aTrial arrhythmias in inhEriTed aRrhythmIa Syndromes: results from the TETRIS study

AIMS

Little is known about the distribution and clinical course of patients with inherited arrhythmia syndrome (IAS) and concomitant atrial arrhythmias (AAs). The aim of the study is (i) to characterize the distribution of AAs in patients with IAS and (ii) evaluate the long-term clinical course of these patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An international multicentre study was performed and involved 28 centres in 16 countries. Inclusion criteria were (i) IAS and (ii) electrocardiographic documentation of AAs. The primary endpoint was a composite of sudden cardiac death, sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), or appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) interventions. Strokes, inappropriate ICD shocks due to AAs, and the occurrence of sinus node dysfunction were assessed. A total of 522 patients with IAS and AAs were included. Most patients were diagnosed with Brugada syndrome (n = 355, 68%) and long QT syndrome (n = 93, 18%). The remaining patients (n = 71, 14%) presented with short QT syndrome, early repolarization syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, progressive cardiac conduction diseases, or idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation was the most prevalent AA (82%), followed by atrial flutter (9%) and atrial tachycardia (9%). Atrial arrhythmia was the first clinical manifestation of IAS in 52% of patients. More than one type of AA was documented in 23% of patients. Nine patients (3%) experienced VA before the diagnosis of IAS due the use of anti-arrhythmic medications taken for the AA. The incidence of the primary endpoint was 1.4% per year, with a two-fold increase in patients who experienced their first AA before the age of 20 (odds ratio 2.2, P = 0.043). This was consistent across the different forms of IAS. Inappropriate ICD shock due to AAs was reported in 2.8% of patients, strokes in 4.4%, and sinus node dysfunction in 9.6%.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with IAS and AAs, AA is the first clinical manifestation in about half of the cases, with more than one form of AAs present in one-fourth of the patients. The occurrence of AA earlier in life may be associated with a higher risk of VAs. The occurrence of stroke and sinus node dysfunction is not infrequently in this cohort.

Leadless Pacemaker Implantation, Focusing on Patients With Conduction System Disorders Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Analysis

Background

Impairment of the conduction system is a common complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), which is typically performed in elderly patients. A leadless pacemaker (LP) may be a suitable option in this frail population, but the available scientific data concerning the efficacy and safety of leadless pacing after TAVR are sparse. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LP implantation in patients with relevant bradycardias after TAVR, compared to other indications.

Methods

Consecutive patients were retrospectively enrolled. Demographics, background heart diseases, interventional parameters, and follow-up data were collected.

Results

A total of 257 consecutive patients who underwent LP implantation were included. In 26 patients, the device was implanted due to bradycardias after TAVR (TAVR group), whereas the remaining 231 patients were in the population without previous TAVR (non-TAVR group). The mean implantation duration (56 ± 22 minutes in the TAVR group vs 48 ± 20 minutes in the non-TAVR group; P = not significant [NS]) and the implantation success rate (100% in the TAVR group vs 98.7% in the non-TAVR group; P = NS) were similar in the 2 cohorts. No significant differences occurred in pacing parameters (sensing, impedance, and threshold, respectively) between the 2 groups, either at implantation or during follow-up. A total of 8 major periprocedural complications (3.1% of patients in total; 3.8% in the TAVR group vs 3.0% in the non-TAVR group; P = NS) occurred within 30 days, without significant difference between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

LP implantation appears to be safe and effective in patients after TAVR, and therefore, this procedure is a suitable option for this often old and frail population.

Validation of Utstein-Based score to predict return of spontaneous circulation (UB-ROSC) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Utstein Based-ROSC (UB-ROSC) score has been developed to predict ROSC in OHCA victims. Aim of the study was to validate the UB-ROSC score using two Utstein-based OHCA registries: the SWiss REgistry of Cardiac Arrest (SWISSRECA) and the Lombardia Cardiac Arrest Registry (Lombardia CARe), northern Italy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with OHCA of any etiology occurring between January 1st, 2019 and December 31st 2021 were included in this retrospective validation study. UB-ROSC score was computed for each patient and categorized in one of three subgroups: low, medium or high likelihood of ROSC according to the UB-ROSC cut-offs (≤-19; -18 to 12; ≥13). To assess the performance of the UB-ROSC score in this new cohort, we assessed both discrimination and calibration. The score was plotted against the survival to hospital admission.

RESULTS

A total of 12.577 patients were included in the study. A sustained ROSC was obtained in 2.719 patients (22%). The UB-ROSC model resulted well calibrated and showed a good discrimination (AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.70-0.72). In the low likelihood subgroup of UB-ROSC, only 10% of patients achieved ROSC, whereas the proportion raised to 36% for a score between -18 and 12 (OR 5.0, 95% CI 2.9-8.6, p < 0.001) and to 85% for a score ≥13 (OR 49.4, 95% CI 14.3-170.6, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

UB-ROSC score represents a reliable tool to predict ROSC probability in OHCA patients. Its application may help the medical decision-making process, providing a realistic stratification of the probability for ROSC.

Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With a Prior Conventional Pacing System

Background

Leadless pacing has been established as an alternative approach to transvenous devices for selected patients. Often, leadless pacemaker (LP) implantation is a de novo procedure, but in an increasing number of patients, an LP is used after previous implantation of a conventional pacing system (CPS).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted of the efficacy and safety of LP implantation in the context of a previously implanted CPS, from 2 large Swiss centres.

Results

A total of 257 consecutive patients undergoing LP implantation were included. They were divided into 2 groups: group 1 consisted of 233 patients who did not have a previous CPS, and group 2 consisted of 24 patients with an in situ CPS. In group 2, a total of 20 patients (83%) required transvenous lead extraction due to infection, malfunction, or other reasons. In 3 patients with device-related infection, lead extraction and LP implantation was performed as a single procedure, whereas in the remaining 11 cases, a time window occurred between the 2 procedures (median: 11.5 days; range: 2-186 days). Electrical device parameters at implantation and during follow-up did not differ between the 2 groups (mean: 12.5 ± 9.3 months). Eight major periprocedural complications (3.1%) were encountered (4 pericardial effusions, 3 instances of femoral bleeding, and 1 instance of intra-abdominal bleeding) in the entire cohort within a 30-day period. No complications occurred in the group with a previous device. No infections were registered, even when complete extraction of an infected CPS was performed prior to LP implantation.

Conclusions

Implantation of an LP in patients with a prior CPS (with or without extraction of the previous system) was effective and safe in our population of patients.