Surgical treatment of penile foreign body granuloma: Penile shaft reconstruction with single- versus two-stage scrotal flap techniques

OBJECTIVES

To report outcomes of surgical treatment in patients with penile foreign body granuloma and compare surgical outcomes between single- and two-stage scrotal flap reconstructions.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with penile foreign body granuloma who underwent surgical treatment were reviewed. Patients with single- and two-stage scrotal flap reconstructions were compared.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients underwent surgical treatment from January 1, 2018 to October 31, 2022. Twenty-three patients underwent single-stage reconstruction with bilateral scrotal flap while 12 patients underwent two-stage repair with 19 operations. Five patients underwent circumcision; one had excision with primary closure. Another patient underwent reconstruction by penile skin preservation technique. There was no statistically significant differences between single- and two-stage groups in wound infection (8.69% vs. 0%, RR 2.71, 95%CI; 0.14-52.29), wound dehiscence (21.74% vs. 8.33%, RR 2.61, 95%CI 0.34-19.87), reoperation rate (26.08% vs. 8.33%, RR 3.13, 95%CI; 0.42-23.10). Postoperative fever was significantly higher in single-stage group (56.52 vs. 8.33%, RR 6.78, 95%CI; 1.01-43.83). Total length of hospital stay was shorter in single-stage group (7.43 ± 3.19 days vs. 10.86 ± 1.57 days, MD -3.42, 95%CI; -5.28 to -1.57). Incidence of patients without Clavien-Dindo surgical complications was significantly lower in single-stage group (43.48% vs. 83.33%, RR 0.53, 95%CI; 0.31-0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Both single- and two-stage techniques may be considered for penile foreign body granuloma reconstruction. Although the hospital stay was longer in two-stage group, the complication rates were lower.

Programmed death‑ligand 1 expression in tumor cells and tumor‑infiltrating lymphocytes are associated with depth of tumor invasion in penile cancer

The present study aimed to demonstrate the proportion of the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in penile cancer patients and the association with clinicopathological parameters. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens were obtained from 43 patients with primary penile squamous cell carcinoma treated at Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, between 2008 and 2018. PD-L1 expression was evaluated by the immunohistochemistry using an SP263 monoclonal antibody. PD-L1 positivity was defined as >25% tumor cell staining or >25% tumor-associated immune cell staining. The correlation between PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological parameters was analyzed. A total of eight of 43 patients (18.6%) were identified as positive for PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. In the PD-L1 positive group, there was a significant association with pathological T stage (P=0.014) with a higher percentage of PD-L1 positive tumors in T1 stage compared with T2-T4 stage. In this cohort, there was a trend towards longer survival in patients with positive PD-L1 expression (5-year OS: 75% vs. 61.2%, P=0.19). Lymph node involvement and the location of tumor at the shaft of penis were two independent prognostic factors for survival. In conclusion, the PD-L1 expression was detected in 18% of penile cancer patients and high expression of PD-L1 was associated with the early T stage.

Improvement of allograft kidney biopsy yield by using a handheld smartphone microscope as an on-site evaluation device

Background

Smart lens is a magnifying device that turns the smartphone into a microscopic exploring instrument. It is a convenient and inexpensive tool as an on-site evaluation device for the kidney biopsy specimen. We demonstrate the benefit of using a handheld smartphone microscope compared to the standard procedure in allograft kidney specimens.

Material and methods

This was a cohort study of allograft kidney biopsies performed between June 2015 and November 2017 in Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. The clinical utility of the “Chula smart lens” applied to the smartphone as an on-site evaluation device was studied. Clinical data, diagnostic quality, and complications were retrospectively reviewed and compared between the smart lens group and the standard group.

Results

The study cohort consisted of 93 allograft kidney biopsies (standard:47, smart lens:46). The mean age was 40.6 (18–48) years, and 63 patients (67.7%) were male. By using the smart lens device, the number of obtained tissue cores was higher (3.5 vs 2.9, p = 0.019) and the inadequacy rate for diagnosis was significantly lower (7% vs 21.3%, p = 0.05).

Conclusion

Using a handheld smartphone microscope as an on-site evaluation device resulted in more positive glomeruli and diagnostic yield compared to the standard procedure.

