Telehealth and Palliative Care for Patients With Cancer: Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic

It has been reported that the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection is higher in patients with cancer than in the general population and that patients with cancer are at an increased risk of developing severe life-threatening complications from COVID-19. Increased transmission and poor outcomes noted in emerging data on patients with cancer and COVID-19 call for aggressive isolation and minimization of nosocomial exposure. Palliative care and oncology providers are posed with unique challenges due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Telepalliative care is the use of telehealth services for remotely delivering palliative care to patients through videoconferencing, telephonic communication, or remote symptom monitoring. It offers great promise in addressing the palliative and supportive care needs of patients with advanced cancer during the ongoing pandemic. We discuss the case of a 75-year-old woman who was initiated on second-line chemotherapy, to highlight how innovations in technology and telehealth-based interventions can be used to address patients’ palliative and supportive care needs in the ongoing epidemic.

Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of non-fermenting gram-negative Bacilli at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Patiala, India

BACKGROUND

Non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB) have emerged as a major cause of healthcare-associated infections and are innately resistant to many antibiotics.

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of NFGNB isolated from various clinical specimens and evaluate their antimicrobial susceptibility profiles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was done at our Department of Microbiology from December 2015 to December 2016. NFGNB were isolated from a variety of clinical specimens, plated on blood agar and MacConkey agar and incubated at 37°C for 18-24 h under aerobic conditions. Appropriate biochemical tests were done to identify the organisms isolated. Antibiotic susceptibility test was performed using the modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method using commercially available discs on Mueller-Hinton agar. Data was analyzed using SPSS IBM version 20.

RESULTS

Out of 19065 clinical samples, cultures were positive in 1854 samples. Out of 1854 culture-positive samples, 216 (11.6%) yielded NFGNB. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common NFGNB, isolated in 190/216 (87.96%) samples, followed by Acinetobacter baumannii (17/216, 7.87%). Overall, most of the NFGNB isolates were susceptible to polymyxin B (88.4%), imipenem (82.9%) and cefoperazone + sulbactam (50.9%), and a total of 11 (64.71%) multidrug-resistant A. baumannii (MDRAB) strains were isolated in the study.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a significantly high prevalence of NFGNB. Isolation of multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa and MDRAB in the present study raises the concern of rapidly emerging antibiotic resistance in this group of bacteria in our region.

Anti-cancer Drugs Associated Atrial Fibrillation—An Analysis of Real-World Pharmacovigilance Data

Background

Several anti-cancer drugs have been linked to new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) but the true association of these drugs with AF is unknown. The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), a publicly available pharmacovigilance mechanism provided by the FDA, collects adverse event reports from the United States and other countries, thus providing real-world data.

Objectives

To identify anti-cancer drugs associated with AF using the FAERS database.

Methods

The FAERS database was searched for all drugs reporting AF as an adverse event (AE). The top 30 anti-cancer drugs reporting AF cases were shortlisted and analyzed. Proportional reporting ratio (PRR) was used to measure disproportionality in reporting of adverse events for these drugs.

Results

When analyzed for AF as a percentage of all reported AE for a particular drug, Ibrutinib had the highest percentage (5.3%) followed distantly by venetoclax (1.6%), bortezomib (1.6%), carfilzomib (1.5%), and nilotinib (1.4%). The percentage of cardiac AE attributable to AF was also highest for ibrutinib (41.5%), followed by venetoclax (28.4%), pomalidomide (23.9%), bortezomib (18.2%), and lenalidomide (18.2%). Drugs with the highest PRR for AF included ibrutinib (5.96, 95% CI= 5.70–6.23), bortezomib (1.65, 95% CI = 1.52–1.79), venetoclax (1.65, 95% CI = 1.46–1.85), carfilzomib (1.53, 95% CI = 1.33–1.77), and nilotinib (1.46, 95% CI = 1.31–1.63).

Conclusions

While newer anti-cancer drugs have improved the prognosis in cancer patients, it is important to identify any arrhythmias they may cause early on to prevent increased morbidity and mortality. Prospective studies are needed to better understand the true incidence of new onset AF associated with anti-cancer drugs.

