Uterine Prolapse in Pregnancy: A Review

Importance

Although not a common occurrence, uterine prolapse during pregnancy can have significant effects for pregnancy outcomes and quality of life of maternal patients. Most data about management exist as case reports; a review of these cases provides some guidance about treatment options.

Objectives

This review examines current literature about uterine prolapse during pregnancy to assess current information about this condition, prevalence, diagnosis, management, and outcomes.

Evidence Acquisition

Electronic databases (PubMed and Embase) were searched using terms "uterine prolapse" AND "pregnancy" AND "etiology" OR "risk factors" OR "diagnosis" OR "therapy" OR "management" limited to the English language and between the years 1980 and October 31, 2022.

Results

Upon review of 475 articles, 48 relevant articles were included as well as 6 relevant articles found on additional literature review for a total of 54 articles. Of those articles, 62 individual cases of uterine prolapse in pregnancy were reviewed including pregnancy complications, mode of delivery, and outcomes. Prevalence was noted to be rare, but much more common in second and subsequent pregnancies. Most diagnoses were made based on symptomatic prolapse on examination. Management strategies included bed rest, pessary use, and surgery (typically during the early second trimester). Complications included preterm delivery, patient discomfort, urinary retention, and urinary tract infection. Delivery methods included both cesarean and vaginal deliveries.

Conclusions

Although a rare condition, uterine prolapse in pregnancy is readily diagnosed on examination. Reasonable conservative management strategies include observation, attempted reduction of prolapse, and pessary use; if these measures fail, surgical treatment is an option.

Relevance

Our review compiles literature and known cases of uterine prolapse during pregnancy and current evidence about prevalence, diagnosis, management, outcomes, and complications of uterine prolapse during pregnancy in order to inform our target audience in their clinical practice.

Alternate Birth Strategies

Community birth is defined as birth that occurs outside the hospital setting. Birthing in a birth center can be safe for certain patient populations. Home birth can also be safe in well-selected patient with a well-established transfer infrastructure should an emergency occur. Unfortunately, many areas of the United States and the world do not have this infrastructure, limiting access to safe community birth. Immersion during labor has been associated with decreased need for epidural and pain medication. Delivery should not occur in water due to concerns for infection and cord avulsion. Umbilical cord non-severance (also called lotus birth) and placentophagy should be counseled against due to well-documented risks without clear benefit. Birth plans and options should be regularly discussed during pregnancy visits.

Furosemide for postpartum blood pressure control in patients with hypertensive disorders

Objective

diuretics have the potential to reduce intravascular volume, decrease blood pressure The aim of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness of furosemide in postpartum patients with pre-eclampsia and chronic hypertension with superimposed pre-eclampsia.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study. Data was extracted from the record of patients who delivered between 2017 and 2020 and had chronic hypertension or, chronic hypertension with superimposed pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, or pre-eclampsia. Patients who received intravenous furosemide in the postpartum period were compared to those who did not. The groups were also analyzed for fetal growth restriction, and pregnancy outcomes comparing those who did receive furosemide and those who did not.

Results

The furosemide group had a statistically significant longer postpartum length of stay (p < 0.0001), required more antihypertensive medications (p < 0.0001), medication increases (p < 0.0001), and emergent blood pressure treatment (p < 0.0001), than the group who did not. There was no difference between groups in hospital readmission, or fetal growth restriction.

Conclusion

The postpartum length of stay and rates of readmission were not decreased in the group treated with intravenous furosemide. Future prospective studies that control for pregnancy comorbidities and severity of preeclampsia are needed to determine furosemide's effect on the volume status of the postpartum pre-eclamptic patient and determine its role in the treatment of these women.

Pelvic Girdle Pain in Pregnancy: A Review

Importance

Pelvic girdle pain is often thought to be a recent phenomenon, but this condition was described as early as 400 BC by Hippocrates. Despite being identified for years, confusion continues about the definition and management of this ailment affecting many pregnancies.

Objective

The purpose of the review is to assess the incidence, etiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnosis, management, and pregnancy outcomes/recovery of current pregnancies, and outcomes of future pregnancies complicated by pelvic girdle pain.

Evidence Acquisition

Electronic databases (PubMed and Embase) were searched from 1980 to 2021 with the only limitation being that the articles were in English. Studies were selected that examined associations between pelvic pain/pelvic girdle pain and pregnancy.

Results

There were 343 articles identified. After reviewing the abstracts, 88 were used in this review. Pelvic girdle pain is a common condition of pregnancy, affecting a reported 20% of pregnant women. The pathophysiology is poorly understood and likely multifactorial, involving both hormonal and biomechanical changes that occur during pregnancy. Several risk factors have been identified. This diagnosis is most commonly made based on symptoms related to pelvic pain during pregnancy. Treatment should be multimodal, including pelvic girdle support, stabilizing exercises, analgesia, and potentially complementary therapies. The effects on future pregnancies are uncertain, although some limited information suggests an increased risk of recurrent PGP in subsequent pregnancies.

Conclusions

Pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy is a common condition that is often overlooked as a normal part of pregnancy but has a significant impact on quality of life during, after, and in subsequent pregnancies. Multimodal therapies are available and are largely low cost and noninvasive.

