Pulsed-field vs cryoballoon vs radiofrequency ablation: Outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has shown promising data in terms of safety and procedural efficiency for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), with similar long-term outcomes compared to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoballoon ablation (CBA) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the procedural and long-term outcomes in patients with persistent AF undergoing PVI using PFA, CBA, or RFA.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with persistent AF undergoing first PVI with PFA, CBA, or RFA were included. Patients underwent 7-day Holter electrocardiography at 3, 6, and 12 months postablation. The primary outcome was recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia after a 90-day blanking period. Safety outcomes included the composite of in-hospital major adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 533 patients with persistent AF underwent PVI using PFA (n = 214), CBA (n = 190), or RFA (n = 129). Procedures with PFA guided by fluoroscopy were shorter than those with CBA (median 60 minutes; interquartile range [IQR] 53-80 minutes vs 84 minutes; IQR 68-101 minutes; P ≤ .001), and procedures with PFA in combination with 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping were shorter than those with RFA (median 101 minutes; IQR 85-126 minutes vs 171 minutes; IQR 141-204 minutes; P < .001). Acute safety events occurred in 2.3%, 2.6%, and 0.8% in the PFA, CBA, and RFA groups, respectively (P = .545). The 1-year confounder-adjusted estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmias was 62.1% for CBA, 55.3% for PFA, and 48.3% for RFA (CBA vs PFA: P = .79; CBA vs RFA: P = .009; PFA vs RFA: P = .010).

CONCLUSION

In patients with persistent AF undergoing first PVI, 1-year confounder-adjusted outcomes are better with PFA and CBA than with RFA.

Pulmonary vein isolation durability and lesion regression in patients with recurrent arrhythmia after pulsed-field ablation

BACKGROUND

A novel multipolar pulsed-field ablation (PFA) catheter has recently been introduced for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Pre-market data showed high rates for PVI-durability during mandatory remapping studies.

OBJECTIVE

To present post-market data in patients with recurrent arrhythmias.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing a redo procedure after an index PFA PVI using a bipolar-biphasic PFA system were included. 3-D electro-anatomical maps (3D-EAM) on redo procedure were compared to the 3D-EAM acquired after ablation during the index procedure. PVI durability was assessed on a per-vein and per-patient level and the sites of reconnections were identified. Furthermore, lesion extent around veins with durable isolation was compared to study lesion regression.

RESULTS

Of 341 patients treated with a PFA PVI, 29 (8.5%) underwent a left atrial redo ablation due to arrhythmia recurrence. At the end of the index procedure, 110/112 veins (98%, four common ostia) were isolated. On redo procedures performed a median of 6 months after the first ablation, 3D-EAM identified 69/110 (63%) PVs with durable isolation. In 6 (21%) patients, all PVs were durably isolated. Reconnections were more often found on the right-sided veins and on the anterior aspects of the upper veins. Only minor lesion regression was observed between the index and redo procedure (a median of 3 mm (0 - 9.5) on the posterior wall).

CONCLUSION

In patients with arrhythmia recurrence after PFA PVI using a first-generation PFA device, durable isolation was observed in 63% of the veins and 21% of the patients showed durable isolation of all previously isolated veins.

Durability of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Pulsed-Field Ablation: Results From the Multicenter EU-PORIA Registry

BACKGROUND

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel nonthermal ablation technology with high procedural safety and efficiency for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Premarket data showed high PVI durability during mandatory remapping studies. Data on lesion durability in real-world patients with clinically indicated redo procedures are scarce.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to report PVI durability rates in patients undergoing a clinically indicated redo procedure after an index PVI using PFA.

METHODS

Patients from 7 European centers undergoing an index PVI using PFA were included the EU-PORIA (European Real-world Outcomes With Pulsed Field Ablation in Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation) registry. In patients with subsequent left atrial redo procedures due to arrhythmia recurrence, 3-dimensional electroanatomical maps were acquired. PVI durability was assessed on a per-vein and per-patient level, and sites of reconnections and predictors of lesion durability were identified.

RESULTS

Of 1,184 patients (62% paroxysmal atrial fibrillation) undergoing an index PVI using PFA, 272 (23%) had an arrhythmia recurrence. Of these, 144 (53%) underwent a left atrial redo procedure a median of 7 (Q1-Q3: 5-10) months after the first ablation. Three-dimensional electroanatomical maps identified 404 of 567 pulmonary veins (71%) with durable isolation. In 54 patients (38%), all pulmonary veins were durably isolated. Prior operator experience with cryoballoon ablation was associated with a higher PVI durability compared to operators with only point-by-point radiofrequency experience (76% vs 60%; P < 0.001). Neither the operators' cumulative experience in atrial fibrillation ablation (≤5 vs >5 years) nor the size of the PFA device used (31 mm vs 35 mm) had an impact on subsequent lesion durability (both P > 0.50).

CONCLUSIONS

In 144 patients with arrhythmia recurrence after PFA PVI, durable isolation was observed in 71% of the pulmonary veins during the redo procedure, and 38% of all patients showed durable isolation of all veins.

Durability of CLOSE-Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Remapping Study

BACKGROUND

Recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is presumably caused by pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections. However, there is little data available on the durability of PVI and incidence of arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent AF.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the lesion durability by means of an a priori planned remapping procedure in patients with persistent AF undergoing CLOSE-guided PVI.

METHODS

In a prospective study, we included patients with symptomatic, persistent AF undergoing CLOSE-guided radiofrequency ablation. Irrespective of AF recurrence, a redo procedure was mandated 6 months following the index procedure to evaluate PV reconnections. The outcome of AF ablation was based on clinical recurrence and 7-day Holter electrocardiogram 3 and 6 months after the index procedure and 3, 6, and 12 months after the redo procedure.

RESULTS

Of 30 patients included, 26 (81% men; median age 68 years) underwent the planned remapping study a median of 6 months after the index procedure, whereas 4 patients without recurrence refused a repeat procedure. In total, 78 of 102 (76%) PVs showed durable isolation and 15 patients (58%) presented complete isolation of all PVs. Beyond the blanking period, 6 of 26 patients (23%) had arrhythmia recurrence before the redo procedure. Recurrence had occurred in 33% of patients with complete isolation of all veins and in 9% of patients with PV reconnections (P = 0.197). After re-PVI in patients with PV reconnections and additional ablation in patients with recurrence but durable PVI, 17 of 26 patients (65%) were free of arrhythmia after 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with persistent AF, CLOSE-guided PVI resulted in durable rate of PVI on a per-vein and per-patient level of 76% and 58%, respectively. Arrhythmia recurrence was numerically higher in patients with durable PVI compared with patients without.

