Abstract P1-14-04: Overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients in the third millennium: Results of an Italian study

BACKGROUND - Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a life-threatening disease. It is important to provide data about real-life MBC patients (pts) to understand the current prognostic factors. The aim of the present observational study, named COSMO (Checking Overall Survival in a MBC Observational study) is to describe the overall survival (OS) in a large cohort of MBC pts, assessing its correlation with specific prognostic factors (demographic, clinic, pathologic and biological).

PATIENTS AND METHODS - The COSMO study is a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study, developed throughout the collaboration of 31 Italian oncological centers. Data about pts diagnosed as metastatic from 01/01/2000 to 31/12/2008, were collected. The association between molecular subtypes, metastatic sites, disease free interval (DFI) and OS were assessed. Pts were classified in three subgroups, based on the biological characteristics of their tumor: luminal, HER2-positive (regardless of hormone receptor) and triple negative (TN). Metastatic sites were categorized as visceral versus non-visceral disease, only bone and central nervous system (CNS) metastases. DFI was calculated from diagnosis to first relapse only for M0 pts.

RESULTS - Of 3931 MBC pts enrolled in the study, 3720 were evaluable, with a median age of 61 years (interquartile range, IQR, 51-71). 1804 (62,1%) pts had a luminal disease, 691 (23,8%) HER2-positive, 410 (14.1%) TN. Median DFI was 3.2 years (IQR 1.7- 6.0). Regarding metastatic sites, pts with visceral disease were 2332 (63%); 826 (22,2%) pts had bone isolated metastases; in 306 (8,3%) pts, CNS metastases were reported. With a median follow up of 9 years (IQR 5.7-11.0) and 3098 (83.3%) recorded events, we founded a median OS of 2.8 years (95%CI: 2.7-2.9) years. OS was strictly depending from molecular subtypes with a better prognosis for HER2-positive versus luminal and TN MBC pts, median OS of 3.1 (95%CI 2.8-3.4), 3.0 (95%CI: 2.9-3.1) and 1.5 (95%CI: 1.3-1.7) years respectively (p-value<0.001). 525 (14,1%) pts received trastuzumab. Metastatic sites affect prognosis, with a better OS for bone disease (3.4 years, 95%CI: 3.1-3.6) versus visceral disease (2.2 years 95%CI: 2.0- 2.3). Brain metastasis correlate with the worst prognosis: OS of 1.5 years (95% CI: 0.8 – 1.7). Even DFI shows a correlation with prognosis: pts with DFI>2 years show a median OS of 3 years (95% CI: 2.9 – 3.2), while those with DFI<2 years have a median OS of 2.4 years (95% CI: 2.3-2.6); HR was 0.69 (95%CI: 0,62-0,76) for every five years of increase in DFI (p-value<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS - Molecular subtype is crucial for prognosis: HER2-positive subtype has the best prognosis, while TN subtype has the shorter OS. Having a longer DFI from diagnosis (>2 years) correlate with a better prognosis. Our study confirm that sites of metastasis affects outcome: visceral involvement correlates with poor prognosis and, particularly, pts with brain metastasis represent the worst subgroup, while pts with solely bone disease have the best prognosis. The COSMO study provides a view on the Italian landscape of MBC between 2000 and 2008, adding new insights about pts prognosis.

Citation Format: La Verde N, Collovà E, Blasi L, Pinotti G, Bernardo A, Bonotto M, Garrone O, Brunello A, Cavazzini MG, Bareggi C, Prochilo T, Porcu L, Moretti A, Barni S, On Behalf of COSMO Study Group. Overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients in the third millennium: Results of an Italian study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-04.

Epirubicin/paclitaxel/etoposide in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a phase I-II study

The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and toxicity of escalating doses of epirubicin and paclitaxel plus fixed dose of etoposide and to define the activity of the triplet in extensive disease small-cell lung cancer. Thirteen patients entered the phase I study: the maximum tolerated doses were epirubicin (EpiDX) 90 mg m⁻² and paclitaxel (P) 175 mg m⁻² with febrile neutropenia as dose-limiting toxicity. The recommended schedule for this regimen for the phase II study was EpiDX 75 mg m⁻², P 175 mg m⁻², etoposide (E) 100 mg m⁻² intravenous (fixed dose) days 1–3 with courses repeated every 21 days. The prophylactic use of colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) was not allowed. Twenty patients entered the phase II trial: median age was 61 years (range 50–70), median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 (0–2); nine patients had visceral disease and 17 had more than two metastatic sites. A total of 100 courses were administered with a median of 5 (range 1–6) per patients. Main toxicity (NCI-CTC) was myelosuppression: neutropenia grades 3 and 4 in 16 and 35% of the courses, respectively. Seven episodes of febrile neutropenia were documented and one patient required hospital admission. Nonhaematological toxicity was moderate. Seven out of 19 evaluable patients achieved a complete response (37%), nine patients (47.3%) a partial response with an overall response rate of 84.2% ((95% confidence interval=60.4–96.6)). In this poor prognostic population of patients the triplet epirubicin/paclitaxel/etoposide showed high antitumour activity with mild nonhaematological side effects. The use of CSFs should be able to improve the haematological profile.