Outcome of Patients With Early-Stage Mismatch Repair Deficient Colorectal Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the outcome of patients with early-stage (stages I-III) mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NIT) with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for publications reporting the outcome of patients with early-stage dMMR CRC receiving NIT. The primary outcome measures were the complete response (CR) rate (clinical CR [cCR] or pathologic CR [pCR]) and the incidence of grade 3 or higher toxicities.

RESULTS

The search identified 37 publications that included 423 patients with colon (n = 326, 77%) and rectal (n = 97,23%) cancers aged 19-82 years; most patients had stage III CRC (88%). Approximately 67% of patients received monotherapy with anti-PD-1 agents; the rest received dual ICIs (ipilimumab plus nivolumab). The CR rate (pCR + cCR) in the overall population was 72% (305 of 423). The R0 resection and pCR rates were 99.3% and 70% among the patients undergoing surgery, respectively. Only four (0.9%) patients had primary resistance to NIT. After median follow-up periods ranging from 4 to 27 months, 3 (0.7%) patients progressed after an initial response. Grade 3 or higher toxicities were uncommon (6.3%), rarely delaying planned surgery.

CONCLUSION

NIT in patients with early-stage dMMR CRC is associated with a high response rate, low primary resistance to immunotherapy and cancer recurrence rate, and an excellent safety profile. The findings of the present systematic review support further investigation of NIT in patients with early-stage dMMR CRC, with a particular emphasis on the organ-preserving potential of this strategy.

Cardiovascular complications associated with novel agents in the chronic lymphocytic leukemia armamentarium: A pharmacovigilance analysis

INTRODUCTION

Over the last few years, improved outcomes in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have been credited to the introduction of novel agents for its treatment. However, the overall cardiovascular safety profile of these agents has not been studied adequately.

METHODS

We searched the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database for adverse events reported for several of these novel agents: ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and idelalisib.

RESULTS

A total of 6074 cardiac adverse events were identified; ibrutinib (4832/36581; 13.2%) was found to have the highest risk of cardiac adverse events. The frequency of atrial fibrillation was highest (41.5%) in the ibrutinib group, while the idelalisib and acalabrutinib groups had the highest reported frequencies of heart failure (25.1%) and myocardial infarction (13.6%), respectively. Hypertension was noted to be relatively higher in the acalabrutinib (25.6%) and venetoclax (11.8%) groups. Overall reported mortality associated with cardiac events was highest in the venetoclax (29.4%) and idelalisib (27.1%) groups.

CONCLUSION

Novel agents in the CLL armamentarium have been associated with several cardiovascular adverse events. Further studies are needed to identify high-risk groups that would benefit from robust cardiovascular surveillance after initiation of treatment with these novel agents.

Teleoncology: Prospects and challenges for cost effective cancer care

e23182

Background: An estimated 20.3 million cancer survivors are expected to be around by 2026. Estimated national expenditure for cancer care in 2017 were $147.3 billion and expected to increase every year. Cancer treatment is complex and requires management decisions, counselling, psychological support to be made by multidisciplinary teams. For rural and remote patients, these teams may be composed of local clinicians, and experts from distant urban centers using telemedicine (TeleMed). Methods: We used 2 databases to study Teleoncology (TelOnc) since 2002. Results: Scope of TelOnc includes cancer Telegenetics, Telepathology, remote supervision, symptom management, survivorship care, palliative care, and increase access to cancer clinical trials. Mobile applications support symptom management, lifestyle modification, and medication adherence. TeleMed can support the oncologist with interactive tele-education. Future TelOnc models would include web-based tools, mobile technologies and remote chemotherapy supervision. TeleMed had a high patient satisfaction rate. In a survey 82.21% participants were satisfied with their TeleMed experience, only 2.14% was not satisfied. Challenges: Despite an area of growing need, few studies have prospectively evaluated its efficacy in cancer. Even fewer data is available in young adults (group with liking for technology) with cancer. Lack of uniform model for reimbursement and hurdles of interstate practice license for providers are unique challenges. Conclusions: TeleMed / TelOnc can improve access to medical care, reduce healthcare costs, (Table) and reduce geographic health disparities. [Table: see text]

Twitter Conversations About Pancreatic Cancer by Health Care Providers and the General Public: Thematic Analysis

Background

 There is a growing interest in the pattern of consumption of health-related information on social media platforms.