Relevance

Our aim is to increase the awareness of pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy as a common but often underdiagnosed and undertreated condition.

Birth plans: definitions, content, effects, and best practices

The first written guide for birth plans was introduced in 1980 as a means for birthing people to document their choices in the child birthing experience. The birth plan offers an opportunity for the patient and the provider to discuss the birthing process and determine how to safely accommodate patient preferences. Patient satisfaction with birthing plans is variable and may depend on how many requests they have, how many of their plans are accomplished, route of delivery, and whether complications arise during or after delivery. Unmet expectations may lead to posttraumatic stress disorder, but following a birth plan may also be protective against it. Birthing people who use a birth plan may be less likely to use epidural anesthesia, have early amniotomy, or use oxytocin. The first stage of labor may be longer when a birth plan is used; however, there does not seem to be a decrease in the length of the second stage of labor among patients with a birth plan. Some providers believe that a disadvantage of birth plans is disappointment when birth plans are not able to be followed, and others consider that birth plans interfere with professional autonomy.

Predicting Uterine Rupture Risk Using Lower Uterine Segment Measurement During Pregnancy With Cesarean History: How Reliable Is It? A Review

Importance

Uterine rupture during labor is a calamitous event that can result in maternal/neonatal morbidity/mortality. Lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness measurement is a proposed method to determine the risk factor of uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after cesarean. Does this measurement predict uterine rupture risk?

Objectives

This review examines current evidence to determine if a thin LUS ultrasound diagnosis during pregnancy with prior cesarean delivery(s) can reliably predict uterine rupture risk while attempting vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC).

Evidence Acquisition

Electronic databases (PubMed and CINAHL) were searched with one limitation of abstracts in English. Search terms used were "lower uterine segment" AND "risk(s)" AND "rupture" OR "dehiscence.

Results

After reviewing 164 identified articles, 15 were used in this review. Of the studies including LUS thickness measurement, notable differences were found: gestational age at time of measurement, full thickness measurement versus myometrial thickness, number of sonographers involved, ultrasound technique (transabdominal vs transvaginal), and blinding. Other factors influencing LUS thickness include fetal weight, amniotic fluid volume, and gestational age. The most recent systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that an LUS > 3.65 mm should be safe for a VBAC, 2-3.65 mm is probably safe, and <2 mm identifies a patient at higher risk for uterine rupture/dehiscence.

Conclusions

Study heterogeneity, absence of an agreed upon thickness threshold, poor correlation between ultrasound and MRI measurements, or physical cesarean measurements currently make VBAC uterine rupture risk prediction uncertain.

Relevance

Our aim is to analyze existing literature to determine if evidence supports LUS measurement in women undergoing VBAC after cesarean to determine risk of uterine rupture.

Window to the Womb: Amniotic Fluid and Postnatal Outcomes

Amniotic fluid volumes are tightly regulated, and amniotic fluid derangement can indicate maternal complications or fetal abnormalities. Ultrasound estimate of amniotic fluid provides a tool to evaluate the maternal-fetal-placental interface in real-time. Oligohydramnios and polyhydramnios are associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Oligohydramnios is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes including cesarean delivery, operative vaginal delivery, induction of labor, postpartum hemorrhage, small for gestational age neonate, intrauterine demise, neonatal death, NICU admission, and APGAR less than 7 at. 5 minutes of life Polyhydramnios is associated with adverse outcomes including cesarean delivery, induction of labor, placental abruption, shoulder dystocia, cord prolapse, postpartum hemorrhage, intrauterine fetal demise, NICU admission, neonatal death, APGAR less than 7 at 5 minutes of life, large for gestational age neonate, and respiratory distress syndrome. Therefore, Amniotic fluid should be evaluated when maternal or fetal well-being is in question.

17 Alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate use in a rural state

BACKGROUND

17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17OHP) is used to reduce the recurrent risk of preterm delivery in women with a history of preterm delivery. Meis et al. conducted a double-blind placebo controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of 17OHP and observed a significant reduction in the risk of recurrent preterm delivery. The FDA granted 17OHP a conditional approval on 2011. A second study observed that 17OHP did not decrease the risk of a recurrent preterm delivery. Criticism of the second study derived from a dissimilarity of the study population.

OBJECTIVE

Our investigation examined the effectiveness of 17OHP in women with a prior preterm delivery in a rural US state with a patient population similar to the original Meis trial.

STUDY DESIGN

17OHP became largely unavailable (due to cost and local pharmacies no longer compounding 17 OHP) and the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Health, and Arkansas Medicaid co-operated to make 17OHP available to women with a prior PTB in our state. This study was a retrospective review of the 17OHP that was offered to women with a prior preterm delivery. For our retrospective review, logistic regression was used on cases of prior preterm delivery between January 2014 and December of 2018 to examine the relationship between 17OHP injections and preterm delivery.

RESULTS

A total of 268 women were analyzed for this review. They were divided into three groups: 0 injections, 1-10 injections, and > 10 injections. We found no relationship between 17OHP injections with preterm delivery.

CONCLUSION

Although our patient population was similar to that of the original Meis trial, our results were more similar to the second study by Blackwell.