1
|
Ganguly S, Lone Z, Muskara A, Imamura J, Hardaway A, Patel M, Berk M, Smile TD, Davicioni E, Stephans KL, Ciezki J, Weight CJ, Gupta S, Reddy CA, Tendulkar RD, Chakraborty AA, Klein EA, Sharifi N, Mian OY. Intratumoral androgen biosynthesis associated with 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1 promotes resistance to radiotherapy in prostate cancer. J Clin Invest 2023; 133:e165718. [PMID: 37966114 PMCID: PMC10645386 DOI: 10.1172/jci165718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Half of all men with advanced prostate cancer (PCa) inherit at least 1 copy of an adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 (1245C) allele, which increases levels of 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1 (3βHSD1) and promotes intracellular androgen biosynthesis. Germline inheritance of the adrenally permissive allele confers worse outcomes in men with advanced PCa. We investigated whether HSD3B1 (1245C) drives resistance to combined androgen deprivation and radiotherapy. Adrenally permissive 3βHSD1 enhanced resistance to radiotherapy in PCa cell lines and xenograft models engineered to mimic the human adrenal/gonadal axis during androgen deprivation. The allele-specific effects on radiosensitivity were dependent on availability of DHEA, the substrate for 3βHSD1. In lines expressing the HSD3B1 (1245C) allele, enhanced expression of DNA damage response (DDR) genes and more rapid DNA double-strand break (DSB) resolution were observed. A correlation between androgen receptor (AR) expression and increased DDR gene expression was confirmed in 680 radical prostatectomy specimens. Treatment with the nonsteroidal antiandrogen enzalutamide reversed the resistant phenotype of HSD3B1 (1245C) PCa in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, 3βHSD1 promotes prostate cancer resistance to combined androgen deprivation and radiotherapy by upregulating DNA DSB repair. This work supports prospective validation of early combined androgen blockade for high-risk men harboring the HSD3B1 (1245C) allele.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zaeem Lone
- Translational Hematology and Oncology Research
| | | | | | | | - Mona Patel
- Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute
| | - Mike Berk
- Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute
| | - Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, and Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Kevin L Stephans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, and Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jay Ciezki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, and Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Shilpa Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, and Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Rahul D Tendulkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, and Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Abhishek A Chakraborty
- Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute
- Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Eric A Klein
- Veracyte Inc., San Francisco, California, USA
- Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Nima Sharifi
- Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Ohio, USA
| | - Omar Y Mian
- Translational Hematology and Oncology Research
- Department of Radiation Oncology, and Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Somasundaram E, Anderson PM, Smile TD, Halima A, Broughman JB, Reddy CA, Parsai S, Scott JG, Chan T, Campbell S, Angelov L, Zahler S, Trucco M, Thomas SM, Johnson S, Qi P, Magnelli A, Murphy ES. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NTLR) predicts local control and overall survival after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metastatic sarcoma. Sci Rep 2023; 13:19256. [PMID: 37935813 PMCID: PMC10630331 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46476-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NTLR) and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) recovery are prognostic across many cancers. We investigated whether NLTR predicts SBRT success or survival in a metastatic sarcoma cohort treated with SBRT from 2014 and 2020 (N = 42). Wilcox Signed Rank Test and Friedman Test compare NTLR changes with local failure vs. local control (N = 138 lesions). Cox analyses identified factors associated with overall survival. If local control was successful, NLTR change was not significant (p = 0.30). However, NLTR significantly changed in patients with local failure (p = 0.027). The multivariable Cox model demonstrated higher NLTR before SBRT was associated with worse overall survival (p = 0.002). The optimal NTLR cut point was 5 (Youden index: 0.418). One-year overall survival in SBRT metastatic sarcoma cohort was 47.6% (CI 34.3%-66.1%). Patients with an NTLR above 5 had a one-year overall survival of 37.7% (21.4%-66.3%); patients with an NTLR below 5 had a significantly improved overall survival of 63% (43.3%-91.6%, p = 0.014). Since NTLR at the time of SBRT was significantly associated with local control success and overall survival in metastatic sarcoma treated with SBRT, future efforts to reduce tumor inhibitory microenvironment factors and improve lymphocyte recovery should be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter M Anderson
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, R3 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, 44195, OH, USA
| | - Ahmed Halima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, R3 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, 44195, OH, USA
| | - James B Broughman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, R3 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, 44195, OH, USA
| | - Chandana A Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, R3 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, 44195, OH, USA
| | - Shireen Parsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio Health Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jacob G Scott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, R3 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, 44195, OH, USA
| | - Timothy Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, R3 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, 44195, OH, USA