Pulsed-field vs. cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation: a propensity score matched comparison of one-year outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has shown favourable data in terms of safety and procedural efficiency for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We sought to compare procedural and 1-year follow-up data of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing PVI using PFA, cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing a first PVI with PFA at our institution were included. For comparison, patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing a first PVI with CBA and RFA were selected using a 1:2:2 propensity score matching. The PFA group followed the standard 32-applications lesion-set protocol, the CBA group a time-to-effect plus 2-min strategy, and the RFA group the CLOSE protocol. Patients were followed with 7d-Holter ECGs 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. The primary endpoint was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) following a blanking period of 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients were included (PFA n = 40; CBA n = 80; RFA n = 80). Median procedure times were shortest with CBA (75 min) followed by PFA (94 min) and RFA (182 min; p < 0.001). Fluoroscopy dose was lowest with RFA (1.6Gycm2) followed by PFA (5.0Gycm2) and CBA (5.7Gycm2; p < 0.001). After a 1-year follow-up, freedom from ATa recurrence was 85.0% with PFA, 66.2% with CBA and 73.8% with RFA (p = 0.12 PFA vs. CBA; p = 0.27 PFA vs. RFA).

CONCLUSION

In a propensity score matched analysis of patients with paroxysmal AF, freedom from any ATa 1 year after PVI using PFA was favourable and at least as good as for PVI with CBA or RFA.

Impact of Left Atrial Posterior Wall Ablation During Pulsed-Field Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is insufficient to treat many patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). Adjunctive left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) ablation with thermal technologies has revealed lack of efficacy, perhaps limited by the difficulty in achieving lesion durability amid concerns of esophageal injury.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of PVI + LAPW ablation vs PVI in patients with PersAF using pulsed-field ablation (PFA).

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of the MANIFEST-PF (Multi-National Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Post-approval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation) registry, we studied consecutive PersAF patients undergoing post-approval treatment with a pentaspline PFA catheter. The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from any atrial arrhythmia of ≥30 seconds. Safety outcomes included the composite of acute and chronic major adverse events.

RESULTS

Of the 547 patients with PersAF who underwent PFA, 131 (24%) received adjunctive LAPW ablation. Compared to PVI-alone, patients receiving adjunctive LAPW ablation were younger (65 vs 67 years of age, P = 0.08), had a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score (2.3 ± 1.6 vs 2.6 ± 1.6, P = 0.08), and were more likely to receive electroanatomical mapping (48.1% vs 39.0%, P = 0.07) and intracardiac echocardiography imaging (46.1% vs 17.1%, P < 0.001). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmias was not statistically different between groups in the full (PVI + LAPW: 66.4%; 95% CI: 57.6%-74.4% vs PVI: 73.1%; 95% CI: 68.5%-77.2%; P = 0.68) and propensity-matched cohorts (PVI + LAPW: 71.7% vs PVI: 68.5%; P = 0.34). There was also no significant difference in major adverse events between the groups (2.2% vs 1.4%, respectively, P = 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PersAF undergoing PFA, as compared to PVI-alone, adjunctive LAPW ablation did not improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months.

Posterior wall ablation by pulsed-field ablation: procedural safety, efficacy, and findings on redo procedures

AIMS

The left atrial posterior wall is a potential ablation target in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation despite durable pulmonary vein isolation or in patients with roof-dependent atrial tachycardia (AT). Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) offers efficient and safe posterior wall ablation (PWA), but available data are scarce.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients undergoing PWA using PFA were included. Posterior wall ablation was performed using a pentaspline PFA catheter and verified by 3D-electroanatomical mapping. Follow-up was performed using 7-day Holter ECGs 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. Recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia lasting more than 30 s was defined as failure. Lesion durability was assessed during redo procedures. Posterior wall ablation was performed in 215 patients (70% males, median age 70 [IQR 61-75] years, 67% redo procedures) and was successful in all patients (100%) by applying a median of 36 (IQR 32-44) PFA lesions. Severe adverse events were cardiac tamponade and vascular access complication in one patient each (0.9%). Median follow-up was 7.3 (IQR 5.0-11.8) months. One-year arrhythmia-free outcome in Kaplan-Meier analysis was 53%. A redo procedure was performed in 26 patients (12%) after a median of 6.9 (IQR 2.4-11) months and showed durable PWA in 22 patients (85%) with only minor lesion regression. Among four patients with posterior wall reconnection, three (75%) presented with roof-dependent AT.

CONCLUSION

Posterior wall ablation with this pentaspline PFA catheter can be safely and efficiently performed with a high durability observed during redo procedures. The added value of durable PWA for the treatment of atrial fibrillation remains to be evaluated.

Clinical Outcomes by Sex After Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Importance

Previous studies evaluating the association of patient sex with clinical outcomes using conventional thermal ablative modalities for atrial fibrillation (AF) such as radiofrequency or cryoablation are controversial due to mixed results. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel AF ablation energy modality that has demonstrated preferential myocardial tissue ablation with a unique safety profile.

Objective

To compare sex differences in patients undergoing PFA for AF in the Multinational Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Postapproval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation (MANIFEST-PF) registry.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a retrospective cohort study of MANIFEST-PF registry data, which included consecutive patients undergoing postregulatory approval treatment with PFA to treat AF between March 2021 and May 2022 with a median follow-up of 1 year. MANIFEST-PF is a multinational, retrospectively analyzed, prospectively enrolled patient-level registry including 24 European centers. The study included all consecutive registry patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent first-ever PFA for paroxysmal or persistent AF.

Exposure

PFA was performed on patients with AF. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation and additional ablation, which was performed at the discretion of the operator.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from clinically documented atrial arrhythmia for 30 seconds or longer after a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety outcome was the composite of acute (<7 days postprocedure) and chronic (>7 days) major adverse events (MAEs).

