Impact of S3 training courses "Sedation and Emergency Management in Endoscopy for Endoscopy Nurses and Assisting Personnel" on the process and structure quality in gastroenterological endoscopy in practices and clinics - results of a nationwide survey

INTRODUCTION

After the S3 Guideline Sedation in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy was published, a training curriculum for a three-day course for endoscopy nurses was developed. The aim of this study was to investigate what effect the course participation had on the daily routine process and structure quality by implementing a German-wide survey in gastroenterology practices and clinics.

METHODS

A questionnaire with a total of 44 individual questions on personnel, space, and equipment structure, sedation, peri- and post-interventional monitoring, as well as discharge and complication management in endoscopy departments was sent to a total of 2113 course participants (1056 Institutions). They had completed the seminar between December 2008/January 2009 and June 2010.

RESULTS

The response rate was 21.2 % (224 /1056). Fifty-four percent were from clinic endoscopy departments, 46 % from practices. Overall, some form of structural change occurred in 86.8 % of the clinics and in 84.5 % of the practices. New staff was hired in 28.1 % of the clinics and 12.6 % of the practices. Rosters were changed in 11.6 % of the clinics and 7.8 % of the practices. Almost all issues improved after course participation. However, they did not reach statistic significance with the exception of the availability of peri-interventional ECG-monitoring in practices. The "performance of sedation in threesomes" increased in clinics by more than 20 % and in practices by more than 15 %. The use of the ASA-classification to assess risk increased significantly in clinics (before 24 %, after 50 %) as well as practices (before 40 %, after 60 %) by more than 20 % (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.0385, respectively). The documentation of the discharge status (e. g. using checklists) more than doubled in clinics (before 19 %, after 41.3 %) and practices (before 17.5 %, after 38.8 %) after course completion.

CONCLUSION

The only nationwide endoscopy nurses' survey on structure and process quality in endoscopy so far, shows that since the publication of the S3 guideline in 2008 numerous processes and structures have improved with respect to patient safety.

Biliary stents: models and methods for endoscopic stenting

Biliary stenting is widely used to palliate malignant obstruction or to treat benign biliary diseases. Recently, the most important changes have related to self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs), which are now available in a wide variety of designs, and to treatment techniques. This article is part of a combined publication that expresses the current view of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) about endoscopic biliary stenting: a technology review describes the stent models and stenting techniques, and a separate clinical guideline states the evidence and recommendations regarding stenting.

European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates, and the European Society of Anaesthesiology Guideline: Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy

Propofol sedation by non-anesthesiologists is an upcoming sedation regimen in several countries throughout Europe. Numerous studies have shown the efficacy and safety of this sedation regimen in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Nevertheless, this issue remains highly controversial. The aim of this evidence- and consensus-based set of guideline is to provide non-anesthesiologists with a comprehensive framework for propofol sedation during digestive endoscopy. This guideline results from a collaborative effort from representatives of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). These three societies have endorsed the present guideline.

European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline: the use of electrosurgical units

Electrosurgery is used in the majority of endoscopic therapeutic procedures. An understanding of the fundamental electrosurgical principles and various settings available on electrosurgical units is essential for the safe and effective use of electrosurgery during endoscopy. The aims of these technical guidelines are to: (1) expose physical principles relevant to the understanding of electrosurgery during endoscopy; (2) describe and provide practical recommendations regarding electrosurgical units that are commonly in use; (3) discuss the clinical relevance of technologies recently implemented in newer electrosurgical units; and (4) review factors relevant to commonly performed therapeutic procedures, including polypectomy, sphincterotomy, contact thermal hemostasis, and argon plasma coagulation.

Standardized reprocessing of reusable colonoscopy biopsy forceps is effective: results of a German multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

National and international guidelines recommend that a standardized protocol consisting of cleaning, ultrasound cleaning, and sterilization should be used for the reprocessing of endoscopic accessories in order to reduce the risk of transmission of microorganisms. This German multicenter study investigated the efficacy of standardized reprocessing of reusable biopsy forceps used during colonoscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten endoscopy centers (eight hospitals and two private practices) used 330 biopsy forceps during routine colonoscopy. The forceps were used once, five times, or 20 times for colonoscopy, based on a randomization plan. The reprocessing protocol consisted of manual cleaning with an enzymatic agent, ultrasound cleaning with an enzymatic agent (30 min, 40 degrees C, 47 Hz), neutralization, drying, and sterilization (5 min, 134 degrees C). Aldehydes were not used, and the protocol did not include a disinfection step. The biopsy forceps were sent to three microbiological institutes, based on a randomization plan, to have them tested for the presence of organisms, including identification of bacteria.

RESULTS

A total of 318 of the 330 forceps were evaluable; 314 forceps (98.74 %) were sterile after use once, five times, or 20 times. Four forceps were contaminated with Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 2), Bacillus licheniformis (n = 1) and Corynebacterium aquaticum (n = 2). All of 25 forceps were sterile after being used 20 times.

CONCLUSION

Colonoscopy biopsy forceps can be reliably reprocessed following this standardized protocol, even without aldehydes.

[Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic accessories - an international comparison of guidelines]

Endoscopic examinations and procedures are essential for diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. As a result of poor reprocessing practice microorganisms can be transmitted via endoscope. The majority of infection transmissions is due to insufficient performance of cleaning and disinfection disregarding guidelines of societies of gastrointestinal endoscopy. A review of the literature and a comparison of European and American guidelines for reprocessing flexible endoscopes are given. Differences in the classification of endoscopic devices, on the possibility of prion transmission, recommendations on staff training and protection, quality assurance of reprocessing and evidence-based graduation of guidelines are stressed and discussed. With respect to the procedure of endoscope reprocessing, differences concerning the cleaning solution to choose, necessity of thoroughly manual cleaning and brushing of the accessible endoscope channels (even in the case of subsequent automatic reprocessing endoscopes in washers-disinfectors), disinfection solution, microbiological quality of water for final rinsing and rationale for alcohol flush of endoscope channels for better drying are mentioned. The need for experimental investigations of the cleaning and disinfection process is stressed. In contrast to recent guidelines of European and American societies of gastrointestinal endoscopy, the now updated recommendations of the Robert Koch-Institute for reprocessing flexible endoscopes and endoscopic accessories are evidence-based and graduated.

Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) and gastrointestinal endoscopy

Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) is a transmissible form of spongiform encephalopathy believed to be contracted from the consumption of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) infected beef products. To date over 100 individuals have developed this incurable disease. There have been no documented cases of iatrogenic infection, but there is a theoretical risk that surgical procedures could transmit the disease. This review describes the background of the disease and assesses the possible risks of transmission through endoscopic procedures. The risk of transmission by endoscopy is small and probably negligible if suitable procedures are followed. The greatest potential danger arises from healthy individuals who are incubating the disease. Pathological prions (PrP(sc)) may be found in lymphatic tissue of these individuals (particularly tonsils), but smaller amounts have been identified in the appendix and Peyer's patches. These prions are resistant to all forms of conventional sterilization. There is a theoretical risk that biopsy forceps and the operating channel of endoscopes could become contaminated. This review gives recommendations as to how these small risks can be minimized. They include the employment of single-use forceps for biopsies taken from the terminal ileum, greater attention to the maintenance of endoscopic equipment and accessories, more rigorous manual cleaning of endoscopic equipment and the use of well designed, disposable cleaning brushes for the operating channel of the endoscope.