Renal Artery Embolization for Acute Renal Hemorrhage: A Single-Center Experience

Background

Emergency renal artery embolization (RAE) is a useful method in treating renal trauma and bleeding renal tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of emergency RAE, and factors associated with RAE failure.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients treated with emergency RAE for acute renal hemorrhage between 1 January 2009 and 31 October 2019 in Srinagarind Hospital. The embolization was performed using coils, glues, and/or gel foams. Factors associated with unsuccessful outcomes were analyzed using univariate and multivariate regression analyses.

Results

A total of 94 patients were treated at the center during the study period with the clinical success rate of 91.5%. The most common cause of acute renal hemorrhage was iatrogenic injury (76.5%). Factors associated with unsuccessful RAE according to multivariate analyses were hypertension (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 24.2) and ruptured tumor/aneurysm (AOR 26.8).

Conclusion

RAE is an effective procedure for acute renal hemorrhage. Hypertension and ruptured tumor/aneurysm were negative predictors for success.

Prognostic Factors for Penile Cancer and Survival in Response to Multimodality Therapy

Purpose

To report treatment outcomes of penile cancer in a single institution in Thailand and to identify prognostic factors for survival, highlighting the crucial role of multi-modality treatment (MMT).

Patients and Methods

Squamous cell carcinoma of penis patients who were treated at Srinagarind hospital between 2007–2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and pathological data were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and data were compared using the Log rank test. Cox regression analysis of factors affecting survival was conducted.

Results

A total of 70 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 69.4 months. Twenty-eight patients (40%) presented with early-stage (stage I or II), whereas 42 patients (60%) were stage III or IV disease. The median OS was 29.3 months (Interquartile range 10.5 months - not reached) for the entire cohort. Nodal involvement was the only factor identified from the multivariate model with the adjusted HR or 5.74 (95% CI 2.52–13.04). For patients with stage IIIB/IV, multi-modality treatment (MMT) resulted in longer survival when compared with surgery alone (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.16–0.90).

Conclusion

Patients with penile cancer in Thailand presented with younger age and more locally advanced stage. Nodal involvement is the single poor prognostic factor for OS and MMT was associated with longer survival in stage IIIB/IV disease.

Perioperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma

Purpose

To determine if age should be considered a relative contraindication to surgery for safety reasons.

Methods

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients who underwent nephrectomy from January 2007 to December 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were grouped into age<65 and age≥65 years. The demographic data, surgical outcomes, complication, hospital stay, blood loss, and survival were compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 101 patients were included; 74 in the younger group, and 27 in the older group. Compared to the young group, lower BMI, higher anemia, higher ASA grade, and comorbidities were frequent in the elderly. The operative time, blood loss, and renal function decline were comparable between two age groups. The complication rates in the older and younger group were 22% and 12%, respectively. The survival time was shorter in older patients compared to the younger ones; hazard ratio 2.25; 95%CI 1.08–4.69, p-value=0.031.

Conclusion

Nephrectomy in elderly patients is safe and feasible and preoperative assessment along with diligent postoperative care may further increase survival. Age alone cannot be regarded as a contraindication for nephrectomy in RCC.

Outcomes of multidisciplinary treatment in penile cancer: Experience from Thailand

555

Background: Penile cancer is relatively more common in Thailand compared to western countries. We report multidisciplinary treatment outcomes of penile squamous cell carcinoma at a regional center in northeast of Thailand. Methods: Using an institutional database, a total of 68 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of penis treated during 2009-2015 were identified. Patient demographics, pathological data, and treatment modality were reviewed. Survival data was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Median age was 53 years (25-89 years) and the median follow-time was 2.7 years. At presentation, 39 patients (57.4%) were node positive, and 9 (13.2%) had metastatic disease. Management was penile preserving surgery in 13 patients, partial penectomy in 36 patients, total penectomy in 15 patients, and palliative with radiation and/or chemotherapy in 4 patients. The 3-year overall survival for patients with N0-1 and N2-3 was 86% and 35% respectively. For those with high risk (N2/N3) non-metastatic disease, multimodality treatment improved overall survival significantly compared with surgery alone (13.7 mo vs 8.6 mo; HR 0.32, p-value = 0.04) Conclusions: Patients present with locally advanced disease had a poor prognosis. Multidisciplinary management improved overall survival N2/N3 patients.