Results

Of 1568 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.5] years; 1015 male [64.7%]) with AF who underwent PFA, female patients, as compared with male patients, were older (mean [SD] age, 68 [10] years vs 62 [12] years; P < .001), had more paroxysmal AF (70.2% [388 of 553] vs 62.4% [633 of 1015]; P = .002) but had fewer comorbidities such as coronary disease (9% [38 of 553] vs 15.9% [129 of 1015]; P < .001), heart failure (10.5% [58 of 553] vs 16.6% [168 of 1015]; P = .001), and sleep apnea (4.7% [18 of 553] vs 11.7% [84 of 1015]; P < .001). Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 99.8% of female (552 of 553) and 98.9% of male (1004 of 1015; P = .90) patients. Additional ablation was performed in 22.4% of female (124 of 553) and 23.1% of male (235 of 1015; P = .79) patients. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmia was similar in male and female patients (79.0%; 95% CI, 76.3%-81.5% vs 76.3%; 95% CI, 72.5%-79.8%; P = .28). There was also no significant difference in acute major AEs between groups (male, 1.5% [16 of 1015] vs female, 2.5% [14 of 553]; P = .19).

Conclusion and Relevance

Results of this cohort study suggest that after PFA for AF, there were no significant sex differences in clinical effectiveness or safety events.

A single-beat algorithm to discriminate farfield from nearfield bipolar voltage electrograms from the pulmonary veins

BACKGROUND

Superimposition of farfield (FF) and nearfield (NF) bipolar voltage electrograms (BVE) complicates the confirmation of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Our aim was to develop an automatic algorithm based on a single-beat analysis to discriminate PV NF from atrial FF BVE from a circular mapping catheter during the cryoballoon PV isolation.

METHODS

During freezing cycles in cryoablation PVI, local NF and distant FF signals were recorded, identified and labelled. BVEs were classified using four different machine learning algorithms based on four frequency domain (high-frequency power (PHF), low-frequency power (PLF), relative high power band, PHF ratio of neighbouring electrodes) and two time domain features (amplitude (Vmax), slew rate). The algorithm-based classification was compared to the true identification gained during the PVI and to a classification by cardiac electrophysiologists.

RESULTS

We included 335 BVEs from 57 consecutive patients. Using a single feature, PHF with a cut-off at 150 Hz showed the best overall accuracy for classification (79.4%). By combining PHF with Vmax, overall accuracy was improved to 82.7% with a specificity of 89% and a sensitivity of 77%. The overall accuracy was highest for the right inferior PV (96.6%) and lowest for the left superior PV (76.9%). The algorithm showed comparable accuracy to the classification by the EP specialists.

CONCLUSIONS

An automated farfield-nearfield discrimination based on two simple features from a single-beat BVE is feasible with a high specificity and comparable accuracy to the assessment by experienced cardiac electrophysiologists.

Comparison of the PolarX and the Arctic Front cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (COMPARE CRYO) - Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Single-shot devices are increasingly used for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF). The Arctic Front cryoballoon (Medtronic) is the most frequently used single-shot technology. A recently developed novel cryoballoon has been introduced (PolarX, Boston Scientific) with the aim to address limitations of the Arctic Front system.

METHODS

COMPARE CRYO is a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial with blinded endpoint adjudication by an independent clinical events committee. A total of 200 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI are randomized 1:1 between PolarX cryoballoon ablation and Arctic Front cryoballoon ablation. Continuous monitoring during follow-up is performed using an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) in all patients. The primary endpoint is time to first recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter, and/or atrial tachycardia) ≥ 120 s between days 91 and 365 post ablation as detected on the (ICM). Procedural safety is assessed by a composite of cardiac tamponade, persistent phrenic nerve palsy >24 h, vascular complications requiring intervention, stroke/transient ischemic attack, atrioesophageal fistula or death occurring during or up to 30 days after the procedure. Key secondary endpoints include (1) procedure and fluoroscopy times, (2) AF burden, (3) proportion of patients with recurrence in the blanking period, (4) proportion of patients undergoing repeat ablation, and (5) quality of life changes at 12 months compared to baseline.

CONCLUSION

COMPARE CRYO will compare the efficacy and safety of the novel PolarX cryoballoon and the standard-of-practice Arctic Front cryoballoon for first PVI performed in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

(ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04704986).

Pulsed-field ablation for the treatment of left atrial reentry tachycardia

BACKGROUND

We describe our initial experience using a multipolar pulsed-field ablation catheter for the treatment of left atrial (LA) reentry tachycardia.

METHODS

We included all patients with LA reentry tachycardia treated with PFA at our institution between September 2021 and March 2022. The tachycardia mechanism was identified using 3D electro-anatomical mapping (3D-EAM). Subsequently, a roof line, anterior line, or mitral isthmus line was ablated as appropriate. Roof line ablation was always combined with LA posterior wall (LAPW) ablation. Positioning of the PFA catheter was guided by a 3D-EAM system and by fluoroscopy. Bidirectional block across lines was verified using standard criteria. Additional radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was used to achieve bidirectional block as necessary.

RESULTS

Among 22 patients (median age 70 (59-75) years; 9 females), we identified 27 LA reentry tachycardia: seven roof dependent macro-reentries, one posterior-wall micro-reentry, twelve peri-mitral macro-reentries, and seven anterior-wall micro-reentries. We ablated a total of 20 roof lines, 13 anterior lines, and 6 mitral isthmus lines. Additional RFA was necessary for two anterior lines (15%) and three mitral isthmus lines (50%). Bidirectional block was achieved across all roof lines, 92% of anterior lines, and 83% of mitral isthmus lines. We observed no acute procedural complications.

CONCLUSION

Ablation of a roof line and of the LAPW is feasible, effective, and safe using this multipolar PFA catheter. However, the catheter is less suited for ablation of the mitral isthmus and the anterior line. A focal pulsed-field ablation catheter may be more effective for ablation of these lines. This study shows the feasibility to ablate linear lesions with a multipolar pulsed-field ablation catheter. 27 left atrial reentry tachycardia were treated in 22 patients.

EUropean real-world outcomes with Pulsed field ablatiOn in patients with symptomatic atRIAl fibrillation: lessons from the multi-centre EU-PORIA registry

AIMS

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a new, non-thermal ablation modality for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The multi-centre EUropean Real World Outcomes with Pulsed Field AblatiOn in Patients with Symptomatic AtRIAl Fibrillation (EU-PORIA) registry sought to determine the safety, efficacy, and learning curve characteristics for the pentaspline, multi-electrode PFA catheter.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All-comer AF patients from seven high-volume centres were consecutively enrolled. Procedural and follow-up data were collected. Learning curve effects were analysed by operator ablation experience and primary ablation modality. In total, 1233 patients (61% male, mean age 66 ± 11years, 60% paroxysmal AF) were treated by 42 operators. In 169 patients (14%), additional lesions outside the PVs were performed, most commonly at the posterior wall (n = 127). Median procedure and fluoroscopy times were 58 (interquartile range: 40-87) and 14 (9-21) min, respectively, with no differences due to operator experience. Major complications occurred in 21/1233 procedures (1.7%) including pericardial tamponade (14; 1.1%) and transient ischaemic attack or stroke (n = 7; 0.6%), of which one was fatal. Prior cryoballoon users had less complication. At a median follow-up of 365 (323-386) days, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of arrhythmia-free survival was 74% (80% for paroxysmal and 66% for persistent AF). Freedom from arrhythmia was not influenced by operator experience. In 149 (12%) patients, a repeat procedure was performed due to AF recurrence and 418/584 (72%) PVs were durably isolated.

