Assessment of Cardiac Radiation Dose in the Co-60 Prone Based Stereotactic Partial Breast Irradiation (CP-sPBI) Using the Distance from the Heart to the Planning Treatment Volume as a Surrogate Marker

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Irradiation of the breast has shown to provide sharp dose gradients using Co-60 prone based stereotactic partial breast irradiation (CP-sPBI), a contemporary device for stereotactic radiotherapy for breast cancer (BC) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). In addition, the precise setup of CP-sPBI permits a small planning treatment volume (PTV) margin of 3 mm creating a greater distance from PTV to organs at risk. However, to date the factors that influence dose gradients and subsequent cardiac doses of ionizing radiation using CP-sPBI have not been well-studied. Here we evaluate distance of the heart to the lumpectomy PTV cavity and how this effects cardiac dose.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A retrospective database of 113 consecutive patients treated by CP-sPBI for APBI from March 2019 to February 2023 who were treated with 30 Gy in 5 fractions were queried for analysis. The minimum distance from the heart to the PTV (hP) was measured in either the axial or sagittal view. A group of 28 patient cases were randomly selected to achieve an even distribution of 28 cases with hP < 2.75 cm and hP ≥ 2.75 cm to compare cardiac toxicities based on hP. Descriptive analyses were performed to evaluate various cardiac dosimetric parameters based on laterality of BC and hP, using the student's t test.

RESULTS

The mean (range) hP was 4.58 cm (0.80-12.23) for all cases. The subgroup analyses of 28 patient cases with cardiac parameters showed the heart mean (range) dose of 1.20 Gy (0.01-2.11). The mean and max heart dose to the left-sided BC were similar to those to the right-sided BC (mean dose: 1.20 vs. 1.19 Gy; P = 0.97 and max dose: 10.47 vs. 5.66 Gy; P = 0.06). An inverse correlation between hP and mean heart dose was shown with the correlation coefficient of -0.81. Using a cutoff of 2.75 cm hP, the differences between hP < 2.75 and hP ≥ 2.75 cm for all cardiac dosimetric evaluations were all statistically significant, including mean (1.67 vs. 0.79 Gy; p<0.01) and maximal heart dose (14.48 vs. 4.11 Gy; p<0.01) CONCLUSION: CP-sPBI treatment delivery system was able to achieve acceptable clinically relevant heart dosimetric parameters when delivering 5 fraction APBI with a mean heart dose of 1.20 Gy for all locations of PTV cavity volume in the breast. Due to CP-sPBIs excellent dose fall-off characteristics, APBI using CP-SPBI showed clinically acceptable cardiac dosimetric parameters, particularly for PTVs located > 2.75 cm from the heart.

Dosimetric Comparison of Adaptive Radiotherapy Modalities for Stereotactic Partial Breast Irradiation

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

An increase in the availability of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) platforms have proven to be effective in the treatment of a variety of sites. In this study, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of non-adaptive RT and 3 different ART platforms: (1) CBCT-based, (2) CT-based, and (3) MRI-based for stereotactic partial breast irradiation (SPBI).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Data were collected from 32 patients (16 left and 16 right breast) treated at a single institution. 16 patients (8 left and 8 right) treated using the non-ART platform were re-planned onto two different ART platforms, CBCT- and MRI-based. The remaining 16 patients treated using CT-based adaptive platform were not re-planned due to the prone patient treatment position (others systems supine). All cases were planned to 30 Gy in 5 fractions. Plan quality was evaluated based on pre-defined planning goals to the OARS: ipsilateral and contralateral lungs (Dmean, Dmax, V20 Gy, V9 Gy), ipsilateral (V15 Gy, V30 Gy) and contralateral breasts (Dmax), heart (Dmean, Dmax, V3 Gy, V1.5 Gy), skin (Dmax, V36.5 Gy), and rib (Dmax, V30 Gy). Target goals were defined by Dmax, Dmin, gradient index, and paddock conformality index. Re-planned cases were compared within the cohort using a paired t-test and a 2-sided t-test was used comparing to the CT-based platform.

RESULTS

Comparing the left and right breast cohort across all platforms, the CT-based ART system showed a signification dose reduction in Dmean (p<0.001 for all platforms), Dmax (p<0.001 for left breast, p<0.03 for right breast) and V9 Gy (p<0.004 for left breast, p<0.001 for right breast) to the ipsilateral lung, V15 Gy (p<0.004 for left breast cohort) to the ipsilateral breast, and Dmax to the contralateral breast (p<0.001) and ribs (p = 0.01, p<0.001, p = 0.01 for CBCT-ART, MRI-ART, and non-ART for left breast cohort only). On average, the MR-Linac platform showed the least degree of OAR sparing across nearly all dosimetric parameters evaluated when compared to all modalities, especially for contralateral lung Dmean and Dmax (p<0.05 for all dosimetric parameters for all platforms) and contralateral breast Dmax (p<0.003 for all platforms). The CBCT-based platform showed superior dose reduction in contralateral lung mean (p<0.03 for all platforms) and heart Dmean (p = 0.065, p<0.001, p = 0.045 for non-adaptive, MRI-ART, and CT-ART for left breast and p<0.008 for right breast). PTV coverage was comparable across all platforms, averaging at approximately 95%. The CT-based ART platform showed a significantly reduced gradient index relative to the CBCT- and MRI-based platforms (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

For SPBI treatments, the CT-based ART platforms displayed a higher degree of OAR sparing for many of the dosimetric parameters recorded relative to the other ART and non-ART platforms presented. The MRI-based system typically showed less reduced OAR sparing; however, the advantage of the system is shown if soft tissue contrast is needed. PTV coverage remained comparable across all platforms.