| | - Shauna Campbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, R3 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, 44195, OH, USA
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stacey Zahler
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Matteo Trucco
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stefanie M Thomas
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Shavaughn Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, R3 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, 44195, OH, USA
| | - Peng Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, R3 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, 44195, OH, USA
| | - Anthony Magnelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, R3 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, 44195, OH, USA
| | - Erin S Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, R3 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, 44195, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tom MC, DiFilippo FP, Jones SE, Suh JH, Obuchowski NA, Smile TD, Murphy ES, Yu JS, Barnett GH, Angelov L, Mohammadi AM, Huang SS, Wu G, Johnson S, Peereboom DM, Stevens GHJ, Ahluwalia MS, Chao ST. 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumor progression for brain metastases treated with radiosurgery: results of a prospective pilot study. J Neurooncol 2023; 163:647-655. [PMID: 37341842 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04377-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumor progression among patients with brain metastases previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery represents a common diagnostic challenge. We performed a prospective pilot study to determine whether PET/CT with 18F-fluciclovine, a widely available amino acid PET radiotracer, repurposed intracranially, can accurately diagnose equivocal lesions. METHODS Adults with brain metastases previously treated with radiosurgery presenting with a follow-up tumor-protocol MRI brain equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumor progression underwent an 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT of the brain within 30 days. The reference standard for final diagnosis consisted of clinical follow-up until multidisciplinary consensus or tissue confirmation. RESULTS Of 16 patients imaged from 7/2019 to 11/2020, 15 subjects were evaluable with 20 lesions (radiation necrosis, n = 16; tumor progression, n = 4). Higher SUVmax statistically significantly predicted tumor progression (AUC = 0.875; p = 0.011). Lesion SUVmean (AUC = 0.875; p = 0.018), SUVpeak (AUC = 0.813; p = 0.007), and SUVpeak-to-normal-brain (AUC = 0.859; p = 0.002) also predicted tumor progression, whereas SUVmax-to-normal-brain (p = 0.1) and SUVmean-to-normal-brain (p = 0.5) did not. Qualitative visual scores were significant predictors for readers 1 (AUC = 0.750; p < 0.001) and 3 (AUC = 0.781; p = 0.045), but not for reader 2 (p = 0.3). Visual interpretations were significant predictors for reader 1 (AUC = 0.898; p = 0.012) but not for reader 2 (p = 0.3) or 3 (p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS In this prospective pilot study of patients with brain metastases previously treated with radiosurgery presenting with a contemporary MRI brain with a lesion equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumor progression, 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT repurposed intracranially demonstrated encouraging diagnostic accuracy, supporting the pursuit of larger clinical trials which will be necessary to establish diagnostic criteria and performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin C Tom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Frank P DiFilippo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stephen E Jones
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nancy A Obuchowski
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Erin S Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jennifer S Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Steve S Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Guiyun Wu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Scott Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David M Peereboom
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Glen H J Stevens
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Neurology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center and Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Somasundaram E, Smile TD, Halima A, Broughman JB, Reddy CA, Parsai S, Scott JG, Chan T, Campbell S, Angelov L, Zahler S, Trucco M, Thomas SM, Johnson S, Qi P, Magnelli A, Anderson PM, Murphy ES. Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NTLR) Predicts Local Control Failure and Overall Survival after Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) In Metastatic Sarcoma. Res Sq 2023:rs.3.rs-2570832. [PMID: 37333401 PMCID: PMC10275040 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2570832/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NTLR) and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) recovery are prognostic across many cancers. We investigated whether NLTR predicts SBRT success or survival in a metastatic sarcoma cohort treated with SBRT from 2014 and 2020 (N = 42). Wilcox Signed Rank Test and Friedman Test compare NTLR changes with local failure vs. local control (N = 138 lesions). Cox analyses identified factors associated with overall survival. If local control was successful, NLTR change was not significant (p = 0.30). However, NLTR significantly changed in patients local failure (p = 0.027). The multivariable Cox model demonstrated higher NLTR before SBRT was associated with worse overall survival (p = 0.002). The optimal NTLR cut point was 5 (Youden index: 0.418). One-year overall survival in SBRT metastatic sarcoma cohort was 47.6% (CI 34.3%-66.1%). Patients with an NTLR above 5 had a one-year overall survival of 37.7% (21.4%-66.3%); patients with an NTLR below 5 had a significantly improved overall survival of 63% (43.3%-91.6%, p = 0.014). Since NTLR at the time of SBRT was significantly associated with local control success and overall survival in metastatic sarcoma treated with SBRT, future efforts to reduce tumor inhibitory microenvironment factors and improved lymphocyte recovery should be investigated.
