs, and times with plasma concentration above 1 micrograms/mL correlated significantly with the relative decrease in leukocyte but not platelet counts. Large interpatient and intrapatient variability of pharmacokinetic parameters was observed with all three schedules. These data do not support fractionating a daily 100-mg etoposide dose. Moreover, it does not appear useful to adjust oral etoposide doses based on pharmacokinetic data obtained once during a prolonged treatment period. Finally, adjusting oral etoposide doses based on hematologic toxicity seems advisable to decrease the interpatient variability of etoposide's pharmacokinetics.

Distinction of two different classes of small-cell lung cancer cell lines by enzymatically inactive neuron-specific enolase

Neuron specific enolase (NSE) is widely used as a neuro-endocrine marker. However the presence of NSE in many non-neuroendocrine tissues has raised questions on the specificity of NSE. We have investigated NSE immunoreactivity (NSA-ag), gamma-enolase activity and total enolase activity in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines. During well-controlled exponential growth comparison of NSE-ag content and gamma-enolase activity with the doubling-time (Td) and NSE-ag content with gamma-enolase and total enolase activity led to a clear distinction of two types of cell line: variant cell lines plus part of the classic cell lines (type I) and the remaining classic cell lines (type II). The distinction was based upon both an abrupt 6-fold increase of gamma-enolase activity and an 18-fold increase of NSE-ag, which for the larger part was enzymatically inactive. Within each group the increase of NSE-ag content was significantly correlated with the increase of gamma-enolase activity and both NSE-ag content and gamma-enolase activity increased linearly with Td. It is concluded that gamma-enolase seems to be associated with the regulation of growth rate and that a compound with the gamma-enolase antigen but without enzyme activity can distinguish two different classes of SCLC cell lines. Furthermore the demonstration that NSE-ag can represent the active enzyme as well as an enzymatically inactive compound may explain why a controversy about neuron- or non-specificity of NSE exists.

Evaluation of tissue polypeptide antigen serum levels for monitoring disease activity during chemotherapy in patients with transitional carcinoma of the urinary tract

In 28 patients with transitional carcinoma of the urinary tract, all treated with chemotherapy, serial measurements of serum tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) were performed and correlated to clinical evaluations of response. At the start of chemotherapy elevated levels of TPA were found in 4 out of 14 patients with T2-4NO-2MO tumours and in 7 out of 14 patients with distant metastases. In most patients with elevated TPA levels who responded to chemotherapy, TPA levels rapidly returned to normal. False positive elevations of TPA were observed in 2 patients. It is concluded that serial measurement of TPA for monitoring disease activity has limited value because of the low sensitivity of TPA, especially for patients with early-stage cancer, and because of the occurrence of false positive results.

Cachexia and cancer: a clinician's view

The cancer-related cachexia/anorexia syndrome is not well understood. It is related to several factors like metabolic changes, tumor types, and disease extent and is frequently accompanied by decreased performance status. An important aspect of anorexia is the psychosocial problem: the patient is unable to join the family for meals precisely when he or she most needs familial support. Several randomized studies have shown that megestrol acetate, possibly in a dose-dependent fashion, can improve appetite and lead to weight gain. This effect seems to be most prevalent in patients with breast cancer and also occurs in the absence of a tumor response. We have retrospectively analyzed 176 patients with cancer types other than breast cancer who received only palliative treatment. The patients were treated with megestrol acetate (160 mg tid) because they complained of anorexia. After 10 days of treatment, megestrol acetate was continued only in those patients whose appetite and/or general well-being improved. Fifty-seven patients (32%) experienced such an improvement and asked for continuation of therapy. Many basic questions are still unanswered; nonetheless, from a practical clinical view it seems worthwhile to offer anorectic patients a chance to improve, especially since side effects of megestrol acetate are absent or mild, and the distinction between responders and nonresponders can be made by 10 days of treatment.

Intrathecal administration of etoposide in the treatment of malignant meningitis: feasibility and pharmacokinetic data

Two patients presenting with malignant meningitis resulting from small-cell carcinoma of the lung and with lymphoblastic leukemia, respectively, were treated by intrathecal administration of etoposide. In both cases, this treatment was well tolerated and produced relief of the central nervous system symptoms. Pharmacokinetic data showed that cerebrospinal fluid drug levels of up to 5.2 micrograms/ml were achieved, which were considerably higher than those obtained after i.v. administration of high-dose etoposide.

A phase I study of local treatment of liver metastases with recombinant tumour necrosis factor

15 patients with therapy-resistant liver metastases were treated in a phase I study with recombinant tumour necrosis factor (rTNF). rTNF was injected into a liver metastasis by ultrasound guidance, using a 50 micrograms escalating dose schedule (3 patients/dosage) ranging from 100 to 350 micrograms per injection. Influenza-like symptoms such as fever, chills, nausea and vomiting were the main clinical side-effects. 2 patients experienced transient hypotension, probably due to concomitant use of morphine. Other toxicities, as reported after systemic use of rTNF, such as decrease in leucocytes and platelet counts, renal or liver toxicity were not observed. No difference was seen in subpopulations of lymphocytes (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD16+ and CD19+) prior to and after rTNF injection. In 8 patients stable disease occurred in rTNF-treated metastases. The maximal dose used by this route of administration is 350 micrograms per injection. Based on these observations we conclude that the toxicity of rTNF injected into liver metastases by sonographic control is transient and mild. The results suggest that intratumoral administration of rTNF might play a role in local tumour control.

Teniposide (VM-26) in ovarian cancer: a review

Relatively few patients with gynecologic malignancies have been included in trials with teniposide given as a single agent. For 109 patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with various doses and schedules, an overall response rate of 12% was reported. Most patients were heavily pretreated and presumably had resistant disease. Information about teniposide's activity in combination with other cytotoxic agents, as well as its efficacy in other gynecologic malignancies, is limited. In view of the favorable pharmacologic and toxicity profiles of teniposide and its possible synergism with cisplatin and carboplatin, new treatment strategies are discussed that may have implications for further investigation of the usefulness of teniposide in advanced ovarian cancer.