CONCLUSION

The EU-PORIA registry demonstrates a high single-procedure success rate with an excellent safety profile and short procedure times in a real-world, all-comer AF patient population.

Safety and Effectiveness of Pulsed Field Ablation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation: One-Year Outcomes From the MANIFEST-PF Registry

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation is a novel nonthermal cardiac ablation modality using ultra-rapid electrical pulses to cause cell death by a mechanism of irreversible electroporation. Unlike the traditional ablation energy sources, pulsed field ablation has demonstrated significant preferentiality to myocardial tissue ablation, and thus avoids certain thermally mediated complications. However, its safety and effectiveness remain unknown in usual clinical care.

METHODS

MANIFEST-PF (Multi-National Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Post-Approval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation) is a retrospective, multinational, patient-level registry wherein patients at each center were prospectively included in their respective center registries. The registry included all patients undergoing postapproval treatment with a multielectrode 5-spline pulsed field ablation catheter to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) between March 1, 2021, and May 30, 2022. The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from clinical documented atrial arrhythmia (AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia) of ≥30 seconds on the basis of electrocardiographic data after a 3-month blanking period (on or off antiarrhythmic drugs). Safety outcomes included the composite of acute (<7 days postprocedure) and latent (>7 days) major adverse events.

RESULTS

At 24 European centers (77 operators) pulsed field ablation was performed in 1568 patients with AF: age 64.5±11.5 years, female 35%, paroxysmal/persistent AF 65%/32%, CHA₂DS₂-VASc 2.2±1.6, median left ventricular ejection fraction 60%, and left atrial diameter 42 mm. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 99.2% of patients. After a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 367 (289-421) days, the 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmia was 78.1% (95% CI, 76.0%-80.0%); clinical effectiveness was more common in patients with paroxysmal AF versus persistent AF (81.6% versus 71.5%; P=0.001). Acute major adverse events occurred in 1.9% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large observational registry of the postapproval clinical use of pulsed field technology to treat AF, catheter ablation using pulsed field energy was clinically effective in 78% of patients with AF.

Acute and Long-term Outcomes of quadripolar IS-4 versus bipolar IS-1 Left Ventricular Leads in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Retrospective Registry Study

BACKGROUND

The implantation procedure of left ventricular (LV) leads and the management of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients can be challenging. The IS-4 standard for CRT offers additional pacing vectors compared to bipolar leads (IS-1). IS-4 leads improve procedural outcome and may also result in lower adverse events during follow-up (FU) and improve clinical outcome in CRT patients. Further long-term FU data comparing the two lead designs are necessary.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center study we included adult patients implanted with a CRT-Defibrillator (CRT-D) or CRT-Pacemaker (CRT-P) with a quadripolar (IS-4 group) or bipolar (IS-1 group) LV lead and with available ≥3 years clinical FU. The combined primary endpoint was a combination of predefined, lead-related adverse events. Secondary endpoints were all single components of the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Overall, 133 patients (IS-4 n = 66; IS-1 n = 67) with a mean FU of 4.03±1.93 years were included. Lead-related adverse events were less frequent in patients with an IS-4 lead than with an IS-1 lead (n = 8, 12.1% vs. n = 23, 34.3%; p = 0.002). The secondary outcomes showed a lower rate of LV lead deactivation/explantation and LV lead dislodgement/dysfunction (4.5% vs 22.4%; p = 0.003; 4.5% vs. 17.9%; p = 0.015, respectively) in the IS-4 patient group. Less patients suffered from unresolved phrenic nerve stimulation with an IS-4 lead (3.0% vs. 13.4%; p = 0.029). LV lead-related re-interventions were fewer in case of an IS-4 lead (6.1% vs. 17.9%; p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective analysis, the IS-4 LV lead is associated with lower lead-related complication rates than the IS-1 lead at long-term FU. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Eliminating transseptal sheath exchange for pulsed field ablation procedures using a direct over-the-needle transseptal access with the Faradrive sheath

AIMS

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) combines the benefits of high procedural efficacy and safety. Transseptal puncture (TSP) to obtain left atrial (LA) access during PVI remains an important source of complications during LA procedures. For PFA procedures, TSP is generally performed using a standard transseptal sheath that is then exchanged over the wire for a dedicated PFA sheath, which might be a potential source for air embolism. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the feasibility and safety of a simplified workflow using the PFA sheath (Faradrive, Boston Scientific) directly for TSP.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively enrolled 100 patients undergoing PVI using PFA at two centres. TSP was performed using the PFA sheath and a standard 98 cm transseptal needle under fluoroscopic guidance. TSP via the PFA sheath was successfully performed in all patients and no complications occurred. The median time from the first groin puncture to the completed LA access was 12 min (IQR 8-16 min).

CONCLUSION

An over-the-needle TSP directly with the PFA sheath proved feasible and safe in our study. This simplified workflow has the potential to reduce the risk of air embolism, to shorten procedure time, and to reduce cost.

Validation of the accuracy of contact force measurement by contemporary force-sensing ablation catheters

INTRODUCTION

Contact force sensing catheters are widely used for ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. They allow quantification of catheter-to-tissue contact, which is an important determinant for lesion formation and may reduce the risk of complications. The accuracy of these sensors may vary across the measurement range, catheter-to-tissue angle, and amongst manufacturers. We aim to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of four different force sensing ablation catheters.

METHODS

A measurement setup containing a heated saline water bath with an integrated force measurement unit was constructed and validated. Subsequently, we investigated four different catheter models, each equipped with a unique measurement technology: Tacticath Quartz (Abbott), AcQBlate Force (Biotronik/Acutus), Stablepoint (Boston Scientific), and Smarttouch SF (Biosense Webster). For each model, the accuracy of three different catheters was measured within the range of 0-60 g and at contact angles of 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°.