Objective

We evaluated the content of discussions around pancreatic cancer on Twitter to identify subtopics of greatest interest to health care providers and the general public. 

Methods

 We used an online analytical tool (Creation Pinpoint) to quantify Twitter mentions (tweets and retweets) related to pancreatic cancer between January 2018 and December 2019. Keywords, hashtags, word combinations, and phrases were used to identify mentions. Health care provider profiles were identified using machine learning and then verified by a human analyst. Remaining user profiles were classified as belonging to the general public. Data from conversations were stratified qualitatively into 5 domains: (1) prevention, (2) survivorship, (3) treatment, (4) research, and (5) policy. We compared the themes of conversations initiated by health care providers and the general public and analyzed the impact of the Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month and announcements by public figures of pancreatic cancer diagnoses on the overall volume of conversations. 

Results

 Out of 1,258,028 mentions of pancreatic cancer, 313,668 unique mentions were classified into the 5 domains. We found that health care providers most commonly discussed pancreatic cancer research (10,640/27,031 mentions, 39.4%), while the general public most commonly discussed treatment (154,484/307,449 mentions, 50.2%). Health care providers were found to be more likely to initiate conversations related to research (odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.70-1.79, P<.001) and prevention (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.41-1.57, P<.001) whereas the general public took the lead in the domains of treatment (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.58-1.69, P<.001) and survivorship (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.13-1.21, P<.001). Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month did not increase the number of mentions by health care providers in any of the 5 domains, but general public mentions increased temporarily in all domains except prevention and policy. Health care provider mentions did not increase with announcements by public figures of pancreatic cancer diagnoses. After Alex Trebek, host of the television show Jeopardy, received his diagnosis, general public mentions of survivorship increased, while Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s diagnosis increased conversations on treatment. 

Conclusions

Health care provider conversations on Twitter are not aligned with the general public. Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month temporarily increased general public conversations about treatment, research, and survivorship, but not prevention or policy. Future studies are needed to understand how conversations on social media platforms can be leveraged to increase health care awareness among the general public.

Early postoperative complications in lung transplant recipients

Lung transplantation has become an established therapy for end-stage lung diseases. Early postoperative complications can impact immediate, mid-term, and long-term outcomes. Appropriate management, prevention, and early detection of these early postoperative complications can improve the overall transplant course. In this review, we highlight the incidence, detection, and management of these early postoperative complications in lung transplant recipients.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with localized mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer: A systematic review

149

Background: Clinical data demonstrating remarkable anti-tumor activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and preclinical data suggesting enhanced efficacy of ICIs in the neoadjuvant setting than in the adjuvant setting led to numerous studies with neoadjuvant ICI in various tumor types including in dMMR CRC. We performed a systematic literature review of the published studies reporting the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ICIs in patients with localized dMMR CRC. Methods: Medline and Embase were searched for eligible case reports, case series, and clinical trial reports. Eligibility criteria included: 1. patients aged 18 years or older, 2. localized dMMR CRC, and 3. received neoadjuvant therapy primarily with ICI. Patients receiving radiation or chemotherapy along with ICI were excluded. The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA harms guidelines. Results: The database search yielded 143 citations which were reviewed by 3 authors (UG, KV, and SC), and 14 citations fulfilled all criteria for inclusion. The analysis included 173 patients with colon cancer (CC) and 19 with rectal cancer (RC). Among the patients with CC, 41 (24 %) received single-agent programmed death 1 (PD-1) blocker, and 132 (76 %) received dual blockade with an anti-PD-1 agent plus an anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) agent. Resection was performed in 171/173 (99%) patients, and 117/171 (69%) achieved complete pathological response (pCR). After median follow-up ranging between 8 and 15 months, none of the patients experienced cancer relapse. Among patients with RC, 16/19 (84%) received a PD-1 blocker, and 3 (16%) received dual PD-1 plus CTLA-4 blocker. Complete clinical response (cCR) was reported in 14/19 (74%) patients, and of the 5 patients who underwent surgery, 4 (80%) achieved pCR. All patients remained progression-free after median follow-up ranging from 6 to 12 months. Cancer progression or death on neoadjuvant ICI was not reported in any studies with CC or RC patients, and only two studies reported grade 3+ toxicity in 3% of CC patients. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy with ICIs results in a remarkably high rate of clinical and pathological tumor regression with negligible safety concerns in patients with dMMR localized CRC. Well-designed clinical trials with long-term follow-up are needed to evaluate the organ-sparing potential of neoadjuvant ICI therapy in patients with dMMR CRC.

