Intensification patterns and the probability of HbA1c goal attainment in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: real-world evidence for the concept of 'intensification inertia'

AIMS

To assess the effects of 'clinical' and 'intensification inertia' by evaluating the impact of different intensification interventions on the probability of HbA_1c goal attainment using real-world data.

METHODS

Electronic health records (Cleveland Clinic, 2005-2016) were used to identify 7389 people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and HbA_1c ≥53 mmol/mol (≥7.0%), despite a stable regimen of two oral antihyperglycaemic drugs for ≥6 months. The participants were stratified by index HbA_1c and analysed over a 6-month period for pharmacological intensification, and then for 12 additional months for HbA_1c goal attainment (<53 mmol/mol).

RESULTS

The probability of HbA_1c goal attainment (Kaplan-Meier analysis) in the group with index HbA_1c 53-63 mmol/mol (7.0-7.9%) was highest with the addition of oral antidiabetic drugs [57.3% (95% CI 52.1, 62.0)] or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists [56.7% (95% CI 40.4, 68.6)], in the 64-74 mmol/mol (8.0-8.9%) group with the addition of oral antidiabetic drugs [31.9% (95% CI 25.1, 38.1)] or insulin [30.6% (95% CI 18.3, 41.0)], and in the ≥75 mmol/mol (≥9.0%) group with the addition of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists [53.0% (95% CI 31.8, 67.6)] or insulin [43.5% (95% CI 36.4, 49.8)].

CONCLUSIONS

Numerical, but not statistically significant, differences in HbA_1c goal attainment probability by type of intensification were most marked in people with the highest index HbA_1c [≥75 mmol/mol (≥9.0%)]; in this group, injectable therapy showed trends toward greater glycaemic control benefits. Additional research into the phenomenon of intensification inertia is warranted.