RESULTS

In total, 6685 measurements were performed using 4 × 3 catheters (median of 568, interquartile range: 511-606 measurements per catheter). Over the entire measurement-range, the force measured by the catheters deviated from the real force by the following absolute mean values: Tacticath 1.29 ± 0.99 g, AcQBlate Force 2.87 ± 2.37 g, Stablepoint 1.38 ± 1.29 g, and Smarttouch 2.26 ± 2.70 g. For some models, significant under- and overestimation of >10 g were observed at higher forces. Mean absolute errors of all models across the range of 10-40 g were <3 g.

CONCLUSION

Contact measured by force-sensing catheters is accurate with 1-3 g deviation within the range of 10-40 g. Significant errors can occur at higher forces with potential clinical consequences.

Bipolar ablation of refractory ventricular arrhythmias using a novel dedicated adapter. A multicenter study

Background

Bipolar ablation (BA) recently emerged as an alternative for treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and premature ventricular contractions (PVC) refractory to a classic unipolar ablation (UA). Data on the use of available BA systems is lacking.

Purpose

To determine feasibility, safety and efficacy of a novel BA adapter in consecutive patients with refractory VT/PVC undergoing repeat ablations.

Methods

The study group consisted of consecutive patients with VT/PVC after failure of at least one standard UA who underwent redo procedures performed with a support of BA at six European centers. A second ablation catheter was connected in the position of a return electrode using a novel BA adapter.

Results

Between March 2021 and March 2022 a total number of 19 patients after failed ablation attempts underwent redo procedure using a novel BA adapter (17 males, age 61±11, number of prior ablation attempts 2,5±1,6; range 1–7). The main indication for redo ablation was recurrence of frequent PVC (n=10), VT (n=8) or electrical storm (n=1). Fifteen patients underwent combined UA+BA procedure during redo ablation, whereas 4 remaining patients underwent BA only. Two patients required epicardial access. Mean procedural time was 157±77 minutes. The mean BA time was 367±245s (power 32±9W) and mean UA time was 349±290s (power 43±6W). Apart from 1 anticipated AV block there were no major complications. Minor complications included char formation at 8mm tip electrode and steam pop without sequalae in one VT patient. BA+UA led to acute elimination of clinical PVC/VT in 18 patients. In the remaining 1 patient no effect on clinical VT during UA+BA was observed. The follow up lasted 4±3 months. Six (75%) VT patients remained arrhythmia-free and significant PVC burden reduction was achieved in nine (90%) PVC patients during follow-up. One patient treated for electrical storm experienced a single VT episode after 11 months. One patient after initially failed UA+BA underwent successful bipolar reablation after 2 months.

Conclusions

Bipolar ablation of refractory ventricular arrhythmias using a novel dedicated adapter is feasible, seems safe and effective. These encouraging preliminary results need to be confirmed in properly designed prospective trials.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Validation of a multipolar pulsed-field ablation catheter for endpoint assessment in pulmonary vein isolation procedures

AIMS

To validate the performance of a multipolar pulsed-field ablation (PFA) catheter compared to a standard pentaspline 3D-mapping catheter for endpoint assessment of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). PFA for PVI using single-shot devices combines the benefits of high procedural efficacy and safety. A newly available multipolar PFA catheter allows real-time recording of pulmonary vein (PV) signals during PVI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients undergoing first PVI using PFA with the standard ablation protocol (eight applications per PV) were studied. Entrance and exit block (10 V/2 ms) were assessed using the PFA catheter. Subsequently, a high-density 3D electroanatomical bipolar voltage map (3D-EAM) was constructed using a standard pentaspline 3D-mapping catheter. Additional PFA applications were delivered only after confirmation of residual PV connection by 3D-EAM. In 56 patients, 213 PVs were targeted for ablation. Acute PVI was achieved in 100% of PVs: in 199/213 (93%) PVs with the standard ablation protocol alone and in the remaining 14 PVs after additional PFA applications. The accuracy of PV assessment with the PFA catheter after the standard ablation protocol was 91% (194/213 veins). In 5/213 (2.3%) PVs, the PFA catheter incorrectly indicated PV-isolation. In 14/213 (6.6%), the PFA catheter incorrectly indicated residual PV-conduction due to high-output pace-capture. Lowering the output to 5 V/1 ms reduced this observation to 0.9% (2/213) and increased the overall accuracy to 97% (206/213).

CONCLUSION

A novel multipolar PFA catheter allows reliable endpoint assessment for PVI. Due to its design, far-field sensing and high-output pace-capture can occur. Lowering the pacing output increases the accuracy from 91 to 97%.

Multipolar pulsed-field ablation for the treatment of left atrial reentry tachycardia

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

A multipolar pulsed field ablation (PFA) catheter was recently introduced for pulmonary vein isolation and combines the benefits of high procedural efficacy and safety. It may also be used to treat left atrial (LA) reentry tachycardia.

Purpose

To describe our initial experience using a multipolar PFA catheter for the treatment of LA reentry tachycardia.

Methods

We included all patients with LA reentry tachycardia treated with a multipolar PFA catheter at our institution. Using 3D electro-anatomical mapping (3D-EAM), we identified the tachycardia mechanism and applied linear lesions either at the left atrial roof, mitral isthmus or on the anterior wall, as appropriate. Positioning of the PFA catheter was verified by integration into 3D-EAM. Applications were performed using 2.0kV with the catheter in basket or flower configuration, depending on ablation site. Bidirectional block across linear lesions was verified using standard criteria. Additional focal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was used to achieve bidirectional block if necessary.

Results

We treated 17 LA reentry tachycardia with a multipolar PFA catheter in 13 patients (median age 69 (59-73) years; 5 females). The tachycardia mechanism was identified as roof-dependent in five, peri-mitral in eight and anterior scar-related in four cases. PFA lesion sets consisted of 12 posterior wall isolations (i.e. roof lines), four mitral isthmus lines (MIL) and eight anterior lines. For ablation of the mitral side of the anterior line, we always used the PFA catheter in basket configuration, while we targeted the posterior wall and the superior side of the anterior line exclusively with the catheter in flower configuration. To ablate the MIL we used both flower and basket configurations. Three roof-dependent, six peri-mitral, and four anterior scar-related tachycardias were successfully terminated by PFA (76%). Additional RFA was necessary for two MIL, two anterior lines and no roof line (17%). Finally, we achieved bidirectional block across all lines. PFA triggered, vagal-mediated and reversible AV block was observed in one case. Otherwise, there were no acute procedural complications.