Collapse
|
5
|
Stevens JS, Murad F, Smile TD, O'Connor DM, Ilori E, Koyfman S, Vidimos A, Waldman AB, Ruiz ES. Validation of the 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network Risk Stratification for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. JAMA Dermatol 2023:2805522. [PMID: 37285135 PMCID: PMC10248812 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.1353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Importance The 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) reclassified cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) into low-, high-, and very high-risk groups to better risk stratify tumors. Mohs micrographic surgery (Mohs) or peripheral and deep en face margin assessment (PDEMA) became preferred surgical modalities for high- and very high-risk tumors. This new risk stratification and the recommendation for Mohs or PDEMA in high- and very high-risk groups have not been validated. Objective To compare outcomes in very high-, high-, and low-risk NCCN groups of CSCCs and in CSCCs treated with Mohs or PDEMA compared with wide local excision (WLE). Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study of CSCCs was performed in 2 tertiary care academic medical centers. Patients 18 years or older and diagnosed between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2019, at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Cleveland Clinic Foundation were included. Data were analyzed from October 20, 2021, to March 29, 2023. Exposures NCCN risk group, Mohs or PDEMA, and WLE. Main Outcomes and Measures Local recurrence (LR), nodal metastasis (NM), distant metastasis (DM), and disease-specific death (DSD). Results A total of 10 196 tumors from 8727 patients were stratified by NCCN guidelines into low-, high-, and very high-risk groups (6003 [59.0%] men; mean [SD] age, 72.4 [11.8] years). Compared with the low-risk group, the high- and very high-risk groups demonstrated a greater risk of LR (high-risk subhazard ratio [SHR], 1.99 [95% CI, 1.21-3.27; P = .007]; very high-risk SHR, 12.66 [95% CI, 7.86-20.39; P < .001]), NM (high-risk SHR, 4.26 [95% CI, 1.28-14.23; P = .02]; very high-risk SHR, 62.98 [95% CI, 19.24-206.17; P < .001]), DM (high-risk SHR, 2.2 × 107 [95% CI, 4.7 × 103-1.1 × 1011; P < .001]; very high-risk SHR, 6.3 × 108 [95% CI, 1.4 × 105-2.9 × 1012; P < .001]), and DSD (high-risk SHR, 4.02 [95% CI, 1.18-13.71; P = .03]; very high-risk SHR, 93.87 [95% CI, 29.19-301.85; P < .001]). Adjusted 5-year cumulative incidence was significantly higher in very high- vs high- and low-risk groups for LR (9.4% [95% CI, 9.2%-14.0%] vs 1.5% [95% CI, 1.4%-2.1%] and 0.8% [95% CI, 0.5%-1.2%], respectively), NM (7.3% [95% CI, 6.8%-10.9%] vs 0.5% [95% CI, 0.4%-0.8%] and 0.1% [95% CI, 0.03%-0.3%], respectively), DM (3.9% [95% CI, 2.6%-5.6%] vs 0.1% [95% CI, 0.04%-0.2%] and 0.01% [95% CI, not applicable], respectively), and DSD (10.5% [95% CI, 10.3%-15.4%] vs 0.5% [95% CI, 0.4%-0.8%] and 0.1% [95% CI, 0.04%-0.3%], respectively). Compared with CSCCs treated with WLE, those treated with Mohs or PDEMA had lower risk of LR (SHR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.46-0.90]; P = .009), DM (SHR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.18-0.83]; P = .02), and DSD (SHR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.36-0.84]; P = .006). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cohort study suggest that the NCCN high- and very high-risk groups identify CSCCs at greatest risk for developing poor outcomes. Further, Mohs or PDEMA resulted in lower LR, DM, and DSD compared with WLE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fadi Murad
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Timothy D Smile
- Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Daniel M O'Connor
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Evelyn Ilori
- Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Shlomo Koyfman
- Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Allison Vidimos
- Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Abigail B Waldman
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Emily S Ruiz
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mayo ZS, Halima A, Broughman JR, Smile TD, Tom MC, Murphy ES, Suh JH, Lo SS, Barnett GH, Wu G, Johnson S, Chao ST. Radiation necrosis or tumor progression? A review of the radiographic modalities used in the diagnosis of cerebral radiation necrosis. J Neurooncol 2023; 161:23-31. [PMID: 36633800 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04225-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cerebral radiation necrosis is a complication of radiation therapy that can be seen months to years following radiation treatment. Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression on standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often difficult and advanced imaging techniques may be needed to make an accurate diagnosis. The purpose of this article is to review the imaging modalities used in differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression following radiation therapy for brain metastases. METHODS We performed a review of the literature addressing the radiographic modalities used in the diagnosis of radiation necrosis. RESULTS Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression remains a diagnostic challenge and advanced imaging modalities are often required to make a definitive diagnosis. If diagnostic uncertainty remains following conventional imaging, a multi-modality diagnostic approach with perfusion MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission spectroscopy (SPECT), and radiomics may be used to improve diagnosis. CONCLUSION Several imaging modalities exist to aid in the diagnosis of radiation necrosis. Future studies developing advanced imaging techniques are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary S Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Ahmed Halima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - James R Broughman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Martin C Tom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Erin S Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Guiyun Wu
