Clinical experience with a bioartificial liver in the treatment of severe liver failure. A phase I clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to develop a bioartificial liver (BAL) to treat patients with severe liver failure until they can be either transplanted or recover spontaneously.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Severe acute liver failure is associated with high mortality. Liver transplantation has emerged as an effective therapy for patients who did not respond to standard management. However, because of the donor organ shortage and urgent need for transplantation, many patients die before they can be transplanted and others do not survive after transplantation, primarily because of intracranial hypertension.

METHODS

Three groups of patients with severe acute liver failure were treated with the BAL. In group 1 (n = 18) were patients with fulminant hepatic failure (FHF), in group 2 (n = 3) were patients with primary nonfunction (PNF) of a transplanted liver, and in group 3 (n = 10) were patients with acute exacerbation of chronic liver disease. Patients in groups 1 and 2 were candidates for transplantation at the time they entered the study, whereas patients in group 3 were not.

RESULTS

In group 1, 16 patients were "bridged" successfully to transplantation, 1 patient was bridged to recovery without a transplant, and 1 patient died because of concomitant severe pancreatitis. In group 2, all patients were bridged successfully to retransplantation. In group 3, two patients were supported to recovery and successful transplants at later dates; the other eight patients, although supported temporarily with the BAL, later died because they were not candidates for transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' clinical experience with the BAL has yielded encouraging results. A randomized, controlled, prospective trial (phase II-III) is being initiated to determine the efficacy of the system.

Scoping Review of Ethical Discourse in Global Cleft Surgery Literature

BACKGROUND

The ethical discourse regarding the delivery of global surgical care has increased in the 21st century. The aims of this manuscript are to explore the differences in ethical domains in the global cleft surgical literature discussed by authors from high-income countries versus lower-middle-income countries and to elucidate changes in ethical discussions over the last decade.

METHODS

A thematic coding analysis was completed using NVivo 12 qualitative data analysis software. Articles were analyzed and coded for discussion of 24 distinct subdomains in the global cleft surgical literature from 1992 to 2022.

FINDINGS

The domains with the most significant discourse in the global cleft surgery literature found were (1) clinical care and delivery and (2) engagement in collaborations and partnerships. Furthermore, when manuscripts are first authored by low- and middle-income country (LMIC) authors, the subdomains of (1) level of visiting trainee supervision, (2) relevance of educational activities, and (3) patient/procedure/location selection increase in relative discourse. The impact of visiting trainees on local educational programs is the ethical subdomain that has the largest increase in the last decade. There are barriers to publication as evidenced by the exclusion of abstracts which included LMIC authors but did not result in publications in peer-reviewed journals.

CONCLUSIONS

A critical finding of this study is that the distribution of discussed ethical domains differs when LMIC authors are included as authors, in particular when primary authorship is from an LMIC author. To the authors' knowledge, there is no other study to date which has attempted this form of analysis.