Conclusion

Linear lesion sets are feasible and safe using a multipolar PFA catheter. Posterior wall isolation by PFA for the treatment of roof-dependent LA reentry tachycardia is highly efficient while anterior lines and MIL remain challenging and may need complementary RFA or a PFA catheter designed for focal or linear ablations.

Pulsed field ablation of atrial fibrillation: recurrence rate after first pulmonary vein isolation and first insights into durability at redo procedures

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is newly available for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and combines the benefits of high procedural efficacy and safety. Independent data on the recurrence-rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) after PVI and on PVI durability during redo procedures are scarce.

Purpose

We report data on the recurrence rate of AF after first PVI using PFA and first insights into findings of PVI durability during redo procedures.

Methods

Consecutive AF patients undergoing a first PFA PVI at our center between May 2021 and August 2021 were included. PVI was verified by 3D-electroanatomical mapping (3D-EAM), and additional PFA lesions were applied when necessary until all PV were isolated. Seven-day Holter ECGs were performed at 3 and 6 months after ablation. After a blanking period of 3 months, episodes of AF/AT lasting more than 30 seconds were considered as AF-recurrence.

Results

41 Patients, median age 69 (interquartile range 62-73) years, 24% female, 56% persistent AF, underwent first PVI by PFA. All PVs were successfully isolated using a multipolar PFA catheter. Median total procedure time including 3D-EAM was 104 (85-121) min. Total fluoroscopy time and dose were 26 (19-30) min and 671 (323-1248) Gym2. Acute complications occurred in 1 (2.4%) patient (cardiac tamponade requiring drainage). Early recurrence of AF during the blanking period occurred in 1 (2.4%) patient. Median follow-up time was 107 (91-152) days. Recurrence of AF after the blanking period was detected in 5 (12%) patients, 1 (6%) in paroxysmal AF and 4 (17%) in persistent AF patients, respectively. Redo procedures in 3 (7.3%) patients with AF recurrence confirmed durable isolation of 12/12 (100%) pulmonary veins and showed no evidence of PFA lesion regression.

Conclusion

AF recurrence rates after PVI by means of PFA are low. Durable isolation of 12/12 pulmonary veins (100%) and no evidence of PFA lesion regression was observed during redo procedures in patients with AF recurrence.

Comparison of the accuracy of contact force measurement in four commercially available force-sensing ablation catheters

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Contact force-sensing catheters are widely used for ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. They allow precise quantification of catheter-to-tissue contact, which is an important determinant of lesion size and durability. Moreover, contact force information reduces the risk for cardiac perforation and is used for estimation of lesion size. However, the accuracy of contact force sensors across different manufacturers has not been validated independently.

Objective

To compare the accuracy and reproducibility of different force sensing catheters used in cardiac electrophysiology procedures.

Methods

A force measurement setup containing a heated saline water bath and a catheter fixation mechanism was constructed. The setup allows to accurately measure forces applied to a platform with the catheter. We studied four different catheter models, equipped with the following, unique force-measurement technologies (figure 1): 1) multiple-fiber optical sensor; 2) single-fiber optical sensor; 3) inductive sensor; and 4) magnetic field sensors. For each model, we assessed three catheters. Repeated measurements within the force range of 0g to 60g and at electrode-tissue contact angles of 0°, 45°, and 90° were performed and validated against the force measurement unit of our measurement setup.

Results

For each catheter, at least 500 measurements at different contact forces (equally distributed across the measurement range of 0 to 60 grams) were performed. Correlation of measured-force to real-force was ρSpearman=0.99 for MFOS, ρSpearman=0.98 for SFOS, ρSpearman=0.99 for IS, and ρSpearman=0.98 for MFS. MFS and SFOS showed a higher variance for high forces and increased intra-catheter variability compared to MFOS and IS. IS overestimated higher contact force at 0° and 30°. MFS and SFOS underestimated contact force for higher forces at 30° and 45° (figure 2). Within a clinical range of 5g to 40g, the catheters reached the following root-mean-square-error, independent of contact angle: MFOS 0.88g ±0.68g, SFOS 2.15g ±1.74g, IS 0.88g ±0.72g, and MFS 1.13g ±1.01g.

Conclusion

Measured contact by force-sensing catheters correlates well with true exerted electrode-tissue force. Despite an excellent overall correlation, some technologies may be prone to significant errors at higher forces (&gt;10g under-/overestimation of true contact force) with potential clinical consequences related to increased risk of perforation.

Validation of a multipolar pulsed field ablation catheter for endpoint assessment in pulmonary vein isolation procedures

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): FP7/2007-2013, №602299, EU-CERT-ICD

Objective

To validate the performance of a multipolar PFA catheter compared to a standard pentaspline 3D-mapping catheter for endpoint assessment of PVI.

Background

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using single-shot devices combines the benefits of high procedural efficacy and safety. A newly available multipolar PFA catheter allows real-time recording of pulmonary vein (PV) signals during PVI.

Methods

Patients undergoing first PVI using PFA with the standard ablation protocol (8 applications per PV) were studied. Entrance- and exit-block (10V/2ms) were assessed using the PFA catheter. Subsequently, a high-density bipolar voltage 3D electro-anatomical map (3D-EAM) was constructed using a standard pentaspline 3D-mapping catheter. Additional PFA applications were delivered only after confirmation of residual PV-connection by 3D-EAM.

Results

In 56 patients, 213 PVs were targeted for ablation. Acute PVI was achieved in 100% of PVs: in 199/213 (93%) PVs with the standard ablation protocol alone and in the remaining 14 PVs after additional PFA applications. Accuracy of PV assessment with the PFA catheter after the standard ablation protocol was 91% (194/213 veins). In 5/213 (2.3%) PVs, the PFA catheter incorrectly indicated PV-isolation. In 14/213 (6.6%) the PFA catheter incorrectly indicated residual PV-conduction due to high-output pace-capture. When the output was reduced to 5V/1ms, pace-capture was reduced to 0.9% (2/213).

Conclusion

A novel multipolar PFA catheter allows reliable endpoint assessment for PVI. Due to its design, far-field sensing and high-output pace-capture can occur, which may require adjustment of standard pacing outputs for verification of exit-block.

Electrophysiological differences of deep sedation with dexmedetomidine versus propofol

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Dexmedetomidine and propofol are commonly used drugs for deep sedation during cardiovascular interventions. Patients undergoing these interventions often have impaired sinus node function or atrioventricular (AV) conduction disease. Anesthetics used for deep sedation may further compromise sinus node function and AV nodal conduction, and thereby interfere with the intervention.

