Neurotrophin channeling of neural progenitor cell differentiation

The act of defining neuropoietic progenitor/stem cells is still in its early phases. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulates extended proliferation of aggregates of subventricular striatal cells, taken from E15 mouse striatum, termed neurospheres in liquid culture. We have shown here and in previous work, using either immunohistochemistry or RT-PCR, that neurosphere cells express 13 cytokines (32 tested) and 20 cytokine receptors (28 tested), with 11 potential paracrine and nine potential autocrine loops. The neurotrophin receptors, Trk A, B, and C, were all expressed. Using a newly developed FACS single cell deposition technique, we evaluated the capacity of single EGF stimulated neurosphere cells to respond to the ligands for Trk A and B, nerve growth factor (NGF), and brain-derived neurotrophin factor (BDNF). Addition of NGF or BDNF to EGF for 14 days had no effect, but removal of EGF at day 14 with subsequent addition of BDNF or NGF resulted in an increase in neuronal and astroglial, but not oligodendrocyte, colony cells at 21 and 28 days of culture for BDNF, and of both cell types at 28 days for NGF. Tri-lineage colonies increased at day 21 with BDNF and at day 28 for both NGF and BDNF. Gross colony morphology also showed changes with neurotrophin addition, forming multiple individual cell balls or filamentous spreads. When EGF was withdrawn, a threshold effect was observed, with small, but not large, colonies ceasing growth. BDNF and NGF showed no effects on cell proliferation when compared to EGF controls, as determined by 5'-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation and thus, they appear to affect differentiation of progenitor cells. These data indicate a sequential action of cytokines with EGF maintaining viability and proliferation and blocking differentiation. Removal of EGF is then permissive for the differentiating effects of BDNF and NGF. These data further indicate that the majority of EGF neurosphere clones have neurotrophin dependent tri-lineage potential.

Correlates between hematopoiesis and neuropoiesis: neural stem cells

There are many parallels between the neuropoietic and lymphohematopoietic systems. The lymphohematopoietic stem/progenitor cell system has been extensively characterized, but there are still major questions relating to the definitive stem cell assay, the structure of the system (i.e., hierarchical versus cell cycle-based), and the nature of differentiation (i.e., stochastic versus deterministic). Recent data have established the existence of an epidermal growth factor (EGF)-responsive neural stem cell in adult mice. We have studied these neural progenitor/stem cells in fetal (day 15) and 2-day postnatal mice and established a single-cell progenitor assay and a variety of putative uni-, bi-, and tripotential stem cells that form in response to EGF. Neurospheres are the EGF-responsive neural units that grow in liquid culture, and we have found that cells derived from these neurospheres express a wide array of cytokines and their receptors. This will provide a window on the hemopoietic progenitor system analogous to that created by the description of in vitro growth of clonal hematopoietic progenitors.

Expression and function of colony-stimulating factors and their receptors in human prostate carcinoma cell lines

BACKGROUND

The predeliction for prostate carcinoma cells to metastasize to bone suggests the hypothesis that bone and/or bone marrow-derived factors may promote prostate carcinoma cell growth or survival, or serve as chemoattractants for these cells.

METHODS

We screened three prostate carcinoma cell lines, DU-145, PC-3, and LNCaP, for the expression of several hematopoiesis-associated colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) and their receptors using RT-PCR (reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction) and immunohistochemical methods, and examined their functional effects.

RESULTS

All of these cell lines express granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), and the DU-145 and PC-3 lines express stem-cell factor (SCF), as determined by RT-PCR and ELISA. Each of these cell lines expresses the receptors for SCF, GM-CSF, M-CSF, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). M-CSF enhanced the soft-agar clonogenicity of PC-3 and DU-145 cells, and GM-CSF stimulated all three cell lines. SCF stimulated the clonogenic growth of DU-145 cells. G-CSF marginally abrogated the induction of cell death in the PC-3 and LNCaP cell lines under serum-free conditions. GM-CSF and M-CSF stimulated modest chemotaxis of PC-3, DU-145, and LNCaP cells (most prominently in PC-3 cells).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that 1) CSFs may be part of a network of paracrine and autocrine loops that modulate prostate carcinoma cell activity, and 2) the growth-stimulatory, survival-enhancing, and/or chemotactic actions of bone marrow-derived CSFs on prostate carcinoma cells may explain in part why bone is a preferential site of prostatic carcinoma metastases.