Urgent need to improve programmatic management of patients with HIV failing first-line antiretroviral therapy

Introduction

Delayed identification and response to virologic failure in case of first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited settings is a threat to the health of HIV-infected patients. There is a need for the implementation of an effective, standardized response pathway in the public sector.

Discussion

We evaluated published cohorts describing virologic failure on first-line ART. We focused on gaps in the detection and management of treatment failure, and posited ways to close these gaps, keeping in mind scalability and standardization. Specific shortcomings repeatedly recorded included early loss to follow-up (>20%) after recognized first-line ART virologic failure; frequent delays in confirmatory viral load testing; and excessive time between the confirmation of first-line ART failure and initiation of second-line ART, which exceeded 1 year in some cases. Strategies emphasizing patient tracing, resistance testing, drug concentration monitoring, adherence interventions, and streamlined response pathways for those failing therapy are further discussed.

Conclusion

Comprehensive, evidence-based, clinical operational plans must be devised based on findings from existing research and further tested through implementation science research. Until this standard of evidence is available and implemented, high rates of losses from delays in appropriate switch to second-line ART will remain unacceptably common and a threat to the success of global HIV treatment programs.

Targeting the third '90': introducing the viral load champion

Objective: To move closer to achieving the third target of the UNAIDS 90-90-90 goals, we prospectively implemented a viral load (VL) champion (VLC) program aimed at enhancing VL monitoring and recognition of treatment failure. Design: Three clinics in eThekwini, Kwa-Zulu Natal (low-, medium- and high-volume, encompassing 9184 patients overall) were each assigned a VLC. We employed a descriptive analysis (chart audit) to compare the pre-intervention period to a 1-year post-intervention period. The number of patients with a VL test performed 6 and 12 months after the intervention was calculated as a proportion of VL tests due at those time points (VL completion rate). Results: The pre-implementation VL completion rate at the three sites was respectively 68% (140/205 patients), 54% (84/155 patients) and 64% (323/504 patients), and the 6-month post-implementation completion rate increased to 83% (995/1194 patients), 90% (793/878 patients) and 99% (3101/3124 patients) (P < 0.0001 for each site). VL completion rates remained significantly higher at 12 months post-implementation, with an average cumulative VL completion rate of >90% across all facilities. Conclusion: We demonstrate a successful, multifaceted, quality-improvement intervention centered on a clinic-level VLC which, taken to scale, has important implications for attaining the third UNAIDS 90-90-90 target.