Purpose

To compare the electrophysiological effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on the function of the sinus node and AV conduction.

Methods

We randomized patients undergoing first atrial fibrilation ablation 1:1 to deep sedation by dexmedetomidine (DEX group) versus propofol (PRO group), according to a standardized protocol. At the end of the ablation procedure with the patients still deeply sedated and hemodynamically stable, we conducted a standard electrophysiological study and assessed sinus node function, properties of AV conduction and atrial refractoriness.

Results

Of 160 patients (65±11 years old; 32% female) included into the study, 80 patients were randomized to the DEX and PRO group each. Procedure duration (128±59 minutes) and sedation depth, as assessed by the "Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation" score (median 3; interquartile range 2, 3), was not different among groups. DEX group patients received a mean of 231±111 mcg of dexmedetomidine and PRO group patients a mean of 657±356 mg of propofol. The table shows the results of the electrophysiological study. DEX group patients had lower sinus rate and longer unadjusted sinus node recovery time (SNRT) at pacing cycle lengths of 600, 500 and 400 ms. However, both corrected (SNRT-RR) and normalized (SNRT/RR) SNRT did not differ among groups. Compared to PRO group patients, AV nodal conduction was slower in DEX group patients as evidenced by longer PR and AH intervals, and a higher Wenckebach cycle length and AV node effective refractory period (ERP) was observed. Conduction properties in the His-Purkinje system were not different among groups, as QRS width and HV interval were similar. An arrhythmia, mainly atrial fibrillation, was induced in 33 patients (21%) during the electrophysiological study, without differences among groups.

Conclusions

Sinus rate and AV conduction are slower during deep sedation with dexmedetomidine compared to propofol. These differences in electrophysiological effects need to be taken into account when using these anesthetics during cardiovascular interventions.

Durability of CLOSE-guided pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation - First results from a prospective remapping study

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

The CLOSE protocol for pulmonary vein isolation (CLOSE-PVI) combines ablation index and inter-lesion distance (≤6 mm) targets. CLOSE-PVI has been shown to result in high clinical success rates. Data on durability of PVI after CLOSE-PVI mainly derive from repeat procedures in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with recurrent AF.

Purpose

We sought to assess the incidence of pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections during a staged redo procedure performed independently of AF recurrence 6 months after CLOSE-PVI in patients with persistent AF.

Methods

In this prospective, single-center study, patients with symptomatic persistent AF (EHRA score &gt;1) undergoing AF ablation were included. Close-PVI was performed during the index procedure. A blanking period of 3 months was applied. Seven-day Holter ECGs were performed at 3 and 6 months post ablation. All patients underwent a staged redo procedure including high-density voltage mapping of the left atrium at 6 months after the index procedure.

Results

Overall, 20 patients were included (median age: 68 years [IQR 63-71]; 20% women; median duration of persistent AF: 8 months [IQR 5-15]; median LAVI 45 ml/m2 [IQR 43-53]). All PVs were successfully isolated with CLOSE-PVI during the index procedure. Four patients (20%) had AF recurrence. The redo procedure was performed after a median of 6.1 months (IQR 5.6-7.3). Of 80 PVs, 71 (89%) were still isolated. No patient had a common ostium. Reconnections were observed in 3 left superior (15%), in one left inferior (5%), in one right superior (5%) and in 4 right inferior (20%) PVs. Fourteen patients (74%) had completely isolated PVs. Two of four patients with AF recurrence (50%) and 12 of 16 patients without AF recurrence (75%) had completely isolated PVs (p=0.33).

Conclusions

CLOSE-PVI achieves durable PVI after 6 months in the majority of patients with persistent AF. In half of persistent AF patients with recurrence after CLOSE-PVI, all PVs are still isolated. These patients may need adjunctive ablation.

Impact of clinical risk factor profile vs. atrial fibrillation phenotype on outcome after pulmonary vein isolation

Aims

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly performed. Both clinical risk factors as well as the AF phenotype have been shown to influence ablation outcomes. The inter-relationship of the two however is incompletely understood.

Methods

In a retrospective analysis of a prospective registry of patients undergoing a first pulmonary vein isolation, the association of 8 predefined clinical risk factors (age &gt;70 years, female gender, hypertension, BMI &gt;30 kg/m2, coronary artery disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease (CKD; eGFR&lt;60ml/min/1.73m2) and diabetes mellitus) and the AF phenotype (paroxysmal vs. persistent AF) were assessed as well as their impact on AF recurrence during follow-up.

Results

Overall, 715 patients were enrolled (median age 63 years, 27% females, 69% paroxysmal AF). The prevalence of obesity, hypertension, heart failure and CKD was significantly higher in persistent AF, while female gender was more prevalent in paroxysmal AF. After 2 years of follow-up, overall freedom from recurrence was 46%, and was higher in paroxysmal AF compared to persistent AF (54.1% vs. 29.1%, p&lt;0.001). Of the clinical risk factors, obesity (p=0.02), CKD (p=0.01) and heart failure (p=0.01) were significantly associated with lower arrhythmia-free survival, and there was a trend for hypertension and coronary artery disease (both p&lt;0.2). A risk score composed of those 5 factors was associated with recurrences in patients with paroxysmal AF (p=0.04, Figure 1), but not in those with persistent AF (p=0.85, Figure 2).

Conclusion

Clinical risk factors predict outcome after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal, but not persistent AF. This is likely due to a strong association of those risk factors with the occurrence of persistent AF.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1Figure 2

Unexpected high failure rate of a specific MicroPort/LivaNova/Sorin pacing lead

BACKGROUND

Pacing leads are the Achilles heel of pacemakers. Most manufacturers report a 3-year survival rate of >99% of their leads. We observed several failures of the Beflex/Vega leads (MicroPort, Shanghai, China; formerly Sorin/LivaNova).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate failure rates of Beflex/Vega leads.

METHODS

We analyzed the performance of Beflex/Vega leads implanted at our tertiary referral center. All-cause lead failures (any issues requiring reinterventions such as lead dislocations, cardiac perforations, and electrical abnormalities) were identified during follow-up. The Beflex/Vega lead was compared with a reference lead (CapSureFix Novus 5076, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) implanted within the same period and by the same operators.

RESULTS

A total of 585 leads were analyzed (382 Beflex/Vega and 203 CapSureFix Novus 5076 leads). Cumulative failure rate estimates were 5.2%, 6.3%, and 12.4% after 1, 2, and 3 years for the Beflex/Vega lead. This was worse compared to the reference lead (1.5%, 1.5%, 3.7% after 1, 2, and 3 years; P = .001). Early failure manifestations up to 3 months occurred at a similar rate (Beflex/Vega vs CapSureFix Novus 5076 lead: 1.3% vs 0.5% for dislocations; 1.3% vs 1.0% for perforations). During follow-up, electrical abnormalities such as noise oversensing (P = .013) and increased pacing thresholds (P = .003) became more frequent in the Beflex/Vega group. Electrical abnormalities were the most common failure manifestation 3 years after implantation in this group (9.4% vs 2.2% for the CapSureFix Novus 5076).

CONCLUSION

The failure rate of the Beflex/Vega lead of >10% after 3 years was higher than that of a competitor lead. This gives rise to concern since >135,000 such leads are active worldwide.

P1492Comparison of the long-term performance of the quadripolar IS-4 and the bipolar IS-1 left ventricular lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

The implantation of left ventricular (LV) leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and the management of lead-related complications can be challenging. The introduction of the quadripolar IS-4 LV lead may have facilitated the implantation procedure and may have reduced lead-related complications. Data of long-term follow-up (FU) comparing the IS-4 lead with the IS-1 LV lead are rare and conflicting.

PURPOSE

Comparison of lead-related complications and all-cause mortality between CRT patients who received an IS-4 or an IS-1 LV lead in the long-term FU.

METHODS

Adults with an indication for a CRT-Defibrillator or CRT-Pacemaker, a successful endovascular IS-4 or IS-1 LV lead implantation, and a minimal FU of three years were included in this retrospective study. The combined primary endpoint was freedom from lead-related complications defined as (i) occurrence of persisting high pacing threshold (&gt;2.75V/0.4ms), (ii) unresolved phrenic nerve stimulation, (iii) LV lead dislodgement/disruption, (iv) the necessity of re-interventions affecting the LV lead, and (v) LV lead deactivation/explantation. Secondary endpoints were all singular complications and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Eligible for the study were 133 patients (IS-4 n = 66; IS-1 n = 67) with a mean FU of 4.03 ± 1.93 years. Baseline characteristics of both patient groups did not differ significantly. Freedom from lead-related complications was higher in patients with an IS-4 lead as compared to an IS-1 lead (Figure 1; 87.9% vs. 65.7%; p = 0.002). The secondary outcomes showed a higher rate of LV lead dislodgement/disruption (4.5% vs. 17.9%; p = 0.015) in the IS-1 patient group and more patients suffered from unresolved phrenic nerve stimulation with an IS-1 lead (3.0% vs. 13.4%; p = 0.029). LV lead deactivation/explantation during FU and LV lead-related re-interventions were fewer in case of an IS-4 lead (4.5% vs 22.4%; p = 0.003; 6.1% vs. 17.9%; p = 0.036, respectively). The rate of persisting high pacing thresholds and all-cause mortality did not differ (4.5% vs. 9.0%; p = 0.492; 22.7% vs 25.4%; p = 0.721, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The quadripolar IS-4 LV lead showed in this retrospective study a better long-term performance than the bipolar IS-1 lead.

Abstract Figure 1

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Tachycardia in a Giant Right Atrium

A 25-year-old male patient with a giant right atrium presented with atrial tachycardia. Electroanatomic mapping revealed micro–re-entry from a low-voltage zone in the region of the right atrial appendage. Linear ablations across the low-voltage zone terminated the tachycardia. The remaining right atrial tissue was electrically normal. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

P2855Unexpectedly high rate of lead failure of the Microport (formerly Sorin/Livanova) Beflex and Vega pacemaker electrodes: A single centre experience

Introduction

Pacing leads remain the weak link of current pacemaker systems. Various differences in design and material exist among companies. Lead performance is mainly assessed via post-marketing studies of the manufacturing companies. Reliable independent reports are rare. We aimed to study the early and long-term performance of the Microport (formerly Sorin/Livanova) Beflex and Vega leads at our centre, for which a lead survival >99% at 3 years has been reported by the company.

Method

In this single centre, retrospective study we analysed the performance of all right ventricular Microport pacemaker leads implanted at our centre between January 2014 and January 2018. Only first pacemaker implants were considered. Lead failure was defined as any lead issue requiring reintervention during follow-up (dislocation, perforation, electrical abnormalities such as lead noise or excessively high thresholds).

Results

A total of 271 Microport right ventricular pacing leads were implanted (233 Beflex and 38 Vega leads). Mean patient age was 76±13.1 years (66% men). Dual chamber pacemakers were implanted in 162 patients (60%) and single chamber in 109 (40%). Mean threshold at implant was 0.6V/0.5ms (range 0.3–1.2V), mean R wave 13.2 mV (range 1.5–30mV) and mean impedance 816 Ohm (range 469–1639 Ohm). Patients without available follow-up information were excluded (N=18, 6.6%). The remaining 253 patients (93.4%) were analysed. Median follow-up was 1.26 years, IQR [25%=0.91 and 75%=2.24]. We observed a total of 25 lead failures (10%). Lead dislocation occurred in 2 cases (0.8%), lead perforation in 5 cases (2%), electrical abnormalities in 6 cases (2.4%) and excessively high threshold in 12 cases (4.8%; mean voltage 4V, range 2–7.5V; mean pulse width 0.75ms, range 0.35–1ms). Yearly incidence of lead failure per 100 leads was 6.1% (95%-CI [4.09–8.98] with a failure rate of 12.74% at 3 year in Kaplan-Meier analysis (Figure).

Figure 1

Conclusion

We found an unexpectedly high rate of lead failure of the Microport Beflex and Vega pacing leads at our centre. The two main reasons for premature lead failure were excessively high thresholds as well as electrical abnormalities during follow-up. Comparison of lead performance with other centres and against other leads are needed to further assess the magnitude of the problem.

Leadless Dual-Chamber Pacing: A Novel Communication Method for Wireless Pacemaker Synchronization

Contemporary leadless pacemakers only feature single-chamber pacing capability. This study presents a prototype of a leadless dual-chamber pacemaker. Highly energy-efficient intrabody communication was implemented for wireless pacemaker synchronization. Optimal communication parameters were obtained by in vivo and ex vivo measurements in the heart and blood. The prototype successfully performed dual-chamber pacing in vivo. The presented wireless communication method may in the future also enable leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy.