Robotic resection of presacral tumors

BACKGROUND

Presacral tumors are a rare entity typically treated with an open surgical approach. A limited number of minimally invasive resections have been described. The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of roboticresection of presacral tumors.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single system analysis, conducted at a quaternary referral academic healthcare system, and included all patients who underwent a robotic excision of a presacral tumor between 2015 and 2023. Outcomes of interest were operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, length of stay, margin status, and recurrence rates.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (11 females and 5 males) were included. The median age of the cohort was 51 years (range 25-69 years). The median operative time was 197 min (range 98-802 min). The median estimated blood loss was 40 ml, ranging from 0 to 1800 ml, with one patient experiencing conversion to open surgery after uncontrolled hemorrhage. Urinary retention was the only postoperative complication that occurred in three patients (19%) and was solved within 30 days in all cases. The median length of stay was one day (range 1-6 days). The median follow-up was 6.7 months (range 1-110 months). All tumors were excised with appropriate margins, but one benign and one malignant tumor recurred (12.5%). Ten tumors were classified as congenital (one was malignant), two were mesenchymal (both malignant), and five were miscellaneous (one malignant).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic resection of select presacral pathology is feasible and safe. Further studies must be conducted to determine complication rates, outcomes, and long-term safety profiles.

Managed care and public health

Both public health and managed care organizations share an interest in ensuring the health status of a defined population. We explore the existing and potential relationships between managed care organizations and public health in several major public health areas, specifically clinical preventive services, prevention-oriented social and political policies, and core public health functions. The latter include health information, health education, personal health services provision, work force and research, community partnerships, and evaluation of health care. We believe there is much potential to improve the population's health through the collaboration of these two sectors of the health care system.

Compliance with the recommendations of the Institute of medicine report, The Future of Public Health: a survey of local health departments

In 1989 a survey of state health officials was conducted to ascertain the extent that the recommendations of the 1988 Institute of Medicine's report, The Future of Public Health, were in place. We applied a similar survey in 1996 to assess the level of implementation of the IOM recommendations at the local health department level. Agreement with the specific IOM recommendations at the local level was, in almost all cases, greater than 90%. However, when one views the extent of these recommendations in place, nearly half fall below 50%. While there have been improvements in areas such as education of the public and outreach towards legislators and voluntary health organizations, our results show that there are still major short-comings when it comes to implementing the recommendations. Lack of resources at the local level appears to be the predominant cause of the low level of implementation, with restricted authority and lack of support also contributing to the problem. We feel the IOM recommendations can provide a strong foundation for our public health system, and hope these results help serve as a benchmark for further study.

A survey of state health department compliance with the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine report, The Future of Public Health

We repeated a survey of state health agencies (SHAs) designed to ascertain the extent that the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine's report, The Future of Public Health, have been implemented. This survey was originally done in 1989 and we repeated the same survey in 1996. While there has been progress in some of the recommendations, such as a separate department of health, agreed-upon public health duties, outreach, infrastructure, and scope of responsibilities, there continue to be problems with the implementation of some of the recommendations. For example, the proportion of agencies reporting that the core public health function of policy development is extant has actually declined since 1989. There continue to be problems, with developing linkages of public health with environmental health and mental health, with strengthening the public health infrastructure, and with expansion of the scope of public health responsibilities. We encourage the continued monitoring of the implementation of the IOM recommendations.