Differing Impact of Preterm Birth on the Right and Left Atria in Adulthood

Background Preterm birth affects 10% of live births and is associated with an altered left ventricular and right ventricular phenotype and increased cardiovascular disease risk in young adulthood. Because left atrial (LA) and right atrial (RA) volume and function are known independent predictors of cardiovascular outcomes, we investigated whether these were altered in preterm-born young adults. Methods and Results Preterm-born (n=200) and term-born (n=266) adults aged 18 to 39 years underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. LA and RA maximal and minimal volumes (absolute, indexed to body surface area, and as a ratio to ventricular volumes) were obtained to study atrial morphology, while LA and RA stroke volume, strain, and strain rate were used to assess atrial function. Secondary analyses consisted of between-group comparisons based on degree of prematurity. Absolute RA volumes and RA volumes indexed to right ventricular volumes were significantly smaller in preterm-born compared with term-born adults. In addition, RA reservoir and booster strain were higher in preterm-born adults, possibly indicating functional compensation for the smaller RA volumes. LA volumes indexed to left ventricular volumes were significantly greater in preterm-born adults as compared with term-born adults, although absolute LA volumes were similar between groups. LA and RA changes were observed across gestational ages in the preterm group but were greatest in those born very-to-extremely preterm. Conclusions Preterm-born adults show changes in LA and RA structure and function, which may indicate subclinical cardiovascular disease. Further research into underlying mechanisms, opportunities for interventions, and their prognostic value is warranted.

Which factors play a role in the decision of mothers to participate in child follow-up examinations after participation in an RCT?: a semi-quantitative study

OBJECTIVES

To determine which factors contribute to the decision of mothers to participate with their child in follow-up (FU) examinations after participation in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) prior to conception.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey, including Likert-scale items. Comparisons will be made between respondents who participated in all FU rounds of data collection and those who did not participate in any FU round with their child.

PARTICIPANTS

Women who participated in an RCT investigating the effect of a preconception lifestyle intervention (LIFEstyle study: Netherlands Trial Register: NTR1530) were invited to participate with their child in three FU data collections when the child had a mean age of 4.2 years, 4.6 years and 6.5 years, respectively. FU rounds included a health questionnaire, physical examination and cardiac assessment, successively.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven respondents were included, of whom 7 (10%) did not participate in any FU round and 24 (36%) participated in all FU rounds. Women who participated with their child in all 3 FU data collection rounds felt more involved in the FU research (95.8%) and agreed more often that the FU was introduced well (91.7%) as compared with women that did not participate in any FU data collection round with their child (14.3% and 28.6%, respectively). Participants of FU rounds more often agreed that participation felt like a health check for their child as compared with non-participants. In addition, participants of the physical examination and cardiac assessment more often let their decision to participate depend fully on their child, as compared with non-participants (39.4% vs 17.7% and 52.5% vs 24%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

To increase participation rates in future FU studies of children after maternal participation in an RCT, we suggest to involve women in the design of the FU study, to emphasise possible perceived benefits of participation and to encourage women to actively involve their child in the decision of participation.

Ductus arteriosus and failed medical therapy

BACKGROUND

Management of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) after pharmacological therapy failure in preterm neonates is controversial and shows marked practice variation. To evaluate which factors motivate the decision to ligate a PDA in clinical practice we examined several clinical and echocardiographic variables.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single center cohort study. We included infants born at less than 37 weeks of gestation, admitted to our neonatal intensive care between 01.01.2008 and 31.12.2015 with a PDA detected on echocardiography after two or three courses of medical therapy. Logistic regression analyses were used to predict surgical ligation for twelve clinical and nine echocardiographic variables separately. We used the multiple imputation technique for missing values.

RESULTS

A total of 89 neonates were included of which forty (45%), underwent surgical ligation of their PDA. In our final multivariate regression model, invasive respiratory support (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.29-10.03), left atrial/aortic root ratio (OR 5.48, 95% CI 1.66-18.11) and presence of ductal steal (OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.47-9.91) were significant predictors for surgical ligation. The prediction model using clinical and echocardiographic variables explained 9% and 24% of the variability to ligate respectively, indicating significant residual variation due to unmeasured factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that invasive respiratory support, increased left atrial/aortic root ratio and the presence of ductal steal were important predictors for surgical ligation in our center. However, this explained only a small proportion of the variability, which emphasizes the need for evidence-based guidelines in the management of preterm neonates after failed pharmacological therapy for a PDA.