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Scott Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. .,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smile TD, Reddy CA, Matia B, Fleming CW, Domb C, Geiger JL, Joshi NP, Woody NM, Chute DJ, Griffith CC, Adelstein DJ, Koyfman SA. A Reappraisal of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Older Adults With Advanced Head and Neck Cancer. Anticancer Res 2022; 42:3845-3852. [PMID: 35896238 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Definitive treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) is often compromised in older adults due to concerns about potential treatment toxicity intolerance. We reviewed our institutional experience with definitive management of older adults with LAHNSCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS From our Institutional Review Board-approved registry, we identified patients aged >60 years with stage III-IV, M0 LAHNSCC (seventh/earlier editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification) treated with definitive radiotherapy from 1993-2019. Indications for concurrent chemotherapy included T3-4 or N2-3 disease. Multivariable analysis using Fine and Gray regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with recurrence. The cumulative incidence method was used to calculate recurrence rates. RESULTS Overall, 350 patients were identified: 223 aged 60-69, 82 aged 70-74, and 45 aged ≥75 years. Median follow-up was 36.3 months. Two-year recurrence rates were 13.7%, 20.2% and 34.8%, respectively; human papillomavirus-positive disease was present in 190 (85%), 44 (54%), and 25 (56%), respectively; and systemic therapy was given to 194 (87%), 64 (88%), and 23 (56%) patients, respectively. Factors significantly associated with increased risk of recurrence included age ≥75 years, Karnofsky performance status 70-80, clinical N2c-N3, and Charlson score 2-3. CONCLUSION Patients aged ≥75 years received less aggressive therapy and experienced increased recurrence compared to younger patients. Outcomes for those aged 70-74 years were similar to younger patients treated with aggressive therapy, despite their inferior performance status/comorbidity, and such patients should not routinely be excluded from standard-of-care therapy. Further study is needed to optimize therapy for a redefined older adult (age ≥75 years) population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A.;
| | - Chandana A Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Brian Matia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Christopher W Fleming
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Chaim Domb
- Case Western Reserve University College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Jessica L Geiger
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Nikhil P Joshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Neil M Woody
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Deborah J Chute
- Department of Pathology, Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Christopher C Griffith
- Department of Pathology, Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - David J Adelstein
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Shlomo A Koyfman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Detloff LR, Ho EC, Ellis SG, Ciezki JP, Cherian S, Smile TD. Coronary intravascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis: A review of the contemporary literature. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:692-702. [PMID: 35718634 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Intracoronary stent restenosis (ISR) is a clinically relevant challenge in the modern era. Heterogeneity in patient- and lesion-specific factors can further compound this clinical challenge. Coronary intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) was the standard therapeutic approach for ISR prior to the advent of drug-eluting stents (DES). Despite prospective data describing the superiority of DES over IVBT for treating de novo ISR, IVBT remains a treatment option for patients with complex disease. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the historical and contemporary literature surrounding IVBT in order to elucidate its role in modern cardiac care and to describe opportunities for future investigations to improve patient selection. Herein, we provide a review of the contemporary literature describing IVBT as a safe and effective treatment option for patients with recurrent, refractory ISR after multilayer DES and no good surgical or mechanical option. Combination therapy with emerging technologies such as DCBs may further increase efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emily C Ho
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Stephen G Ellis
- Miller Family Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jay P Ciezki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Sheen Cherian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ilori EO, Campbell SR, Smile TD, Keller L, Joshi NP, Woody NM, Koyfman SA. Adjuvant Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Improves Outcomes for Resected Complex Keloids. JAAD Case Rep 2022; 25:47-52. [PMID: 35755175 PMCID: PMC9213232 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2022.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
10
|
Smile TD, Ruiz ES, Kus KJB, Murad F, Wei W, Xiong DD, Vidimos AT, Schmults CD, Koyfman SA. Implications of Satellitosis or In-transit Metastasis in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prognostic Omission in Cancer Staging Systems. JAMA Dermatol 2022; 158:390-394. [PMID: 35195668 PMCID: PMC8867391 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Unlike Merkel cell carcinoma and melanoma, satellitosis or in-transit metastasis (S-ITM) is not incorporated into the current cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) staging systems. It is important to determine if the clinical outcomes of S-ITM are relevant to prognosis for patients with CSCC. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the association of S-ITM with clinical outcomes in patients with CSCC and to determine its prognostic implications. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS A dual-institution (Cleveland Clinic and Brigham and Women's Hospital) database was queried for patients who were treated for CSCC in 2010 to 2020. Patients who were node-negative and had S-ITM-the presence of dermal lesions between the primary tumor and first-echelon lymphatic nodal basins at any point in the disease course-were identified. Subcohorts of patients with T3N0 tumors, T4N0 tumors (bone invasive), N1 to 3, and M1 disease were identified for comparison. The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system was used to define cancer stages. Data were analyzed from January 15 to March 31, 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Pairwise comparison of CSCC recurrence and disease-specific survival in patients with and without S-ITM was performed using Cox proportional hazard modeling. Kaplan-Meier and Fine-Gray competing risk methods were used to estimate disease-specific survival and CSCC recurrence, respectively. RESULTS In a total of 518 patients with CSCC, S-ITM was present in 72 (13.9 %) patients (median age [range], 73.9 [31.6-95.8] years; 59 [82%] men; 69 [96%] White non-Hispanic individuals; 25 [35%] patients with immunosuppression) who were node-negative. The subcohorts were composed of 341 patients with T3N0 cancer, 36 with T4N0, 70 with N1 to 3, and 19 with M1 disease. Pairwise comparisons between disease levels using Cox proportional hazard model demonstrated lower cumulative incidence of CSCC recurrence rates in the T3N0 (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.14-0.30; P < .001) and T4N0 (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.68; P = .001) cohorts compared with the S-ITM cohort. No significant difference was observed between patients who were node-positive and those with S-ITM (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.48-1.14; P = .16). The 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 76% for T3N0, 64% for T4N0, 41% for S-ITM, and 39% for N1 to 3. Compared with the S-ITM cohort, DSS was significantly higher in the T3N0 (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.15-0.35; P < .0001) and T4N0 (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.76; P = .01) cohorts, and not significantly different in the node-positive (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.84-3.93; P = .30) and metastatic cohorts (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 0.84-3.93; P = .13). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This multi-institutional cohort study found that patients with CSCC and S-ITM appear to have clinical outcomes comparable to those of patients who are node-positive, and an increased risk of recurrence and worse survival compared with patients who have T3 and T4 disease. These outcomes are similar to those observed for Merkel cell carcinoma and melanoma. Given that S-ITM may be a powerful prognostic factor, it should be incorporated into clinical staging systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D. Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Emily S. Ruiz
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kylee J. B. Kus
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts,Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan
| | - Fadi Murad
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - David D. Xiong
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Allison T. Vidimos
- Dermatology and Plastic Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Chrysalyne D. Schmults
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shlomo A. Koyfman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stevens JS, Murad F, Smile TD, Koyfman S, Waldman AB, Ruiz ES, Schmults CD. CLO22-085: A Dual-Center Retrospective Cohort Validation of the 2021 NCCN Risk Stratification for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022. [DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fadi Murad
- 1 Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Emily S. Ruiz
- 1 Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Somasundaram E, D Smile T, Halima A, Broughman JB, Reddy CA, Parsai S, Scott JG, Shah C, Chan T, Campbell S, Angelov L, Anderson PM, Zahler S, Trucco M, Thomas SM, Johnson S, Mesko N, Nystrom L, Shepard D, Budd GT, Qi P, Magnelli A, Murphy ES. Association between biologically effective dose and local control after stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic sarcoma. J Radiosurg SBRT 2022; 8:265-273. [PMID: 37416333 PMCID: PMC10322177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly utilized for patients with recurrent and metastatic sarcoma. SBRT affords the potential to overcome the relative radioresistance of sarcomas through delivery of a focused high biological effective dose (BED) as an alternative to invasive surgery. We report local control outcomes after metastatic sarcoma SBRT based on radiation dose and histology. Methods From our IRB-approved single-institution registry, all patients treated with SBRT for metastatic sarcoma between 2014 and 2020 were identified. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate local control and overall survival at 1 and 2 years. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to determine optimal BED using an α/β ratio of 3. Local control was compared by SBRT dose using the BED cut point and evaluated by histology. Results Forty-two patients with a total of 138 lesions met inclusion criteria. Median imaging follow up was 7.73 months (range 0.5-35.0). Patients were heavily pre-treated with systemic therapy. Median SBRT prescription was 116.70 Gy BED (range 66.70-419.30). Desmoplastic small round cell tumor, Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and small round blue cell sarcomas were classified as radiosensitive (n = 63), and all other histologies were classified as radioresistant (n = 75). Local control for all lesions was 66.7% (95% CI, 56.6-78.5) at 1 year and 50.2% (95% CI, 38.2-66.1) at 2 years. Stratifying by histology, 1- and 2-year local control rates were 65.3% and 55.0%, respectively, for radiosensitive, and 68.6% and 44.5%, respectively, for radioresistant histologies (p = 0.49). The ROC cut point for BED was 95 Gy. Local control rates at 1- and 2-years were 75% and 61.6%, respectively, for lesions receiving >95 Gy BED, and 46.2% and 0%, respectively, for lesions receiving <95 Gy BED (p = 0.01). On subgroup analysis, local control by BED > 95 Gy was significant for radiosensitive histologies (p = 0.013), and trended toward significance for radioresistant histologies (p = 0.25). Conclusion There is a significant local control benefit for sarcoma SBRT when a BED > 95 Gy is used. Further investigation into the dose-response relationship is warranted to maximize the therapeutic index.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ahmed Halima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - James B Broughman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Chandana A Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Shireen Parsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio Health Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jacob G Scott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Timothy Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Shauna Campbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Peter M Anderson