Multicenter randomized phase III trial of epirubicin plus paclitaxel vs epirubicin followed by paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients: focus on cardiac safety

The aim of the study was to evaluate cardiac safety of two different schedules of Epirubicin and Paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer patients enrolled into a multicenter randomized phase III trial. Patients received Epirubicin 90 mg m⁻² plus Paclitaxel 200 mg m⁻² (3-h infusion) on day 1 every 3 weeks for eight courses (arm A), or Epirubicin 120 mg m⁻² on day 1 every 3 weeks for four courses followed by four courses of Paclitaxel 250 mg m⁻² on day 1 every 3 weeks (arm B). Left ventricular ejection fraction was evaluated by bidimesional echocardiography at baseline, after four and eight courses of chemotherapy and every 4 months during follow-up. Baseline median left ventricular ejection fraction was 60% in arm A and 65% in arm B; after four courses, figures were 57 and 60%, respectively. After eight courses, the median left ventricular ejection fraction in arm A declined to 50% while no further reduction was detected in arm B by adding four courses of high-dose Paclitaxel. Seven episodes of congestive heart failure were observed during treatment in arm A. Present monitoring demonstrated that the risk of congestive heart failure or impairment in the cardiac function correlated only with the cumulative dose of Epirubicin; no impact on cardiotoxicity can be attributed to high-dose Paclitaxel.

Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a dose-dense primary chemotherapy on pathological response rate (pCR) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) treated with combined modality therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stage IIIA/IIIB patients received three courses of induction chemotherapy (ICT) with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil (CEF) followed by local therapy (total mastectomy or segmental mastectomy with axillary nodes dissection) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) with three courses of CEF alternated with three courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Patients were randomized to receive ICT and ACT every 3 weeks (arm A, 'standard treatment') or every 2 weeks with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) support (arm B, 'dose-dense treatment'). In both arms radiotherapy was administered after the end of chemotherapy (in selected cases) and patients with hormonal receptor-positive tumors received tamoxifen for 5 years.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients were randomized (77 arm A and 73 arm B) and demographics were well balanced between the two arms. Compliance to treatment was excellent: 95% and 93% of patients in arms A and B, respectively, completed the treatment program with no modification or delay. Median duration of treatment (ICT+local+ACT) was 183 days (range 0-265) in arm A and 139 days (0-226) in arm B. The average relative dose intensity (ARDI) of chemotherapy was 1.3 with a 30% increase in the dose intensity in arm B in comparison with arm A. No difference in clinical [62%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 49% to 73.2%] and pathological response rates to ICT was observed between the two arms. Median follow-up was 5 years (range 1-96 months); median disease-free survivals were 4.8 years in arm A and 4.5 years in arm B. Median overall survival was 7.8 years in standard therapy: this figure has not yet been reached in the dose-dense treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In LABC a dose-dense regimen, while allowing a 30% increase in the dose intensity of chemotherapy, did not provide significant improvement in pathological response rates. However, accelerated chemotherapy reduced the duration of the combined-modality program (6.1 versus 4.6 months) with no additional toxicities.

Gemcitabine, Ifosfamide and Navelbine (GIN): activity and safety of a non-platinum-based triplet in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

To evaluate activity and toxicity of a non platinum-based triplet including Gemcitabine, Ifosfamide and Navelbine (GIN) in advanced NSCLC. Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients with WHO PS < 2 and bidimensionally measurable disease entered the study. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/sqm day 1 and 1000-800 mg/sqm day 4, Ifosfamide 3 g/sqm day 1 (with Mesna), Navelbine 25 mg/sqm day 1 and 25-20 mg/sqm day 4 were administered intravenously every 3 weeks. Objective responses (ORs) were evaluated every 2 courses: a maximum of 6 courses were administered in responding patients. According to Simon's optimal two-stage design more than 18 ORs out of 54 patients were required to establish the activity of this regimen. Fifty patients entered the study. Main characteristics of the 48 evaluated patients were: median age 63 years, ECOG performance status 0 = 65%, stage IV disease 79% and non-squamous histology 71%. The total number of courses administered was 200, median per patient 4 (range 1-6). Toxicities were evaluated according to WHO criteria: neutropenia grade 3-4 occurred in 47% of the courses; thrombocytopenia grade 3-4 in 6.6%; anaemia grade 3 in 3.5%. Twelve episodes of febrile neutropenia were reported and three patients required hospital admission. No toxic death was reported. Non-haematological toxicity, including skin rash, alopecia and fatigue, were generally. Twenty-five ORs (1 complete response and 24 partial responses) were obtained for a response rate of 52% (95% CI: 37.4-66.5%). One-year survival was 46.5%. This non-platinum-based outpatient triplet showed promising activity against NSCLC with myelosuppression, in particular neutropenia, being dose-limiting. The GIN regimen may represent a valuable alternative to standard platinum-based doublets and triplets in the treatment of advanced NSCLC and further studies with this platinum-free combination are warranted.