Coping and Perception of Prognosis in Patients With Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (iNHL) are a heterogenous group of mostly incurable diseases with prolonged illness courses and prognostic uncertainty. Yet, studies evaluating coping and perception of prognosis are limited.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of adults newly diagnosed with iNHL in the past 3 months at a single academic center. We assessed quality of life (QOL: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General), psychological symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), coping (Brief-COPE), and perception of prognosis (Prognosis Awareness Impact Scale).

RESULTS

We enrolled 70.6% (48/68) of eligible patients. Patients had older age (mean = 66.9,sd = 10.5), were female (60.4%), predominantly identified as White (85.4%), and had at least received a college degree (75%). Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (39.6%) and follicular lymphoma (33.3%) were the most common diagnoses. Overall, 27.1% and 14.6% of patients reported clinically significant anxiety and PTSD symptoms, respectively. Patients highly utilized acceptance (56.2%), seeking emotional support (47.9%), and denial (47.9%) as coping strategies at diagnosis. While 66.7% of patients recalled their oncologist assessment of illness as incurable, only 35.4% reported that the illness is unlikely to be cured. Overall, 45.8% indicated that they were worried about prognosis and 31.2% reported perseverating on their prognosis. Higher emotional coping with prognosis was associated with fewer anxiety (B = -0.6, SE = 0.2, P < .001), depression (B = -0.3, SE = .1, P = .005), and PTSD (B = -1.3, SE = 0.4, P < .001) symptoms and better QOL (B = 1.7, SE = 0.4, P < .001).

DISCUSSION

Patients with iNHL report substantial psychological distress, a diversity of coping strategies, and complex cognitive understanding of their prognosis. Interventions, which address prognostic uncertainty and promote positive emotional coping with prognosis, may ameliorate psychological distress in this population.

Quality of Life and Prognostic Awareness in Caregivers of Patients Receiving Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy

Caregivers of patients undergoing chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) play a critical role during treatment, yet their experience remains largely unaddressed. We aimed to longitudinally describe quality of life (QoL) and psychological distress, as well as prognostic awareness, in caregivers and explore the association of prognosis awareness with baseline psychological distress. We conducted a longitudinal study of caregivers of patients undergoing CAR-T and examined QoL (CAReGiverOncology QoL questionnaire) and psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) prior to CAR-T (baseline) and at days 7, 30, 90, and 180 post-CAR-T. At baseline, caregivers and patients completed the Prognostic Awareness Impact Scale, which examines cognitive understanding of prognosis, emotional coping with prognosis, and adaptive response (ie, capacity to use prognostic awareness to inform life decisions). We enrolled 58% (69 of 120) of eligible caregivers. Caregivers reported QoL impairments that did not change over time (B = 0.09; P = .452). The rates of clinically significant depression and anxiety symptoms were 47.7% and 20.0%, respectively, at baseline, and 39.1% and 17.4% at 180 days. One-third (32%) of the caregivers and patients reported that their oncologist said the cancer is curable. Caregivers' greater emotional coping with prognosis was associated with fewer symptoms of anxiety (B = -.17; P < .001) and depression (B = -.02; P < .001). Cognitive understanding of prognosis and adaptive response were not associated with psychological distress. Caregivers reported QoL impairments throughout the study period. A substantial proportion of caregivers experienced psychological distress and reported misperceptions about the prognosis, highlighting the need for supportive care interventions.

Communication About Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) Therapy

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has revolutionized the treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies, yet treatment may coincide with the potential for life-threatening toxicities. Currently, no studies have investigated how oncologists communicate with patients about CAR-T therapy or what patients and their caregivers want to know prior to consenting for CAR-T therapy. This study characterizes the content of oncologist communication with patients and caregivers about the risks and benefits of CAR-T therapy and explore the information preferences of patients and their caregivers about CAR-T therapy. We conducted a multimethod study of 20 patients with hematologic malignancies referred for CAR-T therapy at the Massachusetts General Hospital and 10 caregivers. We audio recorded the initial outpatient visit with the oncologist to review and sign consent for CAR-T therapy. We subsequently surveyed patients and caregivers about information gaps that remained after consent. We then interviewed patients and caregiver about their perceptions of oncologist communication and information preferences after the consent visit, 1 month, and 3 months post-CAR-T therapy treatment. Qualitative data analysis was conducted using the framework approach. Six major themes regarding communication about CAR-T therapy were identified: (1) oncologists create a narrative of power and innovation about CAR-T therapy, (2) oncologists set clear expectations regarding CAR-T therapy, (3) oncologists preferentially discuss positive treatment outcomes and less frequently address treatment failures or uncertainties, (4) oncologists couple their discussion about risks of CAR-T therapy with assurances about risk mitigation strategies, (5) oncologists engage in empathetic communication throughout the consent visit, (6) patients and caregivers vary in their preferences regarding communication about CAR-T therapy but largely favor a positive discourse during the consent visit and (7) patients who completed CAR-T therapy and their caregivers report significant knowledge gaps during and after treatment. Overall, patients and caregivers felt well informed about CAR T-therapy yet identified communication gaps regarding, advanced care planning, treatment failure and treatment toxicities. A predominantly positive discourse between patients, caregivers, and oncologists around CAR-T therapy leaves patients and caregivers with significant knowledge gaps about negative outcomes. Further research is needed to help oncologists communicate about treatment uncertainties and help patients and their caregivers prepare for negative outcomes of CAR-T therapy.

Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of an Educational Video for CAR T-Cell Therapy Recipients

BACKGROUND

CAR T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment of hematologic malignancies, but it is complex and challenging to convey to patients. Educational video interventions are efficacious for improving patient knowledge about cancer therapeutics and informing their care preferences, yet no educational videos have been evaluated in CAR T-cell therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing an educational video versus usual care in adults (age ≥18 years) with hematologic malignancies receiving CAR T-cell therapy at Massachusetts General Hospital. Intervention participants watched a 13-minute video depicting how CAR T-cell therapy works, logistics, toxicities, prognosis, recovery, and approaches for dealing with prognostic uncertainty. The primary outcome was feasibility (≥60% enrollment rate). Secondary outcomes included acceptability (≥80% reporting comfort with the video), patients' knowledge about CAR T-cell therapy (10-item test), and self-efficacy (Communication and Attitudinal Self-Efficacy Scale-Cancer), decision satisfaction (Decision Conflict Scale), psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and preference for CAR T-cell therapy.

RESULTS

We enrolled 79% (80/101) of eligible patients. Of that group, 91% (30/33) reported being very or somewhat comfortable watching the video, and 94% (31/33) would definitely or probably recommend the video. At 1 month, participants in the video arm reported higher self-efficacy (mean difference [MD], 9.2 [95% CI, -4.0 to 22.3]; Cohen's d, 0.32), decision satisfaction (MD, 2.5 [95% CI, 0.7-4.2]; Cohen's d, 0.67), and lower anxiety (MD, -0.8 [95% CI, -2.5 to 0.7]; Cohen's d, 0.26) compared with participants in the usual care arm. At 1 week, both arms reported high preferences for CAR T-cell therapy (video arm, 94% [33/35]; usual care, 84% [27/32]).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that an educational video for patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy was feasible and acceptable. The educational video demonstrated promising preliminary effects on patient self-efficacy and decision satisfaction and warrants further study.

Longitudinal patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has transformed the treatment for relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies; however, data on patient-reported outcomes in CAR-T are limited. We conducted a longitudinal study of adults with hematologic malignancies receiving CAR-T. We assessed quality of life (QOL; functional assessment of cancer therapy-general), psychological distress (hospital anxiety and depression scale, patient health questionnaire-9, posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD] checklist), and physical symptoms (Edmonton symptom assessment scale-revised) at baseline, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months after CAR-T. We used linear mixed models to identify factors associated with QOL trajectory. We enrolled 103 of 142 eligible patients (3 did not receive CAR-T). QOL (B = 1.96; P < .001) and depression (B = -0.32; P = .001) worsened by 1 week and improved by 6 months after CAR-T. At 6 months, 18%, 22%, and 22% reported clinically significant depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms, respectively. At 1 week, 52% reported severe physical symptoms, declining to 28% at 6 months after CAR-T. In unadjusted linear mixed models, worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (B = 1.24; P = .042), receipt of tocilizumab (B = 1.54; P = .042), and receipt of corticosteroids for cytokine release syndrome and/or neurotoxicity (B = 2.05; P = .006) were associated with higher QOL trajectory. After CAR-T, QOL declined, and depression increased early, followed by improvements in QOL, psychological distress, and physical symptoms by 6 months after infusion. A significant minority of patients reported substantial psychological distress and physical symptoms longitudinally.

Validation of an electronic algorithm for Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in ICD-10-CM

PURPOSE

Lymphoma is a health outcome of interest for drug safety studies. Studies using administrative claims data require the accurate identification of lymphoma cases. We developed and validated an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM)-based algorithm to identify lymphoma in healthcare claims data.

METHODS

We developed a three-component algorithm to identify patients aged ≥15 years who were newly diagnosed with Hodgkin (HL) or non-Hodgkin (NHL) lymphoma from January 2016 through July 2018 among members of four Data Partners within the FDA's Sentinel System. The algorithm identified potential cases as patients with ≥2 ICD-10-CM lymphoma diagnosis codes on different dates within 183 days; ≥1 procedure code for a diagnostic procedure (e.g., biopsy, flow cytometry) and ≥1 procedure code for a relevant imaging study within 90 days of the first lymphoma diagnosis code. Cases identified by the algorithm were adjudicated via chart review and a positive predictive value (PPV) was calculated.

RESULTS

We identified 8723 potential lymphoma cases via the algorithm and randomly sampled 213 for validation. We retrieved 138 charts (65%) and adjudicated 134 (63%). The overall PPV was 77% (95% confidence interval: 69%-84%). Most cases also had subtype information available, with 88% of cases identified as NHL and 11% as HL.

CONCLUSIONS

Seventy-seven percent of lymphoma cases identified by an algorithm based on ICD-10-CM diagnosis and procedure codes and applied to claims data were true cases. This novel algorithm represents an efficient, cost-effective way to target an important health outcome of interest for large-scale drug safety and public health surveillance studies.

Management of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy

INTRODUCTION

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immunotherapy has demonstrated remarkable anti-tumor activity in B-cell malignancies and is under investigation in other hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. While highly efficacious, post-infusion T cell activity often results in massive cytokine release precipitating cytokine release syndrome (CRS), the signature toxicity of CAR T cells. This toxicity is characterized by systemic immune activation resulting in fever, hypotension, respiratory insufficiency and capillary leak. Either in conjunction with or in the absence of CRS, a subset of patients may also develop mild to severe neurotoxicity. Although the precise pathogenesis of CRS and neurotoxicity aren't fully elucidated, risk factors and mitigation strategies have been reported. Areas covered: This manuscript provides an in-depth overview of the pathogenesis, clinical characteristics, current toxicity management strategies, and future perspectives pertaining to CRS and neurotoxicity. Expert Opinion: As CAR T cell based therapies gain popularity in the management of various malignancies, the complimentary toxicities of CRS and neurotoxicity pose a clinical challenge in practice. Risk adaptive modeling incorporating disease profile, patient demographics, lymphodepletion, cell dosing, CAR T construct, and potentially cytokine gene polymorphisms may be instructive to assess individualized risk and optimal CRS/neurotoxicity management.