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stacy Zahler
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Matteo Trucco
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stefanie M Thomas
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Shavaughn Johnson
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nathan Mesko
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lukas Nystrom
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Dale Shepard
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - George Thomas Budd
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Peng Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Anthony Magnelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Erin S Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gupta N, Weitzman RE, Murad F, Koyfman SA, Smile TD, Chang MS, Maher JM, Schmults CD, Vidimos AT, Ruiz ES. Identifying Brigham and Women's Hospital stage T2a cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas at risk of poor outcomes. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021; 86:1301-1308. [PMID: 34864111 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.11.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although most of the poor outcomes with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) occur in high-stage tumors, 26% of nodal metastases and 8% of disease-specific deaths develop in Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) T2a tumors. OBJECTIVE To determine risk factors associated with poor outcomes (nodal metastasis, distant metastases, and disease-specific deaths) in BWH T2a CSCC. METHODS A 17-year retrospective multi-institutional cohort study of primary CSCC BWH T2a tumors. A predictive model based on tumor characteristics was developed to identify those at higher risk of poor outcomes. RESULTS Presence of 1 major criterion (primary tumor diameter ≥40 mm, invasion depth beyond subcutaneous fat, poor differentiation, or large-caliber perineural invasion) and ≥ 1 minor criterion (invasion depth in subcutaneous fat, moderate differentiation, small-caliber perineural invasion, or lymphovascular invasion) was most predictive of developing poor outcomes (area under the curve, 0.53; C-statistic, 0.60). This model has a sensitivity of 7.7%, specificity of 97.4%, and a positive and negative predictive value of 33.3% and 86.1%, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence of poor outcomes in these tumors is 8.0% (95% CI, 5.1-13.7) compared to 2.8% (95% CI, 1.9-4.1) in other T2a tumors (sub-hazard ratio, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.5-5.8). LIMITATIONS Multi-institutional cohort study was not externally validated. CONCLUSIONS BWH T2a-high CSCCs have an 8% chance of developing poor outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neha Gupta
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Rachel E Weitzman
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Fadi Murad
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shlomo A Koyfman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Michael S Chang
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jacqueline M Maher
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York
| | - Chrysalyne D Schmults
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Emily S Ruiz
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kus KJB, Murad F, Smile TD, Chang M, Ashrafzadeh S, Zhou G, Ilori EO, Koyfman SA, Vidimos AT, Schmults CD, Ruiz ES. Higher metastasis and death rates in cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas with lymphovascular invasion. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021; 86:766-773. [PMID: 34774657 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is an aggressive histologic finding but is excluded from current staging systems due to its lack of demonstrated independent prognostic significance. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of LVI on cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma tumor outcomes. METHODS In total, 10,707 cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma tumors from a 20-year, retrospective, multicenter cohort were stratified by the presence (LVI+) or absence (LVI-) of LVI. Outcomes (local recurrence, in-transit metastasis, nodal metastasis, disease-specific death) were compared based on low (Brigham and Women's Hospital [BWH] stage T1/T2a) and high (BWH T2b/T3) tumor stages. RESULTS Of the 10,707 tumors, 78 had LVI. The analysis of low-stage BWH tumors showed the LVI+ group had a significantly higher 5-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LVI+: 12.3%; LVI-: 1.1%; P < .01), metastasis (LVI+: 4.2%; LVI-: 0.4%; P < .01), and disease-specific death (LVI+: 16.2%; LVI-: 0.4%; P < .01). The analysis of BWH high-stage tumors showed the LVI+ group maintained a higher 5-year cumulative incidence of metastasis (LVI+: 28.5%; LVI-: 16.8%; P = .06) and disease-specific death (LVI+: 25.3%; LVI-: 13.9%; P = .03), however, there was no difference in local recurrence (LVI+: 16.3%; LVI-: 15.8%; P = .11). LIMITATIONS Retrospective study design. CONCLUSION LVI+ cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas have higher rates of metastasis and death at 5 years. Future staging systems should consider incorporating LVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylee J B Kus
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan
| | - Fadi Murad
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Michael Chang
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sepideh Ashrafzadeh
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Guohai Zhou
- Center for Clinical Investigation, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Evelyn O Ilori
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Shlomo A Koyfman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Chrysalyne D Schmults
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Emily S Ruiz
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Domb C, Smile TD, Reddy C, Woody NM, Campbell SR, Canavan JF, Joshi NP, Greskovich JF, Chute DJ, Burkey BB, Ku LA, Lamarre E, Lorenz RR, Prendes B, Scharpf J, Schwartzman L, Geiger JL, Koyfman SA, Fleming CW. Updated Outcomes of Split Course Radiotherapy in Elderly or Infirm Patients With Advanced Cancers of the Head and Neck. Anticancer Res 2021; 41:4995-5000. [PMID: 34593447 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Head and neck cancers are often treated with extended courses of radiotherapy (RT), which may prove excessively toxic for frail patients. Split course RT (SCRT) delivers two courses of RT separated by 4-6 weeks, personalizing treatment intensity based on response. In this study, we present our updated experience using this technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS From a single institution database, we identified patients considered for SCRT. For patients undergoing a second course of RT, cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence (LRR) and overall survival (OS) are reported. RESULTS A total of 98 patients were included, of whom seventy-five percent underwent a second course of RT. The most common fractionation was 30 Gy in 10 fractions for each course, with a median cumulative dose of 60 Gy. In those undergoing a second course of RT, median OS was 9.7 months and cumulative incidence of LRR at 6, 12, and 24 months was 17.0%, 23.1%, and 29.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION SCRT offers an attractive treatment paradigm to personalize radiation intensity based on patient tolerance, while maintaining reasonable safety and efficacy in those unfit for standard full course RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaim Domb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Chandana Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Neil M Woody
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Shauna R Campbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Joycelin F Canavan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Nikhil P Joshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - John F Greskovich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, U.S.A
| | - Deborah J Chute
- Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Brian B Burkey
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Lamie A Ku
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Eric Lamarre
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Robert R Lorenz
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Brandon Prendes
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Joseph Scharpf
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Larisa Schwartzman
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Jessica L Geiger
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Shlomo A Koyfman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Christopher W Fleming
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, U.S.A.;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patients with advanced cancer who have "oligometastatic" disease (OMD) have a limited burden of metastatic sites such that they may benefit from definitive therapies with limited toxicities. The incidence of cancers diagnosed in the elderly is increasing and treatment choices for them are often made because of their vulnerability to side effects. The present review discusses treatment of the elderly with OMD considering cancer outcomes and treatment toxicity. RECENT FINDINGS Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is emerging as a standard in the management of OMD because of its excellent local control and minimal toxicity. Phase II trials suggest that SBRT added to palliative therapy may improve overall survival and may delay the initiation of systemic therapy in OMD patients. Elderly patients are well represented in OMD studies SBRT will contribute significantly to the management of OMD in the elderly patient population by optimizing cancer control and limiting side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian W Winter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, CA-5, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, CA-5, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Gregory M M Videtic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, CA-5, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Smile TD, Xiong DX, Varra V, Winter IW, Beal BT, Gastman BR, Geiger JL, Adelstein DJ, Bergfeld WF, Piliang MP, Billings SD, Ko JS, Knackstedt TJ, Lucas JL, Poblete-Lopez CM, Meine JG, Vij A, Vidimos AT, Koyfman SA. Disease Progression in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients With Satellitosis and In-transit Metastasis. Anticancer Res 2021; 41:289-295. [PMID: 33419823 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Satellitosis/in-transit metastasis (S-ITM) has prognostic value in melanoma and Merkel cell carcinoma, but is not incorporated into cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) staging. PATIENTS AND METHODS From our IRB-approved registry, patients with high-risk cSCC, including patients with S-ITM, were identified. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) analyses were performed to compare disease progression (DP) and overall survival (OS). Cumulative incidence of DP and OS analyses were performed using Fine-Gray and Kaplan-Meier methods, respectively. RESULTS A total of 18 S-ITM subjects were compared to 247 high risk subjects including T3N0 (n=143), N1-N3 without extranodal extension (ENE) (n=56), N1-N3 with ENE (n=26) and M1 disease (n=22). Median follow up was 16.5 months. Three-year rates of DP were 22% for T3N0, 42% for S-ITM, 48% for T4 bone invasion, 50% for N1-N3 without extranodal extension (ENE), 53% for N1-N3 with ENE, and 66% for M1. Patients with S-ITM did not experience significantly worse DP compared to those with T3N0 (HR=1.96, 95%CI=0.8-4.9; p=0.14). CONCLUSION Cutaneous SCC patients with S-ITM experienced outcomes similar to locally advanced non-metastatic cSCC patients. Larger studies are needed to guide incorporation into staging systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A.;
| | - David X Xiong
- College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A
| | - Vamsi Varra
- College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A.,Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Ian W Winter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Brandon T Beal
- Jacksonville Skin Cancer Specialists, Jacksonville, FL, U.S.A
| | - Brian R Gastman
- Dermatology and Plastic Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Jessica L Geiger
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - David J Adelstein
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | | | | | | | - Jennifer S Ko
- Institute of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | | | - Jennifer L Lucas
- Dermatology and Plastic Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | | | - Jon G Meine
- Dermatology and Plastic Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Alok Vij
- Dermatology and Plastic Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Allison T Vidimos
- Dermatology and Plastic Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| | - Shlomo A Koyfman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Smile TD, Reddy CA, Qiao-Guan G, Winter WI, Stephans KL, Woody NM, Balagamwala EH, Amarnath SR, Magnelli A, AlHilli MM, Michener CM, Mahdi H, DeBernardo RL, Rose PG, Cherian SS. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for the treatment of oligometastatic gynecological malignancy in the abdomen and pelvis: A single-institution experience. J Radiosurg SBRT 2021; 7:189-197. [PMID: 33898082 PMCID: PMC8055243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES Metastasis-directed therapy with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the setting of oligometastatic disease is a rapidly evolving paradigm given ongoing improvements in systemic therapies and diagnostic modalities. However, SBRT to targets in the abdomen and pelvis is historically associated with concerns about toxicity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SBRT to the abdomen and pelvis for women with oligometastases from primary gynecological tumors. MATERIALS/METHODS From our IRB-approved registry, all patients who were treated with SBRT between 2014 and 2020 were identified. Oligometastatic disease was defined as 1 to 5 discrete foci of clinical metastasis radiographically diagnosed by positron emission tomography (PET) and/or computerized tomography (CT) imaging. The primary endpoint was local control at 12 months. Local and distant control rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Time intervals for development of local progression and distant progression were calculated based on follow up visits with re-staging imaging. Acute and late toxicity outcomes were determined based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. RESULTS We identified 34 women with 43 treated lesions. Median age was 68 years (range 32-82), and median follow up time was 12 months (range 0.2-54.0). Most common primary tumor sites were ovarian (n=12), uterine (n=11), and cervical (n=7). Median number of previous lines of systemic therapy agents at time of SBRT was 2 (range 0-10). Overall, SBRT was delivered to 1 focus of oligometastasis in 29 cases, 2 foci in 2 cases, 3 foci in 2 cases, and 4 foci in 1 case. All patients were treated comprehensively with SBRT to all sites of oligometastasis. Median prescription dose was 24 Gy (range 18-54 Gy) in 3 fractions (range 3-6) to a median prescription isodose line of 83.5% (range 52-95). Local control by lesion at 12 and 24 months was 92.5% for both time points. Local failure was observed in three treated sites among two patients, two of which were at 11 months in one patient, and the other at 30 months. Systemic control rate was 60.2% at 12 months. Overall survival at 12 and 24 months was 85% and 70.2%, respectively. Acute grade 2 toxicities included nausea (n=3), and there were no grade > 3 acute toxicities. Late grade 1 toxicities included diarrhea (n=1) and fatigue (n=1), and there were no grade > 2 toxicities. CONCLUSION SBRT to oligometastatic gynecologic malignancies in the abdomen and pelvis is feasible with encouraging preliminary safety and local control outcomes. This approach is associated with excellent local control and low rates of toxicity during our follow-up interval. Further investigations into technique, dose-escalation and utilization are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Chandana A Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - George Qiao-Guan
- College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - W Ian Winter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kevin L Stephans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Neil M Woody
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ehsan H Balagamwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sudha R Amarnath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Chad M Michener
- Gynecological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Haider Mahdi
- Gynecological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Peter G Rose
- Gynecological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sheen S Cherian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Contrera KJ, Smile TD, Mahomva C, Wei W, Adelstein DJ, Broughman JR, Burkey BB, Geiger JL, Joshi NP, Ku JA, Lamarre ED, Lorenz RR, Prendes BL, Scharpf J, Schwartzman LM, Woody NM, Xiong D, Koyfman SA. Locoregional and distant recurrence for HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer using AJCC 8 staging. Oral Oncol 2020; 111:105030. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
20
|
Smile TD, Parsai S, Pflederer TM, Murphy ES. Treatment paradigms for oligometastatic pediatric cancers: a narrative review with a focus on radiotherapy approaches. Ann Palliat Med 2020; 10:6002-6015. [PMID: 33183056 DOI: 10.21037/apm-20-1023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
There is a growing body of prospective evidence describing an oligometastatic phenotype in adults for whom local metastasis-directed therapy can improve outcomes in select patients. However, a relative paucity of data for pediatric patients with oligometastatic disease creates challenges in choosing optimal treatment. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the literature surrounding pediatric oligometastatic disease and treatment, specifically focusing on the role of radiotherapy. A review of studies ranging from 2008 to 2020 was performed. The radiotherapy techniques evaluated included conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Our search yielded 6 studies evaluating conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, 9 studies of SBRT, and 3 studies of spine SRS. Metastasis-directed therapy for treatment of pediatric oligometastasis is generally well-tolerated, is associated with favorable local control, and is shown to improve event-free survival and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes in select pediatric patients. Pediatric patients with oligometastatic disease may benefit from aggressive local therapy to metastatic sites in conjunction with a comprehensive treatment paradigm. Retrospective data have led to promising prospective trials that will further clarify patient selection and management. Additional data are needed to elucidate long term oncologic and toxicity outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Shireen Parsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Travis M Pflederer
- College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Erin S Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|