Limited benefit and high financial burden of drugs used to manage cancer-associated anorexia/cachexia syndrome (CACS)

55

Background: To date, drugs used for CACS have limited efficacy and may have unwanted side effects. Despite this, clinicians commonly prescribe certain drugs for CACS, adding financial burden to patients through out-of-pocket costs near or at the end of life. We sought to describe the range of costs of the multiple drugs commonly used to manage CACS. Methods: We reviewed oncology, nutrition, and supportive care guidelines (ASCO, ESMO, ESPEN, MASCC) and compiled a list of drugs recommended for CACS. We also included drugs commonly used off-label in clinical practice as identified by study authors. Using GoodRx.com, we extracted available formulations (e.g., tablet [tab] vs capsule [cap] vs oral disintegrating tablet [ODT] vs solution [sol]), and brand name vs generic products for each drug. We identified the average retail price, and the lowest price with coupons, for each formulation using the most commonly used dosage for a 2-week period (typical fill). The average retail price is the cash price for consumers without prescription drug coverage. The lowest price represents a discounted, ‘’best case’’ scenario of out-of-pocket costs for patients without prescription drug coverage. We collected data using the zip code 10065 in May 2021 to describe the range of costs of these drug formulations. Results: We included 7 drugs available in 20 formulations (Table). For a 2-week fill, the least expensive options included generic olanzapine 5 mg tab (once daily) and generic mirtazapine 15 mg tab (once daily), costing $4.50 per fill. Brand-name solutions were costly, ranging from $605.50 (megestrol acetate, Megace ES) to $1,156.30 (dronabinol, Syndros). Costs between formulations of the same drug/dosage varied widely: for olanzapine 5 mg, the lowest price varied from $4.50 [generic, tab] to $238.40 [Zyprexa zydis, brand-name, ODT]. Conclusions: We found that the costs of drugs used for CACS are highly variable, ranging from < $5 to > $1000 per fill. Overall there is limited data supporting use of drugs for managing CACS. Thus, our findings can help guide patient-clinician discussions about the risk/benefit ratio of a prescription for managing CACS, while highlighting the importance of seeking less expensive formulations when possible.[Table: see text]

Lost in translation: evaluating the readability of online patient information for neuroendocrine tumors

INTRODUCTION

Recent data show that many patients with NETs do not receive sufficient education regarding their diagnosis and therefore tend to search for information or literature independently. We sought to assess the readability of OPI for neuroendocrine tumors and to analyze compliance to NIH guidelines for OPI (readability level 8th grade or below).

METHODS

We performed a Google search to compile a list of the top ten OPI websites using the search term "neuroendocrine tumor". We calculated median readability scores for each website across the 9 scales as well as overall readability scores across all sites.

RESULTS

A total of 10 websites were included for analysis. 6/10 (60%) of the websites belonged to academic institutions, while 2/10 (20%) were from non-profit organizations, and 1 each were a government website (10%) and patient advocacy organization (10%). The median (with interquartile range or IQR) readability score for all websites across the nine readability tests was 9.6 (IQR 8.8-11.2).

CONCLUSION

Our findings underscore the need to develop online patient education material that is readable and therefore easily understandable for patients and caregivers dealing with this unique group of malignancies.

Isolated ovarian vein thrombosis in COVID-19 infection

COVID-19 (coronavirus disease-19) is associated with an increased risk for thrombosis due to endothelial dysfunction and hyperactivation of the immune system induced by the virus. Most cases of venous thromboembolism associated with COVID-19 are either pulmonary emboli or deep vein thromboses. Ovarian vein thrombosis is a rare condition most commonly seen in the postpartum period. This report describes a case of COVID-19-associated ovarian vein thrombosis in a nonpregnant woman with no evidence of underlying